Connect with us

Utah

Utah’s congressmen think your vote is meaningless, Robert Gehrke writes

Published

on

Utah’s congressmen think your vote is meaningless, Robert Gehrke writes


Believe politicians when they tell you their power means more than American democracy, Gehrke warns.

(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Robert Gehrke.

The arrogance in the message from Utah’s congressional delegation to voters would be shocking if it wasn’t so predictable: You don’t matter. Your vote doesn’t matter. American democracy as we know it is a cheap joke.

Advertisement

The disdain of Reps. Chris Stewart, Burgess Owens, John Curtis and Blake Moore is crystal clear in a brief the quartet filed opposing a lawsuit seeking to overturn the brazen gerrymander passed by the Legislature — who intended to deprive Utahns of a meaningful voice in their government.

“There’s no constitutional right to be free from partisan gerrymandering,” they wrote in the brief, as first reported by my colleague Emily Anderson Stern.

They go on to contend that the U.S. Constitution grants unilateral authority to state legislatures to run federal elections however they see fit, and courts, traditionally the arbiters of the constitutionality of legislative acts, are in this case powerless to be any sort of a check.

Think, for a minute, about what that could mean.

The provisions of the Utah Constitution that guarantee us a fundamental right to vote in free and fair elections, that assures every Utahn a voice at the ballot box, and require that the laws of the state apply uniformly and equally to everyone all would become meaningless.

Advertisement

We might as well erase them from existence, because, when it comes to elections, the Legislature can simply do whatever the hell it wants, the congressmen allege.

Debbie Sorensen inserts her ballot into a drops box Monday, Nov. 2, 2020, in Salt Lake City. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

Perhaps the most absurd part of their argument is this: If you have a problem with the way the Legislature has rigged the elections, the recourse you have is to vote them out — in a rigged election.

If the delegation is right, there would be few limits to the abuse legislators could impose, manipulating the system to the point that elections would just be for show. Meaningful representative democracy would cease to exist and, at that point, we might as well live in North Korea.

Maybe this sounds like hyperbole, but it illustrates this point that no rational person could seriously think framers of the Constitution — who built an entire system of government on divided power, checks and balances and the notion of federalism — intended to give one group of people complete, unchecked power when it comes to voting, an act essential to the core of America.

Advertisement

The entitled men of Utah’s delegation are making a mockery of the notion of what it is to be an elected representative — twisting the Constitution to undermine elections and the will of the people they are supposed to represent.

Their theory is radical, but not original. A group of far-right North Carolina Republicans argued the “independent legislature” concept in a gerrymandering case before the U.S. Supreme Court back in December and the court was generally not receptive. But since then, newly elected justices on the North Carolina Supreme Court decided they want to re-hear the underlying case, meaning the court will likely punt for now.

The Utah Supreme Court will also certainly disregard it since even the Legislature’s attorneys weren’t so brazen to make the same argument.

That doesn’t mean, however, that we should ignore the contempt these four men have for all of us as citizens and voters. These men have put their names to a document declaring you are not entitled, no matter how you vote, to cast a ballot in a fair and meaningful election.

And if there is any question that they value their own power more than American democracy, believe them when they tell you in their own words.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Utah law targeting DEI leads university to close LGBT, women’s centers

Published

on

Utah law targeting DEI leads university to close LGBT, women’s centers


When Becket Harris started college at the University of Utah, the school’s LGBT center quickly became the most important spot on campus for her — a place where she studied, made friends and never had to worry about how people would react to learning she was transgender.

Harris, 20, was devastated to learn this week that the center is closing — along with one for students from underrepresented racial and religious communities and another for women — in response to a new state law that rolls back diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in public schools and universities.

“What am I going to do without my space on campus? How’s my friend group going to stay together?” said Harris, who finished her sophomore year this spring. “It’s attacking a space that’s very personal to me.”

Across Utah, public schools, universities and government agencies must make shifts to comply with the law, which goes into effect Monday. The state becomes the latest where Republican legislators have restricted DEI programs, amid a broader conservative effort to limit what is taught in schools and make diversity programs a flash point in the nation’s political debate.

Advertisement

Laws in other states have forced some universities to eliminate programs and jobs and, more commonly, to change hiring practices, such as ending requirements for diversity statements from job candidates. Some type of change to diversity requirements or programs has been made at 164 college campuses in 23 states since January 2023, according to a tally by the Chronicle of Higher Education.

At the University of Utah, administrators said they have had less than two months — the bill was passed in January, but the state higher education office’s guidance about how to comply with the law came down in May — to make final decisions about how to reorganize their staff and services. The school won’t lose its student services and will continue holding cultural events, but complying with the law will require a significant change in approach, administrators said.

“This definitely is having a profound impact,” said Lori McDonald, vice president for student affairs.

The Utah law labeled services for different communities — racial, ethnic, religious, gender-based or sexuality-based — as “discriminatory.”

Although it left their funding in place, it effectively directed schools to reorganize those services, such as mental health, career and scholarship help, under generalized campus centers catering to all students. Furthermore, the state’s guidance indicated those services couldn’t operate in centers that also did cultural programming.

Advertisement

At the University of Utah, school officials said that means closing its specialized centers in favor of two umbrella offices: one for all cultural programming and another for all student services. The school’s Division of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion has been eliminated. About 45 staff were affected, many of whom will be reassigned to the two new centers.

“This is not the path we would have chosen,” University Provost Mitzi Montoya wrote in a note to deans and faculty Thursday. “But … it is our calling to rise to the challenges of the day and find a better way forward.”

On Friday, a farewell was planned for the university’s LGBT Resource Center, which asked supporters to “join us to laugh, cry and celebrate” its 21-year run. An Instagram post advertising the goodbye party drew dozens of comments and broken-heart emojis.

“I’m starting school in the fall and am so upset this won’t be a resource for our community,” one person wrote. Another said, “Every single person in this building made me feel at home.”

Added a third, “I found support here [when] there was nowhere else.”

Advertisement

Along with the LGBT Resource Center, the university’s Women’s Resource Center and the Center for Equity and Student Belonging will close. Both the women’s center and the Center for Equity and Student Belonging, previously known as an ethnic student affairs center, had been in operation for more than 50 years, Montoya noted.

The law doesn’t mandate the closure of student centers, allowing them to stay open as cultural centers as long as they don’t also provide student services. Utah state Rep. Katy Hall (R), the bill’s House sponsor, said some universities had chosen to close centers “to better meet the goals” of the law.

The idea of leaving the centers open without providing the services they were created to house felt disingenuous, McDonald said, and university officials weren’t sure enough staff would be left to run them after some employees move to the student services center.

The university plans to keep its Black cultural center open; staff are working on how it will operate under the law as a gathering place, McDonald said. Those plans will have to be approved by the state, university officials said.

The law does not affect classroom instruction, academic freedom or academic research, the Utah System of Higher Education said in its guidance.

Advertisement

This spring, lawmakers in Alabama and Iowa passed similar bills to restrict DEI programs, and Wyoming removed state funding for the state university’s DEI office, forcing its closure. In mid-June, Republican members of Congress introduced a bill proposing to end all federal diversity, equity and inclusion programs and pull funding from government agencies, schools and others with DEI programs.

The law’s passage in Utah played to the more conservative wing of a divided Republican Party, said Michael Lyons, a political science professor at Utah State University. In an election year, Gov. Spencer Cox (R) and other GOP lawmakers faced the need to win over party delegates in Utah’s caucus-based nominating process.

“It’s not surprising to see them take very conservative positions,” he said.

Upon signing the bill, Cox said it offered a “balanced solution” by repurposing funding “to help all Utah students succeed regardless of their background.” His office did not respond to a request for comment from The Post this week.

Hall, the bill’s sponsor, said on the House floor that the measure came about because she had heard “serious concerns about the landscape at our higher education institutions” from “students and many professors.”

Advertisement

“I hope that students who benefited from these centers in the past know that the expectation is that they will still be able to receive the services and support that they need to succeed,” Hall told The Post.

Utah House Minority Leader Angela Romero (D) said she feared the bill would end up erasing people and identities, noting in a floor debate that she might not have succeeded at the University of Utah if not for the support of the ethnic students’ center. Free-speech advocates have also said such laws have a chilling and censoring effect on campuses.

Utah State University said this month it would reassign programs and clubs that had been housed under the school’s Inclusion Center and would ensure that its Latinx Cultural Center and a proposed Native American center comply with the law. The school said it would create a new center for community and cultural matters. Weber State University in Ogden, Utah, has closed its Division of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion and identity-based centers and reorganized staff positions.

At the University of Utah, where staff members are still working out plans for the new centers, Harris, the student, remembered the LGBT center as a cozy place that made college much easier — and worried about what the changes might mean for future students.

“I could just walk into a space,” Harris said, “and I knew that everyone there was safe to talk to.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Grand County Sheriff: Search for missing Moab couple changes from ‘rescue’ to ‘recovery’

Published

on

Grand County Sheriff: Search for missing Moab couple changes from ‘rescue’ to ‘recovery’


MOAB, Utah (ABC4) — The search for a missing Moab couple has officially transitioned from a ‘rescue’ mission to a ‘recovery’ one, according to Grand County Sheriff Jamison Wiggins.

Ray and Maranda Ankofski have been missing since June 21 after they traveled the Steel Bender off-road trail in Grand County. A search for the couple began after they didn’t return on time and their vehicle was reported as abandoned.

The son of the couple, Raymond Ankofski told ABC4.com earlier this week officials were planning to scale back their response at the end of the week because of the costs associated with the search efforts. According to a press release from Grand County Sheriff’s Office, as of Tuesday, eight agencies were involved in the search.

“Despite exhaustive efforts, including the use of advanced search techniques and resources, Ray and Maranda Ankofski have not been located,” stated a press release from Wiggins. “The decision to transition from a search and rescue mission to a recovery was made based on evidence at the scene during the operation.”

Advertisement

In the days following their disappearance, the couple’s children started a fundraiser via GoFundMe, with the initial goal of raising $25,000 — but Raymond Ankofski explained the money would not be for the family.

“The money is going towards the search and rescue to bring my parents back, and to find my parents,” Rauymond Ankofski said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah gets $20 million for transportation and traffic light technology

Published

on

Utah gets $20 million for transportation and traffic light technology


The Federal Highway Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation has announced a $20 million grant to Utah.

Drivers of snow plows, public transportation buses, and other government-operated vehicles are using technology that can direct traffic lights to change in order to improve safety and travel time.

Under the “Saving Lives and Connectivity: Accelerating V2X Deployment” program, Utah will receive $20 million of the $60 million that is aimed to improve vehicle technologies. The other $40 million will go to Texas and Arizona.

“Connecting vehicles and infrastructure is a great way for us to be able to take advantage of technology to help improve safety and other outcomes. And Utah’s DOT has been a leader in this space for a long time,” Shailen Bhatt, US Federal Highway Administrator said.

Advertisement

UDOT will use this $20 million to fund projects in Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming, where each state represents different population concentrations and transportation facilities.

Bhatt says protecting personal private information can be one of the challenges when using these types of technology.

“So we will want people to understand what is being exchanged is called a basic safety message of DSM. The vehicle is going to report to the intersection that I’m approaching, and the intersection is going to report back ‘oh, the light is about to turn red or my light is red’, but it’s all anonymous data,” Bhatt said.

The technology is being used in Salt Lake City, where travel time reliability and bus performance have improved.

“It is unequivocal that when you deploy technology, we are able to reduce crashes, we’re able to reduce congestion, we’re able to reduce the amount of time people sit in traffic, and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from our system. And we look forward to more investments being made on the basis of the data that we get from this initial deployment,” Bhatt said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending