A latest panel on freedom of the press and the general public’s proper to know mentioned ongoing efforts of gathering info in Montana, and famous the challenges journalists and the general public typically face when doing so.
“With out a free press, with out the fitting to know, with out the fitting of free speech and participation, democracy merely can not survive,” retired Montana Supreme Courtroom Justice James Nelson mentioned throughout a Feb. 9 discussion board he moderated that was sponsored by the Lewis and Clark Library and the League of Girls Voters of the Helena Space.
“These rights are completely basic to our democracy,” he mentioned.
Panelists included Martha Sheehy, who has had a 35-year legislation profession through which she has represented media pursuits and residents in instances of the constitutional proper to know, Nelson mentioned. And in addition on the panel was Darrell Ehrlick, editor in chief of the digital information outlet Each day Montanan and former editor of the Billings Gazette, who has filed many public info requests.
Persons are additionally studying…
Sheehy described the general public’s proper to know as a three-legged stool through which the fitting to take part, the fitting to know and the fitting to privateness work off one another.
“A 3-legged stool can solely stability if all three legs are robust,” she mentioned, including the balancing check is performed by each public physique, at each assembly by each public doc.
She mentioned “99% of the time it really works and it really works actually, very well,” including little or no litigation rises out.
Sheehy mentioned that more often than not public entities are working underneath these guidelines “and everyone seems to be making an attempt to get it proper.”
She mentioned Montana statute was amended in 2015, which permits public entities to cost charges, “which has put slightly hitch in our giddy-up.”
Ehrlick mentioned that largely when his information group requests paperwork they get them.
However time is commonly an element.
He mentioned Sheehy, who he works with on such issues, has instructed him that perhaps they get the requested info in a yr.
“However information is relative and its relevance decreases over time,” he mentioned.
He mentioned he had a buddy who waited 10 years for a Freedom of Info Act request to be fulfilled, including he doubted the data was nonetheless related.
“They fulfilled it,” he mentioned of the federal government company, “however did they?”
Getting info can come at a value. Later within the dialog Ehrlick mentioned in the event that they resolve to sue to get info, his information group units apart $10,000 “within the kitty for authorized charges.”
“That’s OK for a information group, however in case you are a member of the general public you most likely don’t have $10,000 to burn,” he mentioned.
The panelists instructed the general public that if they’re denied a request, they need to ask the company to supply their motive in writing and ask they cite the supply underneath which they made their determination.
Ehrlick mentioned Montana journalists don’t have anything particular at their disposal when it comes to getting info, including the legislation doesn’t acknowledge a particular class for journalists. He mentioned the general public is entitled to the identical legislation as reporters.
He mentioned the media and press have computerized standing as a result of they seem on the conferences, generally as solely viewers members, as the general public’s eyes and ears.
“We stand of their sneakers,” he mentioned.
Sheehy mentioned digital storage has resulted in additional documentation and saving info in numerous ways in which elevate a whole lot of questions resembling public officers who now talk on non-public telephones or non-public emails.
“It’s created extra issues than it’s solved,” she mentioned.
The panelists inspired individuals to become involved.
“The obligation to take part just isn’t a proper, it’s a accountability,” Sheehy mentioned.
Ehrlick mentioned “rights are like muscle groups,” it’s important to train them.
He mentioned individuals ought to be taught democracy.
“It’s a problem, perhaps I just like the combat too, I don’t deny that,” he mentioned.
Nelson urged individuals to know who their native legislators are and to assist their native media. He mentioned democracy just isn’t a spectator sport.
“For those who sit within the stands and do nothing, we’re going to lose it,” he mentioned.
For those who worth your constitutional rights, in the event you worth your democracy, it’s important to arise and combat for it. As of late, it’s important to combat fairly arduous, he mentioned, including individuals want to carry their legislators accountable to reply their questions.
“Help your native media,” he mentioned, including to put in writing letters to the editor and go to public conferences.
About 100 individuals listened in on the Feb. 9 on-line discussion board. Individuals can watch the panel dialogue at Helena Civic Tv at https://www.helenacivictv.org/on-demand/4330. Lewis and Clark Library mentioned they’d have it posted on their YouTube channel.
Assistant editor Phil Drake could be reached at 406-231-9021.