Connect with us

Montana

Montana House endorses bill removing greenhouse gas emissions from environmental reviews

Published

on

Montana House endorses bill removing greenhouse gas emissions from environmental reviews


HELENA — The Montana Home has given preliminary approval to a invoice launched late this session that seeks to revise the state’s guidelines for environmental critiques, in response to a court docket resolution that stopped work on a proposed pure gas-fired energy plant close to Laurel.

In a preliminary vote Friday, Home members voted 71-29 in favor of Home Invoice 971, sponsored by Rep. Josh Kassmier, R-Fort Benton. Three Democrats joined all Republicans in assist.

The invoice would stop the state from contemplating greenhouse fuel emissions or their potential impacts on local weather change when doing an environmental overview on a proposed undertaking.

“Home Invoice 971 makes it clear that, till the federal authorities by the act of Congress mandates that carbon is a regulated pollutant, or except and till Montana policymakers enact legal guidelines to control carbon, a procedural overview doesn’t embody local weather evaluation,” Kassmier mentioned.

Advertisement

The vote comes simply two weeks after a decide in Yellowstone County put a halt on NorthWestern Power’s development of the 175-megawatt Laurel Producing Station. On April 6, District Courtroom Choose Michael Moses dominated the Montana Division of Environmental High quality had did not take the required “exhausting look” at greenhouse fuel emissions and lighting impacts when granting an air high quality allow for the undertaking. He vacated the allow and ordered DEQ to do further evaluation.

HB 971 was launched on April 14. That’s after the common deadline for brand new payments, so it required a two-thirds vote to maneuver ahead. Republicans maintain a two-thirds supermajority within the Home, they usually voted on social gathering traces to permit the invoice to be launched.

HB 971 had its first listening to within the Home Pure Sources Committee on April 17, and it was restricted to simply over an hour of testimony, because it was held throughout a break in a prolonged Home flooring session. Later that night, the committee returned and voted to advance the invoice to the total Home.

On Friday, the Home voted unanimously to amend the invoice, eradicating a piece that might have put in a lot broader exemptions to environmental overview if the Montana Supreme Courtroom invalidated the availability banning consideration of local weather impacts.

Regardless of the amendments, opponents mentioned they nonetheless objected to the invoice’s fast timeline and abbreviated listening to.

Advertisement

“I am nonetheless going to be voting towards this, as a result of I can not assist this sample of doing the individuals’s enterprise with out due course of and participation – and really, that is form of the purpose of the regulation,” mentioned Rep. Marilyn Marler, D-Missoula.

However supporters defended the method.

“Sure, it was introduced on the final minute, however so was the choice that introduced it to us,” mentioned Rep. Steve Gunderson, R-Libby.

“We didn’t do something exterior of the method – we used our guidelines to droop the foundations,” mentioned Home Speaker Rep. Matt Regier, R-Kalispell.

The Home additionally endorsed one other invoice that supporters mentioned was partially in response to Moses’ ruling. Senate Invoice 557, sponsored by Sen. Mark Noland, R-Bigfork, would additionally say challenges over greenhouse gases can’t typically be used to void or delay a allow. As well as, it could add extra hurdles for anybody looking for to problem an environmental overview – together with requiring that they’d made official feedback to the company earlier than their last resolution and requiring them to indicate a chance of their authorized motion succeeding earlier than they’ll get an injunction to delay a undertaking.

Advertisement

“It does not say that people cannot deliver an injunction, it does not say that people cannot testify – all of them can,” mentioned Rep. Gary Parry, R-Colstrip. “It is making an attempt to guard the businesses as properly – and anyone who’s making an attempt to do a undertaking – from individuals coming in and never having any pores and skin within the sport.”

The Home voted 64-35 in favor of SB 557.

One member who voted no was Rep. Lee Deming, R-Laurel. He mentioned he was conflicted in regards to the invoice as a result of lots of his constituents stay near the proposed energy plant and have expressed considerations in regards to the impression, however he acknowledges a necessity for power initiatives prefer it.

HB 971 and SB 557 are each scheduled for last votes within the Home on Monday.





Source link

Advertisement

Montana

Students deliver Christmas meals to veterans in Great Falls

Published

on

Students deliver Christmas meals to veterans in Great Falls


Posted

and last updated

Students deliver Christmas meals to veterans in Great Falls

Advertisement

In the video above, Paul Sanchez reports on students from Central Catholic High School in Great Falls, who provided all of the fixings for Christmas meals for 50 military veterans.



Copyright 2024 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Average gas prices drop 4¢ per gallon in Montana

Published

on

Average gas prices drop 4¢ per gallon in Montana


Gas prices have dropped again across Montana just as drivers hit the roads for one of the year’s busiest travel times.

GasBuddy.com reports average gasoline prices in the state have fallen 4.2¢ per gallon in the last week and are averaging $2.79 per gallon as of Monday.

Gas prices are 20.2¢ per gallon lower than at this time a month ago and 22.7¢ per gallon lower than a year ago.

The national average price of gasoline has risen 3.1¢ per gallon over the last week to $3.01 per gallon, which is 2.6¢ lower than a month ago.

Advertisement

GassBuddy.com reports the cheapest gas in Montana was at $2.56 per gallon on Sunday while the most expensive was $3.06 per gallon.





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana State Supreme Court Upholds Historic Climate Decision

Published

on

Montana State Supreme Court Upholds Historic Climate Decision


Montana’s Republican lawmakers may not be swayed by the gravity of climate crisis, but six state Supreme Court justices did not need convincing. Last Wednesday, 16 young plaintiffs won a resounding victory as those jurists upheld a historic 2023 climate decision, with only one dissenting vote among the seven justices. With climate deniers poised to roll back energy and environmental policies in Washington next year, and the U.N. climate conference (COP29) failing to resolve major international challenges, the decision was a bright spot in an otherwise dismal year of climate policy developments.

The case tackled the state’s appeal of Held v. Montana (2023), which found a provision of the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) unconstitutional. This “MEPA limitation” prohibited environmental studies demonstrating how the state’s greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global climate change. The state Supreme Court agreed with a lower-court ruling that the provision is unconstitutional because it violated the right to “a clean and healthful environment.”

More from Gabrielle Gurley

In the 2023 decision, Judge Kathy Seeley took great care to provide a detailed exploration of the climate issues and give credence to the young people’s fears for their future. While state Supreme Court justices touched on some climate issues, such as increasing global temperatures, they turned their attention to the specific question of climate change as “a serious threat to the constitutional guarantee of a clean and healthful environment in Montana.”

Advertisement

Significantly, the justices pointed to the state constitution’s stipulation that “the state and each person shall maintain and improve” Montana’s environment “for present and future generations.” The legislature, for its part, had the responsibility to protect what they termed the “environmental life support system” from “unreasonable depletion and degradation of natural resources.”

They decided that the framers of the state constitution wanted to carve out “the strongest environmental protection provision found in any state constitution” and agreed with the young plaintiffs that there is ample evidence that the climate crisis has exacerbated wildfires and affected air and water quality in the state. The jurists also noted that the framers “would [not] grant the State a free pass to pollute the Montana environment just because the rest of the world insisted on doing so.”

The single dissent from Justice Jim Rice rested largely on the standing of the young people to bring the initial lawsuit. He argued that there was “no project, no application, no decision, no permit, no enforcement of a statute” that materially affected the group. Their stories were “not legally unique” and no different from other state residents.

Gov. Greg Gianforte (R-MT) argued that the case will prompt “perpetual lawsuits” and increase energy bills for residents. He also echoed the dissenting justice’s contention that the decision was another example of judicial activism with the court “step[ping] outside of its lane” to tread on legislative prerogatives. Not surprisingly, using Held v. Montana as an entrée, Montana Republican legislative leaders—the GOP controls both chambers—have pledged to take up new curbs on the state courts when the legislature reconvenes in January.

But for now, the ruling produces a powerful precedent that citizens, no matter their age, play an important role in shielding the planet from environmental harm, and cannot be easily dismissed.

Advertisement

December 23, 2024

5:15 AM

Unlike many news organizations, the Prospect has remained staunchly committed to keeping our journalism free and accessible to all. We believe that independent journalism is crucial for a functioning democracy—but quality reporting comes at a cost.

This year, we’re aiming to raise $75,000 to continue delivering the hard-hitting investigative journalism you’ve come to expect from us. Your support helps us maintain our independence and dig deeper into the stories that matter most.

Advertisement

If you value our reporting, please consider making a contribution today. Any amount helps secure our future and ensure we can continue holding power to account.

Will you support independent journalism with a donation to the Prospect?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending