Connect with us

Montana

Montana House endorses bill removing greenhouse gas emissions from environmental reviews

Published

on

Montana House endorses bill removing greenhouse gas emissions from environmental reviews


HELENA — The Montana Home has given preliminary approval to a invoice launched late this session that seeks to revise the state’s guidelines for environmental critiques, in response to a court docket resolution that stopped work on a proposed pure gas-fired energy plant close to Laurel.

In a preliminary vote Friday, Home members voted 71-29 in favor of Home Invoice 971, sponsored by Rep. Josh Kassmier, R-Fort Benton. Three Democrats joined all Republicans in assist.

The invoice would stop the state from contemplating greenhouse fuel emissions or their potential impacts on local weather change when doing an environmental overview on a proposed undertaking.

“Home Invoice 971 makes it clear that, till the federal authorities by the act of Congress mandates that carbon is a regulated pollutant, or except and till Montana policymakers enact legal guidelines to control carbon, a procedural overview doesn’t embody local weather evaluation,” Kassmier mentioned.

Advertisement

The vote comes simply two weeks after a decide in Yellowstone County put a halt on NorthWestern Power’s development of the 175-megawatt Laurel Producing Station. On April 6, District Courtroom Choose Michael Moses dominated the Montana Division of Environmental High quality had did not take the required “exhausting look” at greenhouse fuel emissions and lighting impacts when granting an air high quality allow for the undertaking. He vacated the allow and ordered DEQ to do further evaluation.

HB 971 was launched on April 14. That’s after the common deadline for brand new payments, so it required a two-thirds vote to maneuver ahead. Republicans maintain a two-thirds supermajority within the Home, they usually voted on social gathering traces to permit the invoice to be launched.

HB 971 had its first listening to within the Home Pure Sources Committee on April 17, and it was restricted to simply over an hour of testimony, because it was held throughout a break in a prolonged Home flooring session. Later that night, the committee returned and voted to advance the invoice to the total Home.

On Friday, the Home voted unanimously to amend the invoice, eradicating a piece that might have put in a lot broader exemptions to environmental overview if the Montana Supreme Courtroom invalidated the availability banning consideration of local weather impacts.

Regardless of the amendments, opponents mentioned they nonetheless objected to the invoice’s fast timeline and abbreviated listening to.

Advertisement

“I am nonetheless going to be voting towards this, as a result of I can not assist this sample of doing the individuals’s enterprise with out due course of and participation – and really, that is form of the purpose of the regulation,” mentioned Rep. Marilyn Marler, D-Missoula.

However supporters defended the method.

“Sure, it was introduced on the final minute, however so was the choice that introduced it to us,” mentioned Rep. Steve Gunderson, R-Libby.

“We didn’t do something exterior of the method – we used our guidelines to droop the foundations,” mentioned Home Speaker Rep. Matt Regier, R-Kalispell.

The Home additionally endorsed one other invoice that supporters mentioned was partially in response to Moses’ ruling. Senate Invoice 557, sponsored by Sen. Mark Noland, R-Bigfork, would additionally say challenges over greenhouse gases can’t typically be used to void or delay a allow. As well as, it could add extra hurdles for anybody looking for to problem an environmental overview – together with requiring that they’d made official feedback to the company earlier than their last resolution and requiring them to indicate a chance of their authorized motion succeeding earlier than they’ll get an injunction to delay a undertaking.

Advertisement

“It does not say that people cannot deliver an injunction, it does not say that people cannot testify – all of them can,” mentioned Rep. Gary Parry, R-Colstrip. “It is making an attempt to guard the businesses as properly – and anyone who’s making an attempt to do a undertaking – from individuals coming in and never having any pores and skin within the sport.”

The Home voted 64-35 in favor of SB 557.

One member who voted no was Rep. Lee Deming, R-Laurel. He mentioned he was conflicted in regards to the invoice as a result of lots of his constituents stay near the proposed energy plant and have expressed considerations in regards to the impression, however he acknowledges a necessity for power initiatives prefer it.

HB 971 and SB 557 are each scheduled for last votes within the Home on Monday.





Source link

Advertisement

Montana

An influx of outsiders and money turns Montana Republican, culminating in a Senate triumph

Published

on

An influx of outsiders and money turns Montana Republican, culminating in a Senate triumph


BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Democrats’ crushing loss in Montana’s nationally important U.S. Senate race settled a fierce political debate over whether a surge of newcomers in the past decade favored Republicans — and if one of the new arrivals could even take high office.

Voters answered both questions with an emphatic “yes” with Tim Sheehy’s defeat of three-term Democratic Sen. Jon Tester, helping deliver a GOP Senate majority and laying bare a drastic cultural shift in a state that long prided itself on electing home-grown candidates based on personal qualifications, not party affiliation.

It’s the first time in almost a century that one party totally dominates in Montana. Corporations and mining barons known as the Copper Kings once had a corrupt chokehold on the state’s politics, and an aversion to outsiders that arose from those times has faded, replaced by a partisan fervor that Republicans capitalized on during the election.

Tester, a moderate lawmaker and third-generation grain farmer from humble Big Sandy, Montana, lost to wealthy aerospace entrepreneur Sheehy, a staunch supporter of President-elect Donald Trump who arrived in Montana 10 years ago and bought a house in the ritzy resort community of Big Sky.

Advertisement

“The political culture in Montana has changed fundamentally over the past 10 to 15 years,” said University of Montana history professor Jeff Wiltse. “The us vs. them, Montanans vs. outsiders mentality that has a long history in Montana has significantly weakened.”

What to know about Trump’s second term:

Follow all of our coverage as Donald Trump assembles his second administration.

The state’s old instinct for choosing its own, regardless of party, gave way to larger trends that began more than a decade ago and accelerated during the pandemic.

Job opportunities in mining, logging and railroad work — once core Democratic constituencies — dried up. Newcomers, many drawn by the state’s natural social distancing, came in droves — with almost 52,000 new arrivals since 2020. That’s almost as many as the entire prior decade, according to U.S. Census data. As the population changed, national issues such as immigration and gender identity came to dominate political attention, distracting from local issues.

Advertisement

The 2024 Senate race brought a record-setting flood of outside money on both sides — more than $315 million, much of it from shadowy groups with wealthy donors. That effectively erased Montana’s efforts over more than a century to limit corporate cash in politics.

Sheehy’s win came after the party ran the table in recent Montana elections where voters installed other wealthy Republicans including Gov. Greg Gianforte, U.S. Sen. Steve Daines and U.S. Rep.-elect Troy Downing.

Daines is the only one of the group originally from Montana — once a virtual requirement for gaining high office in the state.

Apple-flavored whiskey and Champagne

The contrast between Montana’s old and new politics was on vivid display on election night. Tester’s party was a sedate event at the Best Western Inn in Great Falls — rooms for $142 a night — where the lawmaker mingled with a few dozen supporters and sipped on apple-flavored whiskey in a plastic cup.

Sheehy’s more boisterous affair was in Bozeman — the epicenter of Montana’s new wealth — at an upscale hotel where a standard room costs $395. Long before his victory was announced, carts bearing Champagne were rolled in as the candidate remained sequestered in a secure balcony area most of the night with select supporters.

Advertisement

Sheehy, a former U.S. Navy SEAL from Minnesota, moved to Montana after leaving the military and, along with his brother, founded Bridger Aerospace, an aerial firefighting company that depends on government contracts. Sheehy also bought a ranch in the Little Belt Mountains, and during the campaign cast himself as the modern equivalent of an early western settler seeking opportunity.

Tester received 22,000 more votes on Nov. 5 than in his last election — a gain that exceeded his margin of victory in previous wins. Yet for every additional Tester voter, Sheehy gained several more. The result was a resounding eight-point win for the Republican, removing Democrats from the last statewide office they still held in Montana.

For Republicans, it completed their domination of states stretching from the Northern Plains to the Rocky Mountains.

“We have North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Utah — we’re all kind of red now,” said Montana Republican Party Chairman Don Kaltschmidt.

Democrats as recently as 2007 held a majority of Senate seats in the Northern Plains and almost every statewide office in Montana.

Advertisement

Daines — who led GOP efforts to retake the Senate as chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee — pointed out during Sheehy’s election party that Republicans would control both Montana Senate seats for the first time in more than a century.

‘Conservative refugees’

Tester and other Democrats bemoan the wealth that’s transformed the state. It’s most conspicuous in areas like Big Sky and Kalispell, where multimillion-dollar homes occupy the surrounding mountainsides while throngs of service workers struggle to find housing.

It’s not quite the same as the Copper Kings — who at their peak controlled elected officials from both major parties — but Democrats see parallels.

“What do they say — history doesn’t repeat itself but it rhymes,” said Monica Tranel, the defeated Democratic candidate in a western Montana House district. “It is very evocative of what happened in the early 1900s. It’s very much a time of change and turmoil and who has a voice.”

Montana in 2022 gained a second House seat due to population growth over the prior decade, giving Democrats a chance to regain clout. After a narrow loss that year to former Trump Interior Sec. Ryan Zinke, Tranel ran again this year and lost.

Advertisement

Even as she turned to history to explain Montana’s contemporary political dynamic, Tranel considered the future. She acknowledged that Democrats have fallen out of step with a conservative electorate more attuned to party labels.

“The label itself is what they are reacting to,” she said. “Do we need a different party at this point?”

Republican officials embraced wealthy newcomers.

Steve Kelly, 66, who calls himself a “conservative refugee,” moved to northwestern Montana from Nevada at the height of the pandemic. He spent most of his 30-year career in law enforcement in Reno, but said he tired of the city as it grew and became more liberal — “San Francisco East,” he called it.

In 2020, Kelly and his wife bought a house outside Kalispell on a few acres so they could have horses. He got involved with the local Republican party and this fall won a seat in the state Legislature on an anti-illegal immigration platform.

Advertisement

“It seems to be different here. Most of the people we have met have also been conservative refugees, getting away from other cities,” he said.

Driving the growth are transplants from western states dominated by Democrats, especially California, where more than 85,000 Montana residents originated, or about 7.5% of the population, Census data shows. Almost half of Montana residents were born out of state.

Worker wages in Montana have been stagnant for decades, said Megan Lawson with the independent research group Headwaters Economics in Bozeman. Income from stocks, real estate and other investments has risen sharply, reflecting the changing — and wealthier — demographic.

“Certainly a large share of it is coming from folks who are moving into this state,” Lawson said. “When you put all this together it helps to explain the story of the political shift.”

___

Associated Press reporter Michael Schneider in Orlando, Florida, contributed to this report.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana transgender lawmaker on Capitol Hill's bathroom ban: 'Do not cede ground'

Published

on

Montana transgender lawmaker on Capitol Hill's bathroom ban: 'Do not cede ground'


The question of who uses which bathroom on Capitol Hill has become a heated topic ahead of the 119th U.S. Congress convening next year.

This debate was sparked by the historic election of Sarah McBride, a transgender woman, to represent Delaware in Congress. In response, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) introduced a resolution aiming to require transgender individuals to use bathrooms corresponding to their sex assigned at birth.

Democratic state Rep. Zooey Zephyr, the first transgender woman in Montana’s state legislature, understands what it feels like to be singled out.

She joined Scripps News on Friday to weigh in on the controversy unfolding in D.C.

Advertisement

“It’s important to acknowledge that while these attacks on transgender people are always brought one bill at a time, they do not focus on specific issues,” Zephyr said. “The hate of trans people is boundless. We saw that when Nancy Mace went on far-right media earlier this week and claimed that it was ‘offensive’ that Congresswoman McBride views herself as an equal to Nancy Mace.”

“When we see policies targeting trans women just trying to live their lives in the restroom, trying to play sports with their friends — that is not where the hate stops from the right,” Zephyr said. “That hate is on display at every moment, which is why it’s important for us to resist these efforts to target our community.”

In 2023, Republican lawmakers in Montana voted to ban Zephyr from the House floor and from participating in debates after she spoke out against a bill banning gender-affirming care for minors. The incident led to legal challenges over Zephyr’s censure and to political activism from supporters of transgender rights.

“The attacks we see on trans people will escalate. This will not be the last attack on Congresswoman McBride,” Zephyr said. “In my perspective, it is important that we make sure as trans people in this country that we do not cede ground to someone who wants to erase us — regardless of whether they want to erase us in the Capitol, or if they want to erase us as we go through our daily lives in public. We have to stand strong.”

Advertisement

Rep. Nancy Mace to introduce bill on restroom use tied to sex at birth

In an interview with Scripps News this week, Mace said her resolution was specifically targeted at Rep.-elect McBride, who stated she will “follow the rules as outlined” even if she disagrees with them.

“I’m not here to fight about bathrooms,” McBride said. “I’m here to fight for Delawareans to bring down the costs facing families.”

Despite McBride’s statement, Mace said her effort to ban transgender individuals from certain bathrooms extends beyond Washington. She is advocating for legislation requiring transgender people to use restrooms that align with their sex assigned at birth on any property receiving public funds.

Advertisement

“I have PTSD from the sexual abuse I have suffered at the hands of a man. We have to as women draw a line in the sand, a big fat red line, about our rights,” Mace said. “And the basic question today is, do women have rights or do we not? And I will tell you just the idea of a man in a locker room watching me change clothes after a workout is a huge trigger and it’s not OK to make and force women to be vulnerable in private spaces.”

RELATED STORY | As House GOP targets McBride, she says ‘I’m not here to fight about bathrooms’





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Powerhouse Football Team Drops Incredible Hype Video For Legendary Rivalry Game

Published

on

Powerhouse Football Team Drops Incredible Hype Video For Legendary Rivalry Game


Montana State brought its fastball for the team’s Brawl of the Wild hype video.

The Bobcats will take the field Saturday against the Montana Grizzlies in the latest installment of one of the greatest rivalries in all of sports.

Advertisement

Fans of the Bobcats and Grizzlies hate each other. They’re the only two major schools in the state, and both are FCS powerhouses.

The bitterness runs deep between the fans, and once a year, they come together on the gridiron to earn bragging rights for a year.

Montana State drops epic hype video for Brawl of the Wild against Montana. 

If you’re going to play in a monster college football game, then you need a great hype video to get the fans juiced up.

Well, the Bobcats brought their A-game with a hype video featuring Journey’s classic hit song “Separate Ways (Worlds Apart).”

Advertisement

Smash the play button below, and then hit me with your reactions at David.Hookstead@outkick.com.

That video goes insanely hard. That’s one of the best hype videos I’ve seen all season long, and I’m not at all surprised that it’s for the Brawl of the Wild.

The 11-0 Bobcats battling it out with the 8-3 Grizzlies is exactly what fans want to see in the final game of the regular season, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

MSU is looking to go undefeated. Montana is looking to play spoiler and improve their position for the FCS playoffs.

This is what it’s all about, and do not sleep on the Brawl of the Wild simply because it’s FCS action. As someone who used to live in Bozeman, I can tell you that the environment will be nuts Saturday and the city and Bobcat Stadium will be rocking.

Advertisement

You can catch the game at 2:00 EST on ESPN+. It should be one of the best of the weekend. Let me know your thoughts on the Brawl of the Wild at David.Hookstead@outkick.com.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending