Connect with us

West

Judge Judy's son wants to see lawsuits in wake of deadly LA wildfires: Public officials 'personally liable'

Published

on

Judge Judy's son wants to see lawsuits in wake of deadly LA wildfires: Public officials 'personally liable'

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

EXCLUSIVE – As the California wildfires continue to blaze, a couple of popular TV judges say they’re ready to see some consequences.

The California wildfires have burned countless homes and taken over 20 lives as of this week. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have taken the brunt of the blame in the wake of the devastation. Some allege the leaders failed to secure enough resources for the blaze, while others have condemned Bass for going on international travel in the midst of the inferno and cutting the city’s fire department budget by millions.

Advertisement

Adam Levy and Tanya Acker, judges on Prime Video’s “Tribunal Justice,” told Fox News Digital they want to see some accountability. Judge Patricia DiMango serves as the third judge on the “Tribunal Justice” panel.

“I know a number of people whose homes have burned to the ground,” said Acker. “And I know the communities that have burned or are burning… It’s just a really hard time.”

CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: ESSENTIAL PHONE NUMBERS FOR LOS ANGELES-AREA RESIDENTS AND HOW YOU CAN HELP THEM  

The wind whips embers while a firefighter battles the fire in the Angeles National Forest near Mt. Wilson as the wildfires burn in the Los Angeles area, during the Eaton Fire in Altadena, California, Jan. 9, 2025.  (REUTERS/Ringo Chiu)

Acker explained she felt “blessed and lucky” because she only had to evacuate briefly and was able to return to her house.

Advertisement

Levy, the son of Judge Judy, who serves as a creator on “Tribunal Justice,” said he hopes to see some lawsuits in the wake of the inferno.

“I hope so,” he told Fox News Digital. “I do. But, you know, the problem is that when there are lawsuits filed, as the lawsuit that was recently filed down in New Orleans and the Bourbon Street massacre, if there is a judgment, if you can overcome issues of sovereign immunity and if you can overcome issues of third-party liability for the criminal conduct, right, of third parties and the issues of foreseeability which always come into play, taxpayers pick up the tab. I think that system has to change.” 

SILENT ON ARRIVAL: LA MAYOR KAREN BASS REFUSES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS FOR HER ABSENCE WHILE WILDFIRES RAVAGE CITY

“Palisades Fire” near Brentwood neighborhood in Los Angeles, California, United States on January 11, 2025. (Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

One lawsuit has popped up against Southern California Edison in response to the Eaton fire. Trial law firms McNicholas & McNicholas, Becker Law Group and Singleton Schreiber filed the lawsuit on behalf of the victims impacted by the fire, alleging that Southern California Edison failed to comply with essential electrical and fire safety standards, including failing to maintain power lines and overgrown vegetation, Fox 11 reported. The lawsuit referred to it as “gross negligence.”

Advertisement

Levy pointed fingers at public officials who he said “know that they are immune from any liability” and are “going to do whatever they have to do to remain in office.”

JUDGE JUDY’S SON, FELLOW JUDGES DISH ON WHY AUDIENCES LOVE TV COURTROOM DRAMA: INSTANT ACCOUNTABILITY

“Despite the fact that the decisions that they’re making are putting the majority of their constituents at risk,” Levy said. “You have to. That’s my feeling. And that’s coming from me. And I was a former DA. I set policy. I set my budget, and I did it always with the safety of my constituents in mind… And unfortunately, there are people, there are politicians who don’t hesitate to do the wrong thing so long as it makes it more likely that they are re-elected. And we’ve got to change that. We have to make sure that public officials have skin in the game. And the only way we do that is by changing the tort laws.”

Acker said she hopes people won’t start dragging LA into a really divisive national conversation, but agreed that people are entitled to ask questions of California leadership.

“There’s a difference between sort of trying to dig in and get at the root cause of something and just sort of trying to score political points,” Acker said. “I think the latter is not helpful, but that doesn’t mean that… We have to figure out how and why this happened. And people need to be held accountable for decisions that they made or didn’t make. And, you know, we’ve got to make sure that we do a better job of protecting this community going forward. So, you know, tough questions should be asked. I mean, and the time for doing that, I think, is going to continue for the foreseeable future because there’s a lot to figure out here.”

Advertisement

Adam Levy, right, is Judge Judy Sheindlin’s son, and stars with Judge Tanya Acker and Judge Patricia DiMango in the series “Tribunal Justice.” (Michael Becker/Prime Video)

‘TRIBUNAL JUSTICE’ JUDGES SHARE TIPS ON HOW TO TELL WHEN SOMEONE IS LYING

“I think that we need to have a really rigorous investigation as to what happened so we can prevent this from happening again,” she later added. “And we really need to dig in and help these communities rebuild.”

As for the reports that looters have started to take advantage of the communities in flames, Acker held nothing back. 

“I cannot think of anything more despicable than trying to prey on homes and properties that have been devastated, victimizing people who are already going through one of the worst moments of their lives,” Acker told Fox Digital. “I cannot think of anything more despicable… I’m pleased that our district attorney has indicated that his office will be taking a tough position, a tough stance on those who are preying on people. And I mean, I just I can’t think of anything more abhorrent.” 

Advertisement

The Santa Monica Police Department has arrested 39 people in evacuation zones since the start of the Palisades Fire, SMPD told Fox News. Suspects were caught with daggers, window-breaking tools, masks, gloves and narcotics and other “burglary tools,” according to police.

“This community is really going through one of the worst moments in its history. And to exacerbate that pain by victimizing people,” Acker continued. “And I just – I can’t, I have no words for it. And I hope that those who engage in those kinds of activities are caught and prosecuted to the fullest extent possible.”

The second season of “Tribunal Justice” debuts on Prime Video on Monday, January 27, with new episodes every weekday.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wyoming

Abortion-rights advocates cheer Wyoming Supreme Court ruling; opponents plan constitutional amendment – WyoFile

Published

on

Abortion-rights advocates cheer Wyoming Supreme Court ruling; opponents plan constitutional amendment – WyoFile


As a plaintiff in the 2022 lawsuit that kicked off years of legal sparring over Wyoming abortion rights, Dr. Giovannina Anthony had waited a long time for Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision on the state’s abortion bans.

“It has been a long road,” she said. One with ups and downs, drawbacks and delays. And even though the high court ruled against the state’s abortion bans, she’s not under the illusion that the fight for abortion access is over. 

“But at least today, we can claim a victory and say, it was really worth it,” said Anthony, a Jackson obstetrician. “It was worth it to go four years and keep it up and keep raising money and keep the awareness going. I’m really proud of our team. I’m really proud of what we accomplished.”

In reading the Supreme Court’s decision siding with plaintiffs, Anthony said, “Clearly, this is a court that holds a lot of respect for our constitution.” 

Advertisement

That’s because much of the decision hinged on constitutional language. 

Anthony and other plaintiffs argued that abortion is enshrined in the “right of health care access” in Article 1, Section 38 of the Wyoming Constitution. The clause states, “Each competent adult shall have the right to make his or her own health care decisions.”

The state’s attorneys, meanwhile, countered that abortion isn’t health care. 

But in deciding what that language means in this case, “all five Wyoming Supreme Court justices agreed that the decision whether to terminate or continue a pregnancy is a woman’s own health care decision protected by Article 1, Section 38,” the court’s summary stated.

As abortion rights activists in Wyoming and beyond celebrated the decision, the anti-abortion camp decried it and called for legislative action. 

Advertisement

“This ruling is profoundly unfortunate and sadly serves to only prolong the ultimate proper resolution of this issue,” Gov. Mark Gordon said in a statement. While the ruling may settle a legal question for the time being, Gordon said, “it does not settle the moral one, nor does it reflect where many Wyoming citizens stand, including myself.”

Anti-abortion activists in the silent March for Life in Cheyenne in January 2020. (Nadav Soroker, Wyoming Tribune Eagle/Wyoming News Exchange)

Gordon asked the Attorney General’s office to file a petition for rehearing the decision, which it will file within 15 days.

The voters of Wyoming should settle the matter once and for all, Gordon argued. “A constitutional amendment taken to the people of Wyoming would trump any and all judicial decisions.”

He called on the Legislature to pass such an amendment during the upcoming session and deliver it to his desk. A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to appear on the ballot in the following general election. 

Gordon may get his wish during the Legislature’s 2026 budget session, which convenes Feb. 9.

Advertisement

State lawmakers are already preparing a bill to modify the Wyoming Constitution and clear a path for another attempted abortion ban. Speaker of the House Chip Neiman, a Republican from Hulett, said that he’s been workshopping language with Torrington Republican Sen. Cheri Steinmetz. 

“I’ve got to run it by a lot of other people,” Neiman said. 

Reps. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams and Chip Neiman listen during a 2023 hearing on their request to defend Wyoming’s abortion ban. (Brad Boner/Jackson Hole News&Guide/Pool)

Ideally, he added, a single constitutional amendment would be considered, although the legislative strategy is still up for discussion. 

“We’ve got a little over a month before we have to be in session,” Neiman said. “That’ll give us time to kind of see which is maybe the best plan of action.” 

A constitutional amendment would have to navigate the legislative process in a 20-day session geared toward passing Wyoming’s budget. Then, in the 2026 general election, more than half of Wyoming voters who cast a ballot would have to agree to the constitutional change.

Neiman struck an optimistic tone about an amendment’s prospects of passing the first hurdle during the session in Cheyenne.

Advertisement

“I can’t speak for the other chamber,” he said, “but in my chamber I’ve got a lot of phone calls and a lot of texts from a lot of my legislators who are just beside themselves at what happened.”

Senate President Bo Biteman did not return a phone call before this story published.

Victorious 

Chelsea’s Fund, an organization that helps pay for abortion services, was another of the plaintiffs that challenged Wyoming’s abortion bans. Executive Director Janean Forsyth said Tuesday’s decision affirms what her organization has long known: “that abortion is essential health care, and Wyoming women have a constitutional right and the freedom to make their own health care decisions, and that should be without government interference.”

Forsyth was flooded with messages and calls Tuesday, she said, especially from the community of reproductive rights organizations. 

“I think that [the news is] a beacon of hope for, not only Wyoming communities and families, but also nationwide,” she said. 

Advertisement

Christine Lichtenfels was Chelsea’s Fund executive director when the original suit was filed and throughout much of the legal battle. Relief wasn’t quite the word to describe how she felt Tuesday, she said. 

“In reading the decision, there is just a sense that, ‘Oh, there is reason in the world,” she said. “It makes me think that, yes, Wyoming is the Equality State. We can say that now without cringing.” 

(Disclosure: Lichtenfels is currently working with WyoFile on an unrelated legal matter.)

The Wellspring Health Access clinic in Casper is pictured in December 2022, and shows signs of May 2022 arson, including boarded up windows. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

Wyoming’s only abortion clinic, Wellspring Health Access in Casper, was also a plaintiff in the lawsuit. Knowing the decision would directly impact the facility’s fate, Clinic President Julie Burkhart was nervous when she opened it. Reading quickly dispelled her fears, she said, as it dawned on her that the justices sided with the plaintiffs’ legal team. 

“We are delighted,” she told WyoFile.  

Many people questioned her 2021 decision to open an abortion clinic in such a conservative state, she said. The court decision solidifies an intuition she felt back then about Wyoming residents’ sense of what’s fair and right. 

Advertisement

Burkhart and colleagues expect future challenges to arise, however. 

“While we celebrate today’s ruling, we know that anti-abortion politicians will continue their push to restrict access to health care in Wyoming with new, harmful proposals in the state legislature,” Burkart said in a statement. “Patients should not have to live in fear that their health care decisions will be suddenly upended at the whim of a judge or lawmaker.”

Across the state in Jackson, Dr. Anthony anticipates the Wyoming Freedom Caucus will attempt to pass laws that impose targeted restrictions against abortion providers — such as forcing patients to hear a fetal heartbeat or wait a certain time period before the procedure. 

“Unfortunately, the fight’s not over,” Anthony said, “but this is a great moment for us.”

Heartache 

Abortion opponents expressed sadness Tuesday and vehemently disagreed with the court’s opinion. 

Advertisement

State Rep. Rachel Rodriguez Williams was lead sponsor of one of the abortion bans. The Cody Republican and chair of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus did not respond to a request for comment, but posted about the decision on X. 

“My heart aches for Wyoming today,” Rodriguez Williams posted. “Thanks to the decision of four unelected, unchecked attorneys, it’s open season in Wyoming for innocent, preborn babies. Make no mistake: courts can get things wrong, and they sure did get this wrong. I’ll never stop fighting to protect life.”

Anti-abortion billboards can be seen along some Wyoming highways. (Tennessee Watson/WyoFile)

Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray also protested the decision, which he called “outrageously wrong” and “a leftwing activist decision totally out of touch with the Wyoming Constitution.”

Natrona County anti-abortion activist Bob Brechtel, a former Wyoming House member, also expressed frustration with the courts, criticizing the nearly two-year-long wait for a decision and saying he was “ashamed” of the outcome from the high court. 

In 2011, Brechtel co-sponsored the bill authorizing a later-successful constitutional amendment ballot measure that now protects individuals’ rights to make their own health care decisions. Born out of opposition to the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, what became Article 1, Section 38 caused some lawmakers to worry about potential unintended consequences. 

Fifteen years later, one unintended consequence came to fruition. Reached Tuesday, Brechtel confirmed that he did not intend to protect women’s right to have an abortion in Wyoming. 

Advertisement

“There was nothing in the legislation about killing innocent human beings,” he said. “This whole thing has been completely regenerated into something that it was never intended to be.”





Source link

Continue Reading

West

Washington officials blast conservatives for Minnesota-style day care fraud claims in new state

Published

on

Washington officials blast conservatives for Minnesota-style day care fraud claims in new state

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A top blue-state governor slammed conservatives for inflicting “deep damage” on the Somali–American community, while the state’s top prosecutor warned of potential charges after citizen journalists filmed encounters with alleged Minneapolis-like day care addresses and streamed them online.

Citizen journalists have raised public visibility of rampant fraud allegations in Minnesota, with a large part of the allegations stemming from within the Somali community there. Weeks after Gov. Tim Walz came under fire, other bloggers traveled to Seattle and King County, Washington, to visit what they claimed were similarly fraudulent day care sites — drawing Olympia’s ire.

Former White House Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) chief Elon Musk highlighted media posted by Kristen Magnuson, who, along with Cam Higby — an independent journalist recently connected with Charlie Kirk’s conservative Turning Point USA organization — and podcaster Jonathan Choe, sounded the alarm about alleged Minneapolis-style situations cropping up in the Pacific Northwest.

“They are fraud-maxxing this exploit,” Musk claimed in response to a post by Magnuson that included a video scrolling a list of up to 539 daycare centers in Washington state that she said allegedly listed Somali as the primary language.

Advertisement

TIM WALZ PUSHES BACK ON MINNESOTA FRAUD ALLEGATIONS FOLLOWING VIRAL DAYCARE VIDEO

Meanwhile, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, took to X to post several photos of himself meeting with what he said were Somali community leaders.

In those meetings, Ferguson said he “discuss(ed) the deep damage inflicted by Donald Trump’s harmful rhetoric and reckless deportations. Here in Washington state, we recognize that diversity is a strength.” 

Democrats have claimed such “damage” as an uptick in anti-Somali rhetoric and some liberals have condemned citizen journalists taking it upon themselves to visit alleged day care sites.

Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson speaks at a podium in Seattle. (Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

Advertisement

When Fox News Digital attempted to recreate the 539 day care center list Wednesday from the official Department of Child and Youth Services website, the option to select Somali as a primary language had either been removed or was not there. Magnuson said several of the day cares lacked addresses or other standard identifying information.

MINNESOTA’S NEW MEDICAID FRAUD PREVENTION FIX WON’T MAKE ‘ANY DIFFERENCE,’ FORMER FBI AGENT SAYS

Choe replied to Washington Gov. Ferguson on X, warning that he has a “serious Somali fraud problem in (his) state,” particularly in King County, Washington, which Choe alleged was “especially out of control.”

FEDS LAUNCH ‘MASSIVE’ INVESTIGATION AFTER VIRAL VIDEO ALLEGES MINNESOTA DAYCARE FRAUD

“Hey Bob, can you explain this for us?” Higby replied to Ferguson on X, while including a video of him reportedly approaching an address in Federal Way, Washington, that he alleged received more than $200,000 in subsidies.

Advertisement

In the video, a man who accompanied Higby approached the door of the apparent residence and asked if the building was “Dhagash Family Child Care” — as a female voice responded, “no,” and Higby said “rustling” could be heard as his partner approached a home security camera.

In another video, Higby alleged he went to an address listed for a day care that allegedly received $800,000 in subsidies in the town of Kent, Washington, but found “no daycare here” when he approached what appeared to be a residential address.

HHS CUTS OFF MINNESOTA CHILD CARE PAYMENTS OVER ALLEGED DAYCARE FRAUD SCHEME

“Records show massive subsidy payments following inspections reflecting risk of death to children,” Higby wrote.

“There are 539 childcare centers in Washington state that list Somali as the primary language. Most don’t even give a street address. I don’t know how many of these are submitting fraudulent claims for state grants and subsidies, but I have a strong hunch the number is not zero,” read a separate statement from Magnuson.

Advertisement

The Washington State Department of Children, Youth and Families (DCYF) told Fox News Digital that the agency “appreciate(s) our licensed child care providers and the important work they do to care for and educate our youngest learners.”

“We take fraud seriously. Washington state utilizes a variety of measures to minimize fraud. For example, DCYF conducts unannounced site visits at every licensed childcare provider at least once per year,” the agency said.

DCYF also randomly audits its rolls to confirm the accuracy of disbursements to the day care providers, the agency said, verifying attendance and matching families authorized to receive such benefits. The agency said it tallied 1,440 audits in 2024.

Of the lack of addresses found by Magnuson, DCYF said the state has addresses for every provider listed even if the public-facing website lacks full data, and that about 5,500 providers or 2.6% statewide do list Somali as their “language spoken.”

DCYF told Fox News Digital that anyone suspecting fraud should contact the state’s hotline directly at 1‐800‐562‐6906.

Advertisement

FEDS LAUNCH ‘MASSIVE OPERATION’ IN MINNESOTA AMID FRAUD SCANDAL

Washington state government reporter Carleen Johnson also replied to Ferguson’s tweet saying she visited several “Somali-run home daycare centers” in Federal Way, Washington, comparing her visits to those of YouTuber Nick Shirley in Minneapolis. 

“There were no children and no one willing to chat with this reporter,” she said. “They threatened me with police.” 

Amid the videos dropping, Washington Democratic Attorney General Nicholas Brown said his office received complaints from Somali residents “after reports of home-based daycare providers being harassed and accused of fraud with little to no fact-checking.”

“We are in touch with the state Department of Children Youth and Families regarding the claims being pushed online and the harassment reported by daycare providers,” Brown said, adding that showing up on a person’s porch and “threatening or harassing them is not an investigation; neither is filming minors who may be in the home.”

Advertisement

SENATE PRESSURE MOUNTS AS MINNESOTA FRAUD SCANDAL CONTINUES TO UNFOLD

Brown urged anyone subjected to that treatment to contact police or his office’s hate crimes and bias hotline.

“If you think fraud is happening, there are appropriate measures to report and investigate,” Brown said in a statement. Where “fraud is substantiated and verified by law enforcement and regulatory agencies, people should be held accountable.”

Higby responded to Brown appearing to reference his work, tweeting that “journalists showing up to daycares and asking for applications is not harassment or threatening — unless of course, it’s a fraudulent daycare, then it may be threatening to the fraud ring.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

The FAA issued a ground stop for the Seattle airport. (Reuters/Chris Helgren)

Neither Brown’s nor Ferguson’s office responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment by press time.

According to Newsweek, Magnuson filtered her searches for Somali as the primary language of a day care, and added a filter for Washington “Early Achievers” program beneficiaries, which “entitles them to state funding. That second filter cut the number of centers returned to 274,” according to the outlet.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco has a tax plan to save Muni

Published

on

San Francisco has a tax plan to save Muni


A parcel tax plan to rescue Muni would charge most homeowners at least $129 annually if voters approve the policy in November.

The finalized tax scheme, which updates a version presented Dec. 8, comes after weeks of negotiations between city officials and transit advocates.

The plan lowers the levels previously proposed for owners of apartment and condo buildings. They would still pay a $249 base tax up to 5,000 square feet of property, but additional square footage would be taxed at 19.5 cents, versus the previous 30 cents. The tax would be capped at $50,000.

The plan also adds provisions limiting how much of the tax can be passed through to tenants in rent-controlled buildings. Owners of rent-controlled properties would be able to pass through up to 50% of the parcel tax on a unit, with a cap of $65 a year.

Advertisement

These changes bring the total estimated annual tax revenue from $187 million to $183 million and earmark 10% for expanding transit service.

What you pay depends on what kind of property you or your landlord owns. There are three tiers: single-family homes, apartment and condo buildings, and commercial properties.

Owners of single-family homes smaller than 3,000 square feet would pay the base tax of $129 per year. Homes between 3,000 and 5,000 square feet would pay the base tax plus an additional 42 cents per square foot, and any home above 5,000 square feet would be taxed at an added $1.99 per square foot.

Source: Jeremy Chen/The Standard

Commercial landlords would face a $799 base tax for buildings up to 5,000 square feet, with per-square-foot rates that scale with the property size, up to a maximum of $400,000.

The finalized plan was presented by Julie Kirschbaum, director of transportation at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, at a board meeting Tuesday.

Advertisement

The plan proposed in December was criticized for failing to set aside funds to increase transit service and not including pass-through restrictions for tenants.

The tax is meant to close SFMTA’s $307 million budget gap, which stems from lagging ridership post-pandemic and the expiration of emergency federal funding. Without additional funding, the agency would be forced to drastically cut service. The parcel tax, a regional sales tax measure, and cost-cutting, would all be needed to close the fiscal gap.

The next steps for the parcel tax are creating draft legislation and launching a signature-gathering campaign to place the measure on the ballot.

Any measure would need review by the city attorney’s office. But all stakeholders have agreed on the tax structure presented Tuesday, according to Emma Hare, an aide to Supervisor Myrna Melgar, whose office led negotiations over the tax between advocates and City Hall.

“It’s final,” Hare said. “We just need to write it down.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending