Connect with us

Washington

A Tale Of Two Washington Protests: One Demands Congress Do More, Another Tells Federal Officials To Back Off

Published

on

A Tale Of Two Washington Protests: One Demands Congress Do More, Another Tells Federal Officials To Back Off


Mid-Might introduced two demonstrations to Washington, D.C., one asking federal officers to face down whereas the opposite known as for extra authorities intervention. Within the first occasion, on Might 11, mother and father rallied exterior the Division of Schooling to specific their opposition to the brand new laws for constitution faculties proposed by the Biden administration. A day later, a whole lot of unionized nurses marched on the Nationwide Mall and in entrance of the White Home, calling on federal lawmakers to enact laws that may impose new laws on an already closely regulated U.S. well being care system.

The nurses union march, meant to voice help for federal laws imposing new mandates on well being care sector employers, comes on the heels of extremely publicized losses on the state degree. Nurses unions and others pushing for a single-payer, government-run well being care system suffered a excessive profile setback early in 2022, when Democrats who management the California Legislature with giant majorities declined to go laws to implement a single-payer well being care system within the Golden State. Authorities estimates discovered that program would value California taxpayers at the least an additional $314 billion yearly, funded by varied tax will increase in a state that already has one of many nation’s highest common tax burdens.

Advertisement

After that defeat in California, single-payer proponents’ solely state degree hope is within the New York Legislature, the place a Might 10 listening to was held on laws that has been pending for greater than 30 years to create a single-payer well being care system within the Empire State. Whereas that invoice is into account in Albany, nurses unions are directing their consideration to Washington, the place nurses demonstrated on Might 12 in favor of federal laws mandating greater pay, federally dictated staffing ratios, and new protections towards violence.

Nurses unions are backing laws, the Nurse Staffing Requirements for Hospital Affected person Security and High quality Care Act (H.R. 3165), launched in 2021 by Consultant Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois). That invoice would require hospitals nationwide to create annual staffing ratios and different new tips with enter from nurses unions.

“None of us wish to depart bedside nursing,” Cindy Reuss, a former nurse who retired in 2021, informed ABC Information. “However we can not do it. With eight to 10 sufferers, it isn’t protected. We simply need the chance to be good nurses.” But leaving the bedside is exactly what many nurses union members have achieved over the previous yr. There have been 14 completely different well being care labor strikes in 2021 alone.

These well being care strikes have imposed nice value and inconvenience on hospitals and sufferers. Final yr’s strike at Boston’s Saint Vincent Hospital went on for greater than 9 months and is estimated to have value the hospital at the least $40 million. That $40 million might’ve bought an excessive amount of PPE and different medical provides, along with facilitating new hires and pay raises for present nurses. One other 2021 strike in California, which included 32,000 well being care staff, impacted 366 well being care services throughout South California, adversely affecting tens of millions of sufferers.

Advertisement

The staffing ratio mandates that nurses unions are pushing for is a federal model of a coverage to date carried out solely in California, the place laws was enacted in 2004 to determine staffing ratios for well being care services and hospitals that make use of nurses. Lawmakers and governors in each different state, even these dominated by progressives, have since rejected comparable well being care staffing ratio mandates due to the extra prices they’d impose on well being care suppliers and sufferers. Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker (R), for instance, has defined that “many group hospitals and a few nursing properties and even some rehab hospitals would have their operational future put in jeopardy” if the staffing ratios that nurses unions are lobbying for have been to be imposed.

The strategy known as for by nurses union leaders and embodied in Consultant Schakowsky’s invoice stands in distinction with the type of well being care reforms which have been enacted in lots of state capitals in recent times. In contrast to their federal counterparts, governors and state lawmakers have been busy enacting reforms that search to cut back, not develop, authorities’s function within the well being care market.

“There’s a considerate method to develop entry to well being care and cut back prices that doesn’t contain new mandates,” stated Tennessee Senator Web page Walley (R), who sponsored laws enacted final yr that makes it so the state’s certificates of want (CON) laws, which impede the development of recent well being care services in Tennessee and 34 different states, don’t apply to economically distressed elements of the Volunteer State. This reform, which was signed into regulation by Governor Invoice Lee (R) in Might 2021, was adopted by the state’s first reopening of a rural hospital. That hospital reopening in Brownsville had already been on observe previous to the invoice’s passage, however the CON reform permitted final yr will make it simpler to reopen and develop services in additional rural communities shifting ahead.

“Whether or not it is a mini-hospital with an emergency room or substance abuse clinic, it does not make sense to make them soar by these authorities hoops to have the ability to present that service,” Tennessee Home Speaker Cameron Sexton (R) stated of the way in which through which CON laws impede firms and buyers seeking to construct new services that develop entry to well being care. Because the passage of Tennessee’s CON reform invoice, extra rural hospital reopenings have been introduced within the state.

“Slightly than impose new charges or mandate sure staffing ratios, we’re seeking to carry down well being care prices and enhance outcomes by decreasing laws that impede entry to care,” added Senator Walley. The reform enacted by Walley and his colleagues final yr additionally streamlined administrative processes, partially by consolidating state companies that had redundancies in mission and performance.

Advertisement

Laws to repeal or reform certificates of want laws in order that they apply to fewer services and tasks has subsequently been launched in additional states. “It’s driving up well being care prices and it impairs the standard of well being care supply across the state,” South Carolina Senator Wes Climer (R) stated of certificates of want laws in South Carolina. Senator Climer sponsored laws to repeal South Carolina’s CON necessities. Although that invoice stalled within the South Carolina Home after passing out of the Senate, Home leaders acknowledged reform is required. “I did not hear anybody inform me [the] establishment was an excellent possibility and I agree with that,” Speaker Murrell Smith (R) stated on Might 9, days earlier than being sworn in to his new management put up.

CON necessities of some type are on the books in 35 states. Whereas federal lawmakers think about Consultant Schakowsky’s invoice and different proposals to extend authorities’s function within the well being care system, anticipate many state lawmakers and governors to proceed taking the other strategy, partially by repealing or reforming certificates of want necessities, together with reform or repeal of different laws that unnecessarily cut back entry to care and inflate prices for sufferers.

Critics Contend Pending Federal Proposals Would Exacerbate Inflation

“The general public views inflation as the highest drawback going through america – and no different concern comes shut,” discovered a brand new ballot launched by Pew Analysis Heart on Might 12.

“Seven-in-ten Individuals view inflation as a really large drawback for the nation,” Pew researchers added. Like the scholar mortgage bailout and the Construct Again Higher spending invoice, Congresswoman Schakowsky’s invoice is one in every of many proposals pursued by congressional Democrats and the Biden administration that critics contend would solely exacerbate what’s already the best inflation charge in 4 many years.

Democrats in Congress are desirous to do one thing within the short-term, as a result of probabilities for Consultant Schakowsky’s invoice and different progressive objectives will probably be snuffed out after November if Republicans take management of the U.S. Home of Representatives, as polling signifies is prone to occur. But, regardless of the headlines alleging opportunistic pouncing on the a part of the GOP, criticism of the inflationary insurance policies being pursued by the Biden administration and congressional Democrats is just not restricted to Republicans. For instance, Jeff Bezos tweeted on Might 15 that “the administration tried arduous to inject much more stimulus into an already over-heated, inflationary financial system and solely Manchin saved them from themselves.”

Advertisement

When President Joe Biden claims Republicans haven’t any options to inflation and asks “what are they for,” the reply typically instances is that they’re for merely not passing the seize bag of progressive proposals floated by the White Home and pending in Congress, corresponding to Consultant Schakowsky’s invoice. GOP lawmakers, and a few Democrats, genuinely imagine such proposals will solely make inflation worse and have proof to help their place.

President Biden and members of his administration can even get a way of what Republicans “are for” relating to well being care coverage reform by trying on the insurance policies GOP lawmakers have been implementing within the 23 states the place they management all of state authorities. President Biden can proceed to fake Republicans are usually not “for something” and haven’t any reputable critiques of his agenda, however that’s going to sound out of contact to most of the greater than 132 million Individuals who dwell in a state the place voters have put Republicans in command of all levers of state authorities and have affirmed that management for quite a few election cycles.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Yalies to rally in Washington against budget bill

Published

on

Yalies to rally in Washington against budget bill


Students are hosting a press conference with Connecticut senators and lobbying against a Republican budget proposal that could significantly increase taxes on universities’ endowments.


Baala Shakya & Henry Liu

5:39 pm, Jun 11, 2025

Staff Reporters

Advertisement


Baala Shakya, Photography Editor

Yale students will gather at the United States Capitol on Thursday to advocate against changes to federal higher education policy that they believe could devastate Yale’s financial aid and research funding.

The coalition of students from multiple colleges — which calls itself “Fight for Higher Education” — will hold an “advocacy day in defense of higher education” in Washington, D.C. on Thursday. Programming includes a rally and press conference with Connecticut Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy, which 25 student-advocates registered to attend. 

Advertisement

Multiple student organizers told the News that the coalition has received financial support from Yale College for travel costs, and coaching from the University’s federal relations office. The News could not independently confirm University involvement with the student coalition.

“There is a general consensus among young people that there is something about this moment that is urgent and profoundly unsettling, and yet, despite the urgency that we feel, we have failed to follow through and act on that urgency,” Conor Webb ’28, an organizer of the advocacy effort, told the News.

Fight for Higher Education, which does not associate itself with any singular college, organized the advocacy day in Washington in response to a recent budget proposal passed by the House of Representatives in May that would raise the tax on Yale’s endowment from 1.4 to 21 percent, narrow eligibility for Pell Grants, eliminate subsidized student loans and impose a lifetime cap on student borrowing.  

The coalition bills itself as nonpartisan, though no Republican officials are slated to be involved in the Thursday rally. At least one registered Republican student will be in attendance, Zach Pan ’27, one of the organizers, told the News. 

Four student organizers told the News that Yale College is providing reimbursements for travel expenses to and from Washington for Yale students participating in Thursday’s rally. Pan told the News that Fight for Higher Education was formed specifically to obtain funding for students separate from funds already allocated to participating student organizations.

Advertisement

An outside donor, who organizers refused to name, is covering the travel costs for students from other schools. Many students traveling to D.C. will be housed by volunteers who live in the area, the organizers said.

Several student groups, including the Yale College Democrats, the Yale Undergraduate Prison Project, the Yale Student Environmental Coalition and the Yale First-Generation Low-Income Advocacy Movement, have joined the coalition and plan to send members to Thursday’s event. Students from Southern Connecticut State University, Hudson Valley Community College, Macalester College and West Virginia University will also join the coalition in Washington, Pan said.

In addition to the press conference and rally, the coalition is coordinating meetings with senators from swing states, including Republican Senator David McCormick of Pennsylvania, per Pan.

Pan said that Yale’s Office of Federal and State Relations has provided coaching and logistical support to students preparing to meet with their senators about the budget proposal bill which includes the tax hike on universities’ endowment gains. The News could not verify the Yale office’s involvement.

Yale has publicly signaled its opposition to the budget proposal, posting on social media to encourage community members to “tell Congress to protect discovery and opportunity” and “speak up for the future.” In one Instagram post, Yale warned that the proposal could jeopardize the University’s ability to remain debt-free for 85 percent of undergraduates and tuition-free for many middle-class families — arguments that Fight for Higher Education has echoed in their digital campaign.

Advertisement

University President Maurie McInnis sounded the alarm to members of the Yale community when the U.S. House of Representatives passed the bill in May, urging members of the Yale community to contact their senators and share a set of talking points that emphasize the potentially harmful impacts of the bill on universities.

Emi Glass ’26, co-president of the Yale First-Generation Low-Income Advocacy Movement, or YFAM, told the News that after McInnis stated how the endowment tax would severely affect financial aid funding, she “stepped in to support” lobbying efforts against the bill.

“Given the fact that myself and many of the people involved in YFAM would definitely not be able to attend Yale if they didn’t receive very generous financial aid from Yale, it was really concerning to all of us,” Glass said.

Glass plans to travel to Washington on Thursday to join the coalition of students in advocating against the budget bill. She plans to meet with policymakers and an education staffer for Jon Husted, her Ohio senator, she told the News.

Jake Siesel ’27, co-president of the Yale Undergraduate Prison Project, told the News that he too will attend the rally in Washington because the Republican budget proposal is “antithetical” to YUPP’s commitment to equal justice.

Advertisement

“If enacted, the bill would amount to the largest cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program in American history,” Siesel said. “Our organization stands in solidarity with this advocacy effort and will dedicate all available resources to support it.”

The current 1.4 percent tax on the endowments of most private colleges was signed into law by President Donald Trump in 2017.

Advertisement


BAALA SHAKYA




Advertisement

Baala Shakya covers Student Life, Campus Politics and Men’s Crew for the News. She is also a staff photographer and WKND columnist. Originally from San Antonio, Texas, she is a sophomore in Trumbull College majoring in History & Medieval Studies.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington state exploring options to fight to Trump's travel ban

Published

on

Washington state exploring options to fight to Trump's travel ban


Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown said his office is taking a careful look at the Trump administration’s new travel ban and considering whether the state has a legal basis to challenge it.

“We know that this order will affect so many families in Washington,” Brown said at a press conference Tuesday. “This ban sweeps up medical patients, students, and families and people fleeing persecution. Those people are not [a] national security risk.”

RELATED: Trump’s travel ban is now in effect. Here’s what to know

The ban took effect Monday, barring people from 12 countries from entering the U.S. and adding partial restrictions for seven other countries.

Advertisement

Brown said his office is “actively looking at ways to challenge this ban, but it will be difficult.” He referred to a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a travel ban during President Donald Trump’s first administration. It initially targeted seven majority-Muslim countries before a series of legal challenges led to some revisions.

“The court has gotten increasingly hostile to challenges like the one that may be necessary here, because the Supreme Court has, frankly, gotten worse since 2017,” Brown said.

Gov. Bob Ferguson said his office is closely working with the AG’s office and other organizations to monitor how the ban affects Washington residents from the targeted countries who may face new barriers to entering or reentering the U.S. So far, just one day in, responses have been mostly muted at airports and border entry points, in contrast to chaos that erupted at various airports when the first travel ban in 2017 left many foreign travelers in limbo.

Trump said the ban is necessary for national security.

Advertisement

According to his administration, some of the countries on the list need to improve their vetting processes and communication about security concerns. The executive order also says some countries are on the list because they’ve previously refused deportations.

Hamdi Mohamed is a commissioner for the Port of Seattle, which is tasked with managing Seattle’s international entry points, like Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, where the impacts will be felt most. Mohamed said the commission is calling for more transparency in how federal officials enforce these bans at the airport. But it’ll also have an impact within communities living in the U.S., she said. That includes first- and second-generation immigrants.

RELATED: Seattle protesters block ICE vans from leaving immigration court

In addition to her work at the Port of Seattle, Mohamed is also the director of the Office of Immigrant and Refugee Affairs for the City of Seattle. She is from Somalia, which was among the countries targeted during Trump’s last term. The current travel restrictions affect predominantly African and Muslim countries, including Somalia.

Advertisement

“[The travel ban] deepens mistrust. It sends a message that some communities will always be treated with suspicion, regardless of how long they’ve called the United States home or how much they’ve contributed,” she said.

Port authorities expect people from countries on the banned or restricted list will be stopped before they get on a plane to the U.S., but it’s still unclear how that will actually play out in the coming days.

Late last month, Port commissioners also raised their concerns about people who had been held at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection facility at the airport for an extended period of time. People are only supposed to be held there for a maximum of 72 hours, according to a joint statement commissioners that cited federal standards. Prolonged detention without appropriate process, they said, undermines public trust.

Malou Chávez, the executive director for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, said she’s especially concerned about people who have been given asylum in the U.S. and are now trying to get their families here from banned countries. Part of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project’s work includes family reunification efforts for people from some of those countries, like Afghanistan.

Advertisement

“It’s just going to lead to further suffering of our communities. It also sends a clear message of who is welcome and who is unwanted in this country,” she said.

RELATED: A Seattle immigration attorney on ICE and your rights

Chávez said her organization is working with people who have been waiting overseas and have been given federal authorization to travel here. Now, it’s unclear if they’ll face additional hurdles when they attempt to come to the U.S.

For the Washington Attorney General’s Office, the legal fight ahead is only a part of the equation.

Advertisement

Speaking to a crowd of immigrants and their advocates, Brown said there are other ways to address what he calls “dictatorial” and “fascist” actions by the Trump administration against immigrants.

“We need to use our love and our character as well in this moment,” Brown said. “Because it’s going to take all of these things, pulling together to reject the hate that we are seeing from Donald Trump, to reject the lawlessness that we are seeing from Donald Trump, and to reaffirm that the people in this country deserve to be here, and they add value to our state and to our entire nation.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Capitals star T.J. Oshie announces retirement from NHL

Published

on

Washington Capitals star T.J. Oshie announces retirement from NHL



Copyright © 2025 NBCUniversal Media, LLC. All rights reserved





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending