Connect with us

Utah

Utah could require device manufacturers to add content filters to phones, tablets for kids

Published

on

Utah could require device manufacturers to add content filters to phones, tablets for kids


Estimated read time: 4-5
minutes

SALT LAKE CITY — The state of Utah could require cellphone and tablet manufacturers to enable obscenity filters on devices used by minors, under a proposal that received initial support from a Senate committee on Wednesday.

Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, the sponsor of SB104, told the Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee last week the Utah Legislature approved a similar bill several years ago, which would only have gone into effect if at least five other states adopted the same legislation.

Tired of waiting for action from other states — which have so far declined to enact similar laws — Weiler said he’s ready for the Beehive State to move forward on its own, if need be.

Advertisement

“In the years since, we’ve made ourselves an outlier when it comes to social media and foreign websites,” Weiler said, in reference to the state’s high-profile social media regulations passed last year.

So, why not be an outlier when it comes to blocking pornography and other potentially harmful content on devices used by minors?

“The idea is to provide minors with protection and opportunities that they deserve as children to protect them from developing maybe an addiction to pornography before they’re even adults and allow them time to develop good online habits while they’re still young,” the senator said.

Weiler said many phones made by major manufacturers come with preinstalled software to enable content filtering, but they are deactivated by default and sometimes not easily enabled by parents.

His bill would allow the state attorney general to sue manufacturers who don’t comply with the requirements.

Advertisement

Elder Mervyn B. Arnold, a general authority seventy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, spoke in favor of the bill during its initial hearing on Jan. 23. Arnold — who joined Weiler as a private citizen to present the bill — praised efforts to keep children from coming across obscene material.

“This state has a fabulous record … for being out in front and protecting our children and grandchildren from these kinds of issues,” he said. “We do have a right to protect our children from obscene material.”

SB104 was supported by several parents and sexual exploitation advocates, but an earlier version of the bill was held in committee last week after a handful of business groups expressed concern that the bill could present liability to businesses beyond just the manufacturers.

Dave Davis, president and chief legal officer for the Utah Retail Merchants Association, asked why lawmakers aren’t waiting for other states before moving forward. The purpose of the earlier bill was to ensure “a critical mass for manufacturers so that Utah wouldn’t be on an island, and you just don’t get devices.”

He also called the criminal penalties “very, very, very heavy-handed,” and said he was concerned about the potential impact to retailers who sell phones. Representatives from mobile carriers AT&T and Verizon said they hoped to address concerns about liability to retail clerks who sell phones to Utahns.

Advertisement

“We’re just opening the box,” said Jodi Hart with AT&T.

Those with concerns all said they’re supportive of keeping pornography out of the hands of minors, as did Dylan Hoffman with TechNet, a national network of technology companies.

“However,” Hoffman said, “we must respectfully oppose this bill on the basis that we don’t believe that there’s a technically feasible way to comply.”

Instead, he said parents can install free or commercial third-party software to block inappropriate content, and raised the possibility that manufacturers could block sales of smartphones and tablets in Utah as a way to avoid liability.

Hoffman on Wednesday said his organization “(agrees) wholeheartedly with the intent of this bill,” but said he believes it may not pass constitutional muster.

Advertisement

Weiler acknowledged during the Jan. 23 hearing that the bill still needed some tweaks, and asked the committee to hold it without taking a vote while he worked to resolve them.

He introduced an amendment to the bill stating that nothing in it creates a cause of legal action against against the retailer of a device. The amendment also states that an adult — other than a parent or legal guardian — who disables a content filter on a minor’s device “for the purpose of disseminating pornography to the minor” can be charged with a class A misdemeanor subject to a fine up to $5,000.

The bill cleared committee unanimously on Wednesday after lawmakers adopted Weiler’s amendments.

The bill would allow the state attorney general to block a company’s action in violation of the law and seek civil penalties up to $5,000 for each violation. The attorney general would also be allowed to seek to strip companies of their license to operate in the state if they are found in violation.

Weiler was the sponsor of a bill last session that required adult websites to verify the ages of users. The law sparked the ire of the pornography industry and PornHub has since blocked access to users in the state.

Advertisement

Industry groups and the Free Speech Coalition challenged the law in court, but their lawsuit was dismissed in August 2023.

Related stories

Most recent Utah Legislature stories

Bridger Beal-Cvetko covers Utah politics, Salt Lake County communities and breaking news for KSL.com. He is a graduate of Utah Valley University.

More stories you may be interested in



Source link

Utah

Why U. President Taylor Randall, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox plan to meet with Donald Trump this week

Published

on

Why U. President Taylor Randall, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox plan to meet with Donald Trump this week


Randall will be among several key visitors in attendance for a meeting on March 6

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) University of Utah President Taylor Randall speaks on campus during an event on Feb. 7.

University of Utah President Taylor Randall is scheduled to meet with President Donald Trump this week.

Randall is expected to be among several attendees at a White House roundtable meeting on Friday to discuss solutions for the rapidly evolving landscape of college athletics with the president, a U. spokesperson said.

The meeting could be postponed, however, due to the war in Iran. As of Monday, “the odds of it happening this week are 50-50 at best,” according to Yahoo Sports.

Advertisement

If the roundtable happens as scheduled, the guest list includes several current and former notable figures in sports, including NBA Commissioner Adam Silver, golf legend Tiger Woods and former Alabama head coach Nick Saban.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox confirmed in a social media post on X that he would be in attendance as well.

“Thank you [President Donald Trump] for inviting me to participate, and for your commitment to addressing challenges in college sports,” Cox said on X. “[Taylor Randall] is a great university leader who will work with us on solutions for this critical issue.”

(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) University of Utah President Taylor Randall speaks on campus on Feb. 7.

Earlier this year, Randall was called on by the federal House Committee on Education and Workforce to schedule a briefing to discuss the school’s planned private-equity partnership with Otro Capital, according to a report from Sportico.

Advertisement

The Utes announced their proposal in December of last year, which is a first-of-its-kind agreement between a university’s athletic department and a private equity company.

Utah’s deal with Otro has yet to be finalized. In a Feb. 10 interview with The Salt Lake Tribune, Randall said the university is “still just working through all of the issues systematically.”

“We want to do this in the right way to set both of us up for future success,” he added.

The move is expected to infuse hundreds of millions of dollars into the U.’s athletic department to help sustain the financial future of the program with rising deficits across the industry.

“I don’t think any of us would prefer to be in this situation right now,” Randall said in a faculty senate meeting in January. “But it just is what we’re facing.”

Advertisement

For over 150 years, The Salt Lake Tribune has been Utah’s independent news source. Our reporters work tirelessly to uncover the stories that matter most to Utahns, from unraveling the complexities of court rulings to allowing tax payers to see where and how their hard earned dollars are being spent. This critical work wouldn’t be possible without people like you—individuals who understand the importance of local, independent journalism.  As a nonprofit newsroom, every subscription and every donation fuels our mission, supporting the in-depth reporting that shines a light on the is sues shaping Utah today.

You can help power this work.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah snowpack numbers looking dismal with not much time to catch up

Published

on

Utah snowpack numbers looking dismal with not much time to catch up


The 2025-2026 winter season isn’t quite over, but it’s no secret that it’s been a rough one when it comes to snow. Right now, statewide snowpack numbers are hovering around 60% of the median.

But you don’t have to know those numbers to understand what a strange winter it’s been.

“It’s kind of good,” said Carrie Stewart, who lives in Salt Lake City. “I mean, I like it because I like a milder climate. But I realize this summer is going to be hard.”

MORE | Snowpack

“I’m not sad I’m not shoveling,” said Sally Humphreys of Salt Lake City. “But it’s definitely worrying.”

Advertisement

State water officials are also worried. The clock is ticking to bulk up those snowpack numbers.

“We’re running out of time to get the snowpack that we need,” said Jordan Clayton, supervisor of the Utah Snow Survey. “We have about 40 or so days until our typical snowpack peak.”

There is still some time to make up lost ground, but the odds aren’t great. Clayton estimates a 10% chance of reaching normal by the end of the season.

“Those are terrible odds,” he said.

In fact, the odds of having a record low snowpack are greater, sitting at 20%. It’s a grim reality that has officials looking toward the summer anxiously.

Advertisement

“I would expect to see watering restrictions outdoors for a lot of places,” said Laura Haskell, Utah’s drought coordinator.

It’s unknown what the next few weeks will bring, but if Haskell had to guess, she doesn’t see state reservoirs filling up much from where they are now.

“In the spring when that runoff hits, we do get a noticeable peak in our reservoir storage,” Haskell said. “The water just starts coming in. But this year, we don’t anticipate getting that.”

Haskell says we have enough reservoir storage to likely make it through the summer, but there are other implications to worry about.

Our autumn season was pretty wet. That led to decent soil moisture levels, which can then lead to higher vegetation growth.

Advertisement

“If we then have a snowpack that melts out really early, we’ll have a longer than normal summer, if you will, with forage growth that might dry out, and so that’s kind of a bad recipe for promoting fire hazard,” Clayton said.

Utahns have dealt with low snowpack levels in the past. Many Utahns are familiar with their lawn turning brown because of water restrictions.

“We’ll probably just let it go that nice, sandy, golden color that it gets in the summer in a dry climate,” said Dea Ann Kate, who lives in Cottonwood Heights.

As we wait to see what the next few weeks bring, people like Carrie Stewart are just reflecting on an unusual winter.

“It is worrying,” she said. “We need snow. We’ve only shoveled once this season, and that’s very unusual.”

Advertisement

Water officials are now hoping for something else unusual: climbing out of the snowpack hole that’s been created.

“But there are no times going back where the snowpack totals for the state were close to where they are right now, and we ended up actually at a normal peak,” Clayton said. “So while it’s possible, it’s very unlikely.”

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Immigration agents bolster action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some

Published

on

Immigration agents bolster action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some


SALT LAKE CITY — The presence of federal immigration agents tracking immigrants has increased in Salt Lake County-area courtrooms since mid-February as have complaints about how they’re carrying out their duties.

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents may have carried out operations at the Matheson Courthouse in Salt Lake City, according to Lacey Singleton, a public defender who’s regularly at the facility.

“Now it is like they are there all the time … They just basically hang out, and they’re either sitting in the courtroom, or they’re lurking in the hallways,” she said. They wear normal street garb, she said, but for regulars in the courtroom, “they stand out.”

Immigration enforcement action at courthouses around the country has become “a cornerstone” in the efforts of the administration of President Donald Trump to detain and deport immigrants in the country illegally, according to the American Immigration Council, an immigrant advocacy group. Since an arrest of one of Lacey’s clients around Feb. 12 or 13, she and others say, the practice has become more and more common in Utah.

Advertisement

ICE didn’t respond to a KSL query seeking comment, but the practice aligns with the Trump administration’s push to crack down on illegal immigration. Agency guidance notes that the people ICE seeks may appear in courthouses to address unrelated criminal and civil matters, and that such facilities are typically secure.

“Accordingly, when ICE engages in civil immigration enforcement actions in or near courthouses, it can reduce safety risks to the public, targeted alien(s) and ICE officers and agents,” reads a May 27 memo on the matter.

Critics, though, say immigration agents’ efforts can be disruptive and could spur immigrants, otherwise trying to resolve their legal issues, to steer clear of court, jeopardizing their cases. As word spreads of the activity, it could also spur fearful immigrant witnesses and crime victims to steer clear of the legal system, Lacey worries.

Salt Lake County Sheriff Rosie Rivera brought the issue up at a Salt Lake County Council meeting on Tuesday, saying her office has received “multiple complaints” about ICE agents’ activity in Salt Lake County courthouses, where sheriff’s officials, serving as court bailiffs, provide security.

U.S. agents have ratcheted up immigration enforcement action at Utah courthouses, prompting criticism from some. The photo shows attorney Lacey Singleton, center, questioning a suspected agent recently at Matheson Courthouse in Salt Lake City. (Photo: Salt Lake City Bail Fund)

Part of the problem, she said, is that the agents typically wear plain clothes and don’t identify themselves, not even to bailiffs. Another issue relates to the actual process of taking an immigrant into custody, which Rivera says should occur outside of public view with the suspects’ lawyers present.

Advertisement

In one instance, she said, a bailiff heard a scuffle and thought someone was getting assaulted, only to find out it was ICE agents detaining somebody.

A bailiff and an ICE agent subsequently “got into a verbal altercation,” Rivera said. “We are addressing that issue, but I want you to understand, these deputies are put in a really tough situation, and in this situation, I understand how he could get to that point where he had no idea who they were, and he was trying to make sure that somebody wasn’t being assaulted at the time.”

Video from last week, posted to social media by the Salt Lake City Bail Fund, shows Lacey walking past a suspected immigration agent at the Matheson Courthouse, asking for identification but getting no reply. The Salt Lake City Bail Fund, critical of ICE activity, sends observers to the Matheson Courthouse to monitor the agency’s activity.

“That’s a problem because it’s like, who are you?” Lacey said. “For all I know, you’re some random dude who is just, like, off the street and participating in kidnapping people.”

Video supplied to KSL shows an incident outside Riverton Justice Court on Wednesday — four apparent immigration agents in plain clothes wrestling on the ground with an apparent suspect they were trying to take into custody.

Advertisement

“Don’t resist,” someone off-camera says in Spanish while filming the incident. “Son, don’t resist. Calm down. They’re going to hurt you more.”

The woman asks for his name and contact info after the agents cuff him and take him to a nearby car, while another man on the scene shouts at the officials and berates them. “You guys are disgusting,” the man says.

Anna Reganis, a public defender with the Salt Lake Legal Defender Association, like Lacey, said immigration agents detained a man at Salt Lake City Justice Court on Wednesday. She didn’t witness the actual detention, but heard the aftermath.

“All of a sudden, in my courtroom, we could hear from the lobby blood-curdling screams,” Reganis said. She went to the main lobby, finding a woman holding her infant baby “just inconsolably screaming and crying.” Turns out the woman had gone to the courthouse with her husband, and he had just been detained by immigration agents.

Read more:

Lacey maintains that the people the ICE agents seem to be pursuing aren’t the most hardened of criminals, which the Trump administration said would be the focus when the crackdown started. Reganis echoed that, noting that those with business in the Salt Lake City Justice Court face relatively minor offenses.

Advertisement

“Myself and my co-workers all had a bit of a wake-up call because we kept telling ourselves that this wasn’t going to happen at the justice court because all of our cases are class B and C misdemeanors and infractions,” she said.

The Salt Lake City Bail Fund launched training sessions late last year for volunteers to serve as courthouse observers, particularly at the Matheson Courthouse. Liz Maryon, who helps oversee the effort, foresees another round of training to get more help. “We’re currently working on expanding our capacity so that we can be there every day,” she said.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending