Nevada
COMMENTARY: Nevada must more aggressively fund crossings for wildlife

As an avid big-game hunter in Nevada, I have spent countless hours in the wilderness — tracking game, studying migration patterns and admiring the beauty of our state’s diverse basin and range landscapes. For me, hunting is more than a sport; it’s a tradition, a way to connect with nature, and a vital part of wildlife conservation.
Nevada’s wildlife habitats, however, face growing threats from challenges that seem overwhelming — prolonged drought, severe wildfires and the rapid spread of invasive weeds, all of which degrade critical habitats.
Despite these challenges, there are areas where meaningful progress can be made.
The expansion of roads and highways continues to fragment wildlife habitats, creating serious barriers for the animals we value. Yet Nevada has shown that thoughtful solutions are possible. To protect our wildlife and preserve these landscapes for future generations, the state must take decisive action by passing a bill to establish dedicated funding for constructing new wildlife crossings across Nevada.
Wildlife crossings — such as overpasses and underpasses designed to help animals safely traverse busy roadways — are a proven solution to reducing vehicle collisions with wildlife while simultaneously connecting important habitat. These structures are not just beneficial for the animals; they save human lives and prevent costly vehicle damage.
Every year, according to the Nevada Department of Transportation, more than 500 reported wildlife-vehicle collisions occur annually, costing the state close to $20 million. Nevada has a long history of leadership in addressing this issue and has 79 animal crossings in place for both large and small animals, including six overpasses. But without dedicated funding for new hot-spot collision locations, our state risks falling behind as roadways expand and urban development encroaches on critical migration corridors.
In 2023, Gov. Joe Lombardo signed Assembly Bill 12 into law. It created Nevada’s Wildlife Crossing Account and seeded this account with $5 million. The Nevada Department of Transportation is already utilizing these funds to leverage federal funds. While this is a significant step forward, it is only a starting point. A yearly recurring appropriation for wildlife crossings will provide certainty for project planning purposes, accelerating the construction of wildlife crossings where they are needed, keeping roads safe while connecting important habitat.
Critics may argue that funding wildlife crossings is an unnecessary expense, but the data tells a different story. Studies from states across the West show that wildlife crossings can reduce collisions by up to 90 percent. The economic benefits of reducing vehicle damage, medical expenses and insurance costs far outweigh the initial investment in building these structures. Additionally, federal matching funds are available for wildlife infrastructure projects, meaning that state-level investment could be leveraged to bring in additional funding resources. At a time when federal budgets are being drastically cut in search of savings, wildlife crossings make financial sense.
Passing a bill to establish dedicated funding for wildlife crossings is not just a win for hunters — it is a win for all Nevadans. By taking proactive measures, we can reduce collisions, protect motorists and ensure that our state’s treasured wildlife continues to thrive. Conservation is a responsibility we all share, whether you live in Las Vegas or Elko. Let’s not wait for more tragic accidents or further declines in our deer and other wildlife populations before taking action.
Kevin Cabble is a lifelong outdoorsman and board member for the Nevada Wildlife Federation.

Nevada
Nearly 12% of Nevada's student loan holders in default as federal collection efforts restart

LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Nearly 5 million people across the country have not made payments on their student loans for nearly a year (360 days), according to the U.S. Department of Education.
But starting May 5, the department will begin collecting money from those who have defaulted, the department announced last Monday.
WATCH | What the federal collection efforts will mean for Nevadans
Nearly 12% of Nevada’s student loan holders in default as federal collection efforts restart
The mandatory collections come after a five-year pause sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bethel Kifle, a second-year mechanical engineering student at UNLV, has only taken out one student loan so far.
“I was taking summer classes and since I couldn’t use the fall scholarship yet, I just took out a loan, so I don’t have to use my personal money cause again, I need it for — to pay other stuff like bills and stuff. The loan helped me get through that summer without being zero dollars in my banking account,” Kifle said.
Even though she won’t be required to pay the loan back until after graduation, Kifle already has a plan in place.
“The big scholarship I had, I ended up getting like $9,000 refund, so I saved that money just so I can use to pay back the loan that I took out,” Kifle said.
But not everyone is as prepared. According to the U.S. Department of Education, 42.7 million borrowers have more than $1.6 trillion in student debt.
Roughly $12.4 billion of that money is owed by Nevada borrowers, according to the Education Data Initiative. Nearly 12% of them are in default.
“If you take out a loan, you have to pay it back, it’s very simple,” said Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary.
While no loans have been sent to collections since 2020, Trump administration officials announced that will no longer be the case. They say people who don’t make a repayment plan by the May 5 deadline could face involuntary collections.
WATCH | Student loans in default to be referred to debt collection, Education Department says
Student loans in default to be referred to debt collection, Education Department says
“The government can and will collect defaulted federal student loans debt by withholding money from borrowers, tax refunds, federal pensions and even their wages,” Leavitt said.
Kifle’s recommendation for her fellow students is to keep applying for scholarships.
“Every semester, I’m still applying to scholarships. Loans should be the very last resort,” Kifle said.
All borrowers in default will receive email communications from Federal Student Aid (FSA) over the next two weeks making them aware of these developments and urging them to contact the Default Resolution Group to make a monthly payment, enroll in an income-driven repayment plan, or sign up for loan rehabilitation.
Detailed information to help borrowers get out of default is also available at StudentAid.gov/end-default.
This story was reported by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.
Nevada
NEVADA VIEWS: Rent control will hurt average Nevadans

As the owner of a property management company and a real estate investor, I adamantly oppose rent control. Those in favor might say, “Of course you do.” They might accuse me of seeking to get rich off the backs of blue-collar, middle- and lower-class working people. But they’d be wrong.
I immigrated to this country from Sri Lanka when I was 22. My determination and work ethic are what got me where I am today. It is the same determination I see in the landlords who hire my company to manage their properties. And to continue the unmasking, I’m also a Democrat. Rent control is not a partisan issue. It is an economic one.
Rent-control policies, often promoted as a remedy for rising housing costs, produce unintended consequences, including squeezing the very backbone of local real estate — mom-and-pop landlords, many of whom are in blue-collar, middle-class families.
For countless small-property owners, a modest rental home is more than just an investment. It is built over years of hard work and careful financial planning. These landlords often own fewer than five properties — and sometimes just one. According to a recent JP Morgan Chase report, there are 50 million residential rental units across the country, and more than 40 percent belong to mom-and-pop landlords. The goal of these landlords is supplemental income. Yet rental income must first be used to cover maintenance costs and property taxes as well as repairs and maintenance. When government policies impose strict rent controls, these families not only find their potential revenue streams capped but also struggle to cover costs.
As a property manager, I have a front-row view to the good, the bad and the ugly of being a small landlord. One recent “bad” was the impact of the rent moratorium implemented during the pandemic. This moratorium was designed to protect tenants during that challenging economic time — and for some it was much needed. But this measure inadvertently hurt middle-class real estate investors.
With rental income frozen or significantly reduced, many small landlords struggled to meet their financial obligations. The result was foreclosures, deferred maintenance, deteriorating property conditions and — in some cases — the forced sale or abandonment of cherished family assets. This not only undermined the financial stability of these landlords but also contributed to a decline in the overall quality and availability of rental housing.
I could tell story after story, but here are just a few examples:
A local woman who works at a Strip casino as a Culinary union housekeeper went months without receiving rent. A 67-year-old electrician nearly faced bankruptcy without rental reimbursements. A city bus driver had to postpone retirement. A terminally ill property owner who relied on rental income to support his family went 10 months without payments. And a young nurse from the Philippines who purchased her first investment home endured more than a year without rent. These are regular, everyday Nevadans, who don’t have huge nest eggs.
These and other landlords have worked hard to recover. As a community, we should applaud this and be grateful for the needed housing they provide.
My worry, though, is that their hard work will be in vain and that things could turn ugly. Last legislative session, rent control was proposed. Thankfully it was vetoed and never enacted, but I’ve heard rumors that it potentially could again be proposed.
Rent control benefits very few — and not necessarily those with the greatest need. When landlords cannot adjust rents to match market rates, the entire rental ecosystem suffers. Properties fall into disrepair, vacancies rise and the promise of a vibrant, sustainable rental market dims. Ultimately, some tenants may enjoy lower rents in the short term. But more will not, and Nevadans as a whole will witness a future with fewer available, well-maintained rental homes.
Sanje Sedera is president at Las Vegas Integrative Medicine, a broker/owner of Zenith Realty Group and a former commissioner of the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority.
Nevada
Carson City lowers expectations for Nevada revenue projection report

CARSON CITY — Nevada lawmakers are anxiously awaiting a May 1 forecast of how much money the state will have to fund services and new programs for its next two-year budget cycle.
There is already a consensus that revenues will fall below predictions used to create the state budget. But just how far below is a question being raised in budget hearings, in hallway conversations and at press conferences in the days leading up to Thursday’s Economic Forum.
Assembly Minority Floor Leader Gregory Hafen, R-Pahrump, said expectations were “already bad” during a Monday meeting of the joint Assembly Ways and Means and Senate Finance committees.
“Heaven forbid the Economic Forum come back much worse than most of us are projecting it to be,” he said.
$12.4 billion question
The Economic Forum is a panel of experts who forecast the state’s general fund revenues, including the sales and use tax, gaming percentage fee, live entertainment tax, commerce tax, modified business tax and real property transfer tax. Its most recent forecast from December was used by Gov. Joe Lombardo’s staff to craft Lombardo’s proposed budget for the 2026-2027 biennium.
That forecast predicted the state could count on $12.4 billion in revenue during the next two-year budget cycle, about 3.4 percent more than it is expected to receive over the entire the 2024-2025 biennium.
The state’s economic outlook has changed since then, and expectations of lowered revenue are already playing out.
Alexander Marks, deputy executive director of field and communications for the Nevada State Education Association, said the education lobbying group can see the economy’s impact in the governor’s recommended per-pupil spending increase of only $2 in the 2026 fiscal year and $70 for the 2027 fiscal year.
“Why does it appear that way? I mean, I hate to just say vibes, but I mean, certainly the comments that are being made by some of them, the budget meetings,” Marks said. “The $2 per pupil budget increase – it’s like, if we had the money, (Gov. Joe Lombardo would) be offering more.”
Uncertainty driving the conversation
The source of many of the concerns is far outside of lawmakers’ control, including trade tensions that has led to a softening of international travel and increased uncertainty about the impact of tariffs on the domestic economy.
“We know our economy is deeply reliant on tourism,” said Sen. Rochelle Nguyen, D-Las Vegas, at a Wednesday press conference in Carson City. “When trade wars disrupt the global economy, it directly impacts disposable income of tourists, both domestic and international.”
Efforts to pare back the federal government’s $1.3 trillion budget deficit could have an outsized impact on the 28 percent of the Silver State’s budget that comes from the U.S. taxpayers. Most of that money supports the Department of Health and Human Services, which manages the state- and federally-funded Medicaid program, which provides coverage to some 822,000 Nevadans, according to a report from the nonpartisan Kenny Guinn Center for Policy Priorities.
Marks said his group is advocating for changes suggested by the Commission on School Funding, including changes to the state’s property tax structure by resetting depreciation to capture more property taxes, as described in Assembly Joint Resolution 1, but it’s a long-term fix; that reform would require the approval of the legislature, governor twice before being put before voters in 2028.
Bracing for bad news
A Wednesday meeting gave some insight into what to expect from the next Economic Forum report.
Fiscal analysts gave the Technical Advisory Committee on Future State Revenues a preview on non-major revenue sources. The discussion on smaller taxes, including the liquor tax, gaming penalties and the “transportation network tax” on rideshares and cabs, suggested a slowing economy would affect the state’s revenue sources.
“All of the forecasters did reduce their forecasts to some degree because of expectations of softening of tourism and the year-to-date actuals not coming in as predicted to this point,” Michael Nakamoto, a fiscal analyst in the Legislative Counsel Bureau, said during the meeting.
Forecasters projected a $16 million drop in non-major revenue sources each budget year compared with the previous economic forum report. They also reported a $102 million reduction in general fund revenue in the first nine months of the 2025 fiscal year compared with the same period in 2024, which Nakamoto said was skewed by revenue collected when Las Vegas hosted the Super Bowl.
“If they are visitors, or would-be visitors to Nevada, they might be rethinking it for any number of reasons,” he said when talking about the nearly 11 percent decline in liquor tax revenue projected for the 2025 fiscal year. “Or if they live here, they might be foregoing buying alcohol because they need to buy something else.
“And that’s kind of one of the uncertainties, and it’s the great unknowns that we’re sitting and looking at, and it’s honestly one of the things that keeps me up at night as a forecaster.”
Contact McKenna Ross at mross@reviewjournal.com. Follow @mckenna_ross_ on X.
-
News1 week ago
Harvard would be smart to follow Hillsdale’s playbook. Trump should avoid Biden’s. | Opinion
-
Politics6 days ago
Video: Hegseth Attacks the Media Amid New Signal Controversy
-
Business1 week ago
Porto's Bakery moving forward in Downtown Disney, replacing Earl of Sandwich
-
Culture5 days ago
New Poetry Books That Lean Into Calm and Joy Amid Life’s Chaos
-
Politics1 week ago
Supreme Court blocks new deportations of Venezuelans in Texas under 18th century Alien Enemies Act
-
News1 week ago
Maps: Where Do Federal Employees Work in America?
-
Politics7 days ago
Pope Francis and US presidents: A look back at his legacy with the nation's leaders
-
World6 days ago
New Zealand’s minor gov’t party pushes to define women by biological sex