Connect with us

Utah

Power agency warns of federal backlash, urges Cox to veto Utah coal plant bill

Published

on

Power agency warns of federal backlash, urges Cox to veto Utah coal plant bill


The Intermountain Power Agency has urged Gov. Spencer Cox to veto a recently adopted energy bill, warning the measure could have widespread repercussions for Utah.

SB161, approved during the final week of the 2024 Legislature, could force IPA to sell a coal-fired power plant, which is set to be shut down, to the state to keep it operating.

Cox has until Thursday to take final action on the legislation. His office said Monday he is “still reviewing” the legislation but would not comment further. SB161 fell three votes short of a veto-proof majority in the Utah House and two votes short in the state Senate.

The GOP-controlled Legislature worries the state may not be able to meet the growing population’s electricity needs without coal-fired power plants.

Advertisement

At the same time, IPA is working to shutter its coal-fired power plant in Millard County next summer and switch to a natural gas-powered facility as part of a transition to more environmentally friendly plants.

Under SB161, IPA must apply to the state for a new permit by July 1, 2024, to keep the coal plant operating. But IPA has an agreement with the federal Environmental Protection Agency to cease operation of the coal plant by July 1, 2025.

On March 8, IPA Chair Nick Tatton sent a letter to Cox asking him to veto SB161 and spelling out the potential consequences if he does not. In that letter, obtained through an open records request, Tatton warned that applying for a permit to continue operating the Millard County plant would break the existing agreement with the EPA

“By committing to submit an application for an Alternative Permit by July 1, 2024,” Tatton wrote, “IPA would risk EPA action to effectively shut down the existing coal-fired facilities by mid-November 2024.”

Ash accord

Burning coal for power produces ash that is stored in large ponds. In 2015, the EPA issued new rules for storing coal ash, and those facilities could be closed until they met the new regulations.

Advertisement

In 2018, the EPA triggered the closure of IPA’s ash impoundment units with a mandate that they be brought into compliance by 2021. Because IPA was in the process of closing its coal plants, the EPA agreed to a longer timeline. Tatton noted that SB161 forces IPA to break that deal, which could lead the feds to order a shutdown of those ash storage facilities.

“The risk is real. EPA has taken similar action with respect to coal-fired generating facilities in other states, issuing orders for those facilities to cease operating their impoundments within 135 days,” Tatton wrote. “The only way for IPA to comply with such a mandate would be to cease burning coal — and producing electricity — altogether.”

Tatton warned that Utah will face other risks if Cox signs the bill. It could imperil construction of IPA’s gas-powered plant, dubbed IPA Renewed, for which the organization has issued more than $2 billion in bonds and expects to spend billions more.

Attempting to keep the coal plant open beyond July 1, 2025, might also impact Rocky Mountain Power. The state has submitted its plan for reducing regional haze to the EPA for review. That plan, which is still under evaluation by the federal agency, did not require RMP to install pricey pollution controls on its Hunter and Huntington coal-fired plants because IPA was set to close its coal units.

“Requiring even one of those units to continue operating,” Tatton stated, “will almost certainly require other Utah industrial sites to install costly pollution controls.”

Advertisement

IPA and others raised these concerns with lawmakers during the 2024 session to no avail.

Air quality concerns

On Feb. 28, the same day lawmakers gave final approval to SB161, Tatton and other municipal leaders wrote to Cox, EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan, EPA Region 8 Administrator KC Becker and Utah Department of Environmental Quality Executive Director Kim Shelley.

The letter warned that the legislation could spur a legal dispute, costing taxpayers “substantial amounts of money.” It also said proponents, including sponsoring Sen. Derrin Owens, R-Fountain Green, have falsely asserted the bill does not impact federal law, specifically the regional haze plan

The Feb. 28 letter raised the prospect that Utah’s DEQ was allowing itself to be steamrolled by state lawmakers.

“When faced with the prospect of EPA involvement in this issue, DEQ has urged EPA and state legislators not to become involved because DEQ has been purportedly attempting to resolve the bill’s issues,” the letter said. “However, through asking direct questions to DEQ leadership about its efforts to oppose SB161, IPA’s representatives learned that DEQ is not effectively engaged to keep SB161 from passing or to request amendments to SB161 to address our legal and practical concerns. Today’s actions by the Utah House of Representatives underscore the fact that DEQ does not have the situation under control.”

Advertisement

The EPA responded March 7, explaining that state laws cannot create an exception to federal regulations and that enacting the legislation could lead to federal intervention to enforce those regulations. Keeping either or both of the IPA plants operating would require revising the state’s regional haze proposal. If the EPA rejects the updated proposal, it could implement its own air quality plan that the state would be required to implement.

Owens provided The Salt Lake Tribune with a copy of a response to the EPA letter penned by Michael Nasi, a partner with the Texas-based Jackson Walker law firm. The outside firm conducted a feasibility study, which is the basis for SB161, for keeping the IPA facilities running.

(According to the state’s financial transparency website, Utah has paid Jackson Walker nearly $400,000 so far this year.)

Nasi’s response letter criticized IPA for soliciting federal intervention and accuses it of colluding with the EPA.

“The solicitation of EPA’s letter,” Nasi wrote, “is an extremely questionable legal tactic, given how it functionally invites a federal agency (that has recently demonstrated a hostility toward both the rule of law and the state of Utah’s sovereignty) to prematurely and unnecessarily weigh in on issues that are, at this time, squarely within exclusive authority of the state of Utah.”

Advertisement

The response letter also asserts that any threat of intervention by the EPA is premature and would be an unwelcome federal overreach.

That could set up another showdown between the state and the federal government because of other legislation passed this year. SB57 creates a process for the state to ignore federal laws and regulations. Lawmakers repeatedly cited onerous federal environmental regulations as the need for the bill. Legislative lawyers warned that the measure could conflict with the Constitution’s supremacy clause, which says federal law takes precedence over state law.



Source link

Utah

Utah first lady Abby Cox optimistic about legislative moves to strengthen child literacy

Published

on

Utah first lady Abby Cox optimistic about legislative moves to strengthen child literacy


SALT LAKE CITY — Utah is no stranger to discourse surrounding early child literacy.

While the Beehive State generally performs higher than other states in terms of proficiency measures, its leaders still recognize — especially post-COVID — that it’s a real issue that demands serious solutions.

A legislative audit released Tuesday said Utah school teachers and administrators should focus enhanced attention not only on third-graders, the traditional benchmark for early literacy, but also on first-graders, where data starts spotting early literacy challenges in young students.

Then, Utah first lady Abby Cox on Wednesday added to that discussion, speaking with Utah education and policy leaders about the need to meet the literacy crisis head-on and ways Utah has worked to do just that.

Advertisement

“We’re not in the best place that we can be, and we’re a little ahead of the national average; we always have been, but that still isn’t great. We’re in a moment where everybody’s starting to realize this … business community, educators, all of us coming together to realize there’s an issue here,” Cox said.

She mentioned the passage of SB241 during the 2026 legislative session, which committed $25.6 million to literacy coaching, increased the statewide goal to have 80% of third-graders reading at grade-level by 2030 and includes an intervention measure requiring struggling third-graders to repeat the grade — “except in cases of certain good cause exemption.”

“I know we can get 97-plus percent of our kiddos reading on grade level by third grade. We can do this,” Cox said.

She also emphasized the need to get “attention-sucking machines,” AKA cellphones, out of classrooms — something top lawmakers in the state have made strides to emphasize.

July 1 will mark the start of a new Utah law ushered in with the passage of SB69 that essentially places a bell-to-bell ban on cellphones at Utah’s K-12 public schools, unless a school or district opts for a looser policy.

Advertisement

The latest piece of legislation was built upon a similar bill passed during the 2025 session that set a default policy barring students from using their phones during class time.

Despite those restrictions, many lawmakers and educators argued they didn’t go far enough, which led to SB69.

“I don’t think we all know enough about how wonderful this is going to be,” Cox said, adding that data has shown library book checkouts have skyrocketed in schools that have instituted daylong cellphone ban policies.

“I talked to a principal who, after the first day of going bell-to-bell, walked into his high school lunch room, thinking there was a fight, because there was all this chaos and noise … and it was just (students) communicating with each other, playing cards, bringing little games,” Cox said. “It was just beautiful to see, and I think we’re going to see an incredible resurgence as we implement this statewide.”

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Here’s why Bosnia-Herzegovina fans in Utah are living a ‘dream’ during the World Cup

Published

on

Here’s why Bosnia-Herzegovina fans in Utah are living a ‘dream’ during the World Cup


The nation’s soccer team practiced in front of fans this week at Real Salt Lake’s stadium in Sandy.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Fans cheer as Bosnia-Herzegovina players practice for the World Cup during an open training session at America First Field in Sandy on Monday.

The majority of the Bosnians living in Utah did not leave for the Wasatch Front under favorable circumstances.

The Bosnian War in the mid-1990s brought more than 100,000 refugees to the United States, with thousands settling in Salt Lake City.

Thirty years later, however, a moment of celebration brought thousands of Bosnian-Americans together with the arrival of their country’s soccer team in Utah.

Blue and white jerseys flooded the plaza and stands of Real Salt Lake’s Sandy stadium on Monday to watch Bosnia-Herzegovina’s soccer team, which has made Utah its home base in between World Cup games.

Advertisement

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Bosnia-Herzegovina players practice for the World Cup during an open training session at America First Field in Sandy on Monday.

“It was like a dream,” Anel Alagic, who was born in Bosnia but raised in Salt Lake, said. “That we qualified for the World Cup was crazy, but then they told us that the home base would never be here in Salt Lake. It’s surreal.”

The festivities extended beyond the field, as well, with several vendors and volunteers serving Bosnian food and drinks, including its signature coffee from the world’s largest coffee pot, which was made in Bosnia.

The pot is traveling with the national team, heading to Los Angeles on Thursday for a match against Switzerland and then to Seattle for Bosnia’s June 24 match against Qatar.

A dream just to qualify

Bosnia has qualified for the World Cup just twice since declaring its independence in 1992, with the first time coming in Brazil in 2014. This year’s team qualified in dramatic fashion, defeating four-time World Cup champion Italy on penalty kicks.

Advertisement

The Bosnian fans are not taking their team’s presence in the World Cup for granted, with a viral video showing thousands marching in Toronto before the first game and 40,000 to 50,000 expected to be in attendance in Los Angeles on Thursday.

Two Bosnian restaurants in Salt Lake, Cafe on Main and Old Bridge Cafe, will both be closing their doors on Thursday to make the trek to California in support of their country.

And it’s not just people born in Bosnia jumping on the bandwagon, with Cafe on Main saying several Americans showed up in Bosnia jerseys to watch the opening game at the restaurant last week in a packed house.

“I’ve invited a lot of my co-workers and friends that typically don’t even watch soccer,” Alagic said of Bosnia World Cup fever catching on, thanks to events like the open training session. “I was like, ‘We’re having this event. Show out.’ I’ve seen a lot of people here, so it’s cool.”

Bringing people together

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Fans cheer as Bosnia-Herzegovina players practice for the World Cup during an open training session at America First Field in Sandy on Monday.

Advertisement

“Because of the war, our community is all over the world,” said RSL goalkeeper coach Mirza Harambasic, who is Bosnian. “It’s especially strong in the United States, and it’s strong here in Salt Lake City. So obviously everyone is so excited, so happy to be here, so happy to support.”

Harambasic was born in Bosnia and, like many others, came to the U.S. in the ‘90s. He helped coordinate Monday’s event and was confident in Salt Lake’s ability to accommodate the soccer needs of a World Cup team.

“When you talk about an environment to be successful, I don’t think there are many better places in the United States,” Harambasic said. “As far as city, lifestyle, training at elevation, and then obviously the facilities that RSL provides.”

With the first two games in Bosnia’s Group B ending in 1-1 draws, the top two spots are still very much up for the taking, giving fans just enough hope that the country can advance beyond the World Cup group stage for the first time in its history.

sltrib.com is now free to access — no subscription required. We made this decision because we believe access to trustworthy, independent news shouldn’t depend on what you can afford — especially as misinformation and AI-generated content continue to rise.

Advertisement

Free to read doesn’t mean free to produce. Our reporters show up every day to ask hard questions and hold powerful institutions to account. That work takes resources. As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on support from people who believe it matters. Make a donation today to fund local news that serves Utah communities.

You can help us bring more local news to more communities today.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Data center dominates candidate forum in Utah Senate president’s reelection bid

Published

on

Data center dominates candidate forum in Utah Senate president’s reelection bid


SUNSET — A top Utah leader was in the hot seat Tuesday evening over a proposed artificial intelligence data center in Box Elder County.

Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, is being challenged in this month’s primary by fellow Republicans Braden Hess and Stephanie Hollist.

At a town hall forum at Sunset Junior High School, all three candidates met to talk about the Stratos data center – which is being pushed by celebrity businessman Kevin O’Leary – and the state’s water policy overall.

The data center has sparked strong public pushback over concerns about water use and other things. Adams has helped move the project along as chair of the state’s Military Installation Development Authority, or MIDA.

Advertisement
Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, speaks at a candidate forum in Sunset on Tuesday. (Photo: Zachary Pope, KSL)

During the forum, which was sponsored by the nonprofit Grow the Flow, Hollist repeatedly criticized the data center – including when she was asked about her vision for Utah’s water management.

“I might start by not proposing the largest data center in the country,” Hollist said to loud applause, “particularly without all of the voice of the people, the recognition of our concerns, and the data around it.”

Adams, who has served in the Legislature more than 20 years, said the state needs to be competitive in the “AI boom,” but he acknowledged public opposition to the proposal.

“The people spoke (and) said we need clarity, so I pushed back,” he said.

Indeed, Adams recently softened his public support of the project, pushing O’Leary to reduce the project’s size and make other changes, including sending unused water to the struggling Great Salt Lake.

Advertisement

“I tried to listen,” Adams told the crowd. “We actually got a better project because of that.”

Hess, for his part, said the government shouldn’t treat data centers differently than any other business.

Stephanie Hollist and Braden Hess participate in a candidate forum in Sunset on Tuesday. (Photo: Zachary Pope, KSL)

“As long as they are not harming society and our resources in measurable ways,” Hess said, “I think we should allow them to go forward.”

But to the several dozen people who attended Tuesday’s forum, it was clear the data center is a non-starter.

“When you talk about a project that’s going to sap tax dollars away from residents, that’s going to take water, that’s going to endanger our way of life … it’s all a red flag,” said Tameron Williams, a Box Elder County resident who attended the forum. “It all feels pretty dangerous for where we’re at right now.”

Advertisement

Whichever Republican wins the Utah Senate primary next week will advance to the general election in November.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending