Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Opinion: San Diego Needs to Protect Civil Society and Shared Values in Challenging Times

Published

on

Opinion: San Diego Needs to Protect Civil Society and Shared Values in Challenging Times


A march in support of immigrants in February. (Photo by Chris Stone/Times of San Diego)

At Prebys Foundation, we believe in the power of community. That’s why we developed our strategic plan in deep collaboration with nonprofit leaders across San Diego County. What we heard from them was exciting.

They wanted our region to lean into its many strengths — as a border community rich in human and biological diversity, as a leader in medical research and healthcare, as a dynamic center of arts and culture, and as a proud military town that had also become a globally relevant center of innovation and entrepreneurship. Most of all, they hoped we would help this region become a place of purpose, opportunity, and belonging for everyone who calls it home.

Opinion logo

And yet, as we move into 2025, we find our community facing a new and sobering set of challenges: federal restrictions on speech about equity and climate, freezes on long-awaited grant awards, intimidating attacks on nonprofits, restrictions and rollbacks to research and science, on-again-off-again contracts, the vilification of our fellow human beings, and real or threatened cuts to critical programs that help impoverished families, struggling students, dedicated veterans, Americans vulnerable to discrimination, established refugee and immigrant communities, and even emerging scientists.

To put it mildly, this moment is disorienting. As the boxer Mike Tyson famously said, “Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” Seeing so many important organizations, programs, enterprises, and communities — not to mention vulnerable populations — taking so many blows has caused many of us to pause, reflect, and reaffirm our values.

For us in our work, those values are clear. We still believe in belonging and the idea of a San Diego that leans into its world-leading strengths by also embracing the talents, gifts, interests, and many faces of excellence of our diverse and vibrant community.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, values alone don’t keep the lights on. They don’t usher in the next breakthrough in cancer research or deliver meals to shut-ins or ensure that children have enough to eat or craft a work of art that might save a life or inspire a future leader. As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wisely noted, “a budget is a moral document.”

The choices we make in funding — what we support and what we cut — reflect our true priorities as a society and who we are as a people. How we make those cuts—through democratic governance, open dialogue, and transparency — matters just as much.

To be clear, I don’t agree with those who see no room for legitimate disagreement about government spending, social policy, immigration, or even diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Americans do have divergent views on our best path forward, and there’s value in open debate. But when these concerns metastasize into incivility, coercion, and erasure, something is profoundly wrong, and the push-and pull of democratic dialogue becomes impossible. It’s no wonder that the majority of nonprofit leaders in America, including large numbers in San Diego, report feeling deeply dispirited.

We share their concern. Cuts to Medicaid and other lifelines that keep families healthy and stable will make Americans less healthy, our communities more stressed, and the healthcare providers we ultimately all depend on weaker. Similarly, slashing funding for medical research will slow down and eliminate new cures and new treatments that over time would touch every American family. Pretending that variables like race, gender, culture, and even language have no bearing on medicine, how patients are treated, the illnesses they suffer, or how they respond — despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary — will result in worse care for every single one of us.

In San Diego, the stakes are personal for another reason. Medical research and life sciences are areas where America leads the world, and San Diego and California lead America. Why would anyone want to undermine that leadership and with it one of our most important economic drivers?

Advertisement

Like so many places in America, much of what defines our community are the qualities of grace so easily forgotten and sacrificed in moments like this. Our rich arts and culture scene — from traditional organizations to individual artists — is shaped by the beautiful mix of cultures, peoples, and perspectives that come together in this special corner of America. The arts certainly enrich our lives here, but they also fuel our economy, feed our creativity and innovation, and foster civic dialogue in a time when we need it most. Do they also speak truth to power and sometimes offend the mighty? Sure, and that, too, is an essential part of their value in a vibrant community and a free society.

Much more could be said about this — about our young people and the opportunities they seek, their thirst for nature and art and meaning; about all the people in our midst feeling targeted by hatred, racism, and antisemitism simply because of who they are, worried about holding onto rights and freedoms they hoped were secure; about the importance of the environment to a region sitting between the desert and the ocean. The point is not to list everything that feels vulnerable now, but to underscore why this moment deserves the courageous care and exquisite attention of everyone in a position to offer it.

For our part, we are painfully aware that philanthropy cannot fill the gaps being left by federal disinvestment in our community and its nonprofit institutions. We will not pretend otherwise. We know that moral leadership is defined by two moments — when you have power, and when you don’t. No matter how dispirited leaders in our sector may feel right now, we must remember that neither situation is ever fully a given.

Alexis de Tocqueville had it right when he described this country’s civil society as a uniquely precious asset — the goodness at the heart of its greatness. He acknowledged the messiness of what were then called associations, but he asked: “What political power could ever substitute for the countless small enterprises which American citizens carry out daily with the help of associations?” His answer, perhaps even truer today: None.

A country is not a boxing match, and our civil society, along with the values of mutuality, justice, and shared interest it enshrines, should be no one’s punching bag. It is, in fact, the cure to so much of what ails us.

Advertisement

We remain committed to that vision. We fund work that builds a dynamic, equitable, inclusive, and healthy future for San Diego, and we will continue to do so. We will also continue to collaborate with our coalition of the willing — nonprofit and civic leaders, fellow funders, and anyone determined to strengthen our community by making it better for all of us.

Most of all, what we can and will do in this moment is stand alongside our extraordinary community as it navigates this challenging time, and we will work with it to push for the resources, freedom, support, and decency that allow it to play so valuable and distinctive a role  in American society.

Grant Oliphant is CEO of the Prebys Foundation, a major independent foundation working to create an inclusive, equitable, and dynamic future for people across San Diego County. The foundation invests in excellence and opportunity across the arts and culture, medical research, health and well-being, and youth success.



Source link

Advertisement

San Diego, CA

Love and scares: San Diego couples tie the knot at haunted chapel wedding

Published

on

Love and scares: San Diego couples tie the knot at haunted chapel wedding


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — This Halloween, the San Diego County Clerk’s office transformed into a haunted chapel of love for its second annual Halloweddings. Costumed officiants, creepy vows, and spooky decorations set the scene for couples ready to say “I do” in true Halloween style.

For Angela Tran and Phillip Ona, Halloween has always been special. On Friday afternoon, it wasn’t just about candy and costumes, it was their anniversary, and they decided to make it extra memorable.

“We wanted a silly way to get legally married,” Angela said. “Our anniversary is around Halloween, and we had so much fun putting this together.”

Dozens of couples took part in the Halloween-themed ceremony, hosted by the County Clerk’s Office, exchanging vows like:

Advertisement

“Dear friends, we have been summoned here today for the hauntingly joyful wedding of Angela to her boo Phillip.”

County Clerk and Commissioner of Marriages Jordan Marks says events like Halloweddings are about making love less stressful and more memorable:

“People want a great time to celebrate. What better day than Halloween? Now couples get to do that for their entire lives every Halloween.”

No appointments. No long waits. Just walk in, get your marriage license, and tie the knot.

“Halloween is filled with some of the greatest love stories of all time,” Marks added. “Today, people get to pledge their undying love and say ‘I doo’ to their boo.”

Advertisement

For some couples, the theme got extra creative.

“We’re vampires. I don’t know if you bit me, we both have blood,” laughed Angela.

Beneath the darkness, the only thing truly immortal was their love.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

City Staff Spent $6 million More on Rentals Without Council Approval. Councilmembers Want Answers

Published

on

City Staff Spent  million More on Rentals Without Council Approval. Councilmembers Want Answers


A year ago, San Diego city auditors found that staff spent millions more on rental equipment for city departments than what councilmembers approved. But the auditors couldn’t find who OK’d the additional spending.  

Over the last month, councilmembers have demanded answers from city staff after an audit found that a contract with Herc Rentals increased by more than $6 million without approval from the City Council.  

“I had asked on the dais on Oct. 6 where the $6 million had come from that was taken from the general fund and increased unlawfully to the Herc rental contract,” Councilmember Marni von Wilpert said during an Oct. 20 City Council meeting. “I’m still waiting for an answer.”  

The city has a contract with Herc Rentals to rent trucks, forklifts and other equipment and services. This equipment is used by city workers across several departments responsible for park maintenance, public safety and more.  

Advertisement

For fiscal year 2020, councilmembers approved spending up to $14.3 million on rentals. The contract now allows spending up to $65.5 million.  

City law requires the City Council to review and approve certain changes to city contracts. The Council is required to approve new contracts over $3 million and all adjustments to contracts over $200,000. 

The city auditor found that didn’t happen in 2023. That year, staff adjusted the Herc Rentals contract in October by $4 million and then again in December by $2.7 million. Other adjustments made to the contract were approved by the Council.  

The city auditor’s team said departments didn’t know whether their contracts needed Council approval.  

In a statement, Ombretta Di Dio, spokesperson for purchasing and contracting, said the contract was adjusted “to pay outstanding invoices and allow departments access to rental equipment and vehicles to address operational needs, with the intent of obtaining retroactive approval.” 

Advertisement

She said rental equipment and vehicles supported critical operations to the city. When some city vehicles were out for repair or missing parts, they used Herc rentals to help in emergency situations like the 2024 floods.  

The city auditor gave Voice of San Diego the list of every transaction with Herc Rentals from 2019 to 2024. The transactions are from dozens of departments like public utilities, homelessness strategies and solutions, and transportation.  

Di Dio said departments have “flexibility within their approved budget to manage non-personnel costs… When overages occur in one area, they are typically offset by savings in another—ensuring that operations continue without disruption.” 

According to the 2024 audit, “when contract alterations are brought to Council late, it puts pressure on Council’s approval responsibility. As a result, Council’s ability to provide meaningful oversight may be reduced if there is not time to consider other vendors without disrupting critical services.”  

In other words, when contracts are brought late to the City Council it limits their role and authority to make sound decisions on the contracts. Think of it like making charges to a shared credit card. Each department is charging to the credit card, unaware of how much other departments are spending on it too. Then, Council has to deal with the bill. 

Advertisement

Say a department spent more than $50,000 on rental vehicles. They have a better chance of getting that approved by Council if they bring it late, because, well, they have already spent it and now they owe Herc.  

So, Council might feel pressure to approve the action to adjust the contract so they can ensure Herc gets paid. But they don’t know if the departments have that money budgeted, they just know they owe Herc.  

Councilmembers either vote no – and risk interrupting services – or vote yes and continue to meet the demands for rental equipment across departments.  

The Herc contract is an example of these pressures. The Council recently approved an additional eighth amendment to increase the amount in July. The Council voted to increase the contract with the condition that they want to see a specific audit on it. 

“I think one of the things I struggle with sometimes is who will bear the consequences if these contracts aren’t approved,” said Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera during the Council meeting on Oct. 6.  

Advertisement

“I think this is what puts us in a particularly difficult position as councilmembers… it is typically rank and file everyday employees who are doing the work.” 

It’s unclear why the city is spending so much with Herc. A spokesperson with the city said the transportation department received a mid-year adjustment in FY25 to account for increased needs so that other departments’ needs were not reduced.  

The city auditor is planning to do an individual audit on the Herc contract and any other vehicle contracts. 

“We will begin the audit in the near future,” said City Auditor Andy Hanau. 

Claudia Abarca, director of purchasing and contracting, said they implemented eight recommendations of the 13 made by the city auditor in the last year. One of these recommendations includes updating the Council approval threshold and clarifying alterations for goods and services contracts.  

Advertisement

Still, councilmembers are frustrated and looking for answers.  

“Do you realize we had a budget fight this past year for over $4.5 million in which the mayor vetoed it and we overrode the veto?” said Councilmember Von Wilpert during the Council Meeting on Oct. 6.  

“Somebody had to use a city computer and make that adjustment unlawfully. It’s against the municipal code to do that, so who did that?” 

Councilmember Raul Campillo also chimed in to ask if the city disciplined the employees who made the illegal adjustments. Abarca said they did.  

“I’m really hopeful that’s what happened here, because this wasn’t a few dollars over,” said Councilmember Campillo. “This was several million dollars over.” 

Advertisement

Abarca said that city departments were behind on payments and in a deficit of what they owed Herc. She said her staff was directed to make the unauthorized adjustments when they ran it up the chain of command.  

“I don’t know that it went to the mayor himself, I know I did bring this up to the DCOO (deputy chief operating officer) and we’ve been working on this contract for quite some time,” said Abarca. “We’ve done several refinements on how we are monitoring and actually managing the spend for each department to ensure we don’t get to this place again.”  

Abarca added they have not altered any contracts above $200,000 without it coming forward to the City Council since 2023. 

It’s still unclear who is directly responsible for the contract changes, and where each department pulled money from their budget to pay Herc. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Opinion: The jury is in — Cabrillo was a Spaniard

Published

on

Opinion: The jury is in — Cabrillo was a Spaniard


Sept. 28 was the 483rd anniversary of the arrival of the Spanish explorer Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo aboard the San Salvador at what we now call San Diego Bay. The San Salvador was the first European sailing vessel to reach the California coast.

Cabrillo National Monument was established in 1913 by President Woodrow Wilson. The Cabrillo/Spanish connection was prevalent in the original plans for Cabrillo National Monument, which were formulated in 1913.

Twenty years later, a fabricated shift began that asserted Cabrillo was Portuguese. The first reference to Cabrillo being Portuguese, as it relates to the Cabrillo National Monument, occurred in 1934. The first mention of the name João Rodrigues Cabrilho — note the different spelling of the final name — did not appear until 1935 and has never been verified as authentic. 

The iconic statue at Cabrillo National Monument was commissioned by the Portuguese Secretariat of National Propaganda in 1939. Two bronze plaques displayed at the monument referring to Cabrillo as a Portuguese navigator were gifted by the Portuguese Navy in 1957 and 1988. The addition of the statue and plaques was not approved by Congress nor the director of the National Park Service, as required by federal statute.

Advertisement

In 2015, renowned Canadian historian and expert on 16th century Central America, Wendy Kramer, Ph.D., while conducting archival research, discovered several thousand pages of manuscripts with legal documents written by official scribes. Numerous documents were signed by Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo stating that he was a native of the Spanish village of Palma de Micer Gilio, now known as Palma del Río, Córdoba, Spain. Kramer was researching information about Guatemala in the 1520s and 1530s. Her findings were published in 2016 in The Journal of San Diego History.

Kramer’s paper — “Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, Citizen of Guatemala and Native of Palma del Rio: New Sources from the Sixteenth Century” — was peer reviewed by several historians including Carla Rahn Phillips, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota, and Harry Kelsey, the former chief curator of history at the National History Museum of Los Angeles County and research scholar at the Huntington Library. 

Robert Munson, former Cabrillo National Monument historian, verified and agreed with the historians’ peer review. Local historians Iris Engstrand and Molly McLain, then co-editors of “The Journal of San Diego History,” agreed with Kramer’s conclusion.

An April 25, 2018, letter from Cabrillo National Monument Superintendent Andrea Compton to the House of Spain acknowledged and accepted Kramer’s finding that Cabrillo was born in current-day Palma del Río, Córdoba, Spain.

Despite overwhelming evidence and scholarly acceptance, the Cabrillo National Monument refuses to affirm that Cabrillo was of Spanish birth. In fact, after Kramer’s findings, the Cabrillo National Monument inexplicably changed the birthplace of Cabrillo on its website from Spain to “the Iberian Peninsula.” 

Advertisement

Why does the National Park Service promote the inaccurate history that Cabrillo may have been born in Portugal? Even Portugal did not recognize Cabrillo as a native on the famous Monument of the Discoveries (Padrão dos Descobrimentos) in Lisbon.

Why does the National Park Service refuse to update the information it disseminates to the public on its website, wayside exhibit and brochures? Why does it reference the name João Rodrigues Cabrilho when that person does not exist in the history of California? This name is a fake created by the government of Portugal and the Portuguese in California. Read the history of California.

The House of Spain in San Diego’s YouTube channel shows a short video about the Cabrillo National Monument history. 

Where is any similar historical research and peer review acceptance of the Portuguese claims?  Answer: There is none.

Latin American history experts with whom I have consulted unanimously agree Cabrillo was Spanish. They unanimously agree there is no reliable evidence supporting the position that Cabrillo was Portuguese.

Advertisement

The National Park Service needs to be honest in telling the story of Cabrillo. Give all visitors the objective truth. 

Benayas is president of House of Spain in San Diego and lives in San Diego. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending