Utah
Utah’s dismal offense hits rock bottom in 13-7 loss to TCU
After a dreadful offensive night, Utah found a glimmer of hope in the middle of the third quarter Saturday against TCU.
All night, the Isaac WIlson-led offense had struggled to move the ball, punting nine consecutive times as the frustration continued to mount on a chilly October evening at Rice-Eccles Stadium.
The sellout crowd was yearning, begging, for anything to cheer for when the Utes had the ball. To that point, the offense had given them absolutely nothing.
Utah’s 10th drive of the game started similarly to its last nine, with a Micah Bernard run, this time for four yards. On second down, Wilson moved the chains with a 7-yard completion to Brant Kuithe, and on the ensuing play, the true freshman quarterback rocketed the ball to a wide-open Money Parks for a 71-yard touchdown pass.
With 6:12 remaining in the third quarter, the Utes’ dormant offense had a spark.
“All it takes is one play. Money got a little one-on-one route, he won it. Throw it over the top to him, I trust him. O-line did a great job blocking, but just takes one play,” Wilson said.
Utah’s defense allowed 395 yards of offense but held TCU’s high-flying offense to a season-low 13 points — well below their season average of 35.3 — and kept giving Wilson and the Utes’ offense the chance to get another play to take the lead.
In the second half, TCU quarterback Josh Hoover was overwhelmed by Utah defenders, who sped up the normally reliable signal-caller and forced punt after punt to get the ball back into Wilson’s hands.
Aside from causing a turnover and scoring themselves, Morgan Scalley’s unit was doing all it could to win Utah the game.
“Very proud of our defense. … Hold that crew to 13 points, what they’ve been doing this year with really essentially no help field position-wise or staying off the field,” Utah coach Kyle Whittingham said.
Utah had the ball four times after scoring the third-quarter touchdown, but instead of taking the lead, it was a reprise of the same issues that plagued the Utes not only in this game, but throughout this season.
Four possessions with the chance for a go-ahead touchdown ended with two punts and two turnovers on downs.
The most promising drive of the bunch started at the Utah two-yard line with 11:42 left in the contest. On a gotta-have-it third-and-4 deep in their own territory, Wilson connected with Dorian Singer for a 36-yard gain to move the ball to the Utah 44-yard line, but everything after that encapsulated the issues with the offense.
On first down, offensive coordinator Andy Ludwig dialed up a pop pass to Parks, who faked the reverse to Dijon Stanley. It was like TCU knew exactly what was going to happen, taking away not just Parks’ running lane, but staying with Stanley as well.
There was nowhere for the play to go, and Parks was dropped for a loss of five yards.
Utah tried a screen to Kuithe that went for just four yards on second-and-15, and on third-and-11, Wilson nearly walked into a sack before somehow staying alive, scrambling for nine yards after nothing was open.
On a game-defining fourth down, TCU sent safety Jamel Johnson on a blitz. Johnson had a direct line to Wilson, pressuring him and not allowing him to step into his throw, and the true freshman tossed an interception.
That summed up the night for Utah’s offense in a 13-7 loss to TCU.
The Utes scored just once in 14 drives, with the other 13 resulting in either a punt or a turnover on downs.
There’s been plenty of poor offensive performances at Utah over the years, including against TCU 14 years ago, but Saturday challenged for one of the top spots.
“I guess we’re fine, other than not being able to score points, make first downs, run the ball, throw the ball efficiently, make a conversion on third or fourth down,” Whittingham said.
Wilson, who apologized to the defense postgame, looked every bit a true freshman, missing open receivers at times and holding the ball too often at others, which played a part in his four sacks. His field vision just isn’t quite where it needs to be, either.
The offensive line didn’t help matters, turning in one of its worst games of the season.
Utah’s passing attack was never a threat for the vast majority of the game, and TCU knew it. That meant the Horned Frogs could stack the box, play their safeties close to the line of scrimmage, sell out on the run and not get burned. TCU also dialed up a ton of pressure, as most teams have done against Wilson, with favorable results.
Bernard tried to power through to the best of his ability and had gains of 15 and 20 yards, but was held in check for much of the night, finishing with 55 yards on 11 carries.
Ludwig’s play-calling was uninspired, too predictable and didn’t seem to be tailored to Wilson’s strengths.
What happened to all of the tight ends Utah’s offensive coordinator talked up in the offseason? The only tight end utilized Saturday was Kuithe. And so much for a deep receiver room — after Singer and Parks, there’s a steep dropoff in production and utilization. Players like Syracuse transfer receiver Damien Alford, who had 610 yards last year, don’t even see the field.
Utah’s offense hasn’t looked great during the past two games, but on Saturday, it looked pretty much broken. It was so bad that the question had to be asked: Will Whittingham make a change at play-caller?
“Everything’s up in the air right now. Everything’s up for evaluation and we will evaluate,” Whittingham said.
After three straight dismal performances, can this offense even be fixed this season?
“Sure hope so. Sure hope so,” Whittingham said. “But the last three games have not been very encouraging. I know I’ll keep working and try to figure things out and just have to see what happens.”
The way the game started out, it looked like it could be a wild, wacky and chaotic Big 12 contest. Led by Hoover, TCU marched right down the field on its first drive of the game, including a third-and-13 completion, but on a first-down play in the red zone, Hoover fumbled the ball while pulling it away on the read option, and Van Fillinger pounced on it.
It was a stroke of luck for a defense that started the game on its heels, but that luck soon turned the Horned Frogs’ way. After a three-and-out on the Utes’ first series of the evening, the Horned Frogs sent the house and easily navigated through Utah’s punt block team, with DJ Rogers getting his hands on the ball and Jonathan Bax recovering it at the Utah 15-yard line.
With a chance to cash in for the night’s first points, TCU got as far as the Utah three-yard line, but the Utes held strong on the goal line to force a field goal.
TCU kicker Kyle Lemmermann lined up for a chip-shot field goal, but it was blocked by Tao Johnson, conjuring up some memories of TCU’s failures on that goal post in 2008.
After all of that chaos, the remaining 22 minutes of the first half were downright tame.
All things considered, after getting absolutely zero help from the offense, Utah’s defense turned in a decent first-half performance. They gave up nearly 250 yards and had a few lapses, like letting Drake Dabney behind them for a 20-yard gain that was initially called a touchdown before being reversed (Hoover scored on a QB sneak on the next play), but only gave up 10 first-half points to TCU’s high-powered offense.
With an average offense of their own, the Utes would have been in great position for a win.
An average offense would have been a welcome respite for Whittingham. The fans booed at multiple points during a first half of offensive ineptitude, and by the time Utah’s team jogged off the field after scoring zero points and gaining just 86 first-half yards, the boos grew to the loudest level of the night.
After what the fans had just watched, who could blame them?
“Fans pay their money. They have a right to do whatever they want. They pay money for the tickets and if they’re not happy, that’s the way they want to react,” Whittingham said.
“Guys have played a lot of good football through the years and given them a lot of positive things to be excited about, but certainly in the last few games have not been anything to be excited about.”
Saturday’s defeat — the first time the Utes have lost three straight since 2017 — made it official. The program entered this season as the favorite to win the Big 12 championship and will fall well short of the preseason goal they set.
Forget conference title aspirations, Utah now has an uphill climb for bowl eligibility with home games against undefeated BYU and Iowa State and road contests against Houston, Colorado and UCF.
Utah
Utah man dies of injuries sustained in avalanche in Big Cottonwood Canyon
SALT LAKE CITY (KUTV) — A man died after he was caught in an avalanche in Big Cottonwood Canyon over the weekend.
A spokesperson for the Salt Lake County Sheriff’s Office confirmed on Thursday that Kevin Williams, 57, had died.
He, along with one other person, was hospitalized in critical condition after Saturday’s avalanche in the backcountry.
MORE | Big Cottonwood Canyon Avalanche
In an interview with 2News earlier this week, one of Williams’ close friends, Nate Burbidge, described him as a loving family man.
“Kevin’s an amazing guy. He’s always serving, looking for ways that he can connect with others,” Burbidge said.
A GoFundMe was set up to help support Williams’ family.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
_____
Utah
911 recordings detail hours leading up to discovery of Utah girl, mother dead in Las Vegas
CONTENT WARNING: This report discusses suicide and includes descriptions of audio from 911 calls that some viewers may find disturbing.
LAS VEGAS — Exclusively obtained 911 recordings detail the hours leading up to the discovery of an 11-year-old Utah girl and her mother dead inside a Las Vegas hotel room in an apparent murder-suicide.
Addi Smith and her mother, Tawnia McGeehan, lived in West Jordan and had traveled to Nevada for the JAMZ cheerleading competition.
The calls show a growing sense of urgency from family members and coaches, and several hours passing before relatives learned what happened.
MORE | Murder-Suicide
Below is a timeline of the key moments, according to dispatch records. All times are Pacific Time.
10:33 a.m. — Call 1
After Addi and her mother failed to appear at the cheerleading competition, Addi’s father and stepmother called dispatch for a welfare check.
Addi and her mother were staying at the Rio hotel. The father told dispatch that hotel security had already attempted contact.
“Security went up and knocked on the door. There’s no answer or response it doesn’t look like they checked out or anything…”
11:18 a.m. and 11:27 a.m. — Calls 2 and 3
As concern grew, Addi’s coach contacted the police two times within minutes.
“We think the child possibly is in imminent danger…”
11:26 a.m. — Call 4
Addi’s stepmother placed another call to dispatch, expressing escalating concern.
“We are extremely concerned we believe that something might have seriously happened.”
She said that Tawnia’s car was still at the hotel.
Police indicated officers were on the way.
2:26 p.m. — Call 5
Nearly three hours after the initial welfare check request, fire personnel were en route to the scene. It appeared they had been in contact with hotel security.
Fire told police that they were responding to a possible suicide.
“They found a note on the door.”
2:35 p.m. — Call 6
Emergency medical personnel at the scene told police they had located two victims.
“It’s going to be gunshot wound to the head for both patients with notes”
A dispatcher responded:
“Oh my goodness that’s not okay.”
2:36 p.m. — Call 7
Moments later, fire personnel relayed their assessment to law enforcement:
“It’s going to be a murder suicide, a juvenile and a mother.”
2:39 p.m. — Call 8
Unaware of what had been discovered, Addi’s father called dispatch again.
“I’m trying to file a missing persons report for my daughter.”
He repeats the details he knows for the second time.
3:13 p.m. — Call 9
Father and stepmother call again seeking information and continue to press for answers.
“We just need some information. There was a room check done around 3:00 we really don’t know where to start with all of this Can we have them call us back immediately?”
Dispatch responded:
“As soon as there’s a free officer, we’ll have them reach out to you.”
4:05 p.m. — Call 10
More than an hour later, Addi’s father was put in contact with the police on the scene. He pleaded for immediate action.
“I need someone there I need someone there looking in that room”
The officer confirmed that they had officers currently in the room.
Addi’s father asks again what they found, if Addi and her mother are there, and if their things were missing.
The officer, who was not on scene, said he had received limited information.
5:23 p.m. — Call 11
Nearly seven hours after the first welfare check request, Addi’s grandmother contacted police, describing conflicting information circulating within the family.
“Some people are telling us that they were able to get in, and they were not in the hotel room, and other people saying they were not able to get in the hotel room, and we need to know”
She repeated the details of the case. Dispatch said officers will call her back once they have more information.
Around 8:00 p.m. — Press Conference
Later that evening, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police held a news conference confirming that Addi and her mother, Tawnia McGeehan, were found dead inside the hotel room.
The investigation remains ongoing.
______
Utah
Ban on AI glasses in Utah classrooms inches closer to passing
SALT LAKE CITY (KUTV) — AI glasses could allow you to get answers, snap photos, access audio and take phone calls—and now a proposal moving through the legislature would ban the glasses from Utah school classrooms.
“I think it’s a great idea,” said Kizzy Guyton Murphy, a mother who accompanied her child’s class on a field trip to the state Capitol on Wednesday. “You can’t see inside what the student is looking at, and it’s just grounds for cheating.”
Mom Tristan Davies Seamons also sees trouble with AI glasses.
“I don’t think they should have any more technology in schools than they currently have,” she said.
Her twin daughters, fourth graders Finley and Grayson, don’t have cell phones yet.
“Not until we’re like 14,” said Grayson, adding they do have Chromebooks in school.
2News sent questions to the Utah State Board of Education:
- Does it have reports of students using AI glasses?
- Does it see cheating and privacy as major concerns?
- Does it support a ban from classrooms?
Matt Winters, USBE AI specialist, said the board has not received reports from school districts of students with AI glasses.
“Local Education Agencies (school districts) have local control over these decisions based on current law and code,” said Winters. “The Board has not taken a position on AI glasses.
MORE | Utah State Legislature:
Some districts across the country have reportedly put restrictions on the glasses in schools.
“I think it should be up to the teachers,” said Briauna Later, another mother who is all for preventing cheating, but senses a ban could leave administrators with tired eyes.
“It’s one more thing for the administration to have to keep track of,” said Later.
The proposal, HB 42, passed the House and cleared a Senate committee on Wednesday.
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
___
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana4 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology6 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making