The 2024 winter will be the start of a new era for the San Francisco Giants.

Former star catcher Buster Posey has been hired as the team’s president of baseball operations, taking over for the fired Farhan Zaidi. A new general manager will be hired as well, as the entire front office is being changed.

Whoever is hired by Posey to oversee operations with him will have a few needs to address in free agency. Right now, there are only a handful of players who are locks for the lineup in 2025.

Tyler Fitzgerald has emerged as a versatile building block, logging a majority of his innings at shortstop. Joining him on the dirt at the hot corner will be Matt Chapman, who signed a six-year, $151 million extension in early September. 

Heliot Ramos was named an All-Star and will be playing in the outfield. The franchise hopes Jung Hoo Lee can bounce back after a tough first season in the MLB that ended with a shoulder injury.

Patrick Bailey will likely be back as the starting catcher, but one position that is in desperate need of an upgrade is second base.

Marco Luciano has yet to pan out at shortstop and could factor into the mix at the keystone. But, if the Giants look for help outside of the organization, one player to keep an eye on is Gleyber Torres.

A two-time All-Star earlier in his career with the New York Yankees, his time in the Bronx feels like it is coming to an end. Erik Beaston of Bleacher Report believes that San Francisco is a good match for him in free agency.

“The San Francisco Giants need a second baseman and could always use the spark of offense that Torres provides when he is “on.” Conversely, the seven-year man could use a change of scenery.

It is a mutually beneficial pairing, at least on paper, and one the Giants can likely make happen at a lower price than they would have had Torres hit the market a season or two ago,” the MLB expert wrote.

A lot went wrong for Torres in 2024. He was shaky in the field, leading second basemen with a career-high tying 18 errors. At the plate, his power numbers dropped and he struck out a ton.

But, he is still entering the prime of his career, turning 28 in December. A change of scenery could be exactly what he needs to get his career back on track.

The talent is certainly there. He was trending in the right direction down the stretch of 2024 and would be a sizable boost for the Giants’ lineup even if he doesn’t reach the All-Star level he did his first two seasons as a pro.

SAN FRANCISCO – With not much else to do during the COVID-19 pandemic, people were forced to go out and enjoy nature. In San Francisco, the Great Highway closed to traffic allowing pedestrians to roam freely and take in ocean views.

What is Prop K?

Now, voters have the opportunity to close the popular stretch of road to private vehicles, seven days a week, permanently establishing public recreation space.

The measure, Proposition K, needs a 50%+1 affirmative vote to pass.

The upper Great Highway is a two-mile segment of the roadway. 

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency boasts this stretch as a 17-acre park with a two-mile promenade on weekends. On weekdays, it is a roadway with an adjacent trail.

What a yes vote means

A yes vote means you want the city to use the Upper Great Highway as public open recreation space, permanently closing it to private motor vehicles seven days a week with limited expectations.

What a no vote means

A no vote means you do not want San Francisco to make these changes. 

Who is sponsoring Prop K?

A collective of the San Francisco County Supervisors sponsored the ballot measure including Supervisors Joel Engardio, Myrna Melgar, Dean Preston, Rafael Mandelman, and Matt Dorsey. They submitted the ballot measure in June.

Other supervisors who have cosigned this proposition include mayoral candidate Ahsha Safai and Hilary Ronen. 

Prop K is seeing prominent endorsements from Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, State Senator Scott Wiener, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

During the pandemic, the Great Highway was closed to private vehicles between Lincoln Way and Sloat Boulevard.

As the public health crisis waned, city officials tried pilot programs to appease both drivers and those who enjoyed the newfound pedestrian freedom from the road’s closure.

Who opposes Prop K?

While the measure for Prop K made the ballot, opponents said thousands of people use the Great Highway daily to get to work, to access the V.A. hospital and to visit loved ones. 

They also wanted the focus to be on the traffic impacts to other neighborhoods. 

Supervisor Engardio, who authored the measure, said the city is working on making traffic flow improvements on other city streets. 

“There is capacity to get people where they need to go in their cars, and have an oceanside park that would bring immense benefit,” said Engardio. “It’s good for the environment, it’s good for local business and it creates joy for generations of San Franciscans.”

Chris Gutierrez, a barista at Ocean Beach Cafe, said he moved to San Francisco a few months ago.

“I’ve heard people say [closing it to traffic] will make greater traffic on Irving Street,” said Gutierrez. But he had a difference of opinion. “I’m always down for more green spaces.” 

Sunset District resident Eliza Panike shared a similar perspective.

“I don’t use the Great Highway as a transit corridor. I use it far more when it is a park,” she said. 

Mixed reviews

But there are mixed reviews. 

“It will divert all the traffic into the neighborhoods,” said Bobby Von Merta, a San Francisco native whose house is along the Great Highway. “You’ll only have one access along Sunset Boulevard there, which if you come down here on the weekends, it’s already backed up right now.”

Engardio said if Prop K doesn’t pass, The Great Highway south of Sloat Boulevard will have to close next year anyway due to coastal erosion. 

“Right now, if people want to ride bikes, they can already do it on the Great Highway. There is a path to jog on both sides,” said Albert Chow, owner of the Great Wall Hardware Store on Taraval Street who does not support Prop. K.  

In May 2022, the Upper Great Highway was closed to private vehicles on Friday afternoons, weekends and holidays.

According to the SFMTA, in December 2022, the SF Board of Supervisors passed an ordinance to keep this section of the Upper Great Highway as a car-free promenade through December 31, 2025. This ordinance also allowed for a three-year pilot study.

The transit agency’s website says the pilot project ordinance maintains the schedule that the road is closed to private vehicles starting Friday afternoons at 12 p.m. through Monday mornings at 6 a.m. and on holidays.

Voters should note, emergency vehicles, official government vehicles and public transit shuttles would not be impacted by the road closure.

If Prop K passes, it would also require approvals under the California Coastal Act as well as amendments to the city’s general plan.

The current pilot program in place is scheduled to end on December 31, 2025. 

The Yes on K – Ocean Beach Park group says the land is owned and managed by the San Francisco Recreation & Parks Department, whose charter states that park land shall be used for recreational purposes.

If you had told Arizona Cardinals fans they would be 2-3 after the first five games, they would take it.

If you told them it included wins over the San Francisco 49ers and Los Angeles Rams, most Cardinals fans would have rejoiced.

In what has been a roller coaster of a week, many Cardinals fans feel back on top of the world after Arizona beat the team that has plagued them for many years in San Francisco.

Not to bring those fans back to earth (or anyone for that matter) but there are some overreactions to the game – and some correct reactions:

Verdict: Overreaction

At least for one day, yes, the Cardinals did play like the best team in the division. With the Rams losing respectively to the Packers (and sitting at 1-4) on top of Seattle losing to the Giants at home (rather shockingly), indeed Arizona is back in the division race.

But the best team in the division? There’s a long way to go yet.

But today’s victory was a huge warning sign to the division, that despite all the injuries, issues that plagued both sides of the ball, and their recent history, the Cardinals are not messing around.

Verdict: Slight overreaction

Some teams just get hot early in the season – Washington is one of those teams right now, after dismantling Cleveland in similar fashion to the way they dismantled Arizona last week.

Did Arizona’s flaws and weaknesses get exposed last week? Yes – those should still concern even the most optimistic of fans.

But every team has bad games. And Arizona bounced back in, what many would describe, amazing fashion.

Verdict: Slight overreaction

Petzing has drawn the ire of Cardinals fans and analysts this past week, and rightly so. His first two play calls couldn’t have gone better as a rebound against the 49ers – culminating in a Kyler Murray 50 yard run.

The rest of the game left something to be desired – especially on third down. Now, to be fair, Petzing cannot control the blocked field goal, the dropped touchdown pass from Trey McBride, or some other misses from Kyler Murray.

But there were the usual head-scratching choices (some that even commentator Tom Brady couldn’t help but question) that Petzing threw in throughout the game. Perhaps one of the more head-scratching ones was calling play action in the red zone on a long third down.

To give Petzing his flowers, he did settle down in the 4th quarter and kept it simple by feeding James Conner a lot on the game-winning drive.

But there is still some nervousness from Cardinals fans – and the main question boils down to whether he can figure out how to keep the offense consistent outside of the first drive.

Verdict: Overreaction

395 and 406. 35 and 45.

If you guessed that these were the yardage and point totals from last years two games, or rather losses, against San Francisco, you would be correct.

Today, they allowed a similar amount of yards – 384. The Cardinals took advantage of several strange decisions for the 49ers, however, along with 3 opportunistic turnovers to hold them to 23 points – really only 17 given up on defense with the blocked kick return accounting for 6.

Now, this is certainly an improvement – but if you watched the game, there was usually very little Arizona could do to stop the 49ers offense. So while yes, it’s a step in the right direction, I do believe we need a bit more of a consistent sample size before we say the defense has improved.

The next two games should tell us a lot about this team, and particularly this defense, against two teams that have great offensive lines in Green Bay and the LA Chargers.

Verdict: Overreaction

Kyler has been, rightfully so, at the center of much debate amongst Cardinals fans this past week after a poor performance against the Commanders. Today’s showing won’t necessarily silence the doubters – but it should make it clear that Kyler will, or at the very least should, be part of the solution – and it not the problem in Arizona.

His throw to Marvin Harrison Jr. on fourth down in the fourth quarter to save the game was not luck but incredible skill. And there are very few quarterbacks, perhaps only a couple, that could make his first quarter run to the end zone.

No quarterback is perfect – but it’s really up to the Cardinals staff to continue to figure out how to continue to use his unique skill set.

Verdict: Overreaction

In some other comforting thoughts, Marvin Harrison Jr. will be ok. He was covered pretty well in today’s game, but came up with a clutch catch when it mattered the most.

Just because he’s not putting up Malik Nabers-esque numbers does not mean he’s not proven his importance to this team and this offense. Much like Murray, it’s now on the staff to figure out how to best unlock him.

This is a tough thing to keep perspective after a roller coaster of a week, but it’s important for Cardinals fans, even while at a high point, to know that this may keep taking time for things to come together.

The good news? It does appear Arizona is on the right track.