Connect with us

Utah

Tribune editorial: Utah’s new U.S. senator should maintain his independence. Its other one should regain his.

Published

on

Tribune editorial: Utah’s new U.S. senator should maintain his independence. Its other one should regain his.


John Curtis has properly put the nation on notice. And it may matter a lot.

The newly elected U.S. senator from Utah has pledged to be his own person, to stand up for his own principles and for the beliefs and interests of his constituents.

Utahns should expect no less.

In fact, they insisted on it when they chose Curtis overwhelmingly, first as the Republican nominee over a Donald Trump supporting candidate to replace the retiring Sen. Mitt Romney, then as their new senator.

Advertisement

Already, Curtis’ welcome independence has contributed to the withdrawal of President-elect Donald Trump’s first choice to be the new attorney general — the scandal-mired former Rep. Matt Gaetz.

Curtis later expressed hope that some of the new president’s more troublesome choices may have “resolved themselves” once the time-honored process of vetting nominations moves along.

There is reason to hope that Curtis means it when he says he takes seriously the constitutional role of the U.S. Senate, to give its advice and consent to a president’s choices for Cabinet seats and other key executive branch posts, judicial appointments, treaties and other important decisions.

That he may support Trump (or that Trump may support him) on many issues, such as taxes, regulations and public lands, but that he will never be an automatic vote for any of the once and future president’s plans or actions.

“If you expect me to be like Mitt Romney, you’re going to be disappointed,” Curtis said. “If you expect me to be like Mike Lee, (Utah’s other U.S. senator) you’re also going to be disappointed.”

Advertisement

Curtis, for example, did not support either of the two votes to impeach Trump, while Romney was the only Republican senator to vote to convict on both those motions. So they aren’t the same.

Though Curtis could do worse than emulate Romney, who leaves office with great respect from colleagues on both sides of the aisle and much praise for his principled stands and his willingness to work with anyone to solve our nation’s problems.

Mike Lee, meanwhile, might do well to be like, well, Mike Lee. At least the Mike Lee who used to tell anyone who would listen that it was time for Congress to reassert its constitutional role and stop rolling over for the White House.

Lee called it the Article I Project, named for the first part of the Constitution, which lays out the many powers and duties of Congress and places it at once superior to the executive and judicial branches and closest to the people.

That was back in 2016, when Lee had not yet taken, in his words, “the scenic route” from being a Never Trump Republican to joining MAGA Nation.

Advertisement

Now Utahns are right to be concerned that Lee may be no more than a Trump toady, gleefully backing his bills and confirming his appointments without a care for the constitutional separation of powers he used to hold so dear. Because that’s the kind of support Trump demands.

Senators, including Curtis and Lee, take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, not to support the president.

Their constituents should hold them to that promise.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Voices: America at 250 could use a little more Utah

Published

on

Voices: America at 250 could use a little more Utah


Not only the Utah that we are today, but the Utah that we can choose to become.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Gabriel Meneses makes one of the limited edition flags for the United States 250th anniversary at Colonial Flag in Sandy on Monday, June 1, 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

President Trump expected to reduce the size of Utah monuments

Published

on

President Trump expected to reduce the size of Utah monuments


  • President Donald Trump is expected to sign executive orders reducing the size of Utah’s Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments on Monday.
  • The monuments have shifted in size between administrations, with Trump reducing them in 2017 and President Joe Biden restoring their original boundaries in 2021.
  • Environmental groups and Utah officials are divided over the potential reduction, with critics threatening legal challenges and supporters seeking more local control.

President Donald Trump plans to sign an executive order on Monday afternoon shrinking the size of two national monuments in Utah, which currently cover a combined 5,094 square miles, the Deseret News confirmed on background with a Utah source.

The two national monuments — Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears — have oscillated in size through the previous several presidential administrations.

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was created by President Bill Clinton in September 1996. Bears Ears National Monument was created by President Barack Obama in December 2016. Both designations received a mixed reception among Utahns.

In 2017, Trump reduced Bears Ears by about 85% and Grand Staircase by about 46%.

Then when former President Joe Biden took office in 2021, he restored them to their original sizes.

Advertisement

Trump is expected to sign the executive orders in the Oval Office on Monday at 4:30 EST.

In a statement to the Deseret News on Friday, the White House said, “Any policy announcement will come directly from the President. This reporting about potential executive orders is pure speculation.”

National monument designations place restrictions on what recreational and economic activity residents and visitors can do on the land. The designation also prohibits anyone from pursuing new mining claims, oil and gas leasing, coal exploration or new commercial infrastructure projects.

Tourists look at the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument ion Friday, May 14, 2021. | Laura Seitz, Deseret News

However, the Bureau of Land Management previously found that Bears Ears and Grand Staircase have little to offer in terms of oil and gas potential, the Deseret News previously reported.

For nearly three decades since Clinton designated the first monument, Utah’s federal delegation has asked for reductions in land size for more local control, recreation and grazing.

Advertisement

Recently, Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy challenged the monument’s resource management plan to return to a plan the first Trump administration outlined in 2020 with help from local Utahns.

However, her bill died after missing a key deadline to make it to the Senate for a vote.

People react to the potential land reduction

Butler Wash Ruins, a cliff dwelling that was built and occupied by the Ancestral Puebloans in about 1200 A.D., can be seen at Bears Ears National Monument on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. The cliff dwelling features multiple habitation, storage and ceremonial structures. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News

Based on an initial report by ABC4, environmental groups are already vocalizing their disapproval over a potential reduction of monument land.

Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance Executive Director Scott Braden described the potential executive order as “unlawful, unwise and unacceptable,” in a press release sent to the Deseret News.

“This action will only bring uncertainty and chaos to places that should instead be protected for their rich biodiversity, unique geology, and remarkable cultural values,” he wrote. Braden said SUWA was preparing to fight the executive order through lawsuits or by lobbying in Congress.

On X, former Utah state Sen. Nate Blouin referenced the land reduction in conjunction with the Babylon Fire, which as of Friday is 25% contained and has covered more than 100,000 acres in southeastern Utah.

Advertisement

“As the largest wildfire in the U.S. burns pristine landscapes in southeastern Utah, Trump is threatening to shrink both Grand Staircase & Bears Ears National Monuments,” Blouin wrote. “This unprecedented move is happening without input from the region’s ancestral inhabitants.

Ricky Agnew, left, and wife Christy Agnew, right, look at petroglyphs on Newspaper Rock at Bears Ears National Monument on Monday, Dec. 1, 2025. The petroglyphs on Newspaper Rock date back to 1,500 years ago. The older art is attributed to the Basketmaker and Ancestral Puebloan people who inhabited this region from approximately 500 B.C. to 1350 A.D. The more recent petroglyphs are attributed to the Ute people who still live in the Four Corners area. | Tess Crowley, Deseret News



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing expected to wrap up Friday – KSLNewsRadio

Published

on

Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing expected to wrap up Friday – KSLNewsRadio


PROVO — The preliminary hearing for Tyler Robinson is expected to wrap up Friday morning in Provo. But it will still be several weeks before a decision is made on whether there is enough probable cause to bind him over for trial.

Robinson, 23, is charged with 10 crimes, the most serious being aggravated murder, in the death of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed on the campus of Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025. A preliminary hearing is held to determine whether there is sufficient probable cause to go to trial on the charges levied against a defendant.

The Utah County Attorney’s Office finished calling their witnesses to testify on Thursday. Robinson’s defense team, who have already called two forensic experts from the FBI and ATF to testify, are expected to call one more on Friday before resting. Robinson has been attempting to cast doubt on the reliability of DNA testing, arguing that test results are subjective.

Prosecutors have objected several times to the line of questioning, arguing that it falls well outside the bounds of what is needed for a preliminary hearing. Even 4th District Judge Tony Graf warned defense attorney Michael Burt on Thursday during one line of questioning, “I feel we are exiting the orbit of probable cause.”

Advertisement

At the end of a preliminary hearing, both sides typically give closing arguments, and the judge decides if there is enough evidence for a defendant to proceed to trial. On Thursday, Graf granted a defense motion for each side to first submit briefs summarizing their arguments. The state will submit its brief by July 28, followed by the defense’s reply on Aug. 11 and the state’s rebuttal on Aug. 18. After that, another hearing will be held on Sept. 1 for both sides to present their cases in court.

Also on Thursday, portions of the video interview of Robinson’s roommate and boyfriend at the time of Kirk’s death, Lance Twiggs, were shown to the courtroom after much debate.

In addition, screenshots of the text messages exchanged between Twiggs and Robinson, a note Robinson left for Twiggs and messages on Discord that Robinson allegedly sent to his friend group prior to turning himself in, were all displayed in court.

For each piece of evidence introduced during the week-long hearing, Graf has had to decide:

  1. Whether to admit that evidence into the record;
  2. Whether that evidence should be shown to everyone in the courtroom;
  3. Whether that evidence can be filmed by the livestream camera broadcasting the hearing.

Robinson’s defense team remains adamant that broadcasting evidence to people outside the courtroom will jeopardize their client’s right to a fair trial by prejudging a future jury pool. Prosecutors want the evidence shown to everyone for the sake of transparency. Graf has compromised on several pieces of evidence by allowing them to be displayed to people in the courtroom but not on the livestream feed.

The extended debates over what evidence can be shown to the public and what is only viewed by attorneys and the judge have prompted Jeff Neiman, the attorney for Erika Kirk and the Kirk family, to address the courtroom several times, both in person and in a briefing filed Wednesday night, calling on the court to make all evidence public.

Advertisement

“For 10 months, the victim’s family has waited for this preliminary hearing. Erika Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk, and his grieving parents traveled to this courtroom for one reason: to be present at these proceedings and to bear witness to the evidence concerning the death of their husband and son. At certain points throughout the preliminary hearing, the Kirk family sat in the room while evidence was admitted but not presented for their viewing. They were present in body, yet denied the very thing their presence was meant to secure: their ability to meaningfully observe the preliminary hearing,” Neiman said. “The victim’s family’s position is simple. At a minimum, every exhibit entered into evidence during the preliminary hearing must be visible to every person lawfully present in the courtroom.”

Erika Kirk and Charlie Kirk’s parents have been in the courtroom all week for the preliminary hearing.

At Neiman’s request, Graf agreed that at the end of court on Friday, he will show to the courtroom only the enhanced UVU surveillance video allegedly showing Robinson’s movements across the roof of the Losee Center and when he drops off the roof and runs to a wooded area off Campus Drive. The video includes moments in which film editors zoom in on the alleged gunman and impose a red circle around him to make it easier to view. The video was originally submitted as evidence but was only shown to Graf and attorneys.

Friday’s hearing begins at 9 a.m. Watch it livestreamed here:

We want to hear from you.

Have a story idea or tip? Send it to the KSL NewsRadio team here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending