Connect with us

Montana

Montana mining town booms once again thanks to Hollywood

Published

on

Montana mining town booms once again thanks to Hollywood


Montana’s mining towns, particularly Butte, have seen an economic revival thanks to Hollywood productions like 1923, a prequel to Yellowstone.

Butte, once Montana’s largest city and the heart of a copper mining boom that earned it the nickname ‘the richest hill on earth,’ has since seen its population shrink to around 36,000. 

The town has grappled with the aftermath of mining waste and a shortage of well-paying jobs. 

Hollywood’s arrival offered a new kind of boom—this time in the form of economic opportunities and celebrity sightings. Locals whispered about Harrison Ford enjoying drinks at the bar and Helen Mirren shopping at Walmart. Not to mention that Alec Baldwin just wrapped up filming the movie Rust in Livingston, a town close to Butte, last year.

Advertisement

Paige Layne, a new security guard in her hometown of Butte, Montana, was several weeks into her job when she discovered she was guarding the set of 1923, the multimillion-dollar prequel to the hit show Yellowstone. 

News spread quickly, and soon the entire town was buzzing with excitement about the production.  

The premiere of 1923 drew an audience 200 times the size of Butte’s population, but initial reactions to the filming were mixed. 

Residents like Layne were skeptical, worried that the influx of Hollywood productions—including films like Last Survivors (2021), Ghosts of Devil’s Perch (2022), and Father Stu (2022)—might drive up prices in a town already affected by an influx of remote workers during the pandemic.

Advertisement

Montana ’s mining towns, particularly Butte, have seen an economic revival thanks to Hollywood productions like 1923, a prequel to Yellowstone

Locals whispered about Harrison Ford enjoying drinks at the bar and Helen Mirren shopping at Walmart

Locals whispered about Harrison Ford enjoying drinks at the bar and Helen Mirren shopping at Walmart

‘We don’t like outsiders unless you have a really good reason to be in town,’ Layne told the New York Times. ‘This is our town—we love our people.’

However, as filming progressed, opinions softened. Locals were hired for various roles, and the influx of cast and crew brought money into local businesses. 

Bartenders shared stories of Harrison Ford buying rounds for the house, and the production team took a genuine interest in the town’s history and culture.

Advertisement

‘They came in and they ruffled some feathers, man, they really did, but by the end of it, they were contributing to our local community,’ said Layne, who even worked as an extra on set.

Butte’s rugged beauty and historic architecture have made it a magnet for filmmakers. The Uptown district, with its sprawling mansions and faded brick facades, offers an authentic glimpse into the past. 

Hollywood crews have filmed in local diners, bars, union halls, and courthouses. For 1923, entire streets were closed as extras rode horses alongside the stars.

The productions have left lasting benefits. Props were donated to a children’s theater, surplus food went to a local mission, and vintage items from 1923 now decorate the historic Front Street Station, where owners Tom and Janel Madrazo rented out their space for filming. They marveled at the crew’s attention to detail, down to using 1923 coins in scenes.

Butte, once Montana's largest city and the heart of a copper mining boom, has grappled with the aftermath of mining waste and a shortage of well-paying jobs

Butte, once Montana’s largest city and the heart of a copper mining boom, has grappled with the aftermath of mining waste and a shortage of well-paying jobs

Advertisement

Yet, there have been challenges. Road closures and canceled events caused frustrations, and some residents were disappointed that Butte stood in for the more famous Bozeman in 1923.

Montana’s 2019 tax credit for film productions has been key to attracting Hollywood. Between 2020 and 2022, productions spent $77.5 million in the state. 

But industry leaders, like filmmaker Lynn-Wood Fields, worry Montana could lose its momentum unless lawmakers raise the current $12 million cap on credits. 

She advocates for additional incentives to support local filmmakers alongside major Hollywood productions.

Former state lawmaker Jim Keane emphasized the ripple effect of productions like 1923. ‘The truckers, crane operators, caterers—this is what makes it valuable,’ he said.

Advertisement
Pictured: Harrison Ford and his costars on the set of 1923

Pictured: Harrison Ford and his costars on the set of 1923

For locals like Joe Sullivan, the film industry has been transformative. 

Sullivan, a Butte native and production assistant, thought he’d have to leave Montana to pursue a film career. Instead, his five-day gig on Yellowstone grew into seven years of work on major projects.

‘This isn’t L.A. This isn’t New York. It isn’t normal to us,” he said. “This is magic to us.”



Source link

Advertisement

Montana

Apparent AI Glitch in Filing by Montana Public Defender, Recent Congressional Candidate

Published

on

Apparent AI Glitch in Filing by Montana Public Defender, Recent Congressional Candidate


Everyone makes mistakes, even experienced professionals; a good reminder for the rest of us to learn from those mistakes. The motion in State v. Stroup starts off well in its initial pages (no case law hallucinations), but is then followed by several pages of two other motions, which I don’t think the lawyer was planning to file, and which appear to have been AI-generated: It begins with the “Below is concise motion language you can drop into …” language quoted above.

Griffen Smith (Missoulian) reported on the story, and included the prosecutor’s motion to strike that filing, on the grounds that it violates a local rule (3(G)) requiring disclosure of the use of generative AI:

The document does not include a generative artificial intelligence disclosure as required. However, page 7 begins as follows: “Below is concise motion language you can drop into a ‘Motion to Admit Mental-Disease Evidence and for Related Instructions’ keyed to 45-6-204, 45-6-201, and 4614-102. Adjust headings/captions to your local practice.” Page 10 states “Below is a full motion you can paste into your pleading, then adjust names, dates, and styles to fit local practice.” These pages also include several apparent hyperlinks to “ppl-ai-file-upload.s3.amazonaws,” “ppl-ai-fileupload.s3.amazonaws+1,” and others. The document includes what appears to be an attempt at a second case caption on page 12. It is not plausible on its face that any source other than generative AI would have created such language for a filed version of a brief….

There’s more in that filing, but here’s one passage:

While generative AI can be a useful tool for some purposes and may have greater application in the future, when used improperly, and without meaningful review, it can ultimately damage both the perception and the reality of the profession. One assumes that Mr. Stroup has had, or will at some point have, an opportunity to review the filing made on his behalf. What impression could a review of pgs. 12-19 leave upon a defendant who struggles with paranoia and delusional thinking? While AI could theoretically one day become a replacement for portions of staff of experienced attorneys, it is readily apparent that this day has not yet arrived.

The Missoulan article includes this response:

Advertisement

In a Wednesday interview, Office of Public Defender Division Administrator Brian Smith told the Missoulian the AI-generated language was inadvertently included in an unrelated filing. And he criticized the county attorney’s office for filing a “four-page diatribe about the dangers of AI” instead of working with the defense to correct her mistake.

“That’s not helping the client or the case,” Smith said, “and all you are doing is trying to throw a professional colleague under the bus.”

As I mentioned, the lawyer involved seems quite experienced, and ran for the Montana Public Service Commission in 2020 (getting nearly 48% of the vote) and for the House of Representatives in Montana’s first district in 2022 (getting over 46% of the vote) and in 2024 (getting over 44%). “Его пример другим наука,” Pushkin wrote in Eugene Onegin—”May his example profit others,” in the Falen translation.

Thanks to Matthew Monforton for the pointer.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Your guide to local sports events, plus what’s on TV

Published

on

Your guide to local sports events, plus what’s on TV





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026

Published

on

Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026


HELENA — You probably have goals and plans for 2026—the Montana Department of Agriculture does too.

“We’re really focusing on innovative agricultural practices,” Montana Department of Agriculture director Jillien Streit said.

It’s no secret that agriculture—farming and ranching—is not easy. There are long days, planning, monitoring crops and livestock, and other challenges beyond farmers’ and ranchers’ control.

(WATCH: Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026)

Advertisement

Montana Department of Agriculture focusing on innovation in 2026

“We have very low commodity prices across the board,” Streit said. “We still have very high input prices across the board, and we have really high prices when it comes to our equipment, and so, it’s a really tough year.”

But innovation, including new practices, partnerships and technology use, can help navigate some of those challenges.

Advertisement

“We can’t make more time and we can’t make more land, so we need to start putting together innovative practices that help us maximize what our time and land can do,” Streit said.

Practices range from using technology like autonomous tractors and virtual fencing—allowing rangers to contain and move cattle right from their phones—to regenerative farming and ranching.

“It is bringing cattle back into farming operations to be able to work with cover cropping practices to invigorate the soil for new soil health benefits,” Streit said.

The Montana Department of Agriculture is working to help producers learn, share, and collaborate on new ideas to work in their operations.

The department will share stories of practices that work from farms and ranches across the state. Also, within the next year or so, Streit said the department is hoping to roll out technology to help producers collaborate.

Advertisement

“(It’s) providing a communication platform where people can get together and really help each other out by utilizing each other’s assets,” she said.

While not easy, agriculture is still one of Montana’s largest industries, and Streit said innovating and sharing ideas across the state can keep it going long into the future.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending