Connect with us

Utah

The two ways to view Utah State football right now

Published

on

The two ways to view Utah State football right now


Utah State football is 1-4 to start the 2024 season.

After a season opening win over Robert Morris, there was the shutout loss to USC, the heartbreaking loss to Utah, the devastating loss to Temple and Saturday night in Boise against the No. 21-ranked Broncos there was the oh-so-familiar loss.

Utah State lost to Boise State 62-30. It was the ninth straight loss to BSU by USU, and much like the ones that came before it the Aggies weren’t especially close in the end.

A quick look at the Broncos’ final offensive statistics tell much of the story.

Advertisement

Boise State finished with nearly 600 yards of offense (599), rushed for 296 yards at an average clip of seven yards per carry and threw for 303 yards at a average clip of 11.7 yards per reception.

And that was with star running back Ashton Jeanty playing only the first half.

Jeanty, by the way, finished with 186 yards rushing and three touchdowns on just 13 carries.

When the game was on the line — the first half essentially — Boise State had its way with Utah State, enough times at least to score 49 points through two quarters while holding the Aggies to just 17.

If that sounds familiar it is because that is what has happened nearly every year the teams have met on the gridiron (Boise State now leads the all-time series 24-5, with USU’s last win coming in 2015).

Advertisement

Boise State has been in a different class than Utah State. It as simple as that, and narrowing that gap remains the ever-present goal that seems to be always out of reach.

Said USU interim head coach Nate Dreiling afterward: “We saw where we need to get to. From a physicality standpoint they set the tone on that and we have work to do, which is not good. We know where the bar is, especially moving to the Pac-12.”

That Utah State lost to Boise State wasn’t surprising, nor were the losses to USC and Utah. The loss to Temple remains the only real surprising result.

But has the slow start to the season — four losses in five games — doomed the Aggies? Or is their reason to hope that a turnaround is just around the corner?

After the loss to the Broncos there are essentially two ways to look at USU football right now.

Advertisement

The pessimist’s view of Utah State

Boise State wide receiver Cameron Bates (80) stiff arms a Utah State defender on a run in the second half of an NCAA college football game, Saturday, Oct. 5, 2024, in Boise, Idaho. Boise State won 62-30. (AP Photo/Steve Conner) | Steve Conner

In their four losses this season, the Aggies have been outscored 193-80. That is a point differential of 113. Interestingly enough, USU has scored a total of 116 points this year through five games.

More than anything else, that says — loudly — that USU’s defense has not taken a leap forward this season, or anything close to it.

Ranked No. 117 in total defense at the end of the 2023 season, USU currently ranks No. 123 this year.

The competition has been better than a year ago — much better — what with USU having played three ranked opponents already, but statistically the Aggies have regressed from last year.

As a reminder, Utah State gave up 45 points in a blowout loss to Georgia State in the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl last season. Oh, and the Aggies also gave 41 points to New Mexico, 45 points to Boise State and 42 points to San Jose State, to refresh some memories.

Advertisement

And yet, per the numbers, the defense this year has been worse.

Whether or not those numbers are fair, Dreiling knows his defense has to improve. By every objective measure right now, Utah State is losing games mostly because of its defense.

“Defensively we are just too far behind and our margin for error is so small,” Dreiling said. “We have some making up to do. We have played three ranked teams in the last four weeks, so when we get back to our ‘more normal’ competition I hope these games pay off.

“We played some really good teams. I think we are getting better from it, though it may not be showing on the scoreboard. But ultimately we have to get back to work.”

He added, specific to USU’s defensive showing against Boise State, “We are not performing like we need to. We need to execute better. This was a pretty embarrassing performance.”

Advertisement

The question now is do the Aggies have the time and personnel to get better?

Multiple key defensive linemen are injured. Dreiling noted that defensive tackles Miguel Jackson and Taz Williams are out for the season with shoulder injuries, and defensive end Blaine Spires — arguably USU’s best pass rusher — is expected to miss six weeks with a broken toe.

It is bad enough that Seni Tuiaki came out of medical retirement this week to give USU some needed depth along the defensive line for the Boise State game.

Dreiling noted that the Aggies’ defense played better in the second half against Boise State, and he was proud of the performance. It just didn’t matter because the game was already out of hand.

“I am proud of how they are working, we are just not executing like we practice,” Dreiling said. “I need to find a better way to get them to truly understand what we are doing.

Advertisement

“We are giving up way too many explosive plays and when you do, those are hard to overcome. They are playing hard, they want to win, we just aren’t doing all the little things right now and I have to figure out what those are.”

Can he? Can the Aggies figure things out?

Through five games things don’t look all that encouraging, and though the stiffness of competition is set to lower a little, USU still plays UNLV and Washington State, plus a bunch of other MW teams that are at or near the level of Utah State talent-wise.

There might be reason to hope that Utah State’s offense can bridge the gap, carry extra weight if you will, but thus far that hasn’t happened, nor anything really close to that.

And on a night when the Aggies put up 30 points, racked up 500 yards of offense and had multiple career outings from top players, they still lost by more than 30.

Advertisement

Quarterback Spencer Petras played well against Boise State, possibly the best game of his collegiate career. Jalen Royals had two touchdown receptions of 50-plus yards, the Aggies’ offensive line gave up a single sack against a Boise State defense known for getting to QBs and still Utah State was never got closer than 18 points after the nine minute mark in the second quarter.

It doesn’t seem like there is much chance of the offense carrying the defense’s slack, and for the Aggies, sitting at 1-4, there isn’t a lot of time to turn things around and not a whole lot of evidence that USU can.

The optimist’s view of Utah State

Utah State running back Rahsul Faison (3) runs with the ball against Boise State in the second half of an NCAA college football game, Saturday, Oct. 5, 2024, in Boise, Idaho. Boise State won 62-30. (AP Photo/Steve Conner) | Steve Conner

Against Boise State, the Aggies’ offense did something for only the sixth time ever and for the first time since the 2001 season.

Utah State finished the game with a 300-yard passer (Petras), a 200-yard receiver (Royals) and a 100-yard rusher (Rahsul Faison), and they did it against a Boise State team that is the favorite to win the Mountain West Conference and probably make the first 12-team College Football Playoff.

After some up-and-down play in earlier games, the Aggies’ offense played to its capabilities Saturday and it was something to watch.

Royals made history. He is now tied for fifth all-time in career touchdown receptions at Utah State, among other things. He looked as good as any player on the field, Jeanty included.

Advertisement

“I don’t want to offend any of my former teammates, but I don’t think (I’ve played with a player like Royals before),” Petras said. “He is pretty special. A special player. He is really talented, and the best thing about it is he is like the best dude in the world also.”

It wasn’t just Royals Saturday.

Faison rushed for 100 yards for the third straight game, and in the process put his name at the level of former Aggie standout Kerwynn Williams. Faison routinely made Boise State defenders miss tackles, and when they did hit him, he rarely went down easily.

Petras was accurate, poised and finally showed off the arm USU coaches have praised since he got to Logan. Short, intermediate, deep — it didn’t matter the type of pass or where on the field, he proved capable of making it.

Utah State’s offensive line may have had its best overall performance of the season. The unit gave up a single sack — on the first play of the game (Petras took the blame for it) — and after that was arguably the best unit on the field for either team.

Advertisement

“Our offensive line is so close. They continue to fight,” Dreiling said. “What are we, 1-4 or 1-5? I don’t even know and it doesn’t matter, if you walk into the O-line they are smiling and working their butts off and it is showing up on game day.

“Boise State had seven sacks last week versus (Washington State). To hold them to one tonight and have a tailback with over 100 yards rushing… they are playing their butts off.”

Was Utah State’s offense perfect against Boise State? Of course not, but the 30 points scored were the most by an Aggie team against the Broncos since 2015, when Utah State beat Boise State 52-26. It was the most point scored in a losing effort against Boise State since Utah State scored 38 in a 2002 loss in Boise.

The USU defense struggled mightily against Boise State, as detailed above, but those struggles were rather specific. Take away two long touchdown runs for Jeanty — he broke tackles on both runs as Aggie defenders were there to make the play and didn’t — and USU held him to 48 yards on 11 carries, and Utah State did that with a remade defensive line, playing many third string players in key moments.

The Aggies also gave up a lot of passing yards against Boise State and Maddux Madsen — 256 to be exact — but it was by design.

Advertisement

“We put as many bodies in the box to prevent Jeanty,” Dreiling said. “If this quarterback was going to be on he was going to be on. Our game plan was very simple, make sure (Jeanty) didn’t beat us. If they were going to throw for 400 yards that was a risk we were willing to take to take (Jeanty) out of the game.”

If you take away a 96-yard kick off return by Dylan Riley, a rare mistake by the Aggies’ coverage team, all of the sudden the 62 points scored by Boise State become 41. Still a lot of points to be sure, but much more manageable, and the Aggies’ defensive performance doesn’t look nearly as bad, considering the game was played on the Smurf Turf against the best team in the MW.

“At the end of the day, I think we will be fine,” safety Ike Larsen said. “If this group quits, I’ll be really surprised.”

Then there is the record. Yes, the Aggies are 1-4 on the year, but they’ll be the first to tell you that they are 0-1 in conference play and they probably just played the best team they’ll see the rest of the season.

They have time to turn things around, and don’t forget, they have made a habit out of rallying from poor starts to seasons and finishing bowl eligible.

Advertisement

Belief remains. Utah State believes it is getting better, even if the scoreboard and win-loss record doesn’t suggest it.

“We’ve gotten better at a lot of spots,” Larsen said. “We obviously aren’t where we want to be. We are 1-4 or whatever. I don’t care, but we are playing good.”

Added Petras: “We are going to be playing our best football in November, and it is a race to get there. Each week it is ‘How do we improve? And hopefully we continue to grow.”



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

911 recordings detail hours leading up to discovery of Utah girl, mother dead in Las Vegas

Published

on

911 recordings detail hours leading up to discovery of Utah girl, mother dead in Las Vegas


CONTENT WARNING: This report discusses suicide and includes descriptions of audio from 911 calls that some viewers may find disturbing.

LAS VEGAS — Exclusively obtained 911 recordings detail the hours leading up to the discovery of an 11-year-old Utah girl and her mother dead inside a Las Vegas hotel room in an apparent murder-suicide.

Addi Smith and her mother, Tawnia McGeehan, lived in West Jordan and had traveled to Nevada for the JAMZ cheerleading competition.

The calls show a growing sense of urgency from family members and coaches, and several hours passing before relatives learned what happened.

Advertisement

MORE | Murder-Suicide

Below is a timeline of the key moments, according to dispatch records. All times are Pacific Time.

10:33 a.m. — Call 1

After Addi and her mother failed to appear at the cheerleading competition, Addi’s father and stepmother called dispatch for a welfare check.

Addi and her mother were staying at the Rio hotel. The father told dispatch that hotel security had already attempted contact.

“Security went up and knocked on the door. There’s no answer or response it doesn’t look like they checked out or anything…”

11:18 a.m. and 11:27 a.m. — Calls 2 and 3

As concern grew, Addi’s coach contacted the police two times within minutes.

Advertisement

“We think the child possibly is in imminent danger…”

11:26 a.m. — Call 4

Addi’s stepmother placed another call to dispatch, expressing escalating concern.

“We are extremely concerned we believe that something might have seriously happened.”

She said that Tawnia’s car was still at the hotel.

Police indicated officers were on the way.

Advertisement

2:26 p.m. — Call 5

Nearly three hours after the initial welfare check request, fire personnel were en route to the scene. It appeared they had been in contact with hotel security.

Fire told police that they were responding to a possible suicide.

“They found a note on the door.”

2:35 p.m. — Call 6

Emergency medical personnel at the scene told police they had located two victims.

“It’s going to be gunshot wound to the head for both patients with notes”

Advertisement

A dispatcher responded:

“Oh my goodness that’s not okay.”

2:36 p.m. — Call 7

Moments later, fire personnel relayed their assessment to law enforcement:

“It’s going to be a murder suicide, a juvenile and a mother.”

2:39 p.m. — Call 8

Unaware of what had been discovered, Addi’s father called dispatch again.

Advertisement

“I’m trying to file a missing persons report for my daughter.”

He repeats the details he knows for the second time.

3:13 p.m. — Call 9

Father and stepmother call again seeking information and continue to press for answers.

“We just need some information. There was a room check done around 3:00 we really don’t know where to start with all of this Can we have them call us back immediately?”

Dispatch responded:

Advertisement

“As soon as there’s a free officer, we’ll have them reach out to you.”

4:05 p.m. — Call 10

More than an hour later, Addi’s father was put in contact with the police on the scene. He pleaded for immediate action.

“I need someone there I need someone there looking in that room”

The officer confirmed that they had officers currently in the room.

Addi’s father asks again what they found, if Addi and her mother are there, and if their things were missing.

Advertisement

The officer, who was not on scene, said he had received limited information.

5:23 p.m. — Call 11

Nearly seven hours after the first welfare check request, Addi’s grandmother contacted police, describing conflicting information circulating within the family.

“Some people are telling us that they were able to get in, and they were not in the hotel room, and other people saying they were not able to get in the hotel room, and we need to know”

She repeated the details of the case. Dispatch said officers will call her back once they have more information.

Around 8:00 p.m. — Press Conference

Later that evening, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police held a news conference confirming that Addi and her mother, Tawnia McGeehan, were found dead inside the hotel room.

Advertisement

The investigation remains ongoing.

______



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Ban on AI glasses in Utah classrooms inches closer to passing

Published

on

Ban on AI glasses in Utah classrooms inches closer to passing


AI glasses could allow you to get answers, snap photos, access audio and take phone calls—and now a proposal moving through the legislature would ban the glasses from Utah school classrooms.

“I think it’s a great idea,” said Kizzy Guyton Murphy, a mother who accompanied her child’s class on a field trip to the state Capitol on Wednesday. “You can’t see inside what the student is looking at, and it’s just grounds for cheating.”

Mom Tristan Davies Seamons also sees trouble with AI glasses.

“I don’t think they should have any more technology in schools than they currently have,” she said.

Advertisement

Her twin daughters, fourth graders Finley and Grayson, don’t have cell phones yet.

“Not until we’re like 14,” said Grayson, adding they do have Chromebooks in school.

2News sent questions to the Utah State Board of Education:

  • Does it have reports of students using AI glasses?
  • Does it see cheating and privacy as major concerns?
  • Does it support a ban from classrooms?

Matt Winters, USBE AI specialist, said the board has not received reports from school districts of students with AI glasses.

“Local Education Agencies (school districts) have local control over these decisions based on current law and code,” said Winters. “The Board has not taken a position on AI glasses.

MORE | Utah State Legislature:

Some districts across the country have reportedly put restrictions on the glasses in schools.

Advertisement

“I think it should be up to the teachers,” said Briauna Later, another mother who is all for preventing cheating, but senses a ban could leave administrators with tired eyes.

“It’s one more thing for the administration to have to keep track of,” said Later.

The proposal, HB 42, passed the House and cleared a Senate committee on Wednesday.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Advertisement

___



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Kalshi sues Utah over efforts to stop prop betting in the state

Published

on

Kalshi sues Utah over efforts to stop prop betting in the state


SALT LAKE CITY — A prediction market is suing Utah over plans to regulate proposition betting that it says would run afoul of federal regulations.

Kalshi is a New York-based prediction market that allows users to place “event contracts” on future outcomes and earn a payout if they are correct. Those transactions are regulated through the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, the company said Utah has plans to prevent the company from offering contracts in the state and asked the courts to block any enforcement that “interferes with the operation and function of plaintiffs’ futures market.”

“Plaintiff KalshiEX LLC believes the governor of Utah and the Attorney General’s Office of Utah will imminently bring an enforcement action against Kalshi with the intent to prevent Kalshi from offering event contracts for trading on its federally regulated exchange,” the complaint states. “Defendants have repeatedly represented that they believe Kalshi is operating unlawfully under Utah anti-gambling laws.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit points to a couple of posts from Gov. Spencer Cox and an op-ed written by Attorney General Derek Brown in the Deseret News on Sunday. After Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Mike Selig announced that his agency would “defend its exclusive jurisdiction” over prediction markets last week, Cox took to X calling the markets “gambling — pure and simple.”

“They are destroying the lives of families and countless Americans, especially young men,” he wrote. “They have no place in Utah. Let me be clear, I will use every resource within my disposal as governor of the sovereign state of Utah, and under the Constitution of the United States to beat you in court.”

He followed that up last Thursday, saying Utah is “ready to defend our laws in court and protect Utahns from companies that drive addiction, isolation and serious financial harm.”

In his op-ed, Brown argued that prediction markets are “the newest iteration of gambling” and said he didn’t see a difference between betting and trading futures.

“Although traditional sports betting apps are illegal under Utah law, these platforms argue that they merely allow users to hedge their risk,” he wrote. “But what is the real risk to hedge when you are simply predicting whether LeBron James will score more or less than another player? It’s simply a bet, dressed up in different clothing.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit also comes as the state Legislature is advancing a bill that would clarify that proposition betting — or betting placed on specific players or events during games — falls under the state’s definition of gambling, which is prohibited by the Utah Constitution. HB243 has passed the House and a Senate committee and is awaiting consideration on the Senate floor.

But Kalshi says its contracts are lawful thanks to a carveout in Utah’s anti-gambling laws that allows for “lawful business.” Its lawsuit claims Kalshi’s attorneys made “multiple attempts” to contact Brown about potential action against the company but were “met with silence, even though the Utah AG had previously been willing to communicate with counsel.”

Asked about the lawsuit on Tuesday, Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, said he is “standing with the governor on this one.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending