Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco Sureño sentenced to 26 years for killing teen, assaulting deputies, trying to smuggle drugs into Santa Rita Jail

Published

on

San Francisco Sureño sentenced to 26 years for killing teen, assaulting deputies, trying to smuggle drugs into Santa Rita Jail


SAN FRANCISCO — A Bay Area man whose family members have been both implicated in violent crimes and experienced tragedy after tragedy has been sentenced to 26 years in federal prison for killing a 19-year-old man in a gang-related quintuple shooting, court records show.

Jonathan Escobar, 26, was sentenced Monday by U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, three months after Escobar pleaded guilty to using a firearm in a crime of violence, as well as two other felony charges related to assaulting deputies and trying to smuggle drugs into Santa Rita Jail. Escobar’s co-defendant, 34-year-old Jose “Slim” Aguilar, has also pleaded guilty and is awaiting sentencing, court records show.

Escobar’s tumultuous and tragic history may have saved him an even worse penalty. In court papers, prosecutors said they took his youth and extremely unstable upbringing into consideration and decided against filing a murder charge under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, or RICO, which could have resulted in a life sentence or even the death penalty.

In 2021, the Northern California sect of the U.S. Department of Justice charged Escobar and Aguilar with killing 19-year-old Gerson Romero and wounding four other people in a 2018 shooting in San Francisco. The shooting came after Escobar and friends were hanging out at the Beauty Bar nightclub when someone sprayed the area with bullets. Escobar, then a member of the 16th/19th Street Sureños, apparently blamed the Norteño gang and spent the next 80 minutes driving around gang neighborhoods in the city looking for a victim.

Advertisement

It is unclear whether Romero was a gang member or just in the wrong place at the wrong time, but prosecutors say he was not involved in the prior shooting and that he and his friends “were in Norteño-claimed territory on a night when different Norteños had committed a drive-by shooting in Sureño territory.” Prosecutors added the evidence makes it “almost certain” that Escobar fired shots at the victims.

On top of that, Escobar was involved in a group assault in Santa Rita Jail, where two deputies were hospitalized with injuries. He also arraigned for an “associate” to sent mail into the jail that had been soaked with liquidized methamphetamine, according to authorities. The Santa Rita assault occurred in a “protective custody” module of the jail, but involved a gang that Escobar joined after dropping out of the Sureños, prosecutors said in court papers.

According to court records, Escobar has lost numerous loved ones to violence or prison. A defense sentencing memo outlining his upbringing says that his stepfather, Javier Campos Sr., physically abused Escobar and his twin brother and that their uncle, Ismael Carrillo, was sentenced to 24 years in state prison for killing Campos Sr. in 2012, after confronting him about the abuse. Escobar’s older brother, Jose Luis Anthony Escobar, was shot and killed at a Taco Bell in San Francisco one month before Campos Sr.’s death.

In 2021, Escobar’s twin brother was killed. His half-brother, Javier Campos Jr., 22, has been identified by police as a person of interest in two recent gang-related mass shootings, including a deadly shootout at a gas station in Oakland involving multiple gunmen, and a drive-by shooting in San Francisco that wounded nine.

“(Escobar) committed the conduct for which he stands charged,” his attorney, Jay Rorty, wrote in a sentencing memo. “He does not dispute the facts, save simply to say that everything that came before in Jonathan’s life lead him to the commission of the offense.”

Advertisement

But Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Ewenstein, while conceding Escobar had been dealt a rough hand in life, took issue with this rationalization. He submitted a court document offering a rebuttal.

“Escobar’s prior experiences did not compel him to take a gun, drive around the city for 80 minutes looking for victims, find those victims, park the car, get out, walk down the block, wait for pedestrians to pass, and then shoot over and over at a crowd of innocent people,” Ewenstein wrote. “Those actions were entirely Escobar’s choice, made with ample time for reflection and deliberation.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

After Missing Housing Goals, SF Has Permit Process Slashed Under New State Law | KQED

Published

on

After Missing Housing Goals, SF Has Permit Process Slashed Under New State Law | KQED


Under SB 423, which passed last year, cities that miss their state goals on planning for new housing must provide an expedited path for approving permits for new developments that meet existing planning standards.

San Francisco will be the first city where the law is triggered after Wiener included language making it the only city with an annual review of its housing permitting goals. Other cities are reviewed every four years.

On Friday, the California Department of Housing and Community Development ruled that San Francisco was falling short of its goal to plan for building 82,000 new units of housing by 2031. Last year, the city authorized just over 3,000 units, according to the San Francisco Planning Department.

Rich Hillis, director of the Planning Department, called the streamlined process instituted by SB 423 “a new era.”

Advertisement

“You could come in today online and apply for a housing project that will be approved by the end of this summer,” Hillis said at a press conference Monday. “And that is truly a game changer, where that would have normally taken a year, two years — or, as Mayor Breed pointed out, sometimes 10 years or more if CEQA is involved and appeals are involved.”

Critics say the penalties instituted by SB 423 were always part of a plan to do away with local control in favor of market-rate developers.

Lori Brooke, co-founder of anti-upzoning group Neighborhoods United SF, called the state’s goal of 82,000 new units for San Francisco “unattainable” and said the city was unfairly singled out by SB 423, which she said “forces the city to haphazardly make changes to zoning and planning that will be felt for the next 100 years.”

“San Francisco is being punished for actions beyond its control — cities don’t build housing; developers do,” Brooke said in a statement.

KQED’s Sara Hossaini contributed to this report.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco PD tests device that can detect fentanyl in saliva

Published

on

San Francisco PD tests device that can detect fentanyl in saliva


By Joanna Putman
Police1

SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco Police Department will soon deploy a drug testing device that tests for fentanyl and other drugs in saliva, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The Dräger DrugTest 5000 is intended to assist in public intoxication arrests, according to the report. The move comes as a part of a yearlong effort to combat the city’s open-air drug markets.

The Dräger device, which tests saliva samples for several different, is already in use for DUI investigations, according to the report. Ryan Kao, director of the SFPD’s Crime Strategies Division, led discussions with Dräger, persuading the company to develop a prototype specifically for detecting fentanyl.

Advertisement

San Francisco police, already contracted with Dräger for other testing purposes, will be the first to field-test the prototype, according to the report. The device operates with a handheld unit and an analyzer, which processes saliva samples to detect eight types of drugs: fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, methadone, benzodiazepines like Xanax and ketamine. Officers must receive consent before administering the test, similar to procedures in DUI cases.

Kao acknowledged that the new system could lead to more arrests but emphasized its role in providing objective evidence for officers, which can be difficult to obtain in public intoxication arrests.

“In an age where we have so much more scrutiny on our officers, this allows them to say, ‘You know what? I’m not just making it up. I have something that’s scientifically backed,’” Kao said.

Advertisement

“[The] shift from making an arrest to preserving life is commendable…” Sheriff Chad Chronister said. ” I [am] proud of our team for taking her into custody safely”

Advertisement

Video: Fleeing driver fires at Texas officers during pursuit

Cedar Hill Police pursued the suspect down a freeway; the man opened the driver’s side door and fired at least one shot at the officers while continuing to flee

Advertisement

Video shows NY officer fatally shooting 13-year-old on ground. Police say he pointed a replica gun

Utica PD officers stopped two teens because they matched descriptions of robbery suspects; one attempted to flee before producing a replica gun and pointing it at officers

Advertisement

July 4 Sales.png

Save on duty gear from the Officer Store, Flying Cross, Southern Police Equipment, Hero’s Pride and Vertx, as well as our recommended Amazon deals

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Franciscans sound off on study labeling city 'worst-run' in the US for second consecutive year

Published

on

San Franciscans sound off on study labeling city 'worst-run' in the US for second consecutive year


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

San Franciscans had mixed reactions while sounding off on a recent study that dubbed their city the “worst run” in the United States for the second year in a row.

Advertisement

The ranking comes courtesy of WalletHub, a personal finance company that measured the “effectiveness of local leadership” by comparing the quality of city services matched against the city’s total budget to determine its operating efficiency. Their “Best & Worst-Run Cities in America” report casts an analytical eye on 148 sizeable U.S. cities, scrutinizing their performance across several critical service categories and 36 key metrics, while also considering their per-capita spending.

“The best-run cities in America use their budgets most effectively to provide high-quality financial security, education, health, safety and transportation to their residents. Many of the top cities also have a very low amount of outstanding government debt per capita, which can prevent financial troubles in the future,” WalletHub analyst Cassandra Happe explained in a report detailing the study earlier this month.

Despite coming in at 24 in quality of services, analysts placed San Francisco last in its total budget per-capita rank, along with having the highest amount of long-term debt outstanding. The city ranked 148th overall.

SAN FRANCISCO DUBBED WORST CITY IN THE UNITED STATES, ACCORDING TO NEW REPORT

San Francisco, California’s Golden Gate Bridge. (iStock)

Advertisement

“I’m not surprised at all,” Tom Wong, a lifelong San Francisco resident who owns a private security firm in the area, told Fox News Digital of the ranking last Monday. “What we have in San Francisco is not a problem of governance. We have a problem with criminals in governance.”

Wong, a Republican, has voiced his dissent with local officials multiple times, including on the Fox News Channel and the FOX Business Network. When asked what he believes caused many of the city’s issues he identified, he restated that dissent.

“The progressive movement is not about making things better. It’s about how much they could grift before it bellies up,” he said. “They’re pushing the limits of how much people will tolerate beforehand so, in order to fix what we have in the city, we need to change just about everything… The city’s broken. That’s because every level of governance is corrupt.”

A second respondent, who asked to remain anonymous, also agreed with WalletHub’s findings.

“As a New Yorker that has been here in San Francisco for well over a decade, I would say, yeah, it’s pretty poorly run. I wouldn’t argue with the findings,” she told Fox News Digital during an interview last Wednesday.

Advertisement

“The budget is $49 billion, and so I think a lot of people and the residents of the city wonder where that money’s going. We know that it’s going to inflated salaries or whatever, but why aren’t they paying teachers and cops? Teachers sometimes have to pay out of their own pocket for supplies for their classrooms, and we’re understaffed with cops. We can’t attract talent because cops aren’t respected here.”

The respondent identified herself as a “left-leaning progressive” who has become more moderate over time. When asked for her thoughts on city leadership, she pointed out a great divide between progressive Democrats and moderates.

“The city supervisors are split. They prevent Mayor Breed from doing her job. We have a lot of city supervisors that are just really toxic, and they are just bottlenecks for Breed,” she said, particularly naming Supervisors Connie Chan, Hillary Ronen, Dean Preston and Shamann Walton.

“They literally oppose law and order,” she added.

SAN FRANCISCO BECOMES ONE OF THE FIRST MAJOR US CITIES TO DELCARE ‘SANCTUARY’ STATUS FOR TRANSGENDER PEOPLE

Advertisement
Democratic San Francisco Mayor London Breed

San Francisco Mayor London Breed listens at a press conference at City Hall on Feb. 16, 2022, in San Francisco, California. Breed criticized WalletHub’s report, calling it “misleading and inaccurate.” (Gabrielle Lurie/The San Francisco Chronicle via Getty Images)

Ben Wang, owner of San Francisco clothing store Dare Fashion, offered a different take on the study. While speaking to Fox News Digital last Thursday, he emphasized San Francisco’s unbreakable spirit and its longstanding reputation as a progressive haven, where people could go if they felt they didn’t belong anywhere else.

“I totally disagree that San Francisco is the ‘worst-run’ city,” he said.

“I mean, I don’t know because I don’t live in another city,” he continued. “But it might be a little bit unfair because most of the bigger cities on there [the study] have lower ratings… and that makes a lot of sense because problems get more complicated when you have a bigger city and more diverse neighborhoods, and it doesn’t work all over the city. Whereas smaller cities tend to be a bit more homogenous.” 

Wang additionally disagreed with the study’s general premise and methodology. 

“Philosophically, I don’t agree with these types of rating systems because you’re trying to take something that’s very complicated and put it into a numbered list,” he said.

Advertisement

“As a former scientist, I can understand doing some sort of what’s called a multivariate analysis. You’re putting a lot of variables into something, and you’re trying to get it into one metric, but I didn’t see anything that took into account the size of the city, the population of the city or the population density, as a factor in their multivariate analysis. Without those factors, New York City is really low on their list. So is Los Angeles, so is San Francisco, because I feel like maybe a factor was being left out, which is actually very important.” 

Wang feels that pinning the blame on city officials is largely unfair, given the complex nature of commonly-cited problems like drug use and homelessness. He emphasized the need to “dig around for the roots of the problem” instead of blaming those problems on the people who are trying to fix them, even if their efforts sometimes might not yield positive results.

“Where did this problem start? A lot of the homelessness comes from habitual heroin users, and where did they start? I think Big Pharma started that problem with the opioid crisis, pumping out cheap pills, and telling people they weren’t going to get addicted, and they did.”

SAN FRANCISCO OFFICIALS PUSH FOR DRUG-FREE HOUSING IN REVERSAL OF ‘DRUG PERMISSIVE’ POLICIES: REPORT

San Francisco skyline

Ina Coolbrith Park, San Francisco, California, USA. (iStock)

Despite the respondents each having their own take on the study, they shared a few common themes. For one, they had all witnessed crime to some extent.  

Advertisement

Tom Wong, for instance, told FOX Business’ Ashley Webster last year that his private security firm had been rattled by thieves – both the physical business location and vehicle break-ins as well.

“Safety-wise, it’s not good,” he said of the crime conditions in San Francisco last week. “The reason being is that a lot of the crime is being underreported because there are not enough detectives, so the police are not responding to a lot of calls. The business owners, the homeowners are so fed up that they don’t even report the crime.”

Law enforcement, he elaborated, tends to go after more violent crimes under the assumption that insurance will help cover expenses incurred from burglaries.

“After dark, it’s a Third World country,” he added.

Despite his fashion shop being robbed twice in the last three years – with the most recent incident costing the business a whopping $300K that forced him to set up a GoFundMe page to help alleviate the cost – Ben Wang remains determined not to give up on San Francisco.

Advertisement

“I think it’s a big problem,” he said when asked about crime. Linking back to his cause-and-effect example of Big Pharma instigating drug usage and homelessness, he added that income inequality exacerbated by the COVID pandemic made poorer residents more desperate and therefore more likely to commit crimes.

“I love that San Francisco is a very progressive place, and that the whole idea of this place is that we’re going to try new things. The environmental movement started here, all these cool things, Dotcom and the Silicon Valley… it encourages people to try new things, which is fantastic. One of the things that we tried was not prosecuting, shoplifting and small crimes and also going easier on drug crimes and users and all that stuff, and it didn’t work out well,” he added.

The anonymous respondent shared an experience from her own neighborhood, when a nearby abandoned home was burglarized earlier this year.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The cops are called at 2:30 in the morning on a Monday morning, and you have a bunch of SFPD respond to this call. You could see that the gate was broken. You could see that there was a light on. You could see that there were burglars in the house. The cops even had nest cam footage showing the casing and them coming back with crowbars and flashlights. You had all the evidence,” she said. 

Advertisement

“My husband dealt with the cops and the neighbors. I went back to bed. When I woke up at 8:30 in the morning, their getaway car was still parked outside. The cops left the burglars inside the house because they stated that there wasn’t a homeowner to give them permission to enter the house.”

Meanwhile, Mayor London Breed called WalletHub’s ranking “misleading and inaccurate” because she said the study compared San Francisco’s city and county budget with other cities, which only have city budgets, according to FOX 2, an affiliate based in San Francisco,

The report highlighted her previous remarks from her State of the City Address, where she said, “I’m tired of the people who talk about San Francisco as if our troubles are inevitable and our successes a fluke. Our successes are not a fluke, and they’re not fleeting,” adding, “They’re the product of years of hard work, collaboration, investment, creativity, and perseverance. They’re the output of thousands of people, in government and out, who believe in service not cynicism.” 

All three respondents have their own unique bond with the city – and each raved about it in their own way.

“It is the most beautiful place,” Wong said, adding later, “There’s plenty of good food here.”

Advertisement

The second respondent had some similar opinions to share. “There’s a lot of creative, smart people that live here. We have excellent culture and food. The weather is amazing. We’re close in proximity to Big Sur and Napa. And, if you feel like you need services – not that I do – but it’s nice to know that those services are available to people.”

“You just can’t kill the spirit [of the city],” Wang said.  “That’s what San Francisco has been from the times of the Gold Rush. Chinese people came here early… this was always a place that there was opportunity… Even if it’s taking us a little longer, and we should be backpedaling from some misguided policy or things that we tried that didn’t work, I just I find it difficult to believe that you’re going to really kill the spirit of the city.”

Fox News’ Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending