Connect with us

Nevada

Ballot Question 3 the topic at Monday’s Democratic luncheon

Published

on

Ballot Question 3 the topic at Monday’s Democratic luncheon


Occasion Date: 

October 24, 2022 – 1:00pm

The featured audio system at Monday’s Democratic luncheon can be Sondra Cosgrove, PhD, professor of historical past on the Faculty of Southern Nevada, former president of the League of Girls Voters of Nevada, and founder and govt director of each Honest Maps Nevada and Vote Nevada.

Dr. Cosgrove will lead an hour-long dialogue of Poll Query 3, which might reshape the best way normal elections are performed within the Silver State by way of adoption of open primaries and ranked-choice voting. She’s going to seem through Zoom from Las Vegas. Anchoring the dialogue domestically can be Doug Goodman, founder and govt director of Nevadans for Election Reform.

Advertisement

The next abstract of information about and arguments for and in opposition to Query 3 by Rio Lacanlale of the Reno Gazette Journal was printed on Wednesday October 19.

What to find out about Query 3, ranked-choice voting, open primaries

This November, Nevadans will weigh in on three totally different poll measures.

One in all them — Query 3 — may dramatically reshape the best way elections are performed within the Silver State.

This is a breakdown of the poll initiative.

Advertisement

What’s Query 3?

The poll measure, formally often known as “Higher Voting Nevada,” could be damaged down into two components.

First, it asks voters to carry open main elections to the Silver State, and second, it calls on voters to implement ranked-choice voting for normal elections.

The adjustments would have an effect on solely the next top-ballot races: U.S. Congressional, governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, Nevada treasurer, state controller, legal professional normal and the Nevada Legislature.

Why does it matter?

Advertisement

Proper now, Nevada runs closed main elections, which means voters who should not registered with one of many two main events — Republican or Democrat — are excluded from casting ballots in partisan races.

Nonpartisan voters make up practically 29 % of the state’s lively registered voters. Meaning a couple of third of Nevadans haven’t got a say within the candidates who transfer onto the overall election.

How would an open main work?

If the Silver State opens up its main contests to all registered voters, Nevadans will have the ability to forged a poll for any candidate within the affected races.

For these workplaces, all candidates and voters would take part in a single main election no matter their get together.

Advertisement

The highest 5 finishers would then advance to the overall election, which might be decided by ranked-choice voting. Below this alteration, not more than 5 candidates will transfer onto the overall election.

What’s ranked-choice voting?

Below this election overhaul, voters rank as much as 5 candidates so as by desire through the normal election.

The candidate to win greater than 50% of the vote can be elected to workplace, but when no candidate wins an outright majority, the contender with the fewest “first-choice” votes can be eradicated.

Then, in a course of that will repeat till one candidate wins a majority, votes for the eradicated candidate can be redistributed to voters’ subsequent alternative.

Advertisement

What are the arguments for open primaries and ranked-choice voting?

Supporters of Query 3 argue that the state’s present election system disenfranchises voters, stifles voter turnout in main elections and creates an “never-ending gridlock” as a result of “a small vocal base of voters determines our decisions for the overall election.”

“You shouldn’t need to belong to a political get together to train your proper to vote,” says Doug Goodman, a coalition member of Nevada Voters First, the political motion committee backing the initiative.

In 2020, Nevada’s Democratic presidential caucuses utilized ranked-choice ballots.

“No person thought it was complicated then,” stated Sondra Cosgrove, who can also be a member of Nevada Voters First.

Advertisement

What does the opposition need to say?

Opponents of Query 3 argue that ranked-choice voting is complicated and will open the door to extra errors through the tabulation course of.

In addition they argue that the method is “tedious” and will lower participation in elections.

“Ranked-choice voting makes casting a poll extra time-consuming, extra sophisticated and extra complicated for voters,” Emily Persaud-Zamora, govt director of Silver State Voices, has stated.

What occurs if the measure passes in November?

Advertisement

As a result of Query 3 would amend the state structure, voters must go the measure this November and once more within the 2024 election cycle.

If that occurs, state lawmakers would want to undertake the laws by July 1, 2025.

Nevada would then conduct its 2026 election with open primaries and ranked-choice voting.

How ought to I vote on Query 3?

In the event you vote “sure” on Query 3, which means you wish to amend Articles 5 and 15 of the state structure to undertake the proposed adjustments.

Advertisement

A “no” vote would imply no adjustments are made to Nevada’s voting processes. Main elections will stay “closed,” and you’ll proceed to mark down your one most popular candidate per race in your normal election poll.

Sponsored by the Democratic Males’s Committee, this occasion is scheduled for 1:00 PM on Monday, October twenty fourth, and could be attended both in particular person at Black Bear Diner, inside Max On line casino, or on-line through Zoom. The presentation will start after all of the lunch orders have been taken, round 1:30. These wishing to be on distribution for luncheon Zoom hyperlinks ought to contact Wealthy Dunn at richdunn@aol.com.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Air Force Veteran Tells the Story of Hidden Health Risks at Nevada Test Site

Published

on

Air Force Veteran Tells the Story of Hidden Health Risks at Nevada Test Site


Dave Crete was sitting around with some fellow Air Force veterans he worked with almost three decades prior on the Nevada Test and Training Range when they broached the topic of tumors.

It was an unexpected conversation among the eight, but an enlightening one, said Crete, who found out six of his former crewmates had undergone tumor removal procedures. The Las Vegas resident said doctors had found more than 20 lipomas on him, including one that was the size of a grapefruit and surgically removed from his back.

The issues even extended to their families, with wives becoming sick, reporting multiple miscarriages or giving birth to children with defects or illnesses, Crete said.

He discovered the common thread between all these medical complications was exposure to radiation while working at the Nevada Test and Training Range.

Advertisement

Though veterans can usually get benefits to help with costs assumed from injuries related to service, Crete and many of his former crewmates can’t because their jobs were classified, meaning they can’t prove to the government that they were exposed to radiation.

Now, he’s working with federal lawmakers and producing a documentary to raise awareness about this group of impacted veterans.

“Our challenge is this: We’re a group of people that exists that nobody knows about, that nobody knows what we did, and nobody knows about where we worked,” Crete said. “It’s the only way I could figure out to effectively tell people our story and let them see it because there’s no Twin Towers; there’s no plane crash; no ship (got) sunk; there’s nothing to tie our story to, and so we have to create it, and that’s what we’ve been doing, creating a vehicle, if you will, to help us tell our story.”

Crete began the work in 2023 after forming his nonprofit The Invisible Enemy, a Las Vegas-based organization advocating for the thousands of military personnel that worked on the Nevada Test and Training Range and have been affected by exposure to toxic radiation.

The 2.9-million-acre Nevada Test and Training Range — formerly the Nevada Test Site — was established northwest of Las Vegas after World War II as a military testing site for nuclear weapons and now serves as “the largest contiguous air and ground space available for peacetime military operations,” according to Nellis Air Force Base.

Advertisement

Many people commonly refer to part of the range as Area 51, rumored to house top-secret U.S. military equipment and operations.

Crete worked at the Nevada Test and Training Range for four years, ending his service in 1987. He remembers testing being done near the gate where he was stationed. At the time, he and his crew members “didn’t know that’s what you could see,” he said, and were completely unaware of the issues that would follow them due to radiation exposure even when their service ended.

Crete said he would usually work for days at a time — sleeping, eating and drinking water while on the test site — and then go home to his wife, unknowingly bringing his contaminated clothing to be washed.

After discovering at the reunion how many veterans from the Nevada Test and Training Range ended up sick, Crete went digging for answers and found an environmental assessment of the Tonopah Test Range dated December 1975. It was conducted by the Department of Energy and Sandia National Laboratories.

The 89-page document stated that “The impacts of normal operation of the Tonopah Test Range consist of scarring of the land by roads and shrapnel impact, the use of resources and energy, noise, debris, some scattered toxic or radioactive materials, and economic effects on nearby communities.”

Advertisement

Three areas of the test site had been contaminated with plutonium from tests carried on in 1963, but the report stressed that “there is no indication of migration of this surface contamination outside the (site’s) fence, let alone outside the Range; nor is there any indication that this plutonium has entered significantly into local biological systems or food chains.”

“What they decided was that the benefits to national security, the benefits to having a prolific nuclear force, outweighed the future environmental liabilities … the government decided that the juice was worth the squeeze, and none of us knew,” Crete said. “You just never thought that the government would have actually put you somewhere knowing that eventually there was a good chance you were going to end up sick.”

Crete said he had since been in contact with “hundreds and hundreds” of veterans, with more than half reporting some sort of serious health condition among them or their families.

To raise awareness of the plight these veterans have faced, Crete decided he wanted to create a movie. He made an account on film industry website IMDb and began emailing those who were affiliated with projects like the 2023 “Oppenheimer” movie and the 2023 “Downwind” documentary.

He eventually received a response from a camera operator for “Downwind,” who connected him with the documentary’s directors, Mark Shapiro and Douglas Brian Miller. Crete then hired Backlot Docs — the feature documentary production company co-founded by Shapiro and Miller — to create the film.

Advertisement

“The Invisible Enemy” first fundraiser took place in late 2023 and filming began the same year to produce an 11-minute short titled “The Invisible Enemy: Hidden Sacrifice.” It took them three months from conceptualizing to completing the documentary, Crete said, and was uploaded to YouTube this past June.

Crete’s activism hasn’t stopped there.

The Invisible Enemy organization has been working with lawmakers, like U.S. Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., to craft legislation that would help those exposed to radiation at the Nevada Test and Training Range get medical benefits.

On Sept. 16, 2024, Amodei and U.S. Rep Susie Lee, D-Nev., introduced the Presumption for Radiation or Toxin Exposure Coverage for Troops (PROTECT) Act in the U.S. House of Representatives, which would have provided medical care for veterans exposed to radiation and other toxins at the Nevada Test and Training Range by setting a “presumption of exposure” to these toxins starting in 1972.

The bill would have established that anyone who worked at the Nevada Test and Training Range during or after 1972 was presumably exposed to radiation or other toxins. It would cover those not included in Executive Order 13179, which was signed by former President Bill Clinton in 2000 to compensate civilians, their survivors and Department of Energy employees exposed to radiation.

Advertisement

“A quick look at the facts shows that this group of veterans were in serious need of additional support as a result of their service,” Amodei said in a September statement. “As with every veteran, those serving at (the test site) during the determined time frame are entitled to care for illness and injury sustained in the line of service to our nation. I’m glad to lead the charge on this and will continue to push until this change is actualized.”

The House proposal never came to a vote and died with the end of the 118th Congress. It would need to be reintroduced in the new session of Congress.

Crete, who travels to Washington every few months to advocate for the cause, believes they’ll be granted a hearing by Congress this year.

U.S. Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., in 2023 introduced the Providing Radiation Exposed Servicemembers Undisputed Medical Eligibility (PRESUME) Act to support veterans exposed to toxic radiation by prohibiting the secretary of Veterans Affairs from requiring evidence of a specific dose of radiation to determine whether someone is a radiation-exposed veteran.

Under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) established in the 1990s, civilians who contracted cancer and other specific diseases from exposure to radiation can receive compensation without having to go through testing required by the Veterans Affairs, said Shane Liermann, deputy national legislative director for the nonprofit organization, Disabled American Veterans.

Advertisement

A veteran must provide proof of on-site participation, radiation dose estimates from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency and a medical opinion supporting that their disease was caused by radiation exposure to receive entitlement for what Veterans Affairs considered “presumptive diseases” caused by radiation exposure.

But Crete claims that he and other veterans working at the Nevada Test and Training Range can’t even prove they were there due to their classified work, which leaves them unable to get any federal support.

Titus, in a statement, said “radiation dose estimates have historically been unreliable, leaving many exposed veterans unable to obtain the compensation they have earned.”

“In the course of their service, like anyone on the battlefield, veterans at the Nevada Test Site put themselves in harm’s way in service to our country. We cannot continue to leave any of them behind. The bureaucratic barriers to care could be easily fixed through my legislation,” Titus in 2023. “Our country’s atomic veterans helped win the peace during the Cold War, and they must be able to access the highest standard of care available.”

Titus’ bill was last referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs on Nov. 8, 2023. It never came to a vote.

Advertisement

Crete’s next moves will be to continue working with Nevada’s congressional delegation to draft and introduce legislation and create a full-length documentary for “The Invisible Enemy.”

He’ll show the short documentary at film festivals in Santa Fe, New Mexico, and New Jersey in the coming months. Meanwhile, filmmakers continue to gather footage for the longer feature.

The Invisible Enemy is also accepting donations on its website and fundraising through film showings in cities like Cleveland and New York. Crete said he would “speak to anybody and everybody that will listen, so I can tell our story, so that we can get the men and women what they need.”

“We all understand there’s risk, but it’s not reasonable to think that you’re going to be stationed out in the desert in Nevada and have a life-threatening illness, simply because that’s where you slept at night. And that’s what we’re trying to recognize and have the government recognize,” Crete said. “We got to participate in the coolest thing going that the military had, and I believe that there is a way to tell the story of this group of people and what they did and what we accomplished without violating our security. But it’s a story I just truly believe needs to be told, the good and the bad.”

___

Advertisement

(c)2025 the Las Vegas Sun (Las Vegas, Nev.)

Visit the Las Vegas Sun (Las Vegas, Nev.) at www.lasvegassun.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Story Continues

© Copyright 2025 Las Vegas Sun. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

Stanford loses commitment from Nevada OL Tyson Ruffins

Published

on

Stanford loses commitment from Nevada OL Tyson Ruffins


Back on December 21st, Stanford football lost a commitment from Nevada transfer offensive lineman Tyson Ruffins, who announced on X (Twitter) that he was committing to Cal instead. Ruffins is a talented offensive lineman who is coming off a strong redshirt freshman season for the Wolfpack, making his loss significant for the Cardinal.

Ruffins has since deleted his tweet signaling his commitment to Cal while his commitment tweet to Stanford has stayed up. This has created some confusion of as to what his status is with respect to both Stanford and Cal. While I cannot speak for the Cal side of things, I can confirm that Ruffins has not flipped his commitment back to Stanford.

Stanford has since been looking to find other offensive line prospects who can take the spot that Ruffins was originally going to have. They were able to add one today in Georgia Tech transfer Kai Greer, who once verbally committed to Stanford as part of their 2024 class before flipping to Arkansas and then later flipping to Georgia Tech. Stanford extended an offer to him shortly after he entered the transfer portal at the end of December. I’ll share more thoughts on Greer in a separate article, so stay tuned for that.

CardinalSportsReport.com on Facebook, IG, Threads, X (Twitter), & Blue Sky: @StanfordRivals

Advertisement

Ben Parker on Facebook, IG, Threads, X (Twitter), & Blue Sky: @slamdunk406

Email: slamdunk406@yahoo.com

Join the conversation on CardinalSportsReport.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada WR Transfer Cortez Braham Sets Kentucky Visit

Published

on

Nevada WR Transfer Cortez Braham Sets Kentucky Visit


Cortez Braham is headed to Lexington next week. The Nevada wide receiver transfer has set his visit to Kentucky.

The 6-foot-2, 192-pound wideout will take an official visit to Memphis from Jan. 6-8. He will then arrive in Kentucky for his visit on Jan. 8th.

“I know they’re just getting over there to the school, but me, him, and Coach Bush have been talking about the role I can play if I do decide to commit to them,” Braham told KSR+ on Friday.

Braham Talks Kentucky

Cortez Braham has been mainly in contact with Kentucky wide receiver coach L’Damien Washington since entering the portal. He’s also starting to hear from UK’s offensive coordinator Bush Hamdan.

Advertisement

“They were talking about how important I am to their offense. They’re talking about getting me on a visit to really get to know the rest of the staff.”

Kentucky has already added two wide receiver transfers this offseason. The Cats are bringing in Oklahoma transfer JJ Hester and Alabama transfer Kendrick Law.

“Personally, I feel like I play anywhere in the offense: inside, outside. It really doesn’t matter where they put me,” he said. “I’m very versatile. I can play a good part in their offense, being able to go anywhere on the field to make a play.”

Cortez Braham’s Game

Nevada transfer wide receiver Cortez Braham finished the 2024 season with 56 receptions for 724 yards and four touchdowns. He also had one carry for one yard.

“My greatest strengths are that I’m a very good route runner and I catch the ball really well,” Braham said. “Those two attributes set me apart from most receivers.”

Advertisement

Braham is looking to improve his tracking downfield. He also wants to be more consistent with “50-50 balls.”

“I need to make sure I turn those 50-50 balls more my way,” he said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending