Connect with us

Montana

Short-term rentals spike in western Montana

Published

on

Short-term rentals spike in western Montana


On a quiet residential avenue simply two blocks from the College of Montana, a two-story white home with a completed basement has been divided up into a number of residences. The upper-level two-bedroom residence can be an ideal place for a school pupil or a UM worker. However as a substitute, the residence has been transformed into an Airbnb rental for $295 an evening, not together with charges.

It is occurred with growing frequency in each neighborhood in Missoula: A home or residence that was as soon as a spot for an area to dwell has been transformed to a short-term rental for guests. Property house owners wager that the monetary returns are larger in the event that they use their dwelling extra like a lodge. Meaning the long-term renters have to search out one other place to dwell in a metropolis that is coping with a extreme inexpensive housing scarcity.

Missoula noticed a rise of almost 100 extra short-term rental properties from the primary quarter of 2019 to the primary quarter of 2022 for a complete of 583, in response to knowledge from AirDNA.co, an internet site that tracks vacationer properties. There are others which may be working below the radar. Meaning almost 600 properties aren’t housing folks that completely dwell right here and work right here.

Individuals are additionally studying…

Advertisement

In that very same time, common rents in Missoula have elevated about 30%, in response to knowledge from the Missoula Group of Realtors and Sterling Business Actual Property Advisors. The median dwelling gross sales worth rose nearly 43% throughout that interval and now stands at over $535,000.

Different Montana cities which have additionally skilled skyrocketing housing costs have seen even a bigger inflow of short-term rental properties. Whitefish’s stock of Airbnb-style rental properties elevated from 675 to 1,305 in that point interval and Bozeman elevated from 556 to 853.

Advertisement

As housing costs skyrocket and lease hikes proceed to exasperate low and moderate-wage staff in Montana, some public officers and residents are clamoring for solutions on precisely how the conversion of neighborhood properties into leases for guests is affecting the housing market.

Enterprise leaders and College officers have mentioned that they cannot rent sufficient workers due to the excessive price of housing. Complaints about short-term leases have prompted Missoula officers to review the difficulty.

Eran Pehan, Missoula’s director of neighborhood planning, improvement and innovation, mentioned her workers has been conducting an information evaluation to see how widespread the short-term leases are within the metropolis. They will be presenting their outcomes to the Metropolis Council’s housing and redevelopment committee later this summer time.

In 2019, Norma Nickerson of the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Analysis on the College of Montana partnered with Whitefish inn proprietor Rhonda Fitzgerald to put in writing a report concerning the influence of vacationer properties in Montana.

“Initially short-term leases have been thought-about part of the sharing financial system, providing vacationers a low-cost choice to expensive motels or resorts,” they wrote. “However a rising development has emerged with business operators operating hoteling schemes, which are inclined to fracture communities, increase security issues and improve the value of lease for residents whereas depleting inexpensive housing choices.”

Advertisement

In Whitefish, the Metropolis Council banned vacationer properties in most components of city besides the resort zones and the downtown enterprise district.

In response to the Whitefish Pilot newspaper, the Whitefish Sustainable Tourism Administration Plan committee chair Lauren Oscilowski mentioned town wants to verify long-term residents of the city have a spot to dwell in conventional residential neighborhoods.

“There’s a restricted pool of workforce housing and that is designed to attempt to cease the hemorrhaging,” she informed metropolis officers in late 2021, in response to the paper. “What we’re asking you for is to guard our neighborhoods.”

In response to the info from AirDNA, the typical every day charge for a vacationer dwelling in Missoula is $157, and the median occupancy charge is 77%. The variety of energetic leases dropped sharply throughout the pandemic and is now again to the pre-pandemic excessive. Missoula vacationer dwelling costs are highest in August and lowest in January. Solely these vacationer properties that are not owner-occupied are required to register with town for security causes.

In Whitefish, the typical every day charge is $353 and the median occupancy charge is 58%. You are going to pay as a lot a mean of $403 an evening for a rental in December in Whitefish, however the costs drop to a mean of $290 in October.

Advertisement

Kalispell noticed a rise from 231 vacationer properties in early 2019 to 527 in late 2021, however greater than 100 have grow to be non-active in 2022 in that metropolis.

Brint Wahlberg, a Missoula actual property agent, informed the Missoulian final month he is seen that some vacationer dwelling operators have determined it isn’t value it to compete with so many others.

“I’ve seen a handful of trip leases begin to come again in the marketplace on the market,” Wahlberg mentioned. “These are Airbnbs which have taken away properties that long-term Missoulians can dwell in. And possibly the market obtained a bit over-saturated with trip leases, so individuals are beginning to dump them as a result of individuals aren’t getting the returns they thought they’d.”

A number of educational research have indicated that short-term leases result in increased rents and residential costs in communities. A 2017 examine by the Nationwide Bureau of Financial Analysis and UCLA discovered {that a} 1% improve in Airbnb listings results in a mean $9 month-to-month improve in rents and an $1,800 improve in home costs.

An identical examine by the East Bay Housing Group advisable that short-term leases displace workforce housing choices close to transportation infrastructure and job facilities, necessitating longer commutes for residents. A examine from the Centre for Financial Coverage Analysis in London discovered that locations which might be engaging to vacationers are extra inclined to increased lease and residential costs resulting from short-term leases.

Advertisement

There isn’t any doubt that many Montana property house owners are making much-needed earnings from having short-term rental properties.

However Norma Nickerson (who has since retired from her place on the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Analysis) wrote in her 2019 report that many individuals in tourist-heavy communities see collateral harm from vacationer properties.

“Residents have been telling us how short-term leases have been taking over all of the housing,” she mentioned. “Those who at the moment dwell there, it makes their property extra worthwhile. However if you’re a enterprise particular person attempting to rent individuals for the season, there’s no place for individuals to dwell as a result of all of the workforce housing is altering over from long-term leases to short-term leases.”

You should be logged in to react.
Click on any response to login.
Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Montana

Montana Technologies Announces First Quarter 2024 Results

Published

on

Montana Technologies Announces First Quarter 2024 Results


RONAN, Mont., May 20, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Montana Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: AIRJ) (“Montana Technologies”), the developer of AirJoule®, a transformational atmospheric thermal energy and water harvesting technology, today announced its first quarter results.

Key Highlights

  • Closed business combination (the “Business Combination”) with Montana Technologies LLC (“Legacy Montana”) and renamed the combined company “Montana Technologies Corporation”
    • $50 million minimum cash condition was exceeded by securing private investments led by Carrier Global Corporation (“Carrier”), Rice Investment Group, and GE Vernova, among other third parties (the “Capital Raise”)
    • Upon completion of the Business Combination, Montana Technologies’ common stock and warrants began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under new ticker symbols “AIRJ” and “AIRJW,” respectively
  • Formed a joint venture with GE Vernova to advance and commercialize transformational air conditioning and atmospheric water harvesting products featuring AirJoule® technology
    • The joint venture is led by Bryan Barton, formerly the Senior Director of Marketing, Ventures, and Incubation at GE Vernova
  • Entered into joint commercialization agreement term sheets with Carrier to develop and commercialize the AirJoule® dehumidifying and cooling technology for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) solutions in the Americas, Europe, India, and the Middle East
  • Ended the quarter with $37 million of cash on the balance sheet

Executive Commentary

Matt Jore, Chief Executive Officer of Montana Technologies stated, “We are excited to have completed our Business Combination and for Montana Technologies to be listed on Nasdaq. This represents a critical milestone for the company and will enable us, along with our strategic partners, to focus on developing and deploying our atmospheric thermal energy and water harvesting systems worldwide as a response to climate change and water scarcity. In addition, the recently announced partnerships with GE Vernova and Carrier showcase how our proprietary AirJoule® technology has been embraced by industry leaders; these partnerships will open our company and technology into two enormous target markets, HVAC and atmospheric water harvesting. We believe these actions place the company on a path to create a more equitable and sustainable future by fundamentally changing how we optimize increasingly scarce energy and water resources to create a better quality of life for all.”

Pat Eilers, Executive Chairman, stated, “Montana Technologies met the core criteria of a clean tech solutions provider we were searching for when we started the process with Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition II Corp. Montana Technologies, through its proprietary AirJoule® units, has created a transformational technology that provides significant energy efficiency gains in HVAC and atmospheric water harvesting applications, and it addresses two of the world’s most problematic issues, energy efficiency and water scarcity. We are thrilled to have completed this transaction, and I am excited to take on the role of Executive Chairman. I look forward to partnering with our newly announced management team to deliver value in the public markets.”

Advertisement

Commercialization Agreement with Carrier

On January 8, 2024, Legacy Montana and Carrier, a global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, announced that they had entered into a binding term sheet related to a commercial collaboration to develop and commercialize the AirJoule® dehumidification and cooling technology. Subject to certain milestones, Legacy Montana granted Carrier the exclusive right to commercialize the AirJoule® technology into HVAC equipment in the Americas for a period of three years. Legacy Montana, acting through an affiliated joint venture, also provided Carrier with a non-exclusive right to commercialize the AirJoule® technology into HVAC equipment in Europe, India, and the Middle East.

Carrier also committed $10 million in growth equity to Legacy Montana, which was conditional upon the successful raise of at least $50 million in aggregate capital commitments. This condition was achieved with the successful Capital Raise that occurred in conjunction with the closing of the Business Combination in March 2024. Following the Business Combination, Montana Technologies expanded its Board of Directors with the appointment of Ajay Agrawal, Senior Vice President, Global Services, Business Development and Chief Strategy Officer at Carrier.

Joint Venture Agreement with GE Vernova

On January 29, 2024, Legacy Montana announced an agreement to form a joint venture with GE Vernova, a global leader in electrification, decarbonization, and energy solutions, to incorporate GE Vernova’s proprietary sorbent materials into systems that utilize Montana’s patented AirJoule® dehumidification, air conditioning, and atmospheric water harvesting technology.

Advertisement

The AirJoule® technology utilizes advanced sorbents and a self-regenerating pressure swing adsorption system to harvest thermal energy and pure water from air. GE Vernova, a recognized leader in the development of advanced materials technology for industrial systems, also seeks to deploy novel sorbent-based solutions that can enable a zero-carbon emissions future. Incorporating GE Vernova’s sorbent innovations into AirJoule® technology will enhance the performance of the joint venture’s energy-saving HVAC components as well as its atmospheric water harvesting products.

The joint venture closed on March 4, 2024. In addition, GE Vernova made an equity investment in Montana Technologies in conjunction with the Capital Raise. GE Vernova’s Advanced Research team is providing support to the joint venture’s R&D function, and Bryan Barton, formerly the Senior Director of Marketing, Ventures, and Incubation at GE Vernova, joined the joint venture full-time as its Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Barton is currently focused on expanding the joint venture team, advancing AirJoule® prototypes, and managing initial pilot projects with key potential customers for the HVAC components and atmospheric water harvesting products.

Completion of Business Combination

On March 14, 2024, Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition II Corp. (“XPDB”) completed the Business Combination with Legacy Montana, which was originally announced on June 5, 2023. Upon completion of the Business Combination, the combined entity was renamed “Montana Technologies Corporation,” and its common stock and warrants began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under new ticker symbols “AIRJ” and “AIRJW”, respectively.

In conjunction with the Business Combination, the Capital Raise, led by investments from Carrier, the Rice Investment Group, and GE Vernova, and, together with amounts from XPDB’s trust account, exceeded the $50 million cash required to satisfy the related closing condition.

Advertisement

Recent Additions to the Board of Directors and Management Team

As part of the XPDB shareholder approval of the Business Combination, XPDB shareholders elected the following individuals as directors of Montana Technologies:

  • Pat Eilers, Founder and Managing Partner of Transition Equity Partners;
  • Max Baucus, Former Ambassador to China and Six-Term United States Senator from the State of Montana;
  • Paul Dabbar, Former Undersecretary of the Department of Energy for Science and current Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of Bohr Quantum Technology;
  • Matt Jore, Chief Executive Officer of Montana Technologies;
  • Stu Porter, Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Denham Capital; and
  • Marwa Zaatari, Founder and Chief Scientist of D-Zine Partners

Subsequent to the completion of the Business Combination, the following individuals were appointed as directors of Montana Technologies:

  • Ajay Agrawal, Senior Vice President, Global Services, Business Development and Chief Strategy Officer at Carrier Global Corporation; and
  • Kyle Derham, Partner at Rice Investment Group

On May 7, 2024, Montana Technologies named Pat Eilers as Executive Chairman and appointed the following executives to its management team:

  • Stephen Pang, Chief Financial Officer;
  • Chad MacDonald, Chief Legal Officer; and
  • Tom Divine, Vice President, Investor Relations and Finance

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Montana Technologies’ financial statements and related footnotes will be available in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2024, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2024.

Investor Update Webcast

Montana Technologies has provided investors with an earnings call webcast. Interested parties may view the webcast by visiting the investor section of Montana Technologies’ website at www.mt.energy and clicking on the webcast link. 

Advertisement

About Montana Technologies Corporation

Montana Technologies Corporation is a publicly traded company that holds the intellectual properties that make up the AirJoule® system, an atmospheric thermal energy and water harvesting technology that provides efficient and sustainable air conditioning and pure water from air. For more information, visit www.mt.energy.

Forward Looking Statements

The information in this press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of present or historical fact included in this press release, regarding Montana Technologies and its future financial and operational performance, as well as its strategy, future operations, estimated financial position, estimated revenues, and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward looking statements. When used in this press release, including any oral statements made in connection therewith, the words “could,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” the negative of such terms and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions about future events and are based on currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, Montana Technologies expressly disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the statements herein, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release.

Montana Technologies cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond Montana Technology’s control. These risks include, but are not limited to, our status as an early stage Company with limited operating history, which may make it difficult to evaluate the prospects for our future viability; our initial dependence on revenue generated from a single product; significant barriers we face to deploy our technology; the dependence of our commercialization strategy on our relationships with BASF, CATL, Carrier, GE Vernova, and other third parties history of losses, and the other risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” in our SEC filings including in our Registration Statement (See Risk Factors) on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 11, 2024. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described in this press release occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Montana Technology’s SEC Filings are available publicly on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, and readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in such filings.

Advertisement

MONTANA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS






March 31,



 December 31,




2024



2023

Advertisement

Assets







Current assets







Cash


$

37,429,270

Advertisement


$

375,796


Prepaid expenses and other assets



486,338




126,971

Advertisement

Total current assets



37,915,608




502,767


Operating lease right-of-use asset



170,117

Advertisement



49,536


Property and equipment, net



4,137




3,832


In-process research and development

Advertisement


365,300,000





Goodwill



247,233,000




Advertisement

Total assets


$

650,622,862



$

556,135

Advertisement










Liabilities and Stockholders’ equity (deficit)









Current liabilities









Accounts payable


$

431,774

Advertisement


$

2,518,763


Accrued transaction fees



3,077,107




3,644,100

Advertisement

Other accrued expenses



6,781,239




244,440


Due to related parties



1,440,000

Advertisement




Operating lease liability, current



22,981




22,237


Total current liabilities

Advertisement


11,753,101




6,429,540


Earnout Shares liability



61,393,000




Advertisement

True Up Shares liability



286,000





Subject Vesting Shares liability



14,217,000

Advertisement




Operating lease liability, non-current



147,858




27,299


Total liabilities

Advertisement

$

87,796,959



$

6,456,839


Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

Advertisement








Stockholders’ equity (deficit)









Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 25,000,000 authorized shares and 0 shares
issued and outstanding as of  March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023


$



$

Advertisement


Class A Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 600,000,000 authorized shares and
49,063,770 and 32,731,583 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2024
and December 31, 2023, respectively



4,907




3,274


Class B Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 authorized shares and
4,759,642 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023

Advertisement


476




476


Subscription receivable



(6,000,000)




Advertisement

Additional paid-in capital






11,263,647


Accumulated deficit



(43,686,098)

Advertisement



(17,168,101)


Total Montana Technologies Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit)



49,680,715




(5,900,704)


Non-controlling interests

Advertisement


612,506,618





Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)



562,825,903




(5,900,704)

Advertisement

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)


$

650,622,862



$

556,135

Advertisement

MONTANA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)






Three Months Ended
March 31,




2024



2023


Costs and expenses:

Advertisement






    General and administrative


$

827,576



$

218,175

Advertisement

    Research and development



896,613




604,944


    Sales and marketing



37,725

Advertisement



10,423


    Depreciation and amortization



1,145




1,085


Loss from operations

Advertisement


(1,763,059)




(834,627)











Other expenses, net:









    Interest income



38,236

Advertisement




    Change in fair value of Earnout Shares liability



(7,672,000)





    Change in fair value of True Up Shares liability

Advertisement


269,000






    Change in fair value of Subject Vesting Shares



(2,425,000)





Total other expenses, net

Advertisement


(9,789,764)














Loss before income taxes



(11,552,823)




(834,627)

Advertisement

Income tax expense







Net loss


$

Advertisement

(11,552,823)



$

(834,627)


Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests



(26,382)

Advertisement




Net loss attributable to common stockholders of the Company


$

(11,526,441)



$

Advertisement

(834,627)











Weighted average Class A common stock outstanding, basic and diluted



36,916,955




32,599,213


Basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders, Class A common stock

Advertisement

$

(0.28)



$

(0.02)


Weighted average Class B common stock outstanding, basic and diluted

Advertisement


4,759,642




4,759,642


Basic and diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders, Class B common stock


$

(0.28)

Advertisement


$

(0.02)


MONTANA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS






For the Three Months Ended

March 31,

Advertisement



2024



2023


Cash Flows from Operating Activities









Net loss


$

Advertisement

(11,552,823)



$

(834,627)


Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities









Depreciation and amortization

Advertisement


1,145




1,085


Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets



52,068




5,211

Advertisement

Change in fair value of Earnout Shares liability



7,672,000





Change in fair value of True Up Shares liability



(269,000)

Advertisement




Change in fair value of Subject Vesting Shares liability



2,425,000





Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Advertisement








Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets



15,010




12,576


Operating lease liabilities



(51,346)

Advertisement



(5,211)


Accounts payable



(2,674,319)




40,279


Accrued expenses, accrued transaction costs and other liabilities

Advertisement


(1,057,718)




(22,948)


Net cash used in operating activities



(5,439,983)




(803,635)

Advertisement










Cash flows from Investing Activities









Purchases of fixed assets



(1,450)





Net cash used in investing activities

Advertisement


(1,450)














Cash flows from Financing Activities









Proceeds from the exercise of warrants



45,760

Advertisement




Proceeds from the exercise of options



56,250





Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

Advertisement


43,365,000




255,861


Transaction costs – recapitalization



(972,103)




Advertisement

Net cash provided by financing activities



42,494,907




255,861


Net increase (decrease) in cash



37,053,474

Advertisement



(547,774)


Cash, beginning of period



375,796




5,211,486


Cash, end of the period

Advertisement

$

37,429,270




4,663,712











Non-Cash investing and financing activities:









Initial recognition of earnout shares liability

Advertisement

$

53,721,000



$


Initial recognition of True Up Shares liability

Advertisement


555,000





Initial recognition of Subject Vesting Shares liability



11,792,000




Advertisement

Initial recognition of ROU asset and operating lease liability



172,649





Liabilities combined in recapitalization, net



8,680,477

Advertisement




Acquisition of business from GE Vernova in exchange for issuing non-controlling interests



612,533,000














Supplemental Cash flow information:

Advertisement








Taxes paid







Contacts

Investor Relations
Tom Divine – Vice President, Investor Relations and Finance
[email protected]

Advertisement

Media:
Kekst CNC
[email protected] 

SOURCE Montana Technologies



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Medicaid unwinding deals blow to Native care in Montana

Published

on

Medicaid unwinding deals blow to Native care in Montana


Jazmin Orozco Rodriguez

(KFF) About a year into the process of redetermining Medicaid eligibility after the covid-19 public health emergency, more than 20 million people have been kicked off the joint federal-state program for low-income families.

A chorus of stories recount the ways the unwinding has upended people’s lives, but Native Americans are proving particularly vulnerable to losing coverage and face greater obstacles to reenrolling in Medicaid or finding other coverage.

“From my perspective, it did not work how it should,” said Kristin Melli, a pediatric nurse practitioner in rural Kalispell, Montana, who also provides telehealth services to tribal members on the Fort Peck Reservation.

Advertisement

The redetermination process has compounded long-existing problems people on the reservation face when seeking care, she said. She saw several patients who were still eligible for benefits disenrolled. And a rise in uninsured tribal members undercuts their health systems, threatening the already tenuous access to care in Native communities.

One teenager, Melli recalled, lost coverage while seeking lifesaving care. Routine lab work raised flags, and in follow-ups Melli discovered the girl had a condition that could have killed her if untreated. Melli did not disclose details, to protect the patient’s privacy.

Melli said she spent weeks working with tribal nurses to coordinate lab monitoring and consultations with specialists for her patient. It wasn’t until the teen went to a specialist that Melli received a call saying she had been dropped from Medicaid coverage.

The girl’s parents told Melli they had reapplied to Medicaid a month earlier but hadn’t heard back. Melli’s patient eventually got the medication she needed with help from a pharmacist. The unwinding presented an unnecessary and burdensome obstacle to care.

Pat Flowers, Montana Democratic Senate minority leader, said during a political event in early April that 13,000 tribal members had been disenrolled in the state.

Advertisement

Native American and Alaska Native adults are enrolled in Medicaid at higher rates than their white counterparts, yet some tribal leaders still didn’t know exactly how many of their members had been disenrolled as of a survey conducted in February and March. The Tribal Self-Governance Advisory Committee of the Indian Health Service conducted and published the survey. Respondents included tribal leaders from Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, and New Mexico, among other states.

Tribal leaders reported many challenges related to the redetermination, including a lack of timely information provided to tribal members, patients unaware of the process or their disenrollment, long processing times, lack of staffing at the tribal level, lack of communication from their states, concerns with obtaining accurate tribal data, and in cases in which states have shared data, difficulties interpreting it.

Research and policy experts initially feared that vulnerable populations, including rural Indigenous communities and families of color, would experience greater and unique obstacles to renewing their health coverage and would be disproportionately harmed.

“They have a lot at stake and a lot to lose in this process,” said Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families and a research professor at the McCourt School of Public Policy. “I fear that that prediction is coming true.”

Cammie DuPuis-Pablo, tribal health communications director for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes in Montana, said the tribes don’t have an exact number of their members disenrolled since the redetermination began, but know some who lost coverage as far back as July still haven’t been reenrolled.

Advertisement

The tribes hosted their first outreach event in late April as part of their effort to help members through the process. The health care resource division is meeting people at home, making calls, and planning more events.

The tribes receive a list of members’ Medicaid status each month, DuPuis-Pablo said, but a list of those no longer insured by Medicaid would be more helpful.

Because of those data deficits, it’s unclear how many tribal members have been disenrolled.

“We are at the mercy of state Medicaid agencies on what they’re willing to share,” said Yvonne Myers, consultant on the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid for Citizen Potawatomi Nation Health Services in Oklahoma.

In Alaska, tribal health leaders struck a data-sharing agreement with the state in July but didn’t begin receiving information about their members’ coverage for about a month — at which point more than 9,500 Alaskans had already been disenrolled for procedural reasons.

Advertisement

“We already lost those people,” said Gennifer Moreau-Johnson, senior policy adviser in the Department of Intergovernmental Affairs at the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, a nonprofit organization. “That’s a real impact.”

Because federal regulations don’t require states to track or report race and ethnicity data for people they disenroll, fewer than 10 states collect such information. While the data from these states does not show a higher rate of loss of coverage by race, a KFF report states that the data is limited and that a more accurate picture would require more demographic reporting from more states.

Tribal health leaders are concerned that a high number of disenrollments among their members is financially undercutting their health systems and ability to provide care.

“Just because they’ve fallen off Medicaid doesn’t mean we stop serving them,” said Jim Roberts, senior executive liaison in the Department of Intergovernmental Affairs of the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. “It means we’re more reliant on other sources of funding to provide that care that are already underresourced.”

Three in 10 Native American and Alaska Native people younger than 65 rely on Medicaid, compared with 15% of their white counterparts. The Indian Health Service is responsible for providing care to approximately 2.6 million of the 9.7 million Native Americans and Alaska Natives in the U.S., but services vary across regions, clinics, and health centers. The agency itself has been chronically underfunded and unable to meet the needs of the population. For fiscal year 2024, Congress approved $6.96 billion for IHS, far less than the $51.4 billion tribal leaders called for.

Advertisement

Because of that historical deficit, tribal health systems lean on Medicaid reimbursement and other third-party payers, like Medicare, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and private insurance, to help fill the gap. Medicaid accounted for two-thirds of third-party IHS revenues as of 2021.

Some tribal health systems receive more federal funding through Medicaid than from IHS, Roberts said.

Tribal health leaders fear diminishing Medicaid dollars will exacerbate the long-standing health disparities — such as lower life expectancy, higher rates of chronic disease, and inferior access to care — that plague Native Americans.

The unwinding has become “all-consuming,” said Monique Martin, vice president of intergovernmental affairs for the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium.

“The state’s really having that focus be right into the minutiae of administrative tasks, like: How do we send text messages to 7,000 people?” Martin said. “We would much rather be talking about: How do we address social determinants of health?”

Advertisement

Melli said she has stopped hearing of tribal members on the Fort Peck Reservation losing their Medicaid coverage, but she wonders if that means disenrolled people didn’t seek help.

“Those are the ones that we really worry about,” she said, “all of these silent cases. … We only know about the ones we actually see.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

‘Uncomfortable’ position: How, why Marshals held out versus Billings

Published

on

‘Uncomfortable’ position: How, why Marshals held out versus Billings


RAPID CITY, S.D. (KOTA) – Roughly half of the Rapid City Marshals roster left the team on Friday, Co-Owner Wes Johnson tells KOTA News.

Team ownership notified players this week that moving forward they will only get paid $250 per game – that’s the 25% agreed upon in the contract between the team and the Arena Football League. As a result, nearly a dozen players quit.

Wages have been the primary concern from players all season, not only in Rapid City but across the country. It’s what ultimately led to last Saturday’s game, May 11, against the Billings Outlaws to be forfeited.

CONTEXT: Marshals players ‘refuse’ to come out of locker room

Advertisement

On Monday of this week, KOTA News heard from former players Tim Lukas and Brian Villanueva on what made them hold out against Billings, and do it the way they did.

”We’ll do anything to play this game, and we’ll believe anyone that tells us really good things,” Lukas said. “The more that we started seeing cracks in the walls and some of the things that seemed like they were getting ignored by a lot of people, the more it became apparent that we had to act on it.”

Marshals players started brainstorming how they wanted to send a message several days before last Saturday’s game. While it remains unclear what exactly those conversations looked like between players in private, it’s known that the timing of their actions were deliberate.

“Things were getting dragged out in previous weeks and we wanted to make sure that you know decisions were made you know quicker, and that was part of the strategy,” Villanueva said. “If it was truly about making sure that we were taking care of the players than I felt like there would have been a game played, honestly.”

READ: Hear from Marshals ownership as AFL receives backlash

Advertisement

Players whole-heartedly believed that the team ownership would meet their requests and pay them in full before kickoff against the Outlaws. That did not happen.

The Marshals wanted to make a statement, loud and clear, and the end result was felt by their peers across the league.

“A lot of the guys were proud that we stepped up and that we stuck together as a team to write a message to the entire league,” Lukas said.

“Had we not done it in that way, I don’t think it would have been felt as strong,” Villanueva continued.

Although players thought that not playing was the right move, ownership believed otherwise. Forfeiting the game against Billings put the franchise in a “really uncomfortable” financial position, according to Marshals Co-Owner Wes Johnson.

Advertisement

“Wes usually tells us how much time he spends with this organization, and knowing that there’s not a lot of personnel or resources in the building, I know that they both (Wes and Rebecca) are working extremely hard on it,” Lukas said.

Looking back on all of this, Lukas is happy he came to South Dakota, but thinks that if he would have done more research, some of these issues wouldn’t have come as a surprise.

“I wish I would have dug a little bit further into some of the people who are at the very top, running the AFL, just for my own peace of mind,” Lukas said. “But as far as having regrets, I don’t have any regrets.”

On Tuesday of this week, league owners unanimously voted to appoint Jeff Fisher to AFL interim commissioner. Fisher is a former NFL head coach and serves as the president of operations for the Nashville Kats. This move pushes out former league commissioner Lee Hutton.

MORE: Jeff Fisher named interim commissioner of AFL

Advertisement

In addition to league front office changes, many teams have undergone schedule reconstruction to help with scheduling logistics among the teams left in the league. This will take several weeks to finalize, according to Chris Chetty of G6 Sports Group.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending