Connect with us

Idaho

Idaho Poachers Sentenced After Admitting to Shooting Grizzly Sow 40 Times

Published

on

Idaho Poachers Sentenced After Admitting to Shooting Grizzly Sow 40 Times


Two males in Idaho poached a grizzly bear—and received themselves right into a pile of hassle. They killed a federally protected, collared, grizzly sow with a cub. Jared Baum and his father Rex Baum stay in Ashton, Idaho, a year-round sizzling spot for recreation and wildlife that neighbors Yellowstone Nationwide Park. Black bear searching is allowed within the space, however data present the Baums shot what they are saying they thought was a black bear out of season in March 2021—after which tried to cowl it up.

The Idaho Division of Fish and Sport (IDFG), together with a Fremont County deputy, situated a useless grizzly bear just a few weeks later after its GPS collar confirmed no motion. They situated the useless sow half-submerged in a river in addition to her cub, which had died in its den when the sow didn’t return. The stays of the mom bear have been pocked with at the very least 12 bullets and one bullet fragment.

Jared Baum in the end admitted to capturing the bear 40 occasions. He additionally admitted to his father’s involvement—and the duo dumped two handguns they’d used into a close-by pond. A dive crew searched the pond however didn’t discover any firearms. Officers didn’t launch details about the kind of rounds that the poachers used.

Jared Baum’s felony sentence consists of 30 days in jail, three years probation, $12,500 in fines, and a lifetime searching ban. His father, Rex, acquired a misdemeanor sentence with 3 days in jail, $1,400 in fines, and suspended searching privileges for a decade. The lack of searching privileges don’t solely apply in Idaho but additionally in 47 different states via the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact.

Advertisement

Learn Subsequent: Texas Sport Wardens Confiscate 381 Shark Fins From San Antonio Restaurant

The small, japanese Idaho city of Ashton is a part of the Larger Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which incorporates Yellowstone Nationwide Park, Grand Teton Nationwide Park, and parts of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. The GYE is designated because the restoration zone for grizzly bears, which have been protected within the Decrease 48 by the Endangered Species Act since 1975. Idaho is presently considered one of a number of states petitioning to take away grizzly bears from the Endangered Species Act.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Idaho

Changes to Idaho Division of Motor Vehicles on July 1

Published

on

Changes to Idaho Division of Motor Vehicles on July 1


BOISE— Several changes are coming to the Idaho Division of Motor Vehicles (DMV) on July 1 as new legislation takes effect. These changes will improve customer service and offer more options to Idahoans. 

Driver’s License and ID Cards

  • Customers who are eligible to renew their driver’s license online will get a $5 discount for completing the transaction online. 
  • The requirements for getting a free identification card (ID) for voting have been reduced. Legislation has removed the rule that applicants must not have had a valid driver’s license for 6 months before applying for the free ID.

Commercial Drivers and Vehicles

  • Commercial drivers will now be able to get a commercial driver’s license (CDL) for eight years. The previous limit for CDLs was four years. CDLs will also be checked against the National Drug and Alcohol Clearing House. 
  • DMV will now issue two-year weighted registrations for commercial and non-commercial vehicles up to 60,000 lbs. The previous limit was one year. 

License Plates

  • Idaho will offer a Space Force Plate to eligible customers. 
  • All Purple Heart recipients will be able to get a Purple Heart plate for free. Previously the fee exemption only applied to disabled Purple Heart recipients. 
  • Legislation also created a Gadsden Flag “Don’t Tread on Me” plate. Plate sales will help fund educational grants for firearms safety training. While the legislation goes into effect on July 1, per the timeline included in the law, plates will be made available by January 1, 2025. 

Driver’s Education

  • Parents in rural school districts or districts without driver’s education programs will be able to teach the on-the-road portion of driver’s ed. Parents must keep a log of drive time and skills learned. Students will complete the classroom driver’s ed course through the Idaho Digital Learning Alliance (IDLA). More information is available from the Idaho Department of Education. 

Other

  • The definition of “resident” to get a vehicle registration, title, license, or identification card has been changed from 90 days to 30 days. This does not change the definition of resident for voting purposes. 
  • If an owner wants to sell a vehicle that has no active registration, they can get up to two 30-day temporary registrations for the purpose of selling the vehicle. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Idaho

Teton Pass reopens connecting Idaho and Wyoming

Published

on

Teton Pass reopens connecting Idaho and Wyoming


Great news for travelers who work and play in the Teton Valley. After a massive rockslide closed Highway 22 over Teton Pass three weeks ago, the Wyoming Department of Transportation has reopened the pass.

RELATED | Teton Pass reopens with interim detour after major road collapse

I asked Stephanie Harsha from W-DOT what their geologists are saying about the cause of the slide. “It was what our geologists called a perfect storm, so the weather is a big factor with the warming temperatures, and they warm up 20 degrees and with it not cooling off at night the ground just saturated it.”

It was not only important to get the pass open for the busy Fourth of July weekend, but also for the commuters from Victor and Driggs Idaho to get work in Jackson. “It was a big impact to their daily lives I heard people saying it was costing hundreds of dollars a week because of the detour.”

Advertisement

Harsha mentioned they received a lot of help from I.T.D. in getting the popular pass open.

“Together with our stakeholders, partners, contractors, and community advocates, we were able to accomplish this major feat in a matter of weeks – despite expectations that it would take months, or even years – all while keeping safety paramount,” said John Eddins, WYDOT District 3 Engineer. “Of course, we have so many to thank for this achievement.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Idaho

Supreme Court sends Idaho abortion case back to Circuit Court

Published

on

Supreme Court sends Idaho abortion case back to Circuit Court


WASHINGTON (BP) – In a 5-4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) sent the case of Idaho and Moyle v. U.S. back to the Ninth Circuit Court in a ruling released, June 27. The case involves a conflict between state law and the Biden Administration’s use of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA).

“At the heart of the case is the wild assertion by the Biden Administration that abortion is healthcare. Instead of dismantling that argument and protecting lives, the Court punted,” said Brent Leatherwood, Ethics & Religious Liberty (ERLC) president.

“We agree with Justices Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch that any perceived conflict here is the result of the federal government’s novel approach to EMTALA. These justices would have moved forward with ruling on the merits of the case––and the Court should have done so,” he said.

The “unsigned order from the justices leaves in place an order by a federal judge in Idaho that temporarily blocks the state from enforcing its abortion ban, which carves out exceptions only to save the life of the mother and in cases of rape or incest, to the extent that it conflicts with a federal law, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. That 1986 law requires emergency rooms in hospitals that receive Medicare to provide ‘necessary stabilizing treatment” to patients who arrive with an “emergency medical condition,’” according to Amy Howe at scotusblog.com.

Advertisement

Leatherwood said the ERLC will continue to work to support the state law in the case.

According to the ERLC, “While Idaho’s law is allowed to remain in effect in the meantime, it is limited by a decision from the lower court permitting abortion when the health of the woman is deemed at serious risk, and continuing litigation will resolve a lack of clarity on what that terminology means.”

Leatherwood called the Biden Administration action a means to “radically reinterpret laws meant to save lives.”

Lawyers for the Biden Administration argued the law caused confusion between the state’s law prohibiting abortion and the federal regulation mandating physicians perform an abortion in a case when the mother’s health is deemed to be at emergency risk.

“I am disappointed that SCOTUS has not rejected the Biden administration’s blatant attempt to hijack a law that protects mothers and babies. Throughout my 30-year career, EMTALA has never confused me or my obstetric peers when providing emergency care, especially considering 90% of obstetricians do not perform elective abortions,” said Ingrid Skop, an OB-GYN who also serves as the vice president and director of medical affairs at the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Advertisement

Pro-life advocates believe some women are manipulating the federal policy to receive an abortion in Idaho despite the state law.

“I have always – before Dobbs, and since– been able and willing to intervene if a pregnancy complication threatened my patient’s life, and every state pro-life law allows us to act. Forcing doctors to end an unborn patient’s life by abortion in the absence of a threat to his mother’s life is coercive, needless and goes against our oath to do no harm,” she said.

According to the ERLC, “The case will return to the Ninth Circuit with the injunction from the lower court once more in effect, where the court will hear the case on the merits and proceed, essentially, as if the Supreme Court had never taken up the case. This case or other litigation raising these underlying questions will likely return to the Supreme Court in coming terms.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending