Connect with us

Utah

Gordon Monson: BYU and Utah, slammed together again, in the Big 12? This is going to be fun

Published

on

Gordon Monson: BYU and Utah, slammed together again, in the Big 12? This is going to be fun


Utah versus BYU.

You might have heard by now that what had just sort of been blowing in the wind, here and there, over the past decade or so is coming back with a … what? … a vengeance? … a rocket? … a purpose? … a punch to or a grin on the face?

A rivalry, the rivalry, is reborn.

After this little oh-we’ll-play-if-it’s-convenient-for-us hiatus, the Big 12 is facilitating what century-old rivals, the Utes and Cougars, couldn’t manage to achieve themselves, not without having their minds and wills forced.

Advertisement

Forced, they will be starting in 2024, as league-mates that will not, cannot dodge one another. And that’s exactly what had been happening since Utah got itself invited into the Pac-12 and BYU embraced the very thing that opens up a football schedule with more space than anything else possibly could — independence.

From that point on, schools sitting 50 miles apart, the same ones that started playing each other in competitive sports when horse-drawn buggies were plowing up and down roads in Salt Lake and Utah counties, found excuses not to play some seasons. Mostly, it was the Utes causing the disconnect.

They were the ones with the more valid — read: handy — excuse. There was a league schedule to handle, and important non-conference games to book, games that … let’s see, were more exciting for fans and helped generate exposure for the program on a national level and increased recruiting opportunities and the rivalry had become too nasty and other games were more emblematic of the status Utah football had reached and … and … and.

And that last one really bugged BYU folks.

It wasn’t even so much that the teams weren’t playing on occasion, it was the symbolism, the idea that Utah really was separating itself from the Cougars. The Utes were better than BYU. Anyone who wouldn’t acknowledge that wasn’t paying attention. But BYU never wanted that thrown in its mug.

Advertisement

What was happening right in front of Cougar fans was the story of two neighboring brothers who had labored in their respective fields for decades, working the land, plowing the dirt, planting the crop, hunting for pheasants, and such. They didn’t always get along, didn’t see the world exactly the same way, fighting sometimes, but, in many cases, they were more alike than different.

Then, one day, one brother, let’s call him … oh, I dunno … Jed, a poor mountaineer barely kept his family fed. One day he’s out shootin’ for some food, and up through the ground came a bubblin’ crude. Oil that is, black gold, Texas tea.

Well, Jed moves off to Beverly Hills and leaves his dirt-farming brother back on the side of a mountain, struggling to get by. And that brother wasn’t too happy about that, not just because he was being left behind, but because Jed forgot about him, wanted nothing to do with him, actually, indicating that he never really liked him all that much anyway.

That’s Utah-BYU.

There were times when the rivals could have found a way to play football games, but excuses got in the way. Times when Utah didn’t include BYU because they were busy facing Michigan and Florida … but those same years, they had a place for Idaho State and Fresno State and Southern Utah. He never said it publicly, but Kyle Whittingham, who played in Provo, didn’t like facing BYU, didn’t like the difficult distraction it was from his team’s main goal, a goal he learned to focus on above all else from his old Cougar coach, LaVell Edwards.

Advertisement

More damaging and disrespectful for BYU were two things: 1) the suspicion that Utah never lent a helping hand when BYU wanted to get into the Pac-12, even worse that it didn’t want the Cougars in, and 2) the aforementioned notion that Utah in no way needed the Cougars, not anymore. That was the ultimate trash talk. Not to mention, when the two teams did play, while the games were mostly tight, Utah almost always won, except for that last game in 2021, a result the Utes wrote off as an anomaly.

The only reason the games in all sports stayed intact was because most of the public around here — from regular people to politicians — wanted it. The scene reminded me of a childhood friend of mine who used to get in fights with his brother, and whenever they did, their parents made them sit on the floor in the hallway between their rooms, holding hands. They hated that.

That’s pretty much the same feeling, how it stayed for Utah and BYU until earlier this month, when the Utes rather abruptly found themselves without a conference, at least not one that would bring them enough money, and the association that came calling happened to be the one with BYU attached.

Utah prez Taylor Randall said the Utes looked forward to the renewed league rivalry with BYU, calling the whole thing “fun.”

So, as it’s all turned out, ol’ Jed not only has his millions, he’s also benefited from the advancement of his cause, his abilities, his results, his reputation as a football power, having won the Pac-12 the past two seasons, being highly ranked going into this season, and his brother has some millions, too, having scratched and clawed his way, at long last, into a legitimate power league, facing a new challenge in football and basketball and every other sport, eager to see what he can do, what he can grow to do.

Advertisement

Randall was right. This is going to be fun, the authentic rebirth of a rivalry that means more than just having the privilege of bragging over, making fun of your neighbor, your co-worker, your mom, your dad, your cousin. Now it’s a matter of brothers not holding hands, rather fighting for a trophy in the middle of a competitive hurricane. They both are shooting for some food, the same food, hoping that up through the ground will come a bubblin’ crude.

Y’all come back now, y’hear?

Editor’s note • This story is available to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers only. Thank you for supporting local journalism.



Source link

Advertisement

Utah

Could EPA air quality standards be Utah’s first test of its new sovereignty law?

Published

on

Could EPA air quality standards be Utah’s first test of its new sovereignty law?


Top Utah officials aren’t happy with federal air quality standards. And their ammunition to fight back could jeopardize the state’s federal highway funding or even the federal government overriding how the state handles air quality to begin with.

In February, Gov. Spencer Cox called the stricter regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency “onerous” and “so stringent” that it will be “impossible” for the state to comply. The EPA reduced the amount of PM2.5 and ozone pollution allowed in the atmosphere, making it harder to fall within the attainment standards, which Utah hasn’t met since 2006. The Utah Attorney General’s Office has filed and joined other states in challenging the agency over its mandates, like the “Good Neighbor Rule,” which targets ozone pollution emitted across state lines.

The majority of the Utah Legislature is so unhappy with the regulations it partly inspired a new state law that aims to push back. Republican Sen. Scott Sandall’s 2024 “Utah Constitutional Sovereignty Act” sets up a process for the state to opt out of federal regulations they deem as overreach.

The first test of the new statute could be the looming air quality battle the state is picking over the updated air quality standards and the Clean Air Act. But it won’t be an easy sell.

Advertisement

“If the state wants to test the red line,” said Brigham Daniels, a law professor at the University of Utah, “this is a risky one.”

During a May 15 Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim Committee meeting, Bryce Bird, the director of the Utah Division of Air Quality, said Utah is “still really struggling” to meet EPA ozone standards, especially in Salt Lake, Davis and parts of Weber and Tooele counties. But if the state doesn’t fall within the attainment zone of 70 parts per million, which is considered protective of public health, Utah could face federal funding sanctions.

“That prevents both federal funds being used to expand transportation projects here in that non-attainment area, but it also prohibits state funding from being used for regionally significant projects,” Bird said. “So it really does have that direct impact on the fastest growing metropolitan area in the country.”

If Utah still doesn’t clean up the air after funding is frozen, Bird said the federal government could swoop in and create its own plan for how Utah will meet ozone standards. If that comes to pass, the state “will lose flexibility and input into the plan.”

Utah and the Intermountain West face an uphill battle when it comes to meeting EPA ozone standards. Bird said states like Arizona, Utah and Colorado have “higher natural concentrations of ozone and a greater impact from international transport of the precursor emissions to ozone formation,” which places some of the problem outside of the state’s control.

Advertisement

The fact that Utah isn’t solely responsible for ozone pollution within its boundaries is Sandall’s biggest complaint, calling it “the heart of the heartburn,” and that Utah doesn’t have to “try to comply to an uncontrollable standard.”

“That’s the message that we’ve got to send to the federal government is we can’t do that. There’s no way,” he said during the May 15 meeting. “So whether we do that through legislation, whether we do that through a lawsuit, whatever we do, we have to be the ones to say no.”

Republican Rep. Casey Snider followed Sandall’s comments by stating “perhaps there needs to be a fundamental shift in the key objectives” of the Utah Division of Air Quality centered around “pushing back on this overzealous nature of the federal government rather than simply complying with the impossible.”

Daniels said he’s sympathetic to the predicament the state is in because of what the EPA considers to be “a healthy air quality will be very difficult for the state to obtain,” given the outside exacerbating factors. But challenging the Clean Air Act isn’t that simple.

From his perspective, if Utah does take the steps to challenge the Clean Air Act under the Utah Constitutional Sovereignty Act, the state is likely to fail because of the Supremacy Clause, which says the Constitution and federal statutes are “the supreme law of the land,” trumping any state laws.

Advertisement

Daniels added EPA employees are mandated by federal law to enforce the consequences of a state not complying with standards set by the Clean Air Act and a state sovereignty clause won’t stop them from doing so either.

“Within the realm of environmental law and natural resources law, you almost couldn’t have chosen a worse statute to gamble with,” Daniels said. “Because the federal government doesn’t have any discretion about whether or not it moves forward with sanctions.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

What the new ESPN SP+ rankings tell us about BYU, Utah and Utah State

Published

on

What the new ESPN SP+ rankings tell us about BYU, Utah and Utah State


While there is still plenty of time until the 2024 college football season kicks off — for BYU and Utah State, the season is 100 days away, and 98 for Utah — that doesn’t stop the influx of discussion about the upcoming year.

One of the staples of preseason chatter is ESPN’s SP+ rankings, and earlier this week, Bill Connelly released his latest edition, i.e., the post-spring edition, and there are varying expectations for the three Utah FBS schools.

For the Utes, the 2024 season presents the chance to make a big impression in a new conference, the Big 12, while making a run at the expanded College Football Playoff with Cam Rising back and healthy.

For the Cougars, this year is projected to be another difficult learning season as the program adjusts to life at the power conference level.

Advertisement

And for the Aggies, there’s been plenty of turnover again, though perhaps less pessimism surrounds the program heading into 2024 — and a hope the school can finish in the upper half of the Mountain West.

What does Connelly’s latest SP+ rankings — which are calculated on returning production, recent recruiting and recent history — project for these three schools?

These insights give a glimpse at how Utah, BYU and Utah State are viewed on a national scale heading into the year.

As Connelly explains, “SP+ is a tempo- and opponent-adjusted measure of college football efficiency. It is a predictive measure of the most sustainable and predictable aspects of football, not a résumé ranking, and along those lines, these projections aren’t intended to be a guess at what the AP Top 25 will look like at the end of the season. These are simply early offseason power rankings based on the information we have been able to gather to date.”

BYU football coach Kalani Sitake signs an autograph after the BYU alumni game at BYU in Provo on Friday, March 22, 2024. | Kristin Murphy, Deseret News

Where does BYU football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

  • BYU ranks No. 67 nationally in the SP+ metrics with an overall minus-2.0 rating, a two-spot drop from the preseason SP+ rankings released in February.
  • That includes BYU rating No. 63 on offense, No. 84 on defense and No. 11 on special teams.
  • By comparison, the Cougars were No. 60 overall in last year’s post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings. BYU went 5-7 last season.
  • The Cougars rank 12th among the new-look Big 12 Conference in the SP+ rankings, just ahead of Colorado (No. 69) and Cincinnati (No. 70) and just behind Baylor (No. 61). Only two of BYU’s conference games this season — at Houston (No. 79) and vs. Arizona State (No. 88), both in late November — come against Big 12 teams below the Cougars in the SP+ rankings.
  • There are four Big 12 teams in the top 25 of the SP+ rankings: Kansas State (No. 17), Utah (No. 18), Oklahoma State (No. 20) and Arizona (No. 24). BYU plays all four this season, with only one road game at the Utes.
  • BYU is ranked more than 40 spots below one of its two FBS nonconference opponents — SMU comes in at No. 23 — while the other, Wyoming, is behind the Cougars, at No. 87.
  • The Big 12 is third among all FBS leagues in average SP+ ranking, behind only the SEC and Big Ten.
  • BYU ranks 55th nationally in returning production at 65%, per Connelly’s numbers. That includes ranking No. 52 on offense (66%) and No. 51 on defense (64%).

Where does Utah football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

  • Utah ranks No. 18 nationally in the SP+ metrics with an overall 16.1 rating, a one-spot drop from the preseason SP+ rankings released in February.
  • That includes Utah rating No. 39 on offense, No. 11 on defense and No. 34 on special teams.
  • By comparison, the Utes were No. 14 overall in last year’s post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings. Utah went 8-5 last season while dealing with a litany of injuries.
  • The Utes rank second among the new-look Big 12 Conference in the SP+ rankings in their first year in the league, just one spot behind Kansas State (No. 17) and ahead of Oklahoma State (No. 20) and Arizona (No. 24). Utah plays at Oklahoma State and home against Arizona in back-to-back weeks to start conference play, but avoids playing Kansas State.
  • Utah is ranked well ahead of its two FBS nonconference opponents — Baylor comes in at No. 61, while Utah State is No. 101. While both Utah and Baylor are now in the same conference, that will be a non-league game.
  • The Big 12 is third among all FBS leagues in average SP+ ranking, behind only the SEC and Big Ten.
  • Utah ranks 43rd nationally in returning production at 66%, per Connelly’s numbers. That includes ranking No. 61 on offense (63%) and No. 33 on defense (69%).

Big 12 teams in the post-spring SP+ rankings

17. Kansas State.

18. Utah.

Advertisement

20. Oklahoma State.

24. Arizona.

30. Iowa State.

34. West Virginia.

36. TCU.

Advertisement

37. Kansas.

42. Texas Tech.

48. UCF.

61. Baylor.

67. BYU.

Advertisement

69. Colorado.

70. Cincinnati.

79. Houston.

88. Arizona State.

Utah State head coach Blake Anderson looks up a the videoboard late in second half of the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl NCAA college football game against Georgia State, Saturday, Dec. 23, 2023, in Boise, Idaho. (AP Photo/Steve Conner) | Steve Conner, Associated Press

Where does Utah State football rank in ESPN’s post-spring SP+ rankings?

  • Utah State ranks No. 101 nationally in the SP+ metrics with an overall minus-11.0 rating, a six-spot drop from the preseason SP+ rankings released in February.
  • That includes Utah State rating No. 49 on offense, No. 132 on defense and No. 92 on special teams.
  • By comparison, the Aggies were No. 116 overall in last year’s post-spring ESPN SP+ rankings. Utah State went 6-7 last season with a bowl game loss.
  • The Aggies rank eighth among Mountain West teams in the SP+ rankings, just behind Colorado State (No. 98) and Hawaii (No. 100) and slightly ahead of San Diego State (No. 14).
  • Utah State’s conference opener will be against the highest-ranked MWC team in the SP+ rankings, No. 38 Boise State. The game is set for Oct. 5 in Boise.
  • Utah State will play three FBS nonconference opponents this year — both Utah (No. 18) and USC (No. 21) are in the SP+ top 25, while Temple is three from the bottom at No. 132.
  • The MWC is sixth among all FBS leagues in average SP+ ranking, behind fellow Group of 5 league the Sun Belt Conference and ahead of the American Athletic Conference.
  • Utah State ranks 86th nationally in returning production at 57%, per Connelly’s numbers. That includes ranking No. 43 on offense (68%) and No. 110 on defense (47%).
  • That’s a significant improvement over the post-spring SP+ returning production numbers last year, when Utah State ranked 127th nationally (41%).

Mountain West Conference teams in the post-spring SP+ rankings

38. Boise State.

57. Fresno State.

Advertisement

71. UNLV.

87. Wyoming.

92. Air Force.

98. Colorado State.

100. Hawaii.

Advertisement

101. Utah State.

104. San Diego State.

112. San Jose State.

121. Nevada.

131. New Mexico.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Former North American leaders descend on SLC for international trade conference

Published

on

Former North American leaders descend on SLC for international trade conference


Utah’s rising prominence as a player in the global business landscape was the focus of a Thursday conference in Salt Lake City that included an impressive roster of domestic and international leaders including former President George W. Bush, former Mexican President Vicente Fox and past Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Natalie Gochnour, associate dean for the University of Utah’s David Eccles School of Business and director of the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute, told attendees of the Crossroads of the World Summit at downtown’s Grand America hotel that Utah had already established itself as the crossroads of the West and was building an argument for a more ascendant position.

“What I do know is we’re the undisputed crossroads of the West and that’s the seed corn for being the crossroads of the world,” Gochnour said.

Gochnour shared data that reflects Utah’s outsize performance when it comes to global trade, including a comparison of the state’s rankings of 30th in the country in terms of population, 29th largest economy but 16th on a basis of per capita export values.

Advertisement

Gochnour also pointed out that, among western states, Utah has the third highest per capita export ranking, even beating out economic powerhouse California.

“It’s a pretty big punch,” Gochnour said.

While Bush was among the marquee speakers at Thursday’s event, the former president’s presentation was closed to media.

Utah Gov. Spencer Cox quipped about his role as the state’s CBO — Chief Bragging Officer — and shared an anecdote from a recent trip to Vancouver, B.C., where he attended a TED conference.

Cox said he shared a dinner table with a well-known hedge fund billionaire, who he declined to identify, who said Utah’s most powerful built-in asset was the shared characteristics of its residents as smart, hard-working people who prioritize their families.

Advertisement

“Those are Utah values and they used to be American values,” Cox said. “Utah is what America used to be and, I hope, what it can be again.

“I can say those things (about Utah) but to hear it from someone else … I thought a lot about that conversation.”

This story will be updated.

From left, former Mexican President Vicente Fox and former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper speak with Mark Garfield at the Crossroads of the World International Trade Summit at the Grand America Hotel in Salt Lake City on Thursday, May 23, 2024. | Megan Nielsen, Deseret News



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending