Connect with us

Oregon

Small Eastern Oregon town rushes to shore up riverbanks after heavy rains

Published

on

Small Eastern Oregon town rushes to shore up riverbanks after heavy rains


Echo metropolis administrator David Slaght explains Tuesday how floods and excessive water has modified the Umatilla River and what public officers have to do repair it. Heavy rains precipitated the river to swell over the previous a number of days, threatening houses within the small Jap Oregon city south of Hermiston.

Antonio Sierra / OPB

The Umatilla River floods might have ended two years in the past, however the Jap Oregon communities that line the river are nonetheless feeling the consequences.

A bed room neighborhood of about 600 folks just a few miles south of Hermiston, Echo took the brunt of heavy rain runoff from the close by Blue Mountains over the previous a number of days, inflicting the banks of the Umatilla River to swell to twice their regular measurement.

Advertisement

Echo metropolis administrator David Slaght described it Tuesday as a excessive water occasion slightly than a flood, however houses are nonetheless threatened by the rising waters.

On Monday, Echo secured $400,000 from the Umatilla County Board of Commissioners for emergency work to guard houses. Since then, contractors have hauled rocks to the riverbank to halt the encroaching river water.

Slaght stated the worst is probably going over, however the metropolis nonetheless wants a long-term resolution in a area that’s discovered itself extra vulnerable to flooding in recent times.

“We need to relieve the stress on this rock or this rock gained’t final perpetually,” he stated as he stood in entrance of the sediment-stained river. “If we don’t pull the present off, it’s a short lived repair. And we wish it to be a everlasting repair. And the one method to do this is to educate the river again and extra into the middle channel.”

Slaght stated the turning level for Echo was the 2020 floods.

Advertisement

In February 2020, heavy rainfall mixed with a quickly melting snowpack led to important flooding throughout Umatilla County, together with Echo.

Even after the water receded, Slaght stated the trail of the river modified. The brand new form of the river means a flooded Umatilla doesn’t simply have an effect on alfalfa fields or cattle pasture, however a number of houses.

Dennis Sather and his spouse Gina have lived at their Echo house close to the Umatilla for 26 years. After 2020, Sather watched as his house immediately grew to become riverfront property.

“Now I can throw a rock from my yard into the river simply,” he stated.

The Sathers began contemplating their plans ought to the river attain their home, however have been grateful that town and county have been in a position to shore up the river earlier than it acquired to that time.

Advertisement

In a small city with a small finances, Slaght stated his metropolis wants money to fund a everlasting flood mitigation undertaking alongside the river. He stated he’s persevering with talks with the federal authorities to get the undertaking funded.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls

Published

on

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Elon Musk to stop plan to kill 450,000 barred owls


play

Four Oregon lawmakers are calling on Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to help stop a plan that would kill 450,000 barred owls in an effort to save endangered spotted owls over the next 30 years.

The entrepreneurs were named by President-elect Donald Trump to lead the so-called Department of Government Efficiency.

Advertisement

In a letter sent Tuesday, state Rep. Ed Diehl, R-Stayton, Rep. David Gomberg, D-Lincoln County, Rep. Virgle Osborne, R-Roseburg, and Sen.-elect Bruce Starr, R-Yamhill and Polk counties, asked the incoming Trump administration officials to stop the reportedly more than $1 billion project, calling it a “budget buster” and “impractical.”

Environmental groups Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy in late 2024 filed a federal lawsuit in Washington state to stop the planned killing of the barred owls.

Here is why the Oregon lawmakers are opposed to the plan, what the plan would do and why it is controversial.

Why the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to kill barred owls

In August 2024, after years of planning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service came up with a proposal to kill a maximum of 450,000 invasive barred owls over 30 years as a way to quell habitat competition between them and the northern spotted owl.

Advertisement

Spotted owl populations have been rapidly declining due in part to competition from invasive barred owls, which originate in the eastern United States. Northern spotted owls are listed as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act.

According to the USFWS plan, barred owls are one of the main factors driving the rapid decline of northern and California spotted owls, and with their removal, less than one-half of 1% of the North American barred owl population would be killed.

The plan was formally approved by the Biden administration in September 2024.

Why environmental groups want to stop the plan to kill barred owls

Shortly after it was announced, Animal Wellness Action and the Center for a Humane Economy immediately responded in opposition to the plan to kill barred owls. They argued the plan was both ill-conceived and that habitat loss is the main factor driving the spotted owls decline.

Advertisement

“Spotted owls have experienced significant population decline over decades,” a news release from the groups filing the lawsuit said. “This decline began and continues due to habitat loss, particularly the timber harvest of old growth forest. The plan is not only ill-conceived and inhumane, but also destined to fail as a strategy to save the spotted owl.”

In their complaint, the groups argued the USFWS violated the National Environmental Policy Act by failing to properly analyze the impacts of their strategy and improperly rejecting reasonable alternatives to the mass killing of barred owls, such as nonlethal population control approaches, spotted owl rehabilitation efforts and better protections for owl habitat.

Why Oregon lawmakers are asking Musk to stop the plan to kill barred owls

The four Oregon lawmakers are siding with the environmental groups and calling for Musk and Ramaswamy to reverse the federal government’s plan to kill the barred owls. It was not immediately clear how the two could stop the plan.

The lawmakers letter stated the plan was impractical and a “budget buster,” with cost estimates for the plan around $1.35 billion, according to a press release by the two groups.

The letter speculates there likely isn’t an excess of people willing to do the killing for free: “it is expected that the individuals doing the shooting across millions of acres – including within Crater Lake National Park – will require compensation for the arduous, night-time hunts,” according to the press release.

Advertisement

“A billion-dollar price tag for this project should get the attention of everyone on the Trump team concerned about government efficiency,” Diehl said. “Killing one type of owl to save another is outrageous and doomed to fail. This plan will swallow up Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars for no good reason.”

USFWS says they aren’t trying to trade one bird for the other.

“As wildlife professionals, we approached this issue carefully and did not come to this decision lightly,” USFWS Oregon State Supervisor Kessina Lee said in announcing the decision in August. “Spotted owls are at a crossroads, and we need to manage both barred owls and habitat to save them. This isn’t about choosing one owl over the other. If we act now, future generations will be able to see both owls in our Western forests.”  

Statesman Journal reporter Zach Urness contributed to this report.

Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat

Published

on

Santa Clara’s last-second overtime tip-in hands Oregon State men a heartbreaking defeat


A rebound basket with 3.5 seconds left in overtime allowed Santa Clara to escape with an 82-81 overtime win over Oregon State in men’s basketball Thursday night.

The Beavers, looking for their first road win of the season and their third since 2021, just missed when Tyeree Bryan’s tip-in with 3.5 seconds left was the difference.

Oregon State, leading 81-78, had two chances to rescue the win.

Adama Bal, fouled while shooting a three-pointer with 10 seconds remaining, made his first two free throws but missed the third. But Bal outfought OSU for the rebound, then kicked the ball out to Christoph Tilly, whose three-point shot glanced off the rim. Bryan then knifed between two Beaver rebounders, collecting the ball with his right hand and tipping it off the backboard and into the basket.

Advertisement

OSU (12-5, 2-2 WCC) came up short on a half-court shot at the buzzer.

The loss spoiled what was a 12-point second-half comeback for Oregon State, which led by as many as four points in overtime.

Parsa Fallah led the Beavers with 24 points and seven rebounds. Michael Rataj had a double-double with 16 points and 10 rebounds, while Isaiah Sy scored 12 points and Damarco Minor 11.

Elijah Maji scored 21 points for Santa Clara (11-6, 3-1), which has won eight of its last nine games.

The game was tied at 32-32 at halftime following a first half where OSU trailed by as many as 12 points. Fallah and Minor combined to score the final eight points as OSU finished the half on a 10-2 run.

Advertisement

The game began to get away from the Beavers again as Santa Clara built a 60-48 lead with 9:43 remaining. Sy got OSU going with a three-pointer, as the Beavers whittled away at the deficit. OSU eventually grabbed the lead at 67-65 with 5:19 left on another three by Sy. It was a defensive brawl for the rest of regulation, as neither team scored during the final 1:58.

Oregon State never trailed in overtime until the final three seconds. A Sy three with 1:29 left gave the Beavers a four-point cushion. After the Broncos later cut the lead to one, Fallah’s layup with 17 seconds left put OSU up 81-78.

Oregon State returns to action Saturday when the Beavers complete their two-game road trip at Pacific. Game time is 7 p.m.

–Nick Daschel can be reached at 360-607-4824, ndaschel@oregonian.com or @nickdaschel.

Our journalism needs your support. Subscribe today to OregonLive.com.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon Department of Forestry leader resigns as controversy roils agency

Published

on

Oregon Department of Forestry leader resigns as controversy roils agency


Cal Mukumoto answers to the Oregon Board of Forestry, a citizen board appointed by the governor that helps oversee and implement forest policy. His resignation was announced Thursday during a board meeting by Chair Jim Kelly.Sean Meagher/The Oregonian

Oregon State Forester Cal Mukumoto has resigned.

Mukumoto’s resignation was announced Thursday by Board of Forestry Chair Jim Kelly during a meeting of the board. Mukumoto answers to the board, a citizen panel appointed by the governor that helps oversee and implement forest policy.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending