The NFL season is on the horizon. Not only has the bulk of the offseason passed, but both training camp and preseason football have come and gone. Teams are now cutting their rosters down to 53 players as real football will soon be played around the league.

The Washington Commanders have been making roster changes as it’s time for them to release a 53-man roster, which means those dealing with injuries will be put on injured reserve. Commanders defensive end Norell Pollard and defensive tackle Taylor Stallworth were not only added to the injured reserve list but they’re not designated to return and will miss the 2024 NFL season, according to Sam Fortier.

READ MORE: Washington Commanders Finalize Initial 53-Man Roster for 2024 Regular Season

Pollard is an undrafted defensive tackle out of Virginia Tech, where he posted 118 career total tackles, 22 tackles for loss and 12 sacks. The 6-foot, 281-pound defensive end now has his sights set on a return to the gridiron in 2025 with hopes of making his regular season debut.

While Pollard was set for his rookie season, Stallworth is a veteran presence, as a 28-year-old defensive tackle with 58 games under his belt. He, too, will miss the entire season as the two pieces could have provided depth to the defensive line.

Rookie linebacker Jordan Magee was also placed on the injured reserve list, though he is designated return, meaning he will miss at least the first four games of the regular season. The Temple product began to garner quite a bit of hype throughout training camp.

With the Commanders establishing a 53-man roster, the regular season is on the horizon, and Washington can continue to usher in a new era of football as No. 2 overall pick Jayden Daniels hopes to transform the team’s offense. Brighter days are ahead for the franchise, and watching that potential develop this season will be intruiging.

READ MORE: Commanders Closer to 53-Man Roster After Waiving Popular Quarterback

Stick with CommanderGameday and the Locked On Commanders podcast for more FREE coverage of the Washington Commanders throughout the 2024 season.

Follow Kade on Twitter.

• Washington Commanders Cut Former Pittsburgh Steelers WR

• Washington Commanders Pursuing Multiple Trades Ahead of 53-Man Roster Deadline

• Commanders Announce Multi-Year Naming-Rights Deal

• Could Washington Commanders Sign Pro Bowl Free Agent DE?

I grew up attending ARS Armenian Private School in Toronto, where I was deeply immersed in our culture. Though I was involved in non-Armenian activities outside of school, going to university with individuals from diverse backgrounds was a new experience for me.  

To maintain strong community ties, I became active in my university’s Armenian Students Association, which I now chair, and participated in an Armenian mentorship program.

But I wanted more.

I applied to the ANCA Leo Sarkisian Internship with little thought. Though I knew it was something I was interested in doing, I was unsure if spending my summer in Washington, D.C. — a place so far away from home — was a good idea. Additionally, I was uncertain of how the internship would benefit me, given that much of what I would learn would be geared toward a U.S. perspective, and I questioned how relevant it would be to a Canadian.

When I received the call that I had been accepted into the summer program, I was faced with a difficult decision: Should I work locally in Toronto or go to Washington?

I chose the latter.

I have completed the internship and am writing to convince other Canadians to do the same.

The internship offers many opportunities for young Armenians interested in politics, law and research. Local Armenians with high-ranking positions in political offices, museums and law firms offered us advice, and we created unique connections that can be used to advance our future careers. However, what makes this program so special is the fact that everyone we’ve met — whether lecturers or local Armenian professionals — has shown genuine interest in helping us succeed in our chosen career paths.

Among our most impactful lecturers was Charlie Mahtesian, the senior editor from POLITICO, who shared his personal journey in journalism, answered our political journalism questions and inspired us to consider careers in his field. Our meeting with the Library of Congress Armenian and Georgian Area Specialist Dr. Khachig Mouradian was particularly moving. His selection and care for ancient Armenian manuscripts and other texts from the Library’s vast collection inspired all of us and left me with pride knowing that someone so passionate is in charge of nurturing our nation’s rich history.  

Apart from the lectures, I was also given the opportunity to learn through the routine advocacy in which we participated. While at first the concept of going to Capitol Hill and speaking to members of Congress and staff scared me, now having done it several times I no longer feel afraid to express my opinions and advance our community views among those with positions of power. Through lobbying, I had the pleasure of meeting Representatives Anna Eshoo and Adam Schiff, who advocate for Armenian issues on a global scale. They stressed the importance of youth advocacy in shaping congressional opinion on Armenian concerns.

The ANCA assigned individual projects to each intern — mine being the application of Global Magnitsky Sanctions on Azerbaijan’s genocidal leadership. We read detailed reports on Azerbaijani atrocities committed against Armenian prisoners of war and civilian detainees, submitted by the International and Comparative Law Centre NGO (ICLAW) and Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights (ALC) to the Departments of State and Treasury. By reading hundreds of pages of written testimonies and watching videos regarding the horrors and reality of what they went through, I understood the gravity of the situation many Artsakh and Armenian locals face. I also had the opportunity to write about how Canada can improve its relations and support of Armenia by stopping the import of Azerbaijani oil and encouraging Azerbaijan’s safe return of Armenian POWs and civilian captives.

Apart from the rewarding nature of the work, the internship environment was incredible. Working to advance the Armenian cause has been fulfilling and has allowed me to grow professionally. At the same time, after living at the Aramian House for six weeks, I can now say confidently that I have friends across the United States and Canada, all with true love, passion and commitment to the Armenian homeland, despite our distance from it.

So, did I make the right choice to come to Washington, D.C., this summer? Most definitely. To all those wavering in their decision to apply, drop me a note. I look forward to helping you make a decision about an experience that will impact you for a lifetime.

Sabrina Tomarci was born and raised in Toronto, Canada, where she graduated from ARS Armenian Private School. She studies political science and public law at the University of Toronto. She is the president of her university’s Armenian Students Association and is committed to aiding the Armenian cause locally and internationally. Tomarci is an alumnus of the 2024 Leo Sarkisian Internship Program.

Advertisement

Washington State’s new Covenant Homeownership Program has been in effect for just over a month, offering an advantage of home ownership based purely on race. It is a classic example of the misguided, feel-good policies that perpetuate division rather than solve the problems they claim to address. Indeed, this is nothing more than a racist home loans program.

On the surface, the Covenant Homeownership Program, which offers zero-interest loans to individuals from “historically marginalized communities,” might seem like a noble attempt to right the wrongs of past discrimination. It earned celebratory media coverage this month and earlier in the year. However, when you dig deeper, it becomes clear that this initiative is more about virtue signaling and less about fostering genuine equality. Under the eligibility guidelines, a loan recipient doesn’t even have to establish they or their family have been the victims of discrimination. It’s their race alone that deems them a victim of oppression, a common belief amongst progressives.

The program gives up to $150,000 in zero-interest loans for down payments and closing costs to first-time homebuyers who can trace their ancestry to people who lived in Washington before 1968 and belong to a specified marginalized racial group. You must be either black, Hispanic, Native American, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, Korean or Asian Indian. Though Jews were subject to restrictive covenants, Democrats in the state legislature did not deem them worthy of access to their housing loan program. Jews are considered privileged white people by the Radical Left.

More from Jason Rantz: Wing Luke Museum banned exhibit to appease antisemitic staff. Now, Jews fight back

What is the racist home loan program supposed to do?

The Washington State Housing Finance Commission, which handles administration for the Covenant Homeownership Program, claims the loans will help bridge the wealth gap created by discriminatory housing practices of the past. But is this really the solution, or is it just another layer of racial preference that excludes people based solely on the color of their skin?

One of the most troubling aspects of this program is its assumption that people today are victims of racism simply because their ancestors might have been. The idea that one’s eligibility for financial assistance should be tied to their race is as racist as the policies they claim made it less likely for these loan applicants to afford a home to begin with. It perpetuates the notion that people are defined by their racial background rather than their individual circumstances; that a poor white or Jewish family is still better off than a wealthy black or Hispanic family.

This program divides us further rather than bringing us together, creating resentment for those in need who are left out because they’re not from a demographic Democrats can exploit for political power. It’s no wonder why Democrats are struggling, especially nationally, amongst low-income working white families.

You don’t even have to show you’re the victim of racism

The program doesn’t require applicants to demonstrate that they’ve personally suffered from discrimination; their race is enough to qualify them. This not only undermines the principle of individual responsibility but also disregards the many non-minority families who have struggled to achieve homeownership due to financial hardships unrelated to race. By focusing solely on race, the Covenant Homeownership Program ignores the complex socio-economic factors that affect all potential homebuyers, regardless of their racial background.

Moreover, the criteria for eligibility are shockingly exclusionary.

If you’re a white family that’s struggled for generations to make ends meet in Battle Ground or Sultan, too bad. The program’s benefits are explicitly not for you. This is a program designed to benefit some at the expense of others based purely on the color of their skin—a notion that runs counter to the ideals of equality and fairness that should guide public policy.

More from Jason Rantz: Developer pauses massive residential project over Seattle crime crisis

What’s the actual impact of the racist home loans program?

According to the Washington State Housing Finance Commission, which operates the program, only 19 applicants had the loans closed (including 16 black and one Hispanic applicants). In a state with millions of residents, this hardly seems like a sweeping success. If the goal was to make a substantial impact on homeownership disparities, this program is clearly not the answer. Instead, it’s an expensive exercise in virtue signaling that will help a select few while doing little to address the broader issues at play.

There’s also a glaring problem with the racist home loans program. It makes it easier for a family to buy a home it can’t afford and benefits people who can afford a home without the interest-free loan.

Under the program, an applicant is eligible if they make up to the Area Median Income (AMI) of the county they’re purchasing a home in. If a household makes a combined $65,000 in King County (AMI $147,400), and has little in savings, it likely doesn’t make sense to purchase a home yet. If the household makes $147,000 and has a healthy savings account, they likely don’t even need the assistance, even if they’d like to have it (who wouldn’t?).

The program is also incredibly expensive. Each loan is worth up to $150,000, and while it’s interest-free, it still needs to be repaid eventually. But who’s footing the bill in the meantime? Washington taxpayers, many of whom will never qualify for this assistance because they don’t meet the program’s racial criteria. This is a redistribution of wealth based on race, plain and simple, and it’s both unfair and unsustainable.

More from Jason Rantz: Auburn HS ditched speaker it didn’t properly vet after accusations of antisemitism

Home loans program based on racism to address past racism we assume impacted wealth

The justification for this racist home loans program rests on the idea that past discrimination has left minority groups without the generational wealth to buy homes today. While it’s true that discriminatory practices in the past have had lasting effects on some, it’s not fact for all. Generational wealth is also not mandatory for home ownership. And a solution should not be to create new forms of racial discrimination in the present.

Instead, we should focus on policies that help all low-income families, regardless of race, to achieve homeownership. Programs that offer financial education, credit counseling, and, to the extent necessary, assistance with down payments should be available to anyone who needs them, not just those who belong to a specific racial group that the politicians in power need to placate in order to stay in power.

Washington’s Covenant Homeownership Program is a misguided attempt to address historical wrongs through present-day racial preferences. In 50 years, will we need another program to undo the injustices this current program creates? True equality comes from treating everyone with fairness and respect, not by doling out benefits based on the color of one’s skin.

Washington State should rethink this program and instead focus on initiatives that help all families, regardless of race, achieve the American Dream of homeownership (I will admit that it’s at least refreshing that this program makes it harder for the Radical Left to claim home ownership is steeped in “white supremacy culture.”) The path to equality is not through exclusion, but through inclusivity (that other buzzword progressives love to throw around) that uplifts everyone.

More from Jason Rantz: Prominent Seattle business leaders fed up with crime plaguing city as major Starbucks shuts down for safety

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3-7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the podcast here. Follow Jason on X, Instagram and Facebook.

Follow @https://twitter.com/jasonrantz