Nevada

US Supreme Court rejects Nevada Green Party’s bid to reinstate Jill Stein on ballot

Published

2 years ago

September 22, 2024

US Supreme Court rejects Nevada Green Party’s bid to reinstate Jill Stein on ballot

The US Supreme Court on Friday rejected the Nevada Green Party’s request to reinstate its presidential candidate, Jill Stein, on Nevada’s 2024 general election ballot. This decision leaves in place a ruling by the Nevada Supreme Court that bars Stein and the Green Party from appearing on the ballot.

The controversy began when the Nevada Secretary of State’s office provided the party with an incorrect petition form that lacked a crucial affidavit. This affidavit was supposed to attest that signature gatherers believed the signers were registered voters in their respective counties. Despite gathering the required number of signatures to qualify for the ballot, the missing affidavit led the Nevada Democratic Party to challenge Stein’s candidacy, arguing that the party submitted flawed paperwork. Although Stein’s campaign asserted that the mistake stemmed from faulty instructions provided by state officials, the Nevada Supreme Court declined to intervene.

In its appeal to the US Supreme Court, the Green Party’s attorney, Jay Sekulow, argued that barring Stein from the ballot violated the party’s constitutional rights to due process and equal protection. He emphasized that the Green Party had followed the directions provided by state officials and should not be penalized for what he characterized as an “unfortunate mistake.”

The Nevada Democratic Party countered, maintaining that the Green Party’s failure to submit the proper affidavit was more than a mere technicality. They argued that the attestation served as a safeguard against fraud and ensured compliance with state election rules. Nevada’s Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar, a Democrat, who had not taken a position in the initial case, later opposed the Green Party’s request to the Supreme Court, citing concerns that altering the ballot at this stage could create confusion and undermine election integrity.

Ultimately, the US Supreme Court, in a brief and unsigned order, declined to vacate the Nevada court’s ruling without recorded dissents. The justices did not provide a rationale for their decision, as is customary in emergency cases.

Following the court’s decision, the Nevada Green Party issued a statement, asserting that they had complied with the Nevada Secretary of State’s instructions and added:

They have removed our ability to “write-in” a candidate of our choice and replaced it with “None of the Above”, which we view as an act of voter suppression. What these people have done is not only shattered the public trust in government entities in this state, but endorsed their misconduct. They have made it more difficult to get a free and fair election in the state of Nevada. We don’t know what you call this, but it’s NOT democracy!

As ballots for military and overseas voters are already being printed and mailed, the court’s decision means Jill Stein’s name will not appear on the Nevada ballot in the upcoming presidential election.

Source link

Nevada

Vegas casino pulls plug on prediction market conference amid Nevada crackdown

Published

12 hours ago

May 15, 2026

Press Room

Vegas casino pulls plug on prediction market conference amid Nevada crackdown

A Las Vegas casino abruptly pulled the plug on a prediction market conference over fears the event could draw scrutiny from Nevada gambling regulators, according to a report.

Predict 2026 had been slated for the Aria on the Strip before the MGM-operated resort canceled the booking just days after signing the agreement.

‘The [Aria] is issuing this notice in light of Nevada’s current regulatory and enforcement position regarding prediction markets,’ a lawyer for the resort wrote in a termination letter cited by Barron’s.

The dispute highlights escalating tensions between state gambling regulators and prediction market firms such as Kalshi and Polymarket, which let people bet on the outcomes of all kinds of events.

Nevada regulators have taken an especially aggressive stance toward the fast-growing sector, arguing that some sports-event contracts resemble unlicensed wagering that bypasses state gaming rules and taxes.

Last October, the Nevada Gaming Control Board warned casino license holders that maintaining ties to prediction market operators could factor into whether they remain eligible for gaming licenses.

“If a Nevada licensee chooses to offer Sports and Other Event Contracts in Nevada or decides to partner with other entities offering Sports and Other Event Contracts in the state, the Board will consider these developments as it evaluates the suitability of the entity to maintain a Nevada gaming license,” regulators said in the guidance cited by Barron’s.

While Predict 2026 was not sponsored by any prediction market company, Aria’s legal notice indicated that regulators had become increasingly sensitive even to indirect promotion of the industry.

The Aria, which opened in 2009 and is operated by MGM Resorts after being sold to Blackstone in 2021, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The showdown highlights the widening divide between traditional casino operators and the new entrants into the prediction market space.

Legacy gaming giants such as MGM Resorts and Caesars Entertainment have largely stayed away from prediction markets even as companies including DraftKings have launched competing platforms to challenge businesses like Kalshi.

Prediction market operators insist that their event contracts are federally regulated financial instruments overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, allowing them to operate nationwide for users over 18.

Some state gaming regulators, however, have argued that sports-related contracts closely resemble sports betting and should fall under state gambling laws.

Nevada officials have already taken direct legal action against Kalshi.

The Nevada Gaming Commission sued the company over its sports event contracts, and the platform was briefly barred from operating in the state earlier this year, according to Barron’s.

The Post has sought comment from Polymarket, Aria and the Nevada Gaming Control Board.

Source link

Nevada

Best Nevada high schools for athletes? One study has revealed a top 25

Published

24 hours ago

May 15, 2026

Press Room

Best Nevada high schools for athletes? One study has revealed a top 25

Nevada has a rich history of producing athletic legends.

Total number of sports: 24

1. Bishop Gorman (Las Vegas)

Total number of sports: 14

Source link

Nevada

Nevada designates more than 119,000 voters inactive

Published

2 days ago

May 14, 2026

Press Room

Nevada designates more than 119,000 voters inactive

CARSON CITY, Nev. (KOLO) – The State of Nevada says it has designated more than 119,000 voters as inactive ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar says that in the spring of this year, counties updated 14,164 voter records, designated 119,533 voters as inactive and canceled the voter registrations of 7,583 people.

This is in addition to 2025 voter roll maintenance efforts that registered more than 138,000 voters inactive and canceled nearly 177,000 voter registrations.

“State and local election officials are working hard to prepare voters for the upcoming June Primary, and keeping Nevada’s voter rolls up to date is a critical part of that process. County election officials have dedicated significant resources to make sure Nevada’s voter registration records are accurate, so that all eligible Nevadans – and only eligible Nevadans – can cast a ballot,” said Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar. “Mail ballots are being sent to active, registered voters across the state now. Voters can support their local officials’ work by checking and updating their registration information on VOTE.NV.gov.”

Source link