Connect with us

Oregon

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls

Published

on

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls


play

Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.

The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.

Advertisement

In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”

Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.

Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.

Why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to kill barred owls

In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.

Advertisement

Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.

According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.

The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.

Why environmental groups want to stop the plan to kill barred owls

Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.

Advertisement

“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”

In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Musk to stop the plan to kill barred owls

The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.

The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.

The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.

Advertisement

“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”

USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.

“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”  

Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.

Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.

Advertisement



Source link

Oregon

Oregon Ducks Address Biggest Need Through Recruiting Class

Published

on

Oregon Ducks Address Biggest Need Through Recruiting Class


The Oregon Ducks made key signings through the 2026 recruiting class, and Oregon coach Dan Lanning and the program secured five five-star picks. 

Advertisement

One of the biggest position needs that the Ducks addressed through recruiting is safety. According to Rivals’ rankings, seven safeties are featured in the top 100 recruits, and the Oregon Ducks made a big splash in recruiting the position.

Oregon Adds Elite Safeties Through Recruiting

Advertisement

Nov 22, 2025; Eugene, Oregon, USA; Oregon Ducks head coach Dan Lanning smiles before the game against the Southern California Trojans at Autzen Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Troy Wayrynen-Imagn Images | Troy Wayrynen-Imagn Images

Advertisement

One of the biggest signings for the Oregon Ducks is five-star safety Jett Washington. Washington is the No. 22 recruit in the nation, the No. 2 safety, and the No. 1 player from Nevada, per Rivals. While the Ducks signed several elite recruits, Washington could prove to be the most important signing for Oregon.

Washington is a natural athlete, and after choosing between USC, Alabama, and Oregon, the five-star recruit will find himself in Eugene in 2026. Athleticism runs in Washington’s family, as he is the nephew of NBA legend Kobe Bryant, and he can be an immediate difference maker on defense in 2026.

“I think the options are limitless when you see a player of Jett’s ability. He’s got great ball instincts, he can attack. He’s a physical hitter. You look at a lot of things that we were able to do with Dillon this year, Dillon Thieneman on his stack position, I think Jett translates to a lot of that stuff really well as well,” Lanning said of Washington.

Advertisement

Nov 18, 2023; Tempe, Arizona, USA; Oregon Ducks head coach Dan Lanning against the Arizona State Sun Devils at Mountain America Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

The Oregon Ducks also signed four-star safety Devin Jackson, another top 100 recruit. According to the Rivals’ Industry Rankings, Jackson is the No. 68 recruit in the nation, the No. 5 safety, and the No. 9 player from Florida. Despite efforts from the Florida Gators and several other top programs, the effort the Oregon Ducks put in landed them another elite safety in 2026. 

MORE: Dan Lanning Challenging Mike Bellotti In Oregon Coach Milestone

MORE: Oregon Ducks Recruiting Another Multi-Sport Athlete to Eugene

Advertisement

MORE: Oregon Ducks Who Are Still Pending NFL Draft Decisions 

Advertisement

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER HERE! 

Despite not being rated in the top 100, the Ducks also signed four-star safety Xavier Lherisse. Oregon has a strong history of developing players on both sides of the ball, and Lhresse has a high ceiling. With the Ducks, he could break out on the defense and become a top safety over time.

Advertisement

Oct 28, 2023; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Oregon Ducks head coach Dan Lanning congratulates players after defeating the Utah Utes at Rice-Eccles Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Christopher Creveling-Imagn Images | Christopher Creveling-Imagn Images

Why Recruiting At Safety Was Important For Oregon

The Oregon Ducks are earning a valuable addition at safety, which could be critical for the Ducks in 2026. After Oregon’s success in 2025, the team could be losing key defensive back depth.

One significant player who could be leaving the team after the season is safety Dillon Thieneman. He could return to the team next year, but with the season he had, Thieneman could declare for the 2026 NFL Draft.

Advertisement

Ducks safety Solomon Davis announced his intention to enter the NCAA Transfer Portal, and although Davis played primarily on the special teams, that is still another player set to leave the team ahead of 2026. Whether the incoming recruits are ready to play right away or not, the team needed to add depth at the position, and the Ducks landed elite talent in doing so.

Advertisement

New co-defensive coordinator and safeties coach Chris Hampton, right, joins the first practice of spring for Oregon football as they prepare for the 2023 season.

Eug 031623 Uo Spring Fb 06 | Chris Pietsch/The Register-Guard / USA TODAY NETWORK

Advertisement

Oregon has had a top defense this season and has done well at stopping the pass. The defense allowed just 5.36 yards per attempt and 144.1 yards per game in the air. 

Despite Oregon defensive coordinator Tosh Lupoi becoming the head coach of the Cal Bears, the Ducks’ defense has the same amount of potential. Notably, defensive backs coach Chris Hampton is expected to be promoted to defensive coordinator.

Not only is Oregon hiring in-house, but it is the coach who recruited the elite safeties. Hampton will set up the incoming athletes for much success, keeping Oregon as a national title contender. 

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield applauds court ruling blocking SNAP fines on states

Published

on

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield applauds court ruling blocking SNAP fines on states


(Update: Video Added)

SALEM, Ore. (KTVZ) — On Monday, a federal judge blocked efforts by the Trump administration to fine states millions of dollars for administering SNAP benefits. 

Read the full press release from the Office Of The Attorney General, including a statement made by Rayfield, below:

Attorney General Dan Rayfield today (Monday) released the following statement after a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to penalize states with millions of dollars in fines related to their Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) operations:

Advertisement

“In Oregon and across the country, SNAP supports families to make ends meet throughout the year. The federal government’s threat to impose this – especially during the holiday season – created needless uncertainty for programs that help people put food on the table. Today’s ruling stops that disruption and allows Oregon to keep administering SNAP without fear of being punished for following the law.”

On November 26, Attorney General Rayfield and a coalition of 20 other attorneys general sued the Trump administration after it attempted to cut off SNAP benefits for tens of thousands of lawful permanent residents. On December 10, the administration reversed itself and issued new guidance, confirming that lawful permanent residents – including former refugees and asylees – remain eligible for SNAP benefits.

Despite that reversal, the administration continued to threaten states with millions of dollars in fines, claiming that states had missed a required “grace period” for implementing the new guidance, even though the final guidance was not issued until December 10.

Today, the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon issued an order temporarily blocking those penalties. The court’s decision prohibits the federal government’s efforts to impose severe financial penalties on states and protects the continued operation of SNAP programs while the case proceeds.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon utility to review PGE plan over data center cost concerns

Published

on

Oregon utility to review PGE plan over data center cost concerns


The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) has accused Portland General Electric (PGE) of circumventing Oregon’s new POWER Act, which mandates that data centers cover their own energy costs.

CUB claims PGE’s proposed cost-sharing framework unfairly burdens residential customers with a significant portion of the expenses associated with data center growth.

The consumer advocacy group was established in 1984, as a utility watchdog over Oregon’s three investor-owned electric utilities, PGE, Pacific Power and Idaho Power.

PAST COVERAGE | Oregon House passes bill making large data centers pay for power grid costs

Advertisement

According to CUB, PGE’s plan would charge residential customers 34-45% of the costs for new power supply and transmission, despite data centers being the primary drivers of increased energy demand.

CUB argues that this approach contradicts the intent of the POWER Act, which aims to prevent Oregon families from subsidizing data centers.

PGE, however, defends its proposal. The company mentioned a new tool called the Peak Growth Modifier as a means to ensure that those driving peak demand growth bear the associated costs.

“The electric grid and generating resources are built to make sure customers are reliably served at moments when usage is at its highest point – this is peak demand,” PGE said. “The principle is simple: customer groups driving peak-demand growth should pay for the infrastructure needed to serve that growth.”

The Oregon Public Utility Commission is currently reviewing PGE’s plan, with a decision expected by April 2026.

Advertisement

The POWER Act, signed by Gov. Kotek, instructed the commission to create a new industrial customer class for those using over 20 megawatts of energy, primarily data centers.

The bill also included provisions for infrastructure cost-sharing mechanisms, customer protections, and long-term contracts for data centers.

What’s the buzz around data centers?

Data centers are facilities that house and run large computer systems. They have been expanding at a fast pace to power the fast-growing AI economy across the country.

They usually contain several computer servers, data storage devices, network equipment and other devices that allow for storing, managing, processing and transmitting data.

SEE ALSO | Exploring AI data centers’ impact on U.S. resources

Advertisement

Currently, residential customers account for 40% of total electricity consumption, while data centers represent only 6% in Oregon.

However, data centers are expected to grow to approximately 20% of total consumption by 2030.

Oregon currently has 138 data centers, according to Data Center Map’s database.

Data centers use a lot of electricity, especially those specifically built to support generative AI.

A new Pew Research Center analysis of federal and international data shows U.S. data centers used 183 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2024, about 4% of all electricity used nationwide, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

Advertisement

That’s roughly equal to the entire annual electricity use of Pakistan.

According to Pew and the IEA, a typical AI-optimized hyperscale center uses as much electricity as 100,000 homes a year. Newer mega-facilities could use 20 times more once they go online.

In major hubs, especially Northern Virginia, clusters of these centers now consume more than a quarter of the state’s total electricity supply, the Electric Power Research Institute reports.

Carnegie Mellon University estimates U.S. electricity bills could rise 8% by 2030 just from data centers and crypto mining alone, with even steeper hikes in the most data-center-dense regions.

Data centers in the U.S. also consumed 17 billion gallons of fresh, drinking water in 2023, mainly to cool energy-intensive AI chips.

Advertisement

By 2028, hyperscale centers alone could be consuming 16 to 33 billion gallons annually — roughly the yearly use of a mid-sized U.S. city.

The Associated Press and Emma Withrow of The National Desk contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending