Connect with us

Utah

The University of Utah withdrew its sponsorship of a student group. The club took over a school office in protest.

Published

on

The University of Utah withdrew its sponsorship of a student group. The club took over a school office in protest.


A student group at the University of Utah is demanding to be reinstated after the school withdrew its sponsorship last week following recent rallies led by the club — including one in support of Palestine.

Student members of MEChA protested for nearly six hours Wednesday, calling the decision “censorship” and chanting “we will not be silenced” into megaphones. At one point, they took over an office on campus, refusing to leave until the U.’s administration agreed to meet with them.

“We have been targeted by the university for speaking out,” one of the students shouted.

More than 150 students, many from marginalized communities, joined the protest at the Center for Student Equity and Belonging. They spread out and occupied that space for more than an hour, packing the office from wall to wall while waving a Palestinian flag.

Advertisement

That center had sent MEChA the letter on Nov. 9, signed by Associate Director Montelleo D. Hobley Jr., that announced it was pulling its sponsorship because of “behavior that violates university policy.” It came on the same day as the group’s march in solidarity with Palestinians during the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, and about a week after the group had also protested an event about the transgender community held by a conservative student club on campus. The U. said the decision to revoke its sponsorship wasn’t because of the Palestine rally but rather due to MEChA disrupting that latter event to the point it had to be canceled.

The U.’s chapter of MEChA, which stands for Movimiento Estudiantil Chicanx de Aztlán, is part of a national organization that started to represent Latino students; “mecha” also translates to fuse or wick. It has shifted into more of a political group for all underrepresented populations — particularly students of color and LGBTQ students. MEChA de U of U describes itself as “anti-imperialist, anti-colonial, socialist.”

In addition to withdrawing the group’s approval, the Center for Student Equity also stated that the club’s annual conference mainly for high school students of color — in its 28th year at the U. — would be canceled six days before it was supposed to be held.

The club still had the ballroom of the U.’s Union reserved for the event, and they started their sit-in there before moving to the center’s offices. They stomped on the hardwood floors and banged their hands on the tables. “Whose campus?” they shouted. “Our campus.”

“Students deserve to feel represented in higher education,” said Chantal Irungaray, a Latina student and a leader in MEChA, which she said has about 200 active members. “Black and brown students should have space here.”

Advertisement

On Wednesday, a university spokesperson responding to the sit-in pointed to a statement the school had issued last week about club sponsorships and the limitations of free speech on campus.

“The time, place and manner of persons exercising their rights of free expression, speech, assembly and religious worship are subject to campus regulation,” it states. Additionally it notes that all student organizations are held to “student behavior standards.”

The school also released a statement from Mary Ann Villarreal, the vice president for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) at the University of Utah. The letter was drafted as a response to individuals emailing her upset about withdrawing MEChA’s sponsorship.

“I want to assure you that this decision was not an easy one,” she wrote, “and was made only after thorough deliberation, including careful consideration of what chances there might be for an alternate solution.”

Without sponsorship, the club will now be a “registered student organization.” That means it doesn’t have to have an advisor, and is not formally considered a part of the university and cannot use university trademarks.

Advertisement

The students of MEChA rallying Wednesday called for Villarreal’s resignation and alleged that the U.’s support of equity and diversity is performative and suggested it was “phony EDI.” They feel the university is trying to silence them for standing with Palestine, but the school said that’s not the case.

Demonstrations over the Israel-Hamas war have sparked tensions on college and university campuses across the nation. And student groups have met pushback as they express support for Palestinians. The U.S. Senate last month passed a resolution specifically condemning what it called “anti-Israel, pro-Hamas student groups.” Columbia University in New York suspended two pro-Palestinian student groups for allegedly violating campus policy.

The first rally

The first event that spurred backlash at the U. with MEChA was the group’s protest on Nov. 1 at an event held by a conservative campus club.

The U.’s chapter of Young Americans for Freedom was hosting a screening of the movie “Damaged: The Transing of America’s Kids,” a documentary about transgender individuals who transitioned and later returned to their gender assigned at birth.

Advertisement

To advertise for the event, Young Americans for Freedom hung up posters around campus that said, “Men shouldn’t be in women’s bathrooms” and “The transgender movement harms women.” They were approved for posting by the University of Utah.

MEChA students saw those flyers and posted photos of them on their Instagram page, calling them transphobic. They organized what they called an “emergency protest” of the event.

About 50 MEChA students showed up filling the seats in the room at the Marriott Library, waving posters and shouting over the Young Americans for Freedom speakers. They chanted, “Trans people are welcome here.”

University of Utah police officers asked the MEChA students to leave after about 15 minutes, saying they were disrupting the event. The Salt Lake Tribune has seen video of an officer grabbing a student and putting the student’s hands behind their back. At that point, U. police shut down the Young Americans for Freedom screening.

U. spokesperson Rebecca Walsh says that no students were arrested at the event and none, as of Wednesday, have been referred for criminal prosecution or student discipline.

Advertisement

U. police has turned over body camera footage to Salt Lake District Attorney Sim Gill’s office for review. When asked if charges were being looked at, Walsh said, “It’s an ongoing investigation.”

“We’re being looked at as if we’re terrorists,” said Julio Irungaray, Chantal’s brother and a member of MEChA.

The U. has largely pointed to MEChA’s actions at that event as the reason for pulling the group’s sponsorship. In the letter from the Center for Student Equity and Belonging, the school wrote: “The law does not permit one side of a dispute to disrupt and prevent another from peacefully speaking their mind.”

In the statement from the U. on free speech on Nov. 11, the school added that it is prohibited to infringe “on the speech of another, for example, by creating noise to drown out a speaker.” University police, it said, will step in when that happens.

Villarreal added in her statement, as well: “What we cannot allow is for any student organization to shout down or shut down another student group’s programming or speech … no matter how vigorously they might oppose the message.”

Advertisement

The U.’s LGBT Resource Center also put out a statement on social media, criticizing the event and saying it is “shocked, horrified and saddened” by the flyers.

But the school said signs and posters are also covered by the university’s speech policy, and the Young Americans for Freedom’s flyers didn’t violate that because they weren’t targeting an individual, inciting violence or threatening someone.

“Groups that follow these rules may still post flyers and signs that are offensive to identities, beliefs and cultures of other campus community members,” the school wrote.

Lucy Atwood, chair of the U.’s Young Americans for Freedom chapter — which is a “registered” student group — said in a statement to The Tribune: “The University of Utah has an obligation to ensure we can exercise our first amendment rights by bringing conservative speakers to campus without the threat of a hecklers veto – a fact that we have made the school legally aware of. The beliefs and ideas of conservatives matter and our voices will be heard.”

The second rally

MEChA held its rally in support of Palestinians on Nov. 9. Hundreds of students joined in the march across campus, carrying signs that said “Viva Palestina” and chanting “From the river to the sea.”

Advertisement

The letter from the university pulling their sponsorship came later that day.

“It’s not a coincidence,” believes Julio Irungaray.

MEChA students say they feel they’re being punished for supporting Palestine.

In particular, they believe the University of Utah benefits from grants from Israel. In 2019, for instance, the school accepted $123,000 from the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation for private research. That year, the U. received $3 million total from foreign donors.

The university, though, issued a statement in October, condemning all violence in the ongoing war. “We are horrified by the continuing violence, death and destruction in the Middle East and its impact on members of our campus community,” the school said.

Advertisement

MEChA is demanding that the U. cut any ties with Israel and issue a strong statement against the killing of Palestinian people.

“Resistance is justified when people are occupied,” shouted Muna Omar, a Palestinian and U. alumnus who joined the MEChA rally Wednesday. She started a Students for Justice in Palestine chapter at the University of Utah when she was a student eight years ago.

The university said it did not pull the sponsorship of MEChA because of its support for Palestine.

Villarreal wrote in her letter: “I feel the need to make it clear: MEChA’s status was not changed because of their decision to participate in protests or because of their message. The division of Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion, CESB, and the entire university stand strongly in support MEChA’s right to speak out on important issues and to make the voices of its members heard. That is fundamental to a democratic society.”

But, she said, student organizations, in order to be sponsored by the U., must abide by the rules and take direction from their sponsoring office — in this case the Center for Student Equity and Belonging.

Advertisement

“Though EDI and CESB made several requests to have open dialogue and share guidance with MEChA, those attempts were largely rebuffed, and directives were continually ignored,” Villarreal added.

MEChA has received support from groups across the state, as well as alumni of the club, including Utah Rep. Angela Romero, D-Salt Lake City, who posted in support of the students. Two members of Brigham Young University’s Black Menaces also joined the rally Wednesday. And several other students group at the U. joined in solidarity, with the Pacific Islander Student Association putting out a statement that said when one marginalized group is attacked, all are.

Meeting with school leadership

MEChA students said Wednesday that they want their sponsorship reinstated, as well as full autonomy over their club. They passed around lists of their demands during their sit-in, which also included the U. rescheduling their high school conference and guaranteeing that MEChA would lead it.

About 300 students annually attend that event, which is focused on those from marginalized communities. Evelyn Solares, the lead organized in MEChA for that, said it’s a chance for Black and brown students to see themselves in higher education.

She’s frustrated by the cancelation, she said, because the U. touts itself as a minority-serving institution. But then, she said, it turned its back on those kids who might not otherwise have an opportunity to visit a campus.

Advertisement

“It was more than just an event,” added Alondra Morales, another organizer of the conference for MEChA. She then shouted, “La lucha sigue” (“The struggle continues”).

Villarreal said in her letter that the U. is looking to reschedule the conference for spring 2024.

After holding their sit-in for five and half hours Thursday, the students secured a meeting for Monday at noon, saying they wouldn’t leave until a date and time was set.

At the end of their rally, they clapped and one student shouted, “La unión hace la fuerza” (“Unity makes strength”). It’s the motto for MEChA.

(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Chantal Irungaray talks to University of Utah Student Body President, Jack O’Leary, as the group Mecha occupies the Union Ballroom during a protest on the University of Utah Campus, on Wednesday, Nov. 15, 2023.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Could EPA air quality standards be Utah’s first test of its new sovereignty law?

Published

on

Could EPA air quality standards be Utah’s first test of its new sovereignty law?


Top Utah officials aren’t happy with federal air quality standards. And their ammunition to fight back could jeopardize the state’s federal highway funding or even the federal government overriding how the state handles air quality to begin with.

In February, Gov. Spencer Cox called the stricter regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency “onerous” and “so stringent” that it will be “impossible” for the state to comply. The EPA reduced the amount of PM2.5 and ozone pollution allowed in the atmosphere, making it harder to fall within the attainment standards, which Utah hasn’t met since 2006. The Utah Attorney General’s Office has filed and joined other states in challenging the agency over its mandates, like the “Good Neighbor Rule,” which targets ozone pollution emitted across state lines.

The majority of the Utah Legislature is so unhappy with the regulations it partly inspired a new state law that aims to push back. Republican Sen. Scott Sandall’s 2024 “Utah Constitutional Sovereignty Act” sets up a process for the state to opt out of federal regulations they deem as overreach.

The first test of the new statute could be the looming air quality battle the state is picking over the updated air quality standards and the Clean Air Act. But it won’t be an easy sell.

Advertisement

“If the state wants to test the red line,” said Brigham Daniels, a law professor at the University of Utah, “this is a risky one.”

During a May 15 Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim Committee meeting, Bryce Bird, the director of the Utah Division of Air Quality, said Utah is “still really struggling” to meet EPA ozone standards, especially in Salt Lake, Davis and parts of Weber and Tooele counties. But if the state doesn’t fall within the attainment zone of 70 parts per million, which is considered protective of public health, Utah could face federal funding sanctions.

“That prevents both federal funds being used to expand transportation projects here in that non-attainment area, but it also prohibits state funding from being used for regionally significant projects,” Bird said. “So it really does have that direct impact on the fastest growing metropolitan area in the country.”

If Utah still doesn’t clean up the air after funding is frozen, Bird said the federal government could swoop in and create its own plan for how Utah will meet ozone standards. If that comes to pass, the state “will lose flexibility and input into the plan.”

Utah and the Intermountain West face an uphill battle when it comes to meeting EPA ozone standards. Bird said states like Arizona, Utah and Colorado have “higher natural concentrations of ozone and a greater impact from international transport of the precursor emissions to ozone formation,” which places some of the problem outside of the state’s control.

Advertisement

The fact that Utah isn’t solely responsible for ozone pollution within its boundaries is Sandall’s biggest complaint, calling it “the heart of the heartburn,” and that Utah doesn’t have to “try to comply to an uncontrollable standard.”

“That’s the message that we’ve got to send to the federal government is we can’t do that. There’s no way,” he said during the May 15 meeting. “So whether we do that through legislation, whether we do that through a lawsuit, whatever we do, we have to be the ones to say no.”

Republican Rep. Casey Snider followed Sandall’s comments by stating “perhaps there needs to be a fundamental shift in the key objectives” of the Utah Division of Air Quality centered around “pushing back on this overzealous nature of the federal government rather than simply complying with the impossible.”

Daniels said he’s sympathetic to the predicament the state is in because of what the EPA considers to be “a healthy air quality will be very difficult for the state to obtain,” given the outside exacerbating factors. But challenging the Clean Air Act isn’t that simple.

From his perspective, if Utah does take the steps to challenge the Clean Air Act under the Utah Constitutional Sovereignty Act, the state is likely to fail because of the Supremacy Clause, which says the Constitution and federal statutes are “the supreme law of the land,” trumping any state laws.

Advertisement

Daniels added EPA employees are mandated by federal law to enforce the consequences of a state not complying with standards set by the Clean Air Act and a state sovereignty clause won’t stop them from doing so either.

“Within the realm of environmental law and natural resources law, you almost couldn’t have chosen a worse statute to gamble with,” Daniels said. “Because the federal government doesn’t have any discretion about whether or not it moves forward with sanctions.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

What the new ESPN SP+ rankings tell us about BYU, Utah and Utah State

Published

on

What the new ESPN SP+ rankings tell us about BYU, Utah and Utah State


While there is still plenty of time until the 2024 college football season kicks off — for BYU and Utah State, the season is 100 days away, and 98 for Utah — that doesn’t stop the influx of discussion about the upcoming year.

One of the staples of preseason chatter is ESPN’s SP+ rankings, and earlier this week, Bill Connelly released his latest edition, i.e., the post-spring edition, and there are varying expectations for the three Utah FBS schools.

For the Utes, the 2024 season presents the chance to make a big impression in a new conference, the Big 12, while making a run at the expanded College Football Playoff with Cam Rising back and healthy.

For the Cougars, this year is projected to be another difficult learning season as the program adjusts to life at the power conference level.

Advertisement

And for the Aggies, there’s been plenty of turnover again, though perhaps less pessimism surrounds the program heading into 2024 — and a hope the school can finish in the upper half of the Mountain West.

What does Connelly’s latest SP+ rankings — which are calculated on returning production, recent recruiting and recent history — project for these three schools?

These insights give a glimpse at how Utah, BYU and Utah State are viewed on a national scale heading into the year.

As Connelly explains, “SP+ is a tempo- and opponent-adjusted measure of college football efficiency. It is a predictive measure of the most sustainable and predictable aspects of football, not a résumé ranking, and along those lines, these projections aren’t intended to be a guess at what the AP Top 25 will look like at the end of the season. These are simply early offseason power rankings based on the information we have been able to gather to date.”

BYU football coach Kalani Sitake signs an autograph after the BYU alumni game at BYU in Provo on Friday, March 22, 2024. | Kristin Murphy, Deseret News

Where does BYU football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

  • BYU ranks No. 67 nationally in the SP+ metrics with an overall minus-2.0 rating, a two-spot drop from the preseason SP+ rankings released in February.
  • That includes BYU rating No. 63 on offense, No. 84 on defense and No. 11 on special teams.
  • By comparison, the Cougars were No. 60 overall in last year’s post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings. BYU went 5-7 last season.
  • The Cougars rank 12th among the new-look Big 12 Conference in the SP+ rankings, just ahead of Colorado (No. 69) and Cincinnati (No. 70) and just behind Baylor (No. 61). Only two of BYU’s conference games this season — at Houston (No. 79) and vs. Arizona State (No. 88), both in late November — come against Big 12 teams below the Cougars in the SP+ rankings.
  • There are four Big 12 teams in the top 25 of the SP+ rankings: Kansas State (No. 17), Utah (No. 18), Oklahoma State (No. 20) and Arizona (No. 24). BYU plays all four this season, with only one road game at the Utes.
  • BYU is ranked more than 40 spots below one of its two FBS nonconference opponents — SMU comes in at No. 23 — while the other, Wyoming, is behind the Cougars, at No. 87.
  • The Big 12 is third among all FBS leagues in average SP+ ranking, behind only the SEC and Big Ten.
  • BYU ranks 55th nationally in returning production at 65%, per Connelly’s numbers. That includes ranking No. 52 on offense (66%) and No. 51 on defense (64%).

Where does Utah football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

  • Utah ranks No. 18 nationally in the SP+ metrics with an overall 16.1 rating, a one-spot drop from the preseason SP+ rankings released in February.
  • That includes Utah rating No. 39 on offense, No. 11 on defense and No. 34 on special teams.
  • By comparison, the Utes were No. 14 overall in last year’s post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings. Utah went 8-5 last season while dealing with a litany of injuries.
  • The Utes rank second among the new-look Big 12 Conference in the SP+ rankings in their first year in the league, just one spot behind Kansas State (No. 17) and ahead of Oklahoma State (No. 20) and Arizona (No. 24). Utah plays at Oklahoma State and home against Arizona in back-to-back weeks to start conference play, but avoids playing Kansas State.
  • Utah is ranked well ahead of its two FBS nonconference opponents — Baylor comes in at No. 61, while Utah State is No. 101. While both Utah and Baylor are now in the same conference, that will be a non-league game.
  • The Big 12 is third among all FBS leagues in average SP+ ranking, behind only the SEC and Big Ten.
  • Utah ranks 43rd nationally in returning production at 66%, per Connelly’s numbers. That includes ranking No. 61 on offense (63%) and No. 33 on defense (69%).

Big 12 teams in the post-spring SP+ rankings

17. Kansas State.

18. Utah.

Advertisement

20. Oklahoma State.

24. Arizona.

30. Iowa State.

34. West Virginia.

36. TCU.

Advertisement

37. Kansas.

42. Texas Tech.

48. UCF.

61. Baylor.

67. BYU.

Advertisement

69. Colorado.

70. Cincinnati.

79. Houston.

88. Arizona State.

Utah State head coach Blake Anderson looks up a the videoboard late in second half of the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl NCAA college football game against Georgia State, Saturday, Dec. 23, 2023, in Boise, Idaho. (AP Photo/Steve Conner) | Steve Conner, Associated Press

Where does Utah State football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

  • Utah State ranks No. 101 nationally in the SP+ metrics with an overall minus-11.0 rating, a six-spot drop from the preseason SP+ rankings released in February.
  • That includes Utah State rating No. 49 on offense, No. 132 on defense and No. 92 on special teams.
  • By comparison, the Aggies were No. 116 overall in last year’s post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings. Utah State went 6-7 last season with a bowl game loss.
  • The Aggies rank eighth among Mountain West teams in the SP+ rankings, just behind Colorado State (No. 98) and Hawaii (No. 100) and slightly ahead of San Diego State (No. 14).
  • Utah State’s conference opener will be against the highest-ranked MWC team in the SP+ rankings, No. 38 Boise State. The game is set for Oct. 5 in Boise.
  • Utah State will play three FBS nonconference opponents this year — both Utah (No. 18) and USC (No. 21) are in the SP+ top 25, while Temple is three from the bottom at No. 132.
  • The MWC is sixth among all FBS leagues in average SP+ ranking, behind fellow Group of 5 league the Sun Belt Conference and ahead of the American Athletic Conference.
  • Utah State ranks 86th nationally in returning production at 57%, per Connelly’s numbers. That includes ranking No. 43 on offense (68%) and No. 110 on defense (47%).
  • That’s a significant improvement over the post-spring SP+ returning production numbers last year, when Utah State ranked 127th nationally (41%).

Mountain West Conference teams in the post-spring SP+ rankings

38. Boise State.

57. Fresno State.

Advertisement

71. UNLV.

87. Wyoming.

92. Air Force.

98. Colorado State.

100. Hawaii.

Advertisement

101. Utah State.

104. San Diego State.

112. San Jose State.

121. Nevada.

131. New Mexico.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Former North American leaders descend on SLC for international trade conference

Published

on

Former North American leaders descend on SLC for international trade conference


Utah’s rising prominence as a player in the global business landscape was the focus of a Thursday conference in Salt Lake City that included an impressive roster of domestic and international leaders including former President George W. Bush, former Mexican President Vicente Fox and past Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Natalie Gochnour, associate dean for the University of Utah’s David Eccles School of Business and director of the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute, told attendees of the Crossroads of the World Summit at downtown’s Grand America hotel that Utah had already established itself as the crossroads of the West and was building an argument for a more ascendant position.

“What I do know is we’re the undisputed crossroads of the West and that’s the seed corn for being the crossroads of the world,” Gochnour said.

Gochnour shared data that reflects Utah’s outsize performance when it comes to global trade, including a comparison of the state’s rankings of 30th in the country in terms of population, 29th largest economy but 16th on a basis of per capita export values.

Advertisement

Gochnour also pointed out that, among western states, Utah has the third highest per capita export ranking, even beating out economic powerhouse California.

“It’s a pretty big punch,” Gochnour said.

While Bush was among the marquee speakers at Thursday’s event, the former president’s presentation was closed to media.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox quipped about his role as the state’s CBO — Chief Bragging Officer — and shared an anecdote from a recent trip to Vancouver, B.C., where he attended a TED conference.

Cox said he shared a dinner table with a well-known hedge fund billionaire, who he declined to identify, who said Utah’s most powerful built-in asset was the shared characteristics of its residents as smart, hard-working people who prioritize their families.

Advertisement

“Those are Utah values and they used to be American values,” Cox said. “Utah is what America used to be and, I hope, what it can be again.

“I can say those things (about Utah) but to hear it from someone else … I thought a lot about that conversation.”

This story will be updated.

From left, former Mexican President Vicente Fox and former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper speak with Mark Garfield at the Crossroads of the World International Trade Summit at the Grand America Hotel in Salt Lake City on Thursday, May 23, 2024. | Megan Nielsen, Deseret News



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending