Connect with us

Nevada

The Elon Musk effect: Why more businesses want to incorporate in Nevada

Published

on

The Elon Musk effect: Why more businesses want to incorporate in Nevada


Elon Musk’s businesses have been planting roots in Nevada for years now. But after the billionaire faced a legal hurdle in Delaware — the country’s capital for the legal homes of corporations and other business entities — he made his preferences clear.

“I recommend incorporating in Nevada or Texas if you prefer shareholders to decide matters,” Musk posted Jan. 30 on his social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. A Delaware judge had invalidated his $55.8 billion pay package as CEO of Tesla that day.

Weeks later, another billionaire with deepening ties to Nevada had an incorporation win. A Delaware judge ruled in late February that Tripadvisor Inc., the online review and booking site whose controlling shareholder is Formula One’s Greg Maffei, could move its incorporation to the Silver State, despite a legal challenge from shareholders.

Nevada is getting more attention from business entities looking to establish or reincorporate in the state, which doesn’t require moving their physical headquarters.

Advertisement

There were more than 108,000 business entities registered in Nevada in 2023, a roughly 150 percent increase from 2019, according to data from the Secretary of State’s Office. While small businesses make up much of the growth, industry and state officials say the high-profile attention could bring more big names, additional state revenue and maybe even a more diverse economy in the long term.

“Once they realize the benefits of incorporating in Nevada, they’ll start to realize how supportive Nevada is of business and business growth,” Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar said. “(Then) they may even physically consider moving here, which brings jobs, it brings investment and it brings us resources to invest in all the infrastructure that Nevada citizens care about.”

Nevada’s corporate landscape

Delaware has long led the U.S. corporate sphere for its tax policies and depth of case law — 68.2 percent of Fortune 500 companies call the eastern state their legal home. But other states, like Nevada and Texas, have spent decades working to attract some businesses to the state through statutes that provide alternative legal protections for officers and controlling shareholders.

“If we’re running a race, Delaware is in the lead, but Nevada is second,” said Benjamin Edwards, a corporate law professor at UNLV. “We’re not nipping at Delaware’s heels. They’ve probably lapped us a couple times.”

Advertisement

Recent decisions, such as the ruling on Musk’s compensation package, have put those options at center stage. About two weeks after the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision, Musk moved his brain implant company Neuralink’s legal home to Nevada.

Experts say the differences come from greater focus on shareholders in Delaware. Courts and law there put more emphasis on protecting shareholder value, meaning a company’s officer could be sued for things like gross negligence. Statutes in Nevada give those officers far more protections — in most cases, one would face personal liability for fraud.

“What Nevada did is we went further than Delaware, and it’s one of those reasons why people are actively considering Nevada over Delaware these days,” said Michael Bonner, a Las Vegas shareholder at the law firm Greenberg Traurig LLP. “Believe me, it’s still a consideration. Many, many people will still select Delaware.”

Industry members in the state frame it as an insurance policy for the limited liability companies, corporations and other business entities they work with. Cort Christie, CEO and founder of business services firm Nevada Corporate Headquarters, said small businesses — which make up a large majority of state filings as LLCs — consider incorporation in Nevada for the legal protections.

“It’s kind of like all of us can choose the levels of auto insurance that we want, and we’re broke,” Christie said. “We’re gonna choose the lowest limits that we can to save as much money as possible. But we all know that if you get into a bad accident, there can be risks with that and potential lawsuits that come out of that as well, so you want to be properly insured.“

Advertisement

Impact on Nevadans

Business entities aren’t just considering Nevada for its greater liability shield. Others coming from Delaware are looking to save money, according to filings from some publicly traded companies.

Laird Superfood, a plant-based food producer physically headquartered in Boulder, Colorado, reincorporated in Nevada on Dec. 31. In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission before the shareholder vote, it told investors that it expected to pay about $200,000 in Delaware taxes for that fiscal year. By contrast, Laird’s Nevada annual fees are expected to be about $700, according to the filing. Nevada doesn’t have corporate taxes.

Similarly, Tripadvisor’s April 2023 proxy statement to its investors said it paid $250,725 in Delaware taxes in the 2022 fiscal year and would likely pay around $1,725 in annual fees in Nevada.

Despite any rising trends, the average Nevadan may not see immediate changes as more business entities file in the state. Aguilar, whose office oversees business licensing, said the state benefits by generating additional revenue added to the general fund, providing funding later for road projects and other state services.

Advertisement

New registration revenue and other annual fees for corporations and sole proprieterships generated $183.4 million in 2023, according to the state. That’s a 150 percent increase from the nearly $72 million generated in 2019. A spokesperson for Aguilar’s office said the commercial recordings division also generates revenue for the state’s general fund.

Aguilar’s office is determined to work with business owners small and large to improve the process and environment for businesses. Officials are working on a $15 million overhaul to SilverFlume, the state business portal, with the goal of making it usable without the help of a lawyer by mid-2025. Intended improvements include reducing bugs, modernizing the look, increased self-help options and adding functions like automatic license renewals.

In recent weeks, Aguilar said he’s fielded more calls from businesspeople interested in Nevada incorporation. He declined to specify which firms are interested, but he said many of the major shareholders calling already live in Nevada and are inquiring about the state’s differences and the reincorporation process.

“It’s for free advertising for somebody like Elon to talk about the benefits of Nevada,” Aguilar said. “People listen to what he says. And when he speaks, especially from a business perspective, people listen. Then they start asking questions of their own companies: Does it make sense for us to be here, or should we be in Nevada?”

McKenna Ross is a corps member with Report for America, a national service program that places journalists into local newsrooms. Contact her at mross@reviewjournal.com. Follow @mckenna_ross_ on X.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Second annual Silver & Black Gala raises $3 million for youth mental health services in Nevada

Published

on

Second annual Silver & Black Gala raises  million for youth mental health services in Nevada


LAS VEGAS, NEVADA – The Raiders Foundation proudly hosted the second annual Silver & Black Gala on May 17 at Allegiant Stadium, raising an impressive $3 million to benefit youth mental health initiatives across Nevada. Building on the success of its inaugural year and seeing considerable growth, the Gala once again spotlighted the Foundation’s commitment to uplifting communities through access, awareness, and action.

Presented by Intermountain Health, the evening gathered nearly 1,000 attendees, including local business leaders, public officials, and a contingent of Raiders, including alumni, current players, and front office staff for a powerful night of giving. One-hundred percent of the proceeds from the Gala will directly fund mental health services, programs, and resources for youth in Southern Nevada.

The evening began with an impassioned speech from Raiders Owner Mark Davis, who lit the Al Davis Memorial Torch in honor of Elaine Wynn, followed by a surprise $1 million donation from the Raiders Foundation to four Nevada-based organizations delivering critical mental health support to young people: Boys Town Nevada, Community Counseling Center of Southern Nevada, Solutions for Change, and Campus for Hope.

“Mental health is a critical pillar of well-being, especially for our youth,” said Sandra Douglass Morgan, President of the Las Vegas Raiders. “The Raiders are proud to leverage the power of this organization and the generosity of our community to help remove the stigma and expand access to essential resources. The Silver & Black Gala represents more than a night of giving — it’s a statement of our long-term commitment to the health and future of Nevada’s youth.”

Advertisement

“The overwhelming support we received at this year’s Gala reflects how deeply our community cares about the mental health of our young people,” said Kari Uyehara, Executive Director of the Raiders Foundation. “It’s an honor to channel that generosity directly into programs making an immediate and lasting impact. We’re especially proud to recognize and support organizations doing the hard work on the ground every day to lift up Nevada’s youth.”

Each of the four nonprofit recipients expressed deep gratitude for the unexpected investment:

“We’re incredibly grateful to the Raiders Foundation for recognizing the importance of early mental health intervention,” said Executive Director of Boys Town Nevada John Etzell. “This support enables us to expand vital programs that help young people develop resilience, heal from trauma, and build brighter futures.”

“This gift is truly transformational for the young clients we serve,” said Community Counseling Center of Southern Nevada Executive Director Patrick Bozarth. “Mental health care should never be a luxury, and with the Raiders Foundation’s investment, we can reach more youth with the timely, compassionate support they deserve.”

“The Raiders Foundation’s leadership in mental health advocacy is inspiring,” said Danisha Mingo, Founder and Executive Director of Solutions for Change. “This funding allows us to continue our mission of empowering youth through education, therapeutic care, and community engagement — all essential tools in breaking the cycle of trauma and adversity.”

Advertisement

“This generous support from the Raiders Foundation strengthens our ability to meet youth where they are — with empathy, safety, and resources,” said Campus for Hope CEO Kim Jeffries. “Together, we’re building a healthier Nevada where no young person feels invisible or alone.”

The evening also featured the presentation of the “Commitment to Excellence Award” to Gary and Debbie Ackerman from Gaudin Ford and Dan Reynolds from Imagine Dragons in recognition of their outstanding philanthropic and community leadership.

Among the night’s highlights:

  • A Ford Shelby F-250, donated by Gaudin Motor Company, was auctioned for $250,000.
  • A private dinner with Mark Davis, Tom Brady, and Charles Woodson sold for $300,000.
  • Raiders: The Opus, Silver Torch Edition, a 936-page book infused with the first 60 years of the Silver and Black, sold for $1M during the live auction.
  • Stevie Wonder thrilled the audience with an unforgettable 1.5-hour performance.

Notable guests included Owner Mark Davis, President Sandra Douglass Morgan, Head Coach Pete Carroll, and General Manager John Spytek, along with Raiders Alumni Charles Woodson, Jim Plunkett, Eric Allen, and Marcus Allen. More than 40 current Raiders players attended, including Maxx Crosby, Geno Smith, Daniel Carlson, and Jackson Powers-Johnson.

For more information about the Raiders Foundation and future events, visit raiders.com/foundation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

What will Nevada do with two weeks left in the Legislature?

Published

on

What will Nevada do with two weeks left in the Legislature?


The end is near. Don’t worry, it’s not the apocalypse. It’s just the Nevada Legislature.

Legislators are burning the midnight oil pushing through hundreds of bills. Last week marked the major second committee passage deadline, and there is one more major deadline between now and the final day of session on June 2.

Bills without exemptions must pass out of the second house by Friday, May 23, to get the governor’s consideration.

That means there are roughly two weeks for committees to consider some of the most talked-about legislation of the session. Lombardo’s remaining four priority pieces of legislation still need to have their first hearings. At least one of the bills is scheduled to go in front of the Assembly Ways and Means committee this week. Assembly Bill 584, his education package, will be heard Tuesday morning.

Advertisement

But beware: a deadline failure does not mean a piece of legislation is doomed. Policies can be revived or amended into existing bills, prolonging their discussions until sine die, when this session ends.

Here’s what’s been going on in Nevada’s capital.

Recapping the recent deadline

Last week was eventful for the biennial Legislature. It pushed bills through the second committee passage deadline, and advanced some major bills that had been exempt from the deadline.

First, the bid to stop Nevada’s clocks from changing twice a year failed. AB 81, which would have exempted Nevada from daylight saving time, didn’t make it out of the second committee passage.

Advertisement

An amended version of the governor’s AB 540, called the Nevada Housing Access and Attainability Act, passed out of the Assembly Committee on Commerce and Labor on Friday – the first of the governor’s priority bills to make through committee.

It was amended to decrease the amount put into the proposed Nevada Attainable Housing Fund from $200 million to $150 million, and to remove a portion that would have allowed attainable housing projects to be exempt from prevailing wage requirements.

In other news from deadline day, an amended version of the SB 179, which would allow the Nevada Equal Rights Commission to investigate claims of antisemitism in housing, public accommodations and employment, passed out of committee.

During bill’s discussion May 13, Jewish advocacy groups called for the bill to be amended to use the widely recognized definition of antisemitism from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.

Other dead bills

Advertisement

In addition to the death of the daylight saving time bill, 30 other measures failed to advance the Friday deadline.

Those bills include:

  • AB 156 would have increased the salary of Clark County School District trustees to the base salary of a county commissioner.
  • AB 291 would have automatically sealed criminal records for defendants who had their charges dismissed or who were acquitted.
  • SB 143 would have required a study on artificial turf and synthetic grass during the 2025-2026 interim.
  • SB 324 would have prohibited the sale of most water bottles in communities abutting Lake Tahoe.

It’s far less than the 281 measures that failed the first committee passage deadline on April 11. But there are still 414 bills and resolutions as of Monday that are exempt from all deadlines, most often because they contain an appropriation or would have a fiscal or revenue impact to the state.

Monday updates

That brings us to Monday. Agendas have grown longer for money committees where lawmakers are hearing bills with significant fiscal impact to the state, some for the first time. The Senate approved SB 89, a bill preventing someone convicted of a misdemeanor hate crime from purchasing or owning firearms for up to 10 years after the conviction. The bill passed 12-8 and still must be considered by the Assembly.

The Democrats’ answer to education policy — SB 460 sponsored by state Sen. Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro – was heard for the first time Monday afternoon.

Advertisement

Contact McKenna Ross at mross@reviewjournal.com and Jessica Hill at jehill@reviewjournal.com. Follow @mckenna_ross_ and @jess_hillyeah on X.



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

EDITORIAL: New CCEA-backed scheme would strike out students

Published

on

EDITORIAL: New CCEA-backed scheme would strike out students


The problems with Nevada’s public schools won’t be fixed by teachers spending less time in the classroom. Yet that could be a consequence of a proposal pending in Carson City.

The Senate Government Affairs Committee recently heard Senate Bill 161 and moved it to the floor. The bill would allow teachers unions to petition a court for the ability to strike. It’s now illegal for Nevada public employees to strike.

Under the legislation, a union could justify a strike based on grievances involving class size, the number of teachers in the district or a policy related to the emotional or mental health of teachers. A court could sanction a strike upon a finding that it would “be equally or less detrimental” to students “than the continuance of the alleged policy or condition.”

Further, the bill would remove penalties on teachers who engaged in an illegal strike. Only the union could be punished. And it would redefine the legal definition of “strike” to exclude teachers coordinating sick-outs or walking out of individual schools.

Advertisement

It isn’t hard to figure out who this bill would benefit — and it’s not students.

Fewer than two years ago, the Clark County Education Association attempted to use tactics such as these to pressure the Clark County School District during contentious contract negotiations. The district went to court to prevent the union from striking. A judge ruled against the district, finding there wasn’t enough evidence that the union would initiate a work stoppage. Then several schools couldn’t open because of rolling sick-outs.

“The court finds that a strike has occurred,” District Judge Crystal Eller said in September 2023. She imposed a preliminary injunction, and both school and contract negotiations continued. The district and union eventually agreed to a lucrative pay package for teachers.

But the union wasn’t satisfied. It collected signatures for a ballot measure that would allow teachers to strike. In Nevada, initiatives go to the Legislature before the voters. The union wants to use the threat of that initiative as leverage to pass a bill such as SB161, which is slightly less destructive. In Nevada, enabled by a compliant state Supreme Court, initiative sponsors can withdraw their initiatives.

But this legalized blackmail works only if your opponents believe the initiative will pass. That’s unlikely in this case. There are good reasons to ban public employees from striking. Strikes by public employees are strikes against the public and, in some cases, threaten public safety. Public employees shouldn’t be able to extort concessions from the taxpayers who support them. Nevada’s binding arbitration process is already slanted in favor of the union.

Advertisement

Allowing teachers to strike is bad policy. Democrats should be working to advance the interests of students, not union officials.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending