Connect with us

Utah

Utah hunting guide charged in Donald Trump Jr. hunt faces new criminal allegations

Published

on

Utah hunting guide charged in Donald Trump Jr. hunt faces new criminal allegations


A further felony poaching cost has been filed towards the distinguished Utah looking information who was prosecuted earlier this month for illegally utilizing bait to assist Donald Trump Jr. kill a black bear in Carbon County in 2018.

Wade Lemon, a information based mostly in Holden, has been below investigation in the course of the previous a number of years by state wildlife officers who suspect Lemon of main high-paying purchasers on trophy hunts utilizing techniques which can be banned below Utah looking rules.

Within the newest case, a sting operation orchestrated final yr by the Utah Lawyer Basic’s Workplace, Lemon is accused of serving to a shopper shoot a cougar in a “canned” hunt staged in Millard County.

The costs in each instances, often known as “wanton destruction of wildlife,” are third-degree felonies that carry potential jail sentences of as much as 5 years every. Different attainable penalties of a conviction for Lemon are a lack of looking in privileges in Utah and different states and revocation of his outfitting license.

Advertisement

In neither case is the shopper being charged as a result of the info point out they’re the victims of a fraud who had no method of figuring out against the law was occurring after they illegally shot the animal, in keeping with prosecutor Ben Willoughby.

“That mountain lion was treed whereas this hunter was nonetheless packing up his automotive in Sandy, Utah,” mentioned Willoughby, a Davis County assistant district legal professional, in reference to the Millard case. “It’s a fraud on him designed to make it seem like he’s getting a bona fide looking expertise when in actual fact there isn’t any looking, there isn’t any threat, there isn’t any sport concerned in any respect.”

Willoughby and his boss Troy Rawlings have been assigned to prosecute Lemon as Utah’s particular assistant attorneys basic.

Lemon’s preliminary court docket look is about for June 22 in Fillmore’s 4th District Courtroom, the place the cost was filed Monday. On Thursday, The Salt Lake Tribune reached Lemon’s lawyer, Greg Regulation, who declined remark.

The Lemon instances expose an unsavory facet to trophy looking, which is subjected to quite a few guidelines to make sure the animals are pursued and killed ethically and humanely. The ethic of “truthful chase” seems to have little to no place within the two guided hunts that led to costs towards Wade.

Advertisement

Utah does permit the usage of canines to pursue cougars and bears, a observe denounced by many wildlife advocates as animal abuse. To attenuate the potential for abuse, bear and cougar hunts are topic to cautious, but hard-to-enforce guidelines. Below Utah looking rules, for instance, the hunter should be current when the canines are let unfastened and should take part within the chase till the hunt’s conclusion.

In Lemon’s Millard County case, the shopper’s participation was allegedly restricted to being transported by ATV to the spot the place a cougar had been cornered in a tree and squeezing two rounds into the animal’s physique.

Lemon, 61, has been guiding hunters in Utah for the reason that late Nineteen Seventies and has grown his service into considered one of Utah’s largest with worldwide operations in Mexico and Africa. Lemon and his guides have helped greater than 2,000 purchasers “fulfill their dream of harvesting a Trophy Mountain Lion,” in keeping with the web site for Wade Lemon Looking.

“We aren’t lion hunters, we’re lion catchers,” the location states. “Till you will have watched a pack of hounds working a observe you’ll by no means absolutely perceive the eagerness of a houndsman watching an excellent canine work.”

The Millard County case is considered one of a number of into Lemon’s operations, however solely the second to result in prison costs. The sting operation occurred on Jan. 24, 2021, after a houndsman discovered cougar tracks close to Meadow Canyon in Millard County. This individual, recognized solely as a “confidential witness,” labored with state investigators, in keeping with the charging doc.

Advertisement

The unnamed cooperating witness referred to as Lemon to tell him that he was monitoring a cougar and requested if he had a shopper who wished to bag one, and Lemon responded that he may very well be there in a couple of hours with a hunter.

Lemon requested the witness to launch a few of his canines, however to carry some again for when his shopper arrived. At 11:47 a.m., the witness referred to as Lemon to say that his canines cornered a cougar that was “chilling up in a tree,” in keeping with the paperwork. The witness advised the information that each one his canines had been loosed on the cougar pursuit so he had none left to launch for the shopper’s profit. Lemon responded by asking what sort of automobile he would wish to entry the location and whether or not the canines may very well be heard from the highway.

“He mentioned that’s good should you can’t hear it from the highway. That’s the fraud,” Willoughby, the prosecutor, mentioned. “Lemon says, ‘We’ll get different canines loaded in canine bins only for impact.’ That’s proof of the fraud perpetrated on this hunter. They’re concealing the truth that canines have already been launched.”

The rip-off requires fooling the shopper into believing no canines had been let unfastened till he joined the chase, he mentioned.

“Whereas they’re suiting the hunter up, you launch a bunch of different canines which can look to the hunter as if he’s current when the canines are launched,” Willoughby continued. “The trick is when the hunter will get to the scene the place you shoot the cougar, it’s up in a tree and there at the moment are a number of canines across the base of the tree.”

Advertisement

Until the hunter is counting canines, he might not suspect something is amiss.

The shopper, a person from Sandy, advised investigators that he had no concept the hunt was staged and that the cougar had already been positioned earlier than his arrival.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Utah law targeting DEI leads university to close LGBT, women’s centers

Published

on

Utah law targeting DEI leads university to close LGBT, women’s centers


When Becket Harris started college at the University of Utah, the school’s LGBT center quickly became the most important spot on campus for her — a place where she studied, made friends and never had to worry about how people would react to learning she was transgender.

Harris, 20, was devastated to learn this week that the center is closing — along with one for students from underrepresented racial and religious communities and another for women — in response to a new state law that rolls back diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in public schools and universities.

“What am I going to do without my space on campus? How’s my friend group going to stay together?” said Harris, who finished her sophomore year this spring. “It’s attacking a space that’s very personal to me.”

Across Utah, public schools, universities and government agencies must make shifts to comply with the law, which goes into effect Monday. The state becomes the latest where Republican legislators have restricted DEI programs, amid a broader conservative effort to limit what is taught in schools and make diversity programs a flash point in the nation’s political debate.

Advertisement

Laws in other states have forced some universities to eliminate programs and jobs and, more commonly, to change hiring practices, such as ending requirements for diversity statements from job candidates. Some type of change to diversity requirements or programs has been made at 164 college campuses in 23 states since January 2023, according to a tally by the Chronicle of Higher Education.

At the University of Utah, administrators said they have had less than two months — the bill was passed in January, but the state higher education office’s guidance about how to comply with the law came down in May — to make final decisions about how to reorganize their staff and services. The school won’t lose its student services and will continue holding cultural events, but complying with the law will require a significant change in approach, administrators said.

“This definitely is having a profound impact,” said Lori McDonald, vice president for student affairs.

The Utah law labeled services for different communities — racial, ethnic, religious, gender-based or sexuality-based — as “discriminatory.”

Although it left their funding in place, it effectively directed schools to reorganize those services, such as mental health, career and scholarship help, under generalized campus centers catering to all students. Furthermore, the state’s guidance indicated those services couldn’t operate in centers that also did cultural programming.

Advertisement

At the University of Utah, school officials said that means closing its specialized centers in favor of two umbrella offices: one for all cultural programming and another for all student services. The school’s Division of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion has been eliminated. About 45 staff were affected, many of whom will be reassigned to the two new centers.

“This is not the path we would have chosen,” University Provost Mitzi Montoya wrote in a note to deans and faculty Thursday. “But … it is our calling to rise to the challenges of the day and find a better way forward.”

On Friday, a farewell was planned for the university’s LGBT Resource Center, which asked supporters to “join us to laugh, cry and celebrate” its 21-year run. An Instagram post advertising the goodbye party drew dozens of comments and broken-heart emojis.

“I’m starting school in the fall and am so upset this won’t be a resource for our community,” one person wrote. Another said, “Every single person in this building made me feel at home.”

Added a third, “I found support here [when] there was nowhere else.”

Advertisement

Along with the LGBT Resource Center, the university’s Women’s Resource Center and the Center for Equity and Student Belonging will close. Both the women’s center and the Center for Equity and Student Belonging, previously known as an ethnic student affairs center, had been in operation for more than 50 years, Montoya noted.

The law doesn’t mandate the closure of student centers, allowing them to stay open as cultural centers as long as they don’t also provide student services. Utah state Rep. Katy Hall (R), the bill’s House sponsor, said some universities had chosen to close centers “to better meet the goals” of the law.

The idea of leaving the centers open without providing the services they were created to house felt disingenuous, McDonald said, and university officials weren’t sure enough staff would be left to run them after some employees move to the student services center.

The university plans to keep its Black cultural center open; staff are working on how it will operate under the law as a gathering place, McDonald said. Those plans will have to be approved by the state, university officials said.

The law does not affect classroom instruction, academic freedom or academic research, the Utah System of Higher Education said in its guidance.

Advertisement

This spring, lawmakers in Alabama and Iowa passed similar bills to restrict DEI programs, and Wyoming removed state funding for the state university’s DEI office, forcing its closure. In mid-June, Republican members of Congress introduced a bill proposing to end all federal diversity, equity and inclusion programs and pull funding from government agencies, schools and others with DEI programs.

The law’s passage in Utah played to the more conservative wing of a divided Republican Party, said Michael Lyons, a political science professor at Utah State University. In an election year, Gov. Spencer Cox (R) and other GOP lawmakers faced the need to win over party delegates in Utah’s caucus-based nominating process.

“It’s not surprising to see them take very conservative positions,” he said.

Upon signing the bill, Cox said it offered a “balanced solution” by repurposing funding “to help all Utah students succeed regardless of their background.” His office did not respond to a request for comment from The Post this week.

Hall, the bill’s sponsor, said on the House floor that the measure came about because she had heard “serious concerns about the landscape at our higher education institutions” from “students and many professors.”

Advertisement

“I hope that students who benefited from these centers in the past know that the expectation is that they will still be able to receive the services and support that they need to succeed,” Hall told The Post.

Utah House Minority Leader Angela Romero (D) said she feared the bill would end up erasing people and identities, noting in a floor debate that she might not have succeeded at the University of Utah if not for the support of the ethnic students’ center. Free-speech advocates have also said such laws have a chilling and censoring effect on campuses.

Utah State University said this month it would reassign programs and clubs that had been housed under the school’s Inclusion Center and would ensure that its Latinx Cultural Center and a proposed Native American center comply with the law. The school said it would create a new center for community and cultural matters. Weber State University in Ogden, Utah, has closed its Division of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion and identity-based centers and reorganized staff positions.

At the University of Utah, where staff members are still working out plans for the new centers, Harris, the student, remembered the LGBT center as a cozy place that made college much easier — and worried about what the changes might mean for future students.

“I could just walk into a space,” Harris said, “and I knew that everyone there was safe to talk to.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Grand County Sheriff: Search for missing Moab couple changes from ‘rescue’ to ‘recovery’

Published

on

Grand County Sheriff: Search for missing Moab couple changes from ‘rescue’ to ‘recovery’


MOAB, Utah (ABC4) — The search for a missing Moab couple has officially transitioned from a ‘rescue’ mission to a ‘recovery’ one, according to Grand County Sheriff Jamison Wiggins.

Ray and Maranda Ankofski have been missing since June 21 after they traveled the Steel Bender off-road trail in Grand County. A search for the couple began after they didn’t return on time and their vehicle was reported as abandoned.

The son of the couple, Raymond Ankofski told ABC4.com earlier this week officials were planning to scale back their response at the end of the week because of the costs associated with the search efforts. According to a press release from Grand County Sheriff’s Office, as of Tuesday, eight agencies were involved in the search.

“Despite exhaustive efforts, including the use of advanced search techniques and resources, Ray and Maranda Ankofski have not been located,” stated a press release from Wiggins. “The decision to transition from a search and rescue mission to a recovery was made based on evidence at the scene during the operation.”

Advertisement

In the days following their disappearance, the couple’s children started a fundraiser via GoFundMe, with the initial goal of raising $25,000 — but Raymond Ankofski explained the money would not be for the family.

“The money is going towards the search and rescue to bring my parents back, and to find my parents,” Rauymond Ankofski said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah gets $20 million for transportation and traffic light technology

Published

on

Utah gets $20 million for transportation and traffic light technology


The Federal Highway Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation has announced a $20 million grant to Utah.

Drivers of snow plows, public transportation buses, and other government-operated vehicles are using technology that can direct traffic lights to change in order to improve safety and travel time.

Under the “Saving Lives and Connectivity: Accelerating V2X Deployment” program, Utah will receive $20 million of the $60 million that is aimed to improve vehicle technologies. The other $40 million will go to Texas and Arizona.

“Connecting vehicles and infrastructure is a great way for us to be able to take advantage of technology to help improve safety and other outcomes. And Utah’s DOT has been a leader in this space for a long time,” Shailen Bhatt, US Federal Highway Administrator said.

Advertisement

UDOT will use this $20 million to fund projects in Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming, where each state represents different population concentrations and transportation facilities.

Bhatt says protecting personal private information can be one of the challenges when using these types of technology.

“So we will want people to understand what is being exchanged is called a basic safety message of DSM. The vehicle is going to report to the intersection that I’m approaching, and the intersection is going to report back ‘oh, the light is about to turn red or my light is red’, but it’s all anonymous data,” Bhatt said.

The technology is being used in Salt Lake City, where travel time reliability and bus performance have improved.

“It is unequivocal that when you deploy technology, we are able to reduce crashes, we’re able to reduce congestion, we’re able to reduce the amount of time people sit in traffic, and the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from our system. And we look forward to more investments being made on the basis of the data that we get from this initial deployment,” Bhatt said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending