Oregon
Our picks, your votes: The best pitchers in Oregon’s Class 6A softball

As the spring season is underway, The Oregonian/OregonLive wanted to take a look at the top pitchers in Oregon’s Class 6A softball scene.
Here is a look at some of the top players in the circle. Below, vote for who you think is the best pitcher in the state.
Payton Burnham, senior, Sheldon

Oregon
No. 6 Oregon softball tops Michigan to take sole possession of third place in Big Ten

Rylee McCoy’s RBI single in the sixth gave No. 6 Oregon a series-opening win over Michigan.
Paige Sinicki led off the frame with a double and McCoy hit a first pith to right to drive in the winning run in a 3-2 Ducks win Friday night at Jane Sanders Stadium.
Elise Sokolsky (10) struck out two and allowed one hit in 1.2 innings of winning relief for Oregon (33-3, 7-1 Big Ten), which moved into sole possession of third place in the conference.
Katie Flannery homered to lead off the bottom of the second and Stefini Ma’ake added an RBI ground out.
Maddie Erickson put Michigan (27-10, 6-2) on the board with a solo home run in the fifth, then Jenissa Conway tied it with a solo shot in the sixth to end the day for Lyndsey Grein, who allowed two runs on three hits and one walk with eight strikeouts over 5.1 IP in a no-decision.
Sokolsky allowed a one-out single in the seventh but got a strikeout and fly out to leave the tying run aboard as the Wolverines went 0 for 6 with runners on base.
The teams play again at 4 p.m. Saturday.
Oregon
New structure, experience provide potential boons for Oregon State defensive line
CORVALLIS — It can only go up from here.
Last season, the Oregon State defensive line ranked 133rd — dead last in FBS — in sacks with just seven all year. The Beavers were 130th in tackles for loss (45) and 107th in rushing defense.
Injuries hammered OSU, particularly on the interior, forcing inexperienced players to shoulder heavy snap counts. But working their way back to health, restructuring the coaching staff and adding experience has the defensive line group optimistic this spring about a potential big leap ahead.
“By the time we get to fall camp, we’ll be a full go,” defensive line coach Ilaisa Tuiaki said. “With the injured guys, there are still a couple of guys we’re missing because of injuries last year. The improvement this year has been good. We played a lot of young kids last year. D-tackles took some lumps that way. But it will pay dividends for us this year.”
Among those who aren’t participating this spring, but could return to action this season are senior Nick Norris and redshirt sophomore Kelze Howard. Both missed the entire 2024 season with knee injuries.
Head coach Trent Bray has taken over play-calling duties for the Beavers defense, and Tuiaki will split his work with Kharyee Marshall — with Tuiaki leading the interior defensive linemen, and Marshall the edge rushers.
These structural changes allow for a more individualized approach in coaching up a group that, while a year older, still has young contributors. Meetings for defensive tackles and edges are separate, and for the most part they practice as separate position groups.
“This is the first time I’ve experienced that in my career being on the defensive side of the ball, and I think it’s huge,” Tuiaki said. “It’s allowed me to be a bit more detailed in the nuanced play of the D-tackles. You have some teams that will put corners and safeties in the same room, but they always have an assistant helping them out.
“There’s benefits to doing it this way and benefits to having the D-linemen all in one room, but the system we play and all the different things the edges do, they are totally different positions.”
OSU added veteran Tah-Jae Mullix along the interior defensive line via transfer from Western Carolina. While he too has been banged up in the spring, Mullix is expected to return to full participation next week.
Coming back are players like defensive tackle Tevita Pome’e and star edge rusher Nikko Taylor; he gained an extra year of eligibility thanks to the waiver for former junior college players brought on by Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia.
Pome’e, a former Oregon transfer, said the year of experience — while a trial by fire — was valuable for himself and the other young defensive linemen thrust into key roles. Primarily off the field, he said, even as the results on the field came up short.
“I feel like for me, personally, it’s the connection,” Pome’e said. “Now we have that connection with every single one. We get to know each other. Before, I didn’t really know them because I just got in. But I feel like now we have that connection, that bonding that I was looking for. Now we just get going, and everything clicks.”
Taylor will have a central role in remedying OSU’s dead-last pass rush — having amassed a team-high 2.5 sacks last season to go along with 46 total tackles and eight quarterback hurries.
“I felt like I had a great year, but there’s a lot of things I needed to improve on,” Taylor said. “One of the things was being a better pass-rusher. Coming back and being able to rush the passer more efficiently would really help.”
— Ryan Clarke covers college sports for The Oregonian/OregonLive. Reach him at RClarke@Oregonian.com or on Twitter/X: @RyanTClarke. Find him on Bluesky: @ryantclarke.bsky.social.
Oregon
Unemployment benefits for striking workers being considered in Oregon, Washington

Lawmakers in Oregon and Washington are considering whether striking workers should receive unemployment benefits, following recent walkouts by Boeing factory workers, hospital nurses and teachers in the Pacific Northwest that highlighted a new era of American labor activism.
Oregon’s measure would make it the first state to provide pay for picketing public employees — who aren’t allowed to strike in most states, let alone receive benefits for it. Washington’s would pay striking private sector workers for up to 12 weeks, starting after at least two weeks on the line.
“The bottom line is this helps level the playing field,” said Democratic state Sen. Marcus Riccelli, who sponsored Washington’s bill. “Without a social safety net during a strike, workers are faced with tremendous pressure to end the strike quickly or never go on strike in the first place.”
But the bills are raising questions about how they would affect employers, especially amid economic uncertainties tied to federal funding cuts and tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.
“It’s inappropriate to unbalance the bargaining table in a way that forces employers to pay for the costs of a striking worker,” Lindsey Hueer, government affairs director with the Association of Washington Business, told senators during a committee hearing in February. “Unemployment insurance should be a safety net for workers who have no job to return to.”
So far only two states, New York and New Jersey, give striking workers unemployment benefits. Senate Democrats in Connecticut have revived legislation that would provide financial help for striking workers after the governor vetoed a similar measure last year.
Benefits bills advance but face opposition
The measures in Washington and Oregon have been passed by the state Senate of each and are now in the House. The Washington bill faces its final committee hearings on Friday and Monday.
The Economic Policy Institute, a nonprofit, pro-labor think tank in Washington, D.C., has studied the effects of giving unemployment benefits to striking workers and found it to be good for workers and employers alike, said Daniel Perez, state economic analyst for the organization.
First, he said, lengthy strikes are extremely rare. More than half of U.S. labor strikes end within two days — workers wouldn’t receive pay in those cases — and just 14% last more than two weeks. Second, the policy costs very little — less than 1% of unemployment insurance expenditures in every state that has considered legislation.
Bryan Corliss, spokesperson for the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace union, told The Associated Press that the big winners would be low-wage workers.
“If low-wage workers had the financial stability to actually go on strike for more than a day or two without risking eviction, we believe that would incentivize companies to actually come to the table and make a deal,” he said.
During a hearing in the Washington House labor committee last week, several Republican lawmakers tried to amend the bill to require striking workers to look for other jobs or to shorten the time covered from 12 weeks to four. The Democratic majority shot those ideas down.
Republican Rep. Suzanne Schmidt said the bill might be good for workers, but it would hurt employers.
“We’ve seen instances of this with the Boeing strike last year for the machinists,” she said. “We had 32,000 people on strike at the same time and if this had been in play it would have cost millions of dollars to cover those workers. Boeing did actually lose billions having the workers on strike for several months.”
The Oregon bill, which also would make striking workers eligible for unemployment benefits after two weeks, sparked a similar debate, both among Democratic and Republican lawmakers as well as constituents, with hundreds of people submitting written testimony.
The state has seen two large strikes in recent years: Thousands of nurses and dozens of doctors at Providence’s eight Oregon hospitals were on strike for six weeks earlier this year, while a 2023 walkout of Portland Public Schools teachers shuttered schools for over three weeks in the state’s largest district.
The Oregon Senate passed the measure largely along party lines, with two Democrats voting against it.
On the Senate floor, Democratic Sen. Janeen Sollman said she worried about the effect on public employers such as school districts, which “do not have access to extra pots of money.” Private employers pay into the state’s unemployment trust fund through a payroll tax, but few public employers do, meaning that they would have to reimburse the fund for any payments made to their workers.
Democratic Sen. Chris Gorsek, who supported the bill, argued it wouldn’t cost public employers more than what they’ve already budgeted for salaries, as workers aren’t paid when they’re on strike. Also, those receiving unemployment benefits get at most 65% of their weekly pay, and benefit amounts are capped, according to a document presented to lawmakers by employment department officials.
“Unemployment insurance is partial wage replacement, so unemployment insurance in and of itself is not an additional cost to the employer,” Gorsek said. “In fact, the only way Senate Bill 916 would yield additional cost for what was already budgeted by the employer is if the employer decided to hire replacement workers.”
___
Rush reported from Portland, Oregon. Associated Press writer Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut, contributed.
-
News1 week ago
Trump Is Trying to Gain More Power Over Elections. Is His Effort Legal?
-
Politics1 week ago
Texas DOGE bill passes Senate to streamline state regulations
-
News1 week ago
LeShon Johnson, Ex-N.F.L. Running Back, Ran Major Dogfighting Kennel, U.S. Says
-
News1 week ago
Federal judge who drew Trump's anger picks up new case against administration
-
World1 week ago
US Army says vehicle of four missing soldiers found in Lithuania
-
Sports1 week ago
Straight Outta L.A.: Ice Cube's new BIG3 team is the Riot and 'here to shake things up'
-
Technology1 week ago
Some Kindles now let you double-tap anywhere to turn the page
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Tiny Love Stories: ‘I Asked Him Back to My Place’