Nevada
School board president seeks reelection amid tumultuous time for CCSD • Nevada Current
Clark County School District is currently without a permanent superintendent and chief financial officer and is facing public calls for legislative and state audits into financial misplanning that has allegedly left an unknown number of schools facing significant budget shortfalls.
It is a tumultuous time of transition for the fifth largest school district in the country. On that, most people seem to agree.
But what all this should mean for Clark County School Board President Evelyn Garcia Morales and her challenger, Tameka Henry, is up to voters to decide.
Garcia Morales is seeking a second term on the school board, which currently has six voting members, one vacant voting seat, and four non-voting appointed members. Members serve four-year terms.
“Looking at the landscape of the board, right now and into January, there will be loss of incredible knowledge if everyone is brand new,” says Garcia Morales.
Garcia Morales was the only incumbent to run for re-election out of the four trustees whose terms end this year. Trustees Lisa Guzman and Lola Brooks opted not to run for re-election despite being eligible. Katie Williams also did not file for re-election. She intended to finish out the remainder of her term but resigned last month after the Clark County District Attorney’s Office took action to have her removed following an investigation that found she no longer lives in Nevada.
Garcia Morales notes that if she is not reelected, the longest serving board member, Trustee Linda Cavazos, will have been there for seven years come January and everyone else on the board will have either two years or no experience on the board. Garcia Morales sees herself as offering some consistency for the board during a crucial time of transition.
But her challenger sees heavy turnover as exactly what the school board needs to get the school district on a better path.
“I haven’t seen a lot of improvement over the past four years,” said Henry, who also ran against Garcia Morales for the open seat in 2020 but lost. “I was hoping for more, but there’s still this divide on the school board.”
Henry was critical of former Superintendent Jesus Jara; Garcia Morales was largely supportive. Garcia Morales, as board president and as part of a four-member majority voting block, has been criticized for giving too much discretion to the superintendent, leading to lax oversight of district operations by the school board.
Garcia Morales declined to directly address some of the examples often cited by critics — such as Jara giving raises to his core cabinet months before leaving with a big payout of his own. She acknowledged it is “a point of contention” and suggested such narratives are being pushed by people with a specific agenda.
“It really makes me wonder, what’s the gain there?” she said. “If the desire of anybody is to have operational control of a system, what do they miss out on? What are they lacking? Is it control, so they get what they want, even at the cost of serving and supporting kids broadly? And who benefits the most from having that narrative exist?”
Garcia Morales continued to say that effective leaders don’t place blame on external policies, such as the governance models, and instead understand their role and the function of their board.
Henry sees it differently, arguing that “no other board governs this way.”
“The superintendent has more authority and say so than the actual board, which is supposed to be his or her employer,” she said. “This model really needs to be looked at, a deeper dive into it… There is opportunity to switch the governance model given the people who are running (for school board).”
Both candidates were interviewed by the Current prior to concerns being raised by individual principals and the teacher’s union about a potential budget deficit impacting an unknown number of CCSD schools. Gov. Joe Lombardo has called on the Department of Taxation and state legislators to evaluate or audit the district. The Nevada State Superintendent Jhone Ebert has also stepped in, issuing a series of questions to the district.
The Clark County Education Association has publicly called for an investigation into Garcia Morales and her potential knowledge of budget issues and Williams’ residency.
A debate over functionality
Garcia Morales believes the school board has increased its focus on student outcomes and seen improvements on set metrics like test scores and discipline rates.
“It’s not as fast as we’d like, but the progress is there,” she added.
Henry believes the district needs to improve its climate and culture, particularly if it wants to improve retention and recruitment.
“It’s time to start uplifting the positives — the gains, no matter how small,” she said. “The programs that are doing well, we need to replicate them and properly fund them.”
Henry said she also hopes the district might revisit and streamline some of the requirements imposed on nonprofits that want to provide community or wraparound services to students. Smaller organizations with a lot to offer are unable to because of requirements around insurance, she said.
“I understand protecting the data, and protecting our students is important,” said Henry, “but that’s a large price tag for smaller organizations that have the experience and evidence-based research behind them.”
Beyond their differences of opinion of how functional the school board currently is, Henry and Garcia Morales share some common traits. Both graduated from CCSD District C high schools and have children currently enrolled in the district.
Both women also have backgrounds advocating for under-resourced communities. Garcia Morales previously ran The Fulfillment Fund, a nonprofit focused on college access, though she has since left to start her own life and leadership company, called HumanKind Coaching. Henry is executive director of The Obodo Collective, a nonprofit focused on uplifting communities, and has board experience with Head Start, the federally funded free preschool program.
To get to this year’s general election, both women emerged from a five-person primary in June. Henry received the most votes, with 37.6%. Garcia Morales placed second with 29.1% of votes.
Henry raised approximately $23,000 during the first six months of the calendar year, according to campaign finance reports. Top contributors include political action committees affiliated with the Vegas Chamber and the Nevada State Education Association. Henry has also been endorsed by the Clark County Education Association.
Garcia Morales raised no money for her campaign, as of June 30. She told the Current she has simply prioritized her responsibilities on the board and within her family. She said she has faith that voters will know from her actions whether she is the type of leader they want.
The next round of campaign contribution and expense reports are due to the state by Oct. 15, four days before early voting begins.
Nevada
Bill by Nevada’s Amodei to ramp up mining on public land passes House
The U.S. House passed a bill Thursday put forward by Nevada Rep. Mark Amodei that would reinvigorate mining activity on federal lands.
Amodei, a Republican who represents the state’s top half, described the bill as strengthening the nation’s mineral supply chain and helping to counter China’s dominance with minerals.
“Western states are sitting on a wealth of resources and a critical opportunity to break our dangerous reliance on foreign adversaries while powering our own economy,” he said in a statement.
“The Mining Regulatory Clarity Act … gives domestic mining operations the certainty they need to compete aggressively and win.”
The bill passed 219 to 198. Republicans voted 210 in favor, 1 opposed and 9 not voting. Democrats voted 9 in favor, 197 opposed and 7 not voting. It was one of the House’s last actions before adjourning for the year.
Nevada delegation split on mining bill
Amodei was joined by Las Vegas Democrat Steven Horsford, who co-sponsored the bill in the House.
“Streamlining the hardrock mining process will create good jobs and strengthen our energy sector,” Horsford said.
The state’s other two House members — Democrats Susie Lee and Dina Titus — voted in opposition.
Titus spokesperson Dick Cooper told the Reno Gazette Journal that the congresswoman voted no because the bill would allow for increased dumping of mine waste on public lands.
“It would also allow mining companies to gain permanent rights to occupy public lands and preclude other uses including recreational and cultural uses,” he added.
It now heads to the Senate, where Nevada Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto will work to get it passed.
“This bill is common sense, and it’s key for communities across Nevada that count on mining for their livelihoods,” Cortez Masto said in a social media post.
Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a Democrat, also supports it. She helped introduce the Senate companion version of Amodei’s bill.
“Nevada is one of the few places in the United States with an abundance of critical minerals and a robust hardrock mining industry,” Rosen said. “The responsible mining of these minerals supports thousands of jobs and will help to strengthen our domestic manufacturing and clean energy supply chains.”
What does Amodei’s Mining Regulatory Clarity Act do?
The bill is a response to a 2022 decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals involving the Rosemont Copper Mine in Arizona.
The decision basically meant that mining companies must prove valuable minerals exist on a piece of land before they can dump waste material on it. Called the “mineral validity” requirement, it disrupted decades of precedent.
Amodei’s bill would reverse that and allow the practice to resume of using nearby land for mining waste without proving the land contains commercial deposits — something mining companies say is essential for operating on federal land.
“This legislation ensures the fundamental ability to conduct responsible mining activities on federal lands,” said Rich Nolan, National Mining Association president and CEO, in a statement. “Regulatory certainty, or the lack thereof, will either underpin or undermine efforts to decisively confront our minerals crisis.”
The bill also creates an “Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund.” Some fees related to mining claims will be used to fund a program to inventory, assess and clean up abandoned hardrock mines.
Environmental groups blast House vote on Mining Regulatory Clarity Act
Some environmental groups campaigned against the bill and described it as choosing corporate interests over people, Native Americans’ rights and the environment.
Lauren Pagel, policy director for Earthworks, said the bill “will remove already-scarce protections for natural resources and sacred cultural sites in U.S. mining law.”
The Center for Biological Diversity said the bill surrenders public lands to mining conglomerates.
“The so-called Mining Regulatory Clarity Act would bypass the validity requirement and grant mining companies — including foreign companies — the statutory right to permanently occupy and indiscriminately use public lands upon approval of a company’s self-written plan of operations,” said the nonprofit conservation organization in an online post.
Mark Robison is the state politics reporter for the Reno Gazette Journal, with occasional forays into other topics. Email comments to mrobison@rgj.com or comment on Mark’s Greater Reno Facebook page.
Nevada
California school district near Nevada caught up in a dispute over transgender athlete policies – WTOP News
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A Lake Tahoe school district is caught between California and Nevada’s competing policies on transgender student…
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A Lake Tahoe school district is caught between California and Nevada’s competing policies on transgender student athletes, a dispute that’s poised to reorder where the district’s students compete.
High schools in California’s Tahoe-Truckee Unified School District, set in a mountainous, snow-prone area near the border with Nevada, have for decades competed in the Nevada Interscholastic Activities Association, or NIAA. That has allowed sports teams to avoid making frequent and potentially hazardous trips in poor winter weather to competitions farther to the west, district officials say.
But the Nevada association voted in April to require students in sex-segregated sports programs to play on teams that align with their sex assigned at birth — a departure from a previous approach allowing individual schools to set their own standards. The move raised questions for how the Tahoe-Truckee district would remain in the Nevada association while following California law, which says students can play on teams consistent with their gender identity.
Now, California’s Department of Education is requiring the district to join the California Interscholastic Federation, or CIF, by the start of next school year.
District Superintendent Kerstin Kramer said at a school board meeting this week the demand puts the district in a difficult position.
“No matter which authority we’re complying with we are leaving students behind,” she said. “So we have been stuck.”
There are currently no known transgender student athletes competing in high school sports in Tahoe-Truckee Unified, district officials told the education department in a letter. But a former student filed a complaint with the state in June after the board decided to stick with Nevada athletics, Kramer said.
A national debate
The dispute comes amid a nationwide battle over the rights of transgender youth in which states have restricted transgender girls from participating on girls sports teams, barred gender-affirming surgeries for minors and required parents to be notified if a child changes their pronouns at school. At least 24 states have laws barring transgender women and girls from participating in certain sports competitions. Some of the policies have been blocked in court.
Meanwhile, California is fighting the Trump administration in court over transgender athlete policies. President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February aimed at banning transgender women and girls from participating in female athletics. The U.S. Justice Department also sued the California Department of Education in July, alleging its policy allowing transgender girls to compete on girls sports teams violates federal law.
And Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has signedlaws aimed at protecting trans youth, shocked party allies in March when he raised questions on his podcast about the fairness of trans women and girls competing against other female athletes. His office did not comment on the Tahoe-Truckee Unified case, but said Newsom “rejects the right wing’s cynical attempt to weaponize this debate as an excuse to vilify individual kids.”
The state education department said in a statement that all California districts must follow the law regardless of which state’s athletic association they join.
At the Tahoe-Truckee school board meeting this week, some parents and one student said they opposed allowing trans girls to participate on girls teams.
“I don’t see how it would be fair for female athletes to compete against a biological male because they’re stronger, they’re taller, they’re faster,” said Ava Cockrum, a Truckee High School student on the track and field team. “It’s just not fair.”
But Beth Curtis, a civil rights attorney whose children attended schools in Tahoe-Truckee Unified, said the district should fight NIAA from implementing its trans student athlete policy as violating the Nevada Constitution.
Asking for more time
The district has drafted a plan to transition to the California federation by the 2028-2029 school year after state officials ordered it to take action. It’s awaiting the education department’s response.
Curtis doesn’t think the state will allow the district to delay joining CIF, the California federation, another two years, noting the education department is vigorously defending its law against the Trump administration: “They’re not going to fight to uphold the law and say to you at the same time, ‘Okay, you can ignore it for two years.’”
Tahoe-Truckee Unified’s two high schools with athletic programs, which are located about 6,000 feet (1,800 meters) in elevation, compete against both California and Nevada teams in nearby mountain towns — and others more distant and closer to sea level. If the district moves to the California federation, Tahoe-Truckee Unified teams may have to travel more often in bad weather across a risky mountain pass — about 7,000 feet (2,100 meters) in elevation above a lake — to reach schools farther from state lines.
Coleville High School, a small California school in the Eastern Sierra near the Nevada border, has also long been a member of the Nevada association, said Heidi Torix, superintendent of the Eastern Sierra Unified School District. The school abides by California law regarding transgender athletes, Torix said.
The school has not been similarly ordered by California to switch where it competes. The California Department of Education did not respond to requests for comment on whether it’s warned any other districts not in the California federation about possible noncompliance with state policy.
State Assemblymember Heather Hadwick, a Republican representing a large region of northern California bordering Nevada, said Tahoe-Truckee Unified shouldn’t be forced to join the CIF.
“I urge California Department of Education and state officials to fully consider the real-world consequences of this decision—not in theory, but on the ground—where weather, geography, and safety matter,” Hadwick said.
Copyright
© 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
Nevada
Proactive power outage slated for northwestern Nevada
RENO, Nev. (KOLO) – Because of heightened fire weather conditions forecast for northwestern Nevada, a proactive outage is slated for Friday, Dec. 19, in Carson City, Clear Creek, Jack’s Valley, Genoa and Glenbrook from 6 a.m. to 4 p.m., according to a NV Energy news release.
The outage would affect about 715 customers, the release said.
During a Public Safety Outage Management event, the utility proactively de-energizes power for customers in high-risk zones to help protect the community and environment from wildfires, the release said.
If weather conditions change, the potential proactive outage will be adjusted or cancelled.
Customers potentially impacted have been notified via phone, text messages and email.
NV Energy will continue to monitor conditions and provide updates.
The outage timeframe includes the duration of the weather event and an estimated time for crews to inspect the lines for damage, vegetation or debris to begin safely restoring power.
The restoration time may change based on weather conditions or if repairs to equipment need to be made.
Copyright 2025 KOLO. All rights reserved.
-
Iowa5 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Iowa6 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine3 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland5 days agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
Technology1 week agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster
-
South Dakota6 days agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Nebraska1 week agoNebraska lands commitment from DL Jayden Travers adding to early Top 5 recruiting class
-
New Mexico3 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead