Connect with us

Oregon

Major Oregon gun control bills pass out of committee; call for gun permits, raise age limit

Published

on

Major Oregon gun control bills pass out of committee; call for gun permits, raise age limit


Main Oregon gun management payments go out of committee; name for gun permits, elevate age restrict

Two main Oregon gun management payments – one that comes with and expands Measure 114 and the opposite providing a package deal of rules banning ghost weapons and elevating the age for gun possession – handed legislative checks Tuesday on party-line votes.

Senate Invoice 348 – largely mirroring the principle provisions of Measure 114, now stalled in court docket challenges — handed 3-2 out of the Senate Judiciary Committee to the chamber ground with a referral to the Joint Methods and Means Committee.

It requires a allow to purchase a gun beginning July 1, 2024, requires state police to finish a background verify earlier than gun gross sales or transfers and units a brand new ready interval earlier than a vendor can flip over a gun to a buyer after approval.

Advertisement

The Joint Methods and Means Subcommittee on Public Security voted 5-3 to ship an amended Home Invoice 2005, often known as the 2023 Gun Violence Prevention Package deal, to the complete Methods and Means Committee.

It will make it against the law to fabricate, promote or possess a gun and not using a serial quantity beginning Sept. 1, 2024, prohibit individuals below 21 from possessing weapons apart from sure looking rifles and permit cities or counties to bar individuals from carrying weapons in public buildings or on adjoining grounds.

State Rep. Paul Evans, D-Monmouth, stated HB 2005, supported by Gov. Tina Kotek, Legal professional Common Ellen Rosenblum and Mothers Demand Motion, is meant to stability neighborhood security with private liberty and do “extra good than hurt.”

It addresses “18-, 19- and 20-year-olds which are annoyed with the world and don’t know what else to do however talk by means of violence,” Evans stated.

“If there’s a strategy to cease that, that’s what I hoped that this invoice would do, whereas nonetheless preserving as a lot of the looking custom as potential.”

Advertisement

Home Democrats in an announcement cited a statistic that individuals 21 or youthful have carried out six of 9 of the deadliest mass shootings within the nation since 2018.

However Sen. David Brock Smith, R-Port Orford, stated he nervous that HB 2005 would create a “hodgepodge” of various guidelines and “gun-free zones” throughout the state and will make criminals out of law-abiding residents.

Sen. Elizabeth Steiner, D-Portland, countered with an instance of what occurs to individuals who inadvertently deliver weapons into the Oregon Capitol, the place they’re banned. They’re requested to safe them elsewhere, she stated.

“There’s not an intent to make criminals out of people that need to be law-abiding residents,” she stated.

Some lawmakers suspect both invoice will get slowed down in future authorized challenges if finally accepted, as has Measure 114, narrowly handed by Oregonians in November.

Advertisement

State Rep. Jeffrey Helfrich, R-Hood River, a former Portland police officer, stated the state already has spent a couple of half one million {dollars} defending Measure 114 in state and federal court docket. He stated he’s involved extra public {dollars} will likely be diverted to defend the extra gun payments.

A Harney County choose has blocked Measure 114 from taking impact till he decides whether or not it meets state constitutional provisions. It units out a system for gun permits, bans magazines that maintain greater than 10 rounds of ammunition apart from looking or leisure capturing and requires a accomplished legal background verify earlier than gun gross sales.

ADDRESS ‘IMPULSE BUYING’

Along with requiring permits and accomplished background checks to purchase a gun, Senate Invoice 348 consists of Measure 114′s large-capacity journal ban. It will be efficient retroactively to Dec. 8, 2022, the date the measure was set to take impact.

The invoice goes additional than Measure 114 by additionally elevating the age for gun consumers, creating a brand new ready interval of 72 hours to acquire a gun and growing the charges to acquire a gun allow.

Advertisement

Just like HB 2005, it could elevate the age to get a allow and purchase a gun to 21 with one short-term exception: 18-,19- and 20-year-olds might purchase sure looking rifles and shotguns and not using a allow till July 2026 — so long as they’ve accomplished a gun security course.

A vendor couldn’t switch a gun to a buyer with out ready 72 hours after receiving a state police approval quantity following a accomplished legal background verify.

Senate Judiciary Committee chair Floyd Prozanski, D-Eugene, stated the wait would tackle “impulse shopping for” of weapons and scale back potential suicides and home violence-related shootings by offering a “cooling-off interval” earlier than a buyer would get a gun.

The committee members additionally accepted a last-minute modification that might require any authorized problem to the Senate invoice to be filed solely in Marion County Circuit Courtroom.

‘NEEDS MORE WORK’

Advertisement

The vote got here simply hours after leaders of the interfaith grassroots group Carry Each Voice Oregon held a information convention in assist of SB 348 but additionally calling for some adjustments. The group collected the required signatures to put Measure 114 on the poll.

“It’s a superb invoice. It wants extra work,” stated legal professional Liz McKanna, a member of the legislative committee for the Measure 114 marketing campaign.

Carry Each Voice Oregon is anxious that the Senate invoice delays the final allow requirement till July 2024 and additional delays the allow requirement for looking rifles and sure shotguns till 2026, McKanna stated.

The group additionally needed the invoice to permit for a 3rd social gathering or “impartial” location apart from a police company or sheriff’s workplace to simply accept gun allow functions, believing some individuals will likely be reluctant to go on to regulation enforcement. Even a courthouse could be acceptable, McKanna stated.

In associated motion, the Senate Judiciary Committee individually voted 3-2 to ship one other invoice to the ground, Senate Invoice 393, with an modification that accommodates the identical language requiring a 72-hour wait earlier than a gun might be offered to a allow holder. Senate Invoice 393 would take impact on the 91st day after the Legislature adjourns.

Advertisement

It’s meant to protect the ready interval if the extra complete Senate Invoice 348 passes and faces a court docket problem, in response to Prozanski.

He cited a 2021 report in “The Assessment of Economics and Statistics,” that stated states that adopted such gun buy delays recorded 2% decrease murder charges. Prozanski stated the Senate Invoice 393 is being supported, impartial of the extra complete invoice.

Becoming a member of Prozanski in assist of each gun management payments had been Sens. Sara Gelser Blouin, D-Corvallis, and James Manning Jr., D-Eugene. Sens. Kim Thatcher, committee vice chair, and Dennis Linthicum, R-Klamath, voted in opposition to each payments.

Becoming a member of Evans in assist of the amended Home Invoice 2005 had been Sens. Janeen Sollman, D-Hillsboro, Elizabeth Steiner, D-Portland, and Reps. Tawna Sanchez, D-Portland, and Daniel Nguyen, D-Lake Oswego/Portland. These voting in opposition to it had been Rep. Rick Lewis, R-Silverton, Helfrich and Brock Smith.

— Maxine Bernstein

Advertisement

E mail mbernstein@oregonian.com; 503-221-8212

Comply with on Twitter @maxoregonian

Our journalism wants your assist. Please grow to be a subscriber at this time at OregonLive.com/subscribe





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oregon

People with disabilities are extra vulnerable in major disasters like wildfires, says Oregon advocate

Published

on

People with disabilities are extra vulnerable in major disasters like wildfires, says Oregon advocate


FILE – Scorched wheelchairs rest outside Cypress Meadows Post-Acute, a nursing home leveled by the Camp Fire on Dec. 4, 2018, in Paradise, Calif. The staff was able to safely evacuate all 91 patients.

Noah Berger / AP

Jake Cornett, Executive Director and CEO of the advocacy group Disability Rights Oregon, says he will forever be haunted by Ashlyn Maddox’s death during the 2021 Oregon heat wave.

The Portland woman, 36, was disabled and living in a group foster home. She was dropped off by a medical transport company, but the company didn’t make sure she made it safely into her air-conditioned home. She ended up wandering around for hours in the heat, and died only 50 feet from safety.

Advertisement

Cornett says, “These deaths are preventable with the right planning, the right strategy for mitigation, the right preparedness and a response plan that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and respects the needs of people with disabilities.”

Jake Cornett, executive director and CEO of Disability Rights Oregon.

Jake Cornett, executive director and CEO of Disability Rights Oregon.

Courtesy of Ramsey Cox

Cornett spoke with “All Things Considered” host Geoff Norcross about Oregon’s ability to help people with disabilities during a natural disaster, such as the deadly wildfires burning in the Los Angeles area.

This conversation has been edited for clarity and length.


Geoff Norcross: If we were to transport those fires in Southern California here, would we see a similar catastrophe for people with disabilities?

Advertisement

Jake Cornett: Surely, we fear that the same disasters we’ve seen play out in the catastrophes in the lives of people with disabilities in LA would play out right here in Oregon as well. And I don’t think this is just a theoretical question. It’s only a matter of time before we have major wildfires along Highway 20, very close by in Portland and in other major cities throughout our state.

Norcross: What is the obligation of local governments to provide for people with disabilities when disaster strikes? I guess I’m asking if the Americans with Disabilities Act applies here.

Cornett: Absolutely. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires that cities, counties, the state and the federal government are taking into account what the needs are of people with disabilities, and providing accommodations for those needs when engaging in disaster planning.

Norcross: Getting information out to people quickly in a disaster is so critical, especially for something that’s as fast-moving as the LA wildfires. For people who are deaf or blind, can you talk about how that’s extra complicated?

Cornett: Absolutely. You know, emergency response notification systems that happen on your phone are a great tool if you have a phone, or if you have the technology to make your phone provide you the information you need. And that’s particularly important for folks who are blind.

Advertisement

I think about a blind person who may not have the same visual access to information as others. If police run around your neighborhood and put a notice on your door that says “get out of town, there’s an evacuation order, you’re under wildfire threat,” that notice on your door might not be enough because you can’t access that information.

And this is where cities, counties and the state really have an obligation to adjust to how they communicate so that it’s effective for all people with disabilities.

Norcross: And again, when you say obligation, you mean a legal obligation, not just because it’s the right thing to do.

Cornett: Absolutely. There’s a legal obligation to do that under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Norcross: Even if an evacuation order gets to affected people quickly, there’s this expectation that most people will get in their car and they will leave. How does that expectation leave people with disabilities in even greater danger?

Advertisement

Cornett: Yeah, that’s another huge issue for people with disabilities, especially when it happens quickly like the LA fires. People think evacuating is getting in the car, driving quickly away to safety.

But many people with disabilities don’t have access to a car, or they can’t physically drive a vehicle. They’re totally reliant on others to transport them to safety. So just providing that notice is not an adequate way to ensure that we are saving the lives of people with disabilities in the way it needs to be done.

Norcross: Is there an event here in Oregon that you can point to that shows us how situated we are to help people with disabilities when disaster strikes, good or bad?

Cornett: Here in Oregon, we’ve seen hundreds die or have serious injuries because of heat in the past few years. Climate change is real. We live in a warming environment, and it’s having a really disproportionate impact on seniors, on people with disabilities and people with underlying medical conditions.

And I’ll forever be haunted by a story of a 30-something year old woman who was dropped off by a medical transport company, but didn’t wait in their air-conditioned van to make sure that she got inside her home where there was air conditioning. Instead, they took off. She wandered around for hours before dying of heat, just 50 feet from her adult foster home.

Advertisement

These deaths are preventable with the right planning, the right strategy for mitigation, the right preparedness, and a response plan that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act and respects the needs of people with disabilities.



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon State MBB Fall To San Francisco 81-70 As Dons Drain 13 3’s

Published

on

Oregon State MBB Fall To San Francisco 81-70 As Dons Drain 13 3’s


On the heels of a milestone victory over Gonzaga on Thursday night, the Oregon State Beavers could not capture the same magic Saturday in San Francisco.

The road issues again reared their ugly head as OSU fell to USF 81-70, dropping the Beavs to 14-6 overall and 4-3 in conference play.

OSU have just one true road win this season, which came against Pacific on January 11. They are 1-4 in that category.

The biggest blows to the Beavers’ efforts came from beyond the arc. San Francisco made 13 of 22 three-point attempts, while OSU made just one on nine attempts. Malik Thomas was the game’s leading scorer with 24 points and four three-point makes.

Advertisement

Michael Rataj led the Beavs in scoring with 18 points, also grabbing six rebounds and two assists. As a team, the Beavs shot 44.4% on the night making 24 of 54 field goal attempts.

Oregon State will have several days off before hosting Pepperdine on Thursday, January 23.

More Reading Material From Oregon State Beavers On SI

Why Oregon State’s 97-89 Win Over Gonzaga Meant So Much To Beaver Nation

Oregon State Men’s Hoops Stuns Gonzaga, 97-89 in OT

Advertisement

Oregon State Women’s Basketball: Portland Gets Revenge on Beavers with 86-61 Win





Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

3 things to watch as Iowa women’s basketball looks to stop skid at Oregon

Published

on

3 things to watch as Iowa women’s basketball looks to stop skid at Oregon


play

IOWA CITY — Following an uncharacteristic run of home struggles, the Big Ten schedule now takes Iowa women’s basketball as far away from Carver-Hawkeye Arena as possible in the league.

The Hawkeyes (12-6, 2-5 Big Ten Conference) are set to begin their first West Coast conference swing, beginning with Sunday’s 4 p.m. game at Oregon (13-5, 4-3) on BTN+. Iowa will then head to Washington next Wednesday for an 8 p.m. showdown. The Hawkeyes are desperately trying to end a four-game losing streak that suddenly has them flirting with the NCAA Tournament bubble.

Advertisement

With that, here are three things to watch ahead of Sunday’s showdown.

Can the Hawkeyes productively channel their desperation?

Everyone inside the program understands the current situation and how it needs to change. But the Hawkeyes can’t let that pressure generate more tight play on the court, an ongoing theme throughout this four-game losing streak.

“We really are just one or two possessions away,” assistant coach Sean Sullivan said Friday. “With a team like this who’s continuing to fight, we just need one win. We just need one to get going because these kids really do believe.

Advertisement

“Everyone knows their role. Everyone is supporting each other, and that’s the best thing you can do at this time during a four-game losing streak. We’re not going down that black hole. We see the light. We’ve just got to get there.”

Until revealed otherwise, expect another tense affair with plenty of late-game opportunities for Iowa to find a better conclusion. The Hawkeyes need to bring this one home.

How does Iowa handle Oregon’s full-court pressure while potentially leaning more on its own press?

Iowa had some trouble in December with pressing teams, most notably Tennessee and Michigan State, that resulted in heavy turnovers and late struggles. On the flipside, the Hawkeyes have implemented their own press, just sporadically, mainly in moments of desperation.

Iowa leaned on more pressure in Thursday’s loss to Nebraska with some success. Could Sunday be a moment to match the Ducks’ energy there?

Advertisement

“Oregon is going to be pretty intense with ball pressure. That’s not what we do, but we’re slowly doing a little bit more of a press,” Sullivan said “First we did a press break of some type of 2-2-1. Now we’re like, ‘OK, let’s change it up a bit. What do our players feel comfortable with?’ (Thursday) night, we had a lot of success. We’re starting to see what they’re good at.

“Now, we’ve just got to have fun with it. Let’s start doing some random things because when you do something consistently, it’s easy to scout. But when you start changing things up, Nebraska didn’t handle our pressure well. And that builds us confidence. So I think for the future, you’ll definitely start to see some more stuff.”

What does Iowa have in store for Ava Heiden in her Oregon homecoming?

Even as far back as media day, Ava Heiden’s excitement for the Oregon trip was apparent. Her hometown of Sherwood, Oregon, sits about 100 miles north of the Ducks’ campus, so expect a strong cheer for Heiden when Iowa takes the floor Sunday.

“Ava is so athletic,” Sullivan said. “She can jump out of the building. She can get rebounds. And that’s what we’ve got to start figuring out. How can we utilize her a little bit more too?

Advertisement

Heiden’s minutes have been up and down this year, more down lately as Hannah Stuelke has shifted back to the “5” position for more consistency. Heiden didn’t play against Nebraska but could certainly see more usage Sunday.

Dargan Southard is a sports trending reporter and covers Iowa athletics for the Des Moines Register and HawkCentral.com. Email him at msouthard@gannett.com or follow him on Twitter at @Dargan_Southard.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending