San Diego, CA
Guest Commentary: How bad are San Diego’s streets? We can see for ourselves
Another new, and expensive, comprehensive survey to tell us what we already know about San Diego’s streets (“Just how bad are San Diego’s streets? With two major evaluations coming, the city faces a watershed moment,” Jan. 4, La Jolla Light).
City officials say they’ll take it as a “call to action.” Taxpayers need action, period!
Simply drive around our city’s streets, as we do daily, to see the pathetic shape of our infrastructure. Residents have been complaining for years, with meager action from city officials. But this time will be different? Suddenly city Transportation Director Bethany Bezak has had an epiphany because a new laser study will produce more data to tell us what we already know?
The referenced 2016 study illustrated what everyone knew about San Diego’s streets: They were a disaster. Now they are worse. The streets were so poor in 2016 that a City Council member sponsored Proposition H, a measure in which a dedicated fund, including from tax revenue, was earmarked for street and infrastructure improvements. Proposition H was supported by 65 percent of San Diego voters in 2016 and adopted. What has happened to the money from the adoption of Proposition H?
The City Council voted in 2021 to allocate the money to the city’s general fund. The money has effectively been stolen from taxpayers who voted for its intended use — to fix our infrastructure. City officials are mum about Proposition H and the total tax money diverted.
Now a sales tax increase is being discussed to pay for some of the road repairs San Diego taxpayers voted to pay for in 2016 with Proposition H.
It appears city officials will recommend bringing more road repairs in-house due to a lack of local contractors. This is comforting news because the historical street maintenance overseen by the city has resulted in the infrastructure we have today: complete failure.
The city also oversees its infamous Get It Done app for street repairs. How has this worked?
Perhaps the shortage of local contractors is due to the city’s litany of qualifications required for city work eligibility, eliminating many willing to bid. Taxpayers get less results for more money.
Our city might want to consider best practices of other cities. Drive to any incorporated area in San Diego and look at the streets. Drive to Orange County, where medians are tidy and streets are silky smooth. Even Los Angeles’ streets are superior to San Diego streets.
How is it that San Diego has lagged so far behind other municipalities with the maintenance of its streets and sidewalks? What have our mayor, City Council and streets department been doing?
Suddenly San Diego is going to magically shuffle the deck of ineptitude because of a new laser study, create a new tax and then, poof, our streets will be repaired? We are asked to trust these same people to do a job they have been unable to accomplish over the past 10 to 15 years? Taxpayers would be foolish.
It is incomprehensible that the city is still studying this problem. The mismanagement of our infrastructure is alarming, and citizens should demand change. The status quo cannot be depended on to produce results due to a new study.
We need street work now, not a “call to action” based on a new study.
Ted Levis is the owner of Emerald Properties in La Jolla. ◆
San Diego, CA
Coastal Commission ruling opens door to development of National City waterfront
National City’s Pepper Park can soon expand in size by nearly 50%, thanks to a ruling this week by the California Coastal Commission to approve the National City Balanced Plan.
The approval of the plan at the CCC’s Wednesday meeting, developed by the Port of San Diego, means that not only will the popular park have the ability to increase in size, big changes are coming for commercial, recreation and maritime uses on the National City bayfront.
“We are grateful to the California Coastal Commission for its support of the National City Balanced Plan,” said Danielle Moore, chair of the Board of Port Commissioners. “The progress we have made has been anchored in tireless collaboration with the community, business leaders and, of course, the city of National City. It’s about bringing more recreational opportunities to the bayfront while also streamlining and strengthening maritime operations, and we are eager to bring these projects to life.”
Other components of the balanced plan include:
- Realigning Marina Way to serve as the buffer area between commercial recreation and maritime uses
- The closure of Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street, and West 28th Street between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue, around six acres, to increase terminal efficiency by eliminating redundancies
- The development of a recreational vehicle park, tent sites, cabins and the “ultimate development of up to two hotels with up to 365 rooms, as well as dry boat storage,” a port statement read
- A connector rail project to connect the existing rail and loop track located on the National City Marine Terminal to additional rail car storage spots at the existing Burlington Northern Santa Fe National City Yard east of the National Distribution Center
The Board of Port Commissioners must accept the CCC’s certification, then the port and city can begin the process of completing the above projects.
“I am proud of the work we have done to help create a lasting legacy for National City, the Port of San Diego, and the entire region,” said Port Commissioner GilAnthony Ungab. “Nearly a decade in the making, this plan balances the interests of the community and many other stakeholders, addresses public access, maritime, and recreation uses, and expands waterfront access in my community.”
The National City Bayfront is 273 acres of waterfront land and 167 acres of water, and includes the National City Marine Terminal, Pepper Park, Pier 32 Marina, the Aquatic Center and pieces of public art.
San Diego, CA
Gloria announces effort to add more townhomes, cottages to San Diego neighborhoods
Mayor Todd Gloria announced an initiative Wednesday intended to expand housing options in neighborhoods by integrating small-scale residences such as townhomes, rowhomes and cottages into an area’s existing character.
The Neighborhood Homes for All of Us initiative is also intended to support community land trusts — nonprofit organizations that acquire land to create permanent affordable housing.
“Since Day 1 of my administration, I have been focused on building more homes that San Diegans can actually afford — and getting them built faster,” Gloria said at a news conference Wednesday. “‘Neighborhood Homes for All of Us’ is the latest piece of that puzzle. This innovative program will break down the barriers that have gotten in the way of building the type of housing that I believe is ideal for young families and first-time homebuyers for whom the dream of homeownership has long felt out of reach.”
Around 80% of land zoned for housing in the city is restricted to single-family homes, which continue to increase in price, Gloria said. And a significant portion of new housing being built consists of apartment buildings with primarily studio and one-bedroom units, leaving working-class families fewer and fewer options for homes.
Neighborhood Homes for All of Us is intended to increase the housing supply and allow community land trusts to keep housing affordable in disadvantaged communities for low- to middle-income families.
“San Diego is an incredible place to raise a family, and more families need the opportunity to do that in San Diego’s existing, highly desirable single-family neighborhoods where their kids can learn and play in a great community,” City Planning Director Heidi Vonblum said. “But today, that comes at a price that is out of reach for too many. Integrating more options for families requires careful and thoughtful planning, with input from existing and future community members across the city, to ensure these new home opportunities for San Diego’s families are built in ways that best enhance and benefit San Diego’s amazing neighborhoods.”
The initiative will roll out in two phases. In the first phase, beginning this week and continuing through next summer, San Diegans can help determine what the neighborhoods can look like. The public will be able to see renderings showing small-scale neighborhood homes within San Diego’s existing communities, along with new regulations that “provide a clear pathway for building these homes,” according to a statement from Gloria’s office.
Phase 1 will also include an open house and ways for the community to provide feedback and concerns.
Phase 2, scheduled for the second half of 2026, will be for city staff to develop regulations allowing for the building of more neighborhood homes in a way informed by the public feedback.
The initiative is partly funded through a Regional Early Action Planning grant from the San Diego Association of Governments.
San Diego, CA
Affordable housing project for San Diego Unified teachers moves forward
The first of five affordable housing projects for San Diego Unified School District teachers was approved on Wednesday night.
The school board voted unanimously in favor of working with the developer who bid on the project at the Instructional Media Center on Cardinal Lane. The Affordable Workhouse Housing project promises 100% affordability, with 108 one-, two- and three-bedroom units, and some surface lot parking.
“It’s a practical solution to a very real problem, and it sends a message that we are committed to stability, not just for employees but for the students,” one speaker said.
Board members say the project will be fully funded by the developer, DECRO Corporation based in Culver City, and that the estimated annual rent revenue is $125,000 dollars. It is expected to increase 2.5% each year.
Some in the neighborhood are concerned.
“We are one way in and one way out. We are built in a canyon,” neighbor Callie Grear said.
“Parking here is horrible,” neighbor Paul Grear said. “Everybody is parking in front of our street. I can’t even park in front of my house.”
“The safety of our neighborhood is in jeopardy with this plan,” neighbor Patricia Torres said. “We are already overcrowded. We are asking this board to reconsider building on this site.”
Despite the pushback, board members unanimously voted in favor of moving forward with the developer on this project. Unless exempt, it will first undergo city scrutiny. There are still four other locations still on which SDUSD wants to build.
A vote for housing on those other four properties has been postponed until January so that the school board can hold a workshop and appropriately question the developers that are bidding on those projects.
In all five projects, San Diego Unified hopes to build 555 units in the next 10 years.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire