Connect with us

Oregon

Oregon’s congressional Democrats call out ‘alarming’ issues at Sheridan prison

Published

on

Oregon’s congressional Democrats call out ‘alarming’ issues at Sheridan prison


play

Six members of Oregon’s congressional delegation sent a letter Friday to the Federal Bureau of Prisons demanding “swift action” on staffing shortages, inmate medical needs and other “alarming” issues at the Federal Correctional Institute in Sheridan.

The demands come after a report released by the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General on Wednesday found “several serious safety and security issues” at FCI Sheridan impacting employees and inmates.

Advertisement

FCI Sheridan houses male inmates at its medium-security prison and minimum-security prison camp which opened in 1989 and at a detention center which opened in 1995.

What the report from the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General found

The DOJ OIG conducted an unannounced, on-site inspection of FCI Sheridan between Nov. 27 and Dec. 1, 2023, interviewing employees and inmates, reviewing security footage and collecting records related to programs for inmates and education; staffing levels; inmate medical and mental health care; and employee and inmate misconduct.

The medium-security prison was housing 988 inmates within its eight general population units and one special housing unit as of Nov. 28. It was at full capacity, according to the inspector general’s report. The federal detention center was housing 291 inmates, 97% of its capacity, and the camp had 366 inmates, 95% of its capacity.

Among the issues identified was staff shortages. According to the report, FCI Sheridan had 81% of 357 positions filled, and significant use of overtime or “augmentation” was required for the correctional officer posts.

Advertisement

“Even with the use of overtime and augmentation, we found that institution management is not always able to fill all correctional officer posts, which has caused inmates to be minimally supervised or, in certain instances, not supervised at all,” the report said.

The staffing shortages also meant “significant delays” in inmate health care. FCI Sheridan had been without a phlebotomist to draw and prepare blood samples since March 2022, leading to a backlog of 725 lab orders, according to the report. After the on-site visit, FCI Sheridan hired an on-site phlebotomist and reported the backlog was now 44 lab orders as of May. A backlog of 274 X-ray orders was also reduced to 84 following the visit.

Without enough correctional officers to escort inmates to outside appointments, 101 appointments for medical care had been canceled between January and November 2023. Dental care was also delayed at the facility with 350 inmates waiting for routine dental care in October 2023. Of those 350 inmates, 41% had been waiting for two years or more, the report said.

The Residential Drug Abuse Program was suspended entirely three days after the unannounced visit, according to the report. The program had fewer than one-third of the positions filled during the inspection and inmates reported concerns and frustration with their inability to participate in the nine-month program meant to help them address substance-abuse disorders. The program also earns inmates with no violent offenses in their history a one-year reduction credit on their sentence.

“We know this program has since been suspended entirely and the majority of inmates eligible for RDAP were transferred to other facilities offering this programming,” Oregon U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley and U.S. Reps. Earl Blumenauer, Suzanne Bonamici, Andrea Salinas, and Val Hoyle wrote on Friday. “This is an important program for prisoners suffering from substance use disorder and we are concerned it is no longer available at FCI Sheridan.”

Advertisement

‘Deficiencies showcase a comprehensive failure by leadership’

The Democratic legislators wrote they were also concerned with the reported length to investigate and address employee misconduct allegations — 1.5 years in some cases — and the lack of a way to centrally track the number of allegations of inmate-on-inmate sexual misconduct reported to FCI Sheridan employees.

“While we are glad to see FCI Sheridan is now tracking this, we are concerned this was not the case less than six months ago,” the letter said.

The legislators wrote they were concerned with the written response from Federal Bureau of Prisons Director Colette Peters.

“Taken together, these deficiencies showcase a comprehensive failure by leadership at FCI Sheridan and BOP to protect both inmates and prison staff,” the letter said.

Wyden, Merkley, Blumenauer, Salinas, Hoyle and Bonamici included a list of questions in their letter they want answered by the Bureau of Prisons by June 14. They include:

Advertisement
  • How many current vacancies, broken down by position, are there at FCI Sheridan?
  • How many employees are under investigation for misconduct?
  • How does BOP plan to ensure there is a special investigative agent on staff so that similar investigatory backlogs do not occur in the future?
  • Does BOP plan to authorize additional staff positions at FCI Sheridan? If so, how many?
  • How many inmates are currently waiting to receive routine dental care?
  • What does BOP plan to do to reduce the waiting time for dental care?
  • What plans does BOP have in place to ensure inmates needing supplemental oxygen are able to receive it in a timely manner?
  • When was FCI Sheridan most recently accredited by the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care?
  • What plans does BOP have in place to ensure a backlog of medical testing does not occur again?
  • Does BOP plan to maintain a phlebotomist on staff at FCI Sheridan?
  • Does BOP plan to restart the RDAP at FCI Sheridan? If so, when?
  • Does BOP plan to digitize all security cameras within FCI Sheridan? If so, by what date?
  • Does BOP plan to fund the estimated $21.6 million in infrastructure upgrades needed at FCI Sheridan? If so, by what date?
  • Does BOP plan to adopt all of DOJ OIG’s recommendations? If not, why?
  • What resources does BOP need from Congress to address these issues across the network of federal prisons?

Dianne Lugo covers the Oregon Legislature and equity issues. Reach her at dlugo@statesmanjournal.com or on X @DianneLugo





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

Razor clam harvest ban lifted for northern Oregon coast amid shellfish toxin scare

Published

on

Razor clam harvest ban lifted for northern Oregon coast amid shellfish toxin scare


Oregon fish and wildlife officials reopened the northern Oregon coast for razor clamming last week while keeping a prohibition in place south of Yachats and continuing a coastwide ban on harvesting bay clams and mussels.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife had closed the entire coast to shellfish harvesting earlier this month because of a potentially deadly toxin, paralytic shellfish poisoning, or PSP, that had sickened at least 20 people who had eaten Oregon coast mussels.

No one is reported to have died in the outbreak, but some were hospitalized, according to Oregon health officials. Naturally occurring marine toxins are not eliminated by cooking or freezing.

Officials said Friday that two consecutive tests had shown razor clams in the newly reopened area were below the threshold at which harvesting is banned due to biotoxins. They said the earlier closure was precautionary, and that testing had not detected biotoxin levels above the closure threshold.

Advertisement

However, razor clamming is closed from the Yachats River to the California border, where tests have detected high levels of paralytic shellfish poisoning and domoic acid.

Harvesting bay clams and mussels remains prohibited along the entire Oregon and Washington coast.

The state also has reopened commercial oyster fisheries in Tillamook Bay and Netarts, while the Umpqua River/Winchester Bay commercial oyster fishery remains closed. Crab harvesting is open for the length of the Oregon coast.

The Oregon Department of Agriculture operates a toll-free shellfish biotoxin hotline 800-448-2474​ and maintains a list of closures on its website.

— Elliot Njus edits business news. Contact him at enjus@oregonian.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon’s Linn County to revisit large-scale livestock rules following pushback from farm groups

Published

on

Oregon’s Linn County to revisit large-scale livestock rules following pushback from farm groups


Just six months after Linn County commissioners thought they’d voted to limit large-scale poultry farms, the commission is now revisiting its decision, after learning other livestock operations could also be restricted.

In December 2023, Linn County was the first county in Oregon to make use of a rule through state Senate Bill 85. That bill, signed into law last year by Gov. Tina Kotek, added more state oversight and new requirements for large Confined Animal Feeding Operations in Oregon. Environmental advocates said the bill was the first in decades in the state to reform large poultry and livestock facilities, known as CAFOs.

The law also gave local governments the authority to require setbacks, or buffers, between a proposed large-scale CAFO facility and neighboring properties like residential buildings.

FILE: A sign declares opposition to large chicken grow-out facilities planned in Scio, Ore., east of Salem, in this Dec. 9, 2022, photo.

Advertisement

Bradley W. Parks / OPB

In Linn County, commissioners adopted a one-mile setback after a coalition of farmers and community members fought back against three large poultry farms that were proposed in the county. Two have since scrapped plans to develop there, while one recently had its CAFO permit temporarily withdrawn pending a state reconsideration.

Now, commissioners are revisiting the issue. That’s because when they approved the rule back in December, commissioners were under the impression they had approved setbacks for poultry facilities only. But the current text of the setback does not specify whether it should apply to other livestock animals like cattle or hogs, according to Alex Paul, the county’s spokesperson.

When the setbacks were approved, Linn County Farm Bureau President Denver Pugh wrote to commissioners to say he was disappointed the local and state farm bureau were not consulted first. Pugh wrote that the setbacks would drive away potential profitable agriculture.

How Oregon farms manage manure, and what’s changing this year

Advertisement

Kendra Kimbirauskas, a Scio farmer and a member of Farmers Against Foster Farms — a group opposing large-scale poultry farms — said it’s good that commissioners are ensuring there are no unintended consequences of the rule.

“But at the end of the day we maintain that the mile setback is good, it’s good for our local farms, it’s good for our local communities,” Kimbirauskas said. “It’s put in place to protect Linn County residents from the largest industrial-scale livestock operations that are looking to come into the county because of our water and open space.”

Kimbirauskas said that, while some outside interest groups have claimed the setback would ban large livestock facilities from developing in the county, that’s not true. The rules only apply to new livestock operations that haven’t been built. There’s also an exception that allows the setbacks to be waived if a proposed project has the support of its neighbors and is appropriate for a specific site.

On June 11, commissioners agreed to reopen a public hearing on property line setbacks for CAFO facilities. The commission will accept written comments about that issue until Monday.

Commissioners will then consider the written comments at their Tuesday meeting and will decide how to move forward, according to Paul, the county spokesman.

Advertisement

Groups opposing large-scale livestock farms are calling on commissioners to consider the environmental impacts of large CAFO facilities.

“Regardless of livestock species, scale is a serious issue when it comes to the impact of these mega-farms and the amount of untreated manure that they generate,” Oregon-based advocacy group Farmers Against Foster Farms wrote in a statement. “We remain steadfast that the County needs to maintain the 1-mile setback for new industrial-scale operations next to property lines.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

25 plants to draw native bees to Oregon gardens in honor of National Pollinator Week

Published

on

25 plants to draw native bees to Oregon gardens in honor of National Pollinator Week


Honeybees get all the attention, but they aren’t the only bees pollinating our gardens. In Oregon, over 500 native bees are out doing their part, too

As National Pollinator Week (June 17-23) nears, it’s time to bring them into the limelight. Many are beautiful – like the metallic sweat bee with emerald green head and thorax or the cute ball of fluff called a digger bee. They’re also docile, leaving people alone as they move from plant to plant gathering and depositing pollen.

Without insect pollinators cucumbers, apples and berries – along with thousands of other plants – wouldn’t bear fruit or vegetables. That makes conservation vital, said Gail Langellotto, entomologist and professor in the OSU College of Agricultural Sciences. To help make this happen she surveyed bee species from 24 Portland-area gardens, all tended by a cadre of OSU Extension master gardeners.

For this Garden Ecology Lab research project, Langellotto visited the gardens monthly to collect bees. They are then sent to experts at the American Museum of Natural History in New York for identification. The information collected enhances the Oregon Bee Atlas, a volunteer program charged with surveying the whole state.

Advertisement

“We want to generate a species list from Oregon gardens,” she said. “Other states have them, but we don’t know what native bees appear in Oregon. If we know which bees we have, we can determine their health and how we might help them.”

The Oregon Bee Atlas is one of several projects undertaken by the Oregon Bee Project, a collaboration of OSU Extension, the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Oregon Department of Forestry. The project was undertaken by mandate of the Oregon Legislature after 50,000 bumble bees were killed five years ago when blooming linden trees in a parking lot were sprayed with pesticide.

“The Oregon Bee Project is about putting tools in people’s hands to literally build and care for native bee pollinator habitat, and gardeners are really at the forefront of that effort,” said Andony Melathopoulos, OSU Extension bee specialist and leader of OSU’s participation in the project.

On the Oregon State campus in Corvallis, Al Shay, a horticulture instructor at OSU, has led a campaign to show how to be kind to bees. He and his students build pollinator houses and plant accompanying gardens. They’ve installed them, not only on campus, but around town at the Corvallis Fire Department downtown, the Methodist Church and Sunset Park.

Shay hopes to have 20 more pollinator houses placed in public locations by next year, some accompanied by gardens.

Advertisement

“As we become more urbanized, it makes sense to provide habitat for pollinators,” he said. “We’re trying to get the word out and tell people to do the same things in their own backyards.”

Langellotto agrees. Part of her research is looking at volunteer gardens and noting what conditions pollinators thrive in. They use mapping and geographic information systems (GIS) to see what’s adjacent to the gardens – highways, forests, waterways, shopping centers, farms or any other land use that may be nearby.

“We expect gardens can be a fantastic habitat for bees,” she said. “Gardens can be incredible for conservation in general. If we’re able to identify garden features that help conserve bees we will communicate that and hopefully get gardeners to do some of these things.”

Plant selection is the biggie, she said. One tiny garden in her study is right up against Interstate 5 but had the second most number of bees of the 24 they surveyed. And most likely it will rank first or second in diversity.

“It suggests that intentional plant choices make a difference,” Langellotto said. “If you plant it, they will come.”

Advertisement

Native plants play a large role, but there are many exotics that do just as well. Look for single flowers with flat faces; fluffy double flowers deter bees. Choose a diversity of plants and have some that bloom at different times of the year – some plants like Oregon grape even bloom in winter.

Plant in swaths. Planting something is better than nothing, but you’ll notice that a single plant rarely has pollinators visiting.

One of the most important things gardeners can put into practice is limiting use of pesticides (check with your local Extension office or Master Gardeners to determine what is wrong with your plants before treating).

Native bees are solitary and live in ground nests, so leave a little bare ground for them.

“Bees are crucial to the food we eat,” Langellotto said. “They help maintain the plants we love. Something as simple as planting a sustainable garden can help with conservation.”

Advertisement

Top 25 plants for attracting pollinators

Oregon grape flowers bloom at Camassia Nature Preserve in West Linn, a 26-acre natural area managed by international environmental nonprofit The Nature Conservancy. Jamie Hale/The Oregonian

Bloom winter through early spring (February through April)

Vine maple (Acer circinatum): Native, deciduous large shrub or small tree that can be trained to a single or multi-trunked form. Good as an understory plant under tall evergreens. Zone 7.

Tall Oregon grape (Berberis aquifolium, formerly Mahonia): The Oregon State flower, this native evergreen shrub busts out with huge can’t-miss-them clusters of yellow flowers. Zone 7.

Camas (Camassia spp.): A native bulb with tall foliage and an even taller stalk of blue flowers.

Advertisement

Crabapple (Malus floribunda): Deciduous tree with masses of pink or white blooms, followed by red berries. Zone 4.

Willow (Salix spp.): Many different types of this deciduous shrub or tree, depending on which you choose. Some have a graceful weeping form. Zone 6.

Bloom spring through early summer (April through June)

Western serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia spp.): Native deciduous shrub or small tree with star-shaped white flowers followed by maroon-purple berries. Zone 4.

Borage (Borago officinalis): An annual herb with fuzzy foliage and delightful clusters of blue flowers; will reseed year to year. An ancient plant that is used for medicinal purposes.

Advertisement

California lilac (Ceanothus spp.): Tough evergreen shrub with knobs of blue flowers that cover the plant like a blanket. Drought tolerant. There are many cultivars. Zone 7-8.

Tickseed (Coreopsis spp.): An adaptable perennial prized for its bright yellow flowers, often with a red eye, and drought tolerance. Various zones.

Geranium (Geramium spp.): These perennials are not the blustery blooming annual plants that we’re all familiar with; they are tough, hardy perennials with five-petaled flowers in many shades of purple and pink. Zone 3.

Globe gilia (Gilia capitata): A native annual that’s very adaptable to different situations. Sports puffs of lavender flowers. May reseed.

Lupine (Lupinus spp.): Tall spikes of flowers make these perennials, annuals, and biennials distinctive plants in the garden. The most common is blue, but hybrids run the gamut from pink and red, yellow and white and even bi-colors. Zone 3.

Advertisement

Chokecherry (Prunus virginiana): A native deciduous shrub or small tree with pendulous white flowers and attractive bark. Zone 2.

Native annual wildflowers

California poppy (Eschscholzia californica).Staff

Bloom mid- to late summer (July through September)

Blue giant hyssop (Agastache foeniculum and spp.) A drought-tolerant perennial with rods of lavender-blue flowers. Smells like anise when crushed. Zone 4.

California poppy (Eschscholzia californica): The familiar, friendly orange perennial wildflower that’s as tough as it comes. Drought tolerant. Zone 5.

Oregon gumweed (Grindelia stricta or integrifolia): A native perennial bearing school-bus yellow, daisylike flowers. Great for the beach. Zone 8.

Advertisement

Sneezeweed (Helenium autumnale): Another native, yellow-blooming perennial with daisylike flowers and a big cone in the center. Zone 3.

Showy tarweed (Madia elegans): This yellow-blooming native plant is an annual herb, and a beautiful one at that. Flowers are centered with a red ring.

Catmint (Nepeta x faassenii): A pretty, pest-free perennial with gray-green, fragrant foliage and spikes of small flowers in shades of blue and purple. Zone 5.

Russian sage (Perovskia atriplicifolia): Airy clouds of lavender flowers distinguish this heat-loving, low-water perennial. Zone 4.

Phacelia (Phacelia spp.): A fast-growing annual with fernlike foliage topped with fascinating blue flowers that unfurl in a fiddlehead shape. Zone 7.

Advertisement

Stonecrop (Sedum spp.): There are any species of this succulent, both tall and low. Groundcovers normally put out small yellow flowers; tall have blooms in shades of pink. Drought tolerant. Various hardiness, some as low as Zone 4.

Bloom late summer to fall (September through November)

Michaelmas daisy (Aster amellus): An easy-to-grow perennial with daisylike flowers in various shades of purple and pink. There’s even a white one. Zone 4.

Goldenrod (Solidago canadensis): A native perennial with abundant sprays of sunshine yellow. Zone 4.

Douglas aster (Symphyotrichum subspicatum): An adaptable, very-long blooming native perennial with lavender-blue, daisylike flowers. Zone 5.

Advertisement

– List compiled by Signe Danler, OSU Horticulture Department



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending