Connect with us

West

Texas Dem suggests Black people shouldn't pay taxes as form of reparations: 'Puts money back in your pocket'

Published

on

Texas Dem suggests Black people shouldn't pay taxes as form of reparations: 'Puts money back in your pocket'

A House Democrat recently suggested that Black Americans should be exempt from paying taxes as a form of reparations, but she admitted that the plan may not be a success as many within the community who are poor “aren’t really paying taxes in the first place.”

The comments from Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, came during her appearance on an episode of the “Black Lawyers Podcast,” which was released Tuesday.

During the interview with host J. Carter, Crockett recalled a proposal from a celebrity to exempt Black Americans from paying taxes, and said she thought to herself that it was “not necessarily a bad idea.”

Though she could not remember which celebrity offered the proposal, Crockett said, “I’d have to think through it a lot. One of the things they propose is Black folk not have to pay taxes for a certain amount of time because, then again, that puts money back in your pocket.”

CALIFORNIA REPARATIONS PANEL APPROVES PAYMENTS OF UP TO $1.2 MILLION TO EVERY BLACK RESIDENT

Advertisement

The comments from Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, came during her appearance on an episode of the “Black Lawyers Podcast,” which was released Tuesday. (Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

“But at the same time, it may not be as objectionable to some people [as] actually giving out dollars,” she added.

Crockett seemingly implied that reparations are much needed for the Black community in order for it to advance.

“So many Black folk, not only do you owe for the labor that was stolen and killed and all the other things, right, but the fact is we end up being so far behind,” she said.

Crockett then admitted that the plan may have a shaky foundation as some people within the community are not “paying taxes in the first place.”

Advertisement

“If you do the no-tax thing, for people that are already, say, struggling and aren’t paying taxes in the first place —” Crockett said, before Carter suggested “it doesn’t matter to them” and that “they may want those checks like they got during COVID” rather than a tax exemption.

“Exactly,” Crockett responded.

Crockett also said during the interview that she believes there should be some sort of consistency between federal and state governments when it comes to reparations for Black people, saying that if there’s not, then “everybody’s gonna run to whichever state and be like, ‘Yo, I need mine.’”

BLACK NEW YORK RESIDENTS SPAR OVER WHO SHOULD RECEIVE REPARATION PAYMENTS

“So many Black folk, not only do you owe for the labor that was stolen and killed and all the other things, right, but the fact is we end up being so far behind,” said Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Advertisement

“We don’t want to see that — this is definitely something that needs to be thought through,” she said.

Crockett, who has represented Texas’s 30th Congressional District in the House since 2023, also took aim at individuals “that aren’t even willing to do the studies, aren’t willing to invest to make sure we can roll this out the right way.”

Crockett is up for re-election in November and will take on libertarian candidate Ken Ashby in an effort to retain her post in the House.

A handful of Democrat-led states have considered dolling out reparations to certain residents, including California and New York.

In California, cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles have discussed giving reparations to Black residents. In February, California lawmakers introduced a reparations package to the state assembly, including 14 bills they claim will help support Black communities across the state following historical mistreatment.

Advertisement

Members of California’s Legislative Black Caucus said the 14 reparations bills seek a formal apology for slavery and other human rights violations from the governor and legislature, and the return of property taken in race-based cases of eminent domain, among other restitution. The bills are intended to be just the first legislative actions in an effort that will likely span years.

A large crowd of protesters wearing masks and carrying signs that say, “Reparations Now” as they walk through neighborhoods at the Black Lives Matter protest in Bayside, Queens.

Last December, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul signed a bill that established a commission to research the best ways to offer reparations to descendants of slaves in the state.

The New York-based commission, as lauded by one Democratic state senator, is tasked with “examining the legacy of slavery and its lingering negative effects on people currently living in the State of New York, with the goal of issuing a report comprised of recommendations for appropriate action to address these longstanding inequities.”

Advertisement



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Here’s who will lead Utah Valley University as its next president

Published

on

Here’s who will lead Utah Valley University as its next president


Jon Anderson will be charged with moving the Orem school forward following the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk on campus last year.

(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Incoming UVU President Jon Anderson poses for a photo with his family after an event announcing his selection at Utah Valley University in Orem on Friday, July 17, 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Nationals recall Harry Ford

Published

on

Washington Nationals recall Harry Ford


The Washington Nationals recalled catcher Harry Ford from Triple-A Rochester on Friday. Additionally, Washington reinstated right-handed pitcher Max Kranick from the 60-day Injured List and placed catcher Drew Millas on the 10-day Injured list (retroactive to July 12) with a left index finger fracture on Wednesday. Nationals President of Baseball



Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court upholds 125- to 175-year conviction for Steven Marler after child sexual abuse trial in 2025

Published

on

Wyoming Supreme Court upholds 125- to 175-year conviction for Steven Marler after child sexual abuse trial in 2025


CASPER, Wyo. — The Wyoming Supreme Court has upheld the 2025 conviction of Steven Randall Marler, 52, who was sentenced to 125 to 175 years in prison on eight felony counts of sexually abusing two girls under his foster or adoptive care at his home on Casper Mountain. Marler was also convicted of five misdemeanor batteries and a count of child endangerment. He was found not guilty of sexual abusing another two other minors in the family, including the one who had first brought forward allegations in 2016.

The Supreme Court opinion noted that discrepancies in her testimony from previous statements were revealed at trial.

The appeal claimed that the Natrona County court where the trial was held improperly admitted testimony about physical abuse and Marler’s insistence that the children give him massages, which they said he referred to as a “daddy tax.” 

The massages did not result in charges, and Wyoming courts are strict in disallowing evidence of “prior bad acts” for uncharged conduct that might color the opinion of the jury about whether the defendant is guilty of the actual charges.

Advertisement

The opinion released Friday and written by Justice Robert C. Jarosh noted that the Natrona Court, under Judge Kerri Johnson, had multiple hearings before the trial about whether the state should be allowed to introduce that evidence. It can only do so under specific circumstances, such as establishing a course of conduct relevant to  “grooming behavior” and illustrating the power Marler held over the children and his ability and motivation in carrying out the abuse.

“The “daddy tax” massage evidence demonstrated a predictable, recurring pattern of behavior that directly illuminated Mr. Marler’s motive and systematic course of conduct,”  the opinion reads. “The “daddy tax” massage evidence demonstrated a clear behavioral pattern and provided relevant context about how Mr. Marler targeted and groomed the children by exploiting his parental role and initiating abuse through seemingly innocent touching — all as a means to gratify his sexual desires.”

The opinion also noted that the jury had been properly instructed not to infer guilt based on the testimony about uncharged behavior they might find off-putting.

The appeal attorneys also argued that evidence of punishment in the form of spanking, exercise and withholding food was not relevant to the charged crimes and unfairly prejudicial to Marler.

“However, we agree with the district court this evidence was relevant to show Mr. Marler’s intent and motive to gain submission by the victims,” Friday’s opinion said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending