Connect with us

Hawaii

Hawaii power company may have compromised evidence in probe of deadly Maui fire: report

Published

on

Hawaii power company may have compromised evidence in probe of deadly Maui fire: report


The Hawaii electric company whose equipment is believed to have sparked the deadly Maui wildfire removed damaged infrastructure from where the blaze likely started — a move that may have jeopardized the federal investigation into the disaster.

Records obtained by the Washington Post show that the utility company hauled away fallen poles, power lines, transformers, conductors and other equipment from the area surrounding the Lahaina substation starting on Aug. 12 — days before Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents arrived on sight.

In doing so, the power company may have violated national guidelines on how utilities should handle and preserve evidence after a wildfire and compromised the probe into the cause of the inferno that killed at least 115 people.

“If a lot of equipment is already moved or gone by the time the investigators show up, that’s problematic because you want to observe where the equipment was relative to the ignition site,” Michael Wara, who directs the Climate and Energy Policy program at Stanford University, told the Post.

Advertisement

But in a statement, Hawaiian Electric spokesman Darren Pai said the company has been “in regular communication with ATF and local authorities and are operating with them as well as attorneys representing people affected by the wildfires, with inventories and access to the removed equipment, which we have carefully photographed, documented and stored.”

The Post has also reached out for comment from the utility and the law firm representing it, California-based Munger, Tolles and Olsen.

Hawaiian Electric is facing scrutiny for removing downed poles from the scene where the deadly Lahaina fire likely started.
AFP via Getty Images

Lahaina is seen flattened from a distance
The blaze devastated the historic waterfront town of Lahaina, and killed 115 people.
James Keivom

A Hawaiian Electric truck  is pictured near a destroyed neighborhood in Maui
Hawaiian Electric said it thoroughly documented the evidence before removing it.
AFP via Getty Images

Locals have told the Post how the fire started early in the morning of Aug. 8 when a transformer blew and sparked dry grass on Maui County-owned land, just about a mile away from Lahaina’s historic waterfront.

Hawaiian Electric had apparently failed to shut off the electricity in advance of high winds sweeping through the area, and within an hour the blaze roared down the hillside toward the ocean, destroying nearly everything in its path.

The utility is now facing at least eight lawsuits from local residents who are desperately trying to rebuild, claiming the company failed to preserve necessary evidence.

In one of those suits, a law firm representing more than two dozen Lahaina families asked Hawaiian Electric to preserve the evidence twice beginning on Aug. 10, according to correspondence obtained by the Post.

Advertisement

The next day, the Washington Post reported, one of the utility’s attorneys replied that Hawaiian Electric’s main focus was the safety of first responders who were still fighting the blaze, displaced residents and restoring power.


The fire started early in the morning on Aug. 8, likely after a transformer blew and sparked dry grass on county-owned land.
County of Maui /AFP via Getty Images

People watch as smoke and flames fill the air from raging wildfires on Front Street in downtown Lahaina
The blaze is seen rushing towards residents in downtown Lahaina as smoke filled the air.
AP

An aerial view shows the smoke rising over Maui
An aerial view shows the smoke rising over Maui.
Carter Barto/AFP via Getty Images

The company reportedly said it was “taking steps to preserve its own property,” but because so many local, state and federal agencies were still on the ground trying to fight the fires and clear debris, it was “therefore possible, even likely, that the actions of these third parties, whose actions Hawaiian Electric does not control, may result in the loss of property or other items that relate to the cause of the fire.”

“Hawaiian Electric will take reasonable steps to preserve evidence, but cannot make any guarantees due to the rapidly evolving situation on the ground, which is also not within our control,” the letter read, according to the Washington Post.

In response, attorneys for the residents submitted a temporary restraining order to stop Hawaiian Electric from greatly altering the scene where the fire started.

By Aug.18, a judge signed an interim discovery order detailing how the utility should have handled evidence around the “suspected area of origin.”


Tiara Lawrence cries and is comforted by an unidentified man in a blue t-shirt at a vigil
The blaze destroyed nearly everything in its path, and more than 1,100 people remain missing.
James Keivom

A damaged power and utility pole lies on the street
The wildfire caused widespread outages as power lines were struck down.
REUTERS

Under the National Fire Protection Association guidelines, “the integrity of the fire scene needs to be preserved” and “evidence should not be handled or removed without documentation.”

Hawaiian Electric argued in court documents that it removed the evidence because the company does not “own or control the land or public streets beneath its facilities.”

Advertisement

The utility has also hired a California-based “cause and origin” expert to “preserve potential evidence related to the fire,” according to the Washington Post.

Meanwhile, the death toll from the fire has now reached 115 people, and the number of missing has increased to 1,100.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hawaii

Hawaii Set to Host First State Surfing Championship in 2026

Published

on

Hawaii Set to Host First State Surfing Championship in 2026


Hawaii Governor Josh Green was joined by Carissa Moore Monday to announce the 2026 Hawaii High School Athletic Association (HHSAA) surfing competition. The contest will be held at Hookipa Beach on Maui’s north shore on May 1 and May 2 and will cap off the first school year in which surfing is an official team sport at the prep level in the Aloha State.

HHSAA announced that surfing would be added to its spring 2026 schedule back in July after Gov. Green signed a bill providing $685,000 in funding for the state’s interscholastic leagues. Prior to that, athletes like Carissa Moore were left with traveling to compete as individuals representing their schools in NSSA events.

Advertisement

“It would’ve been cool to have a few more of my peers alongside me competing and doing it together, and representing something bigger than ourselves,” Moore told the media on Monday. She joked about the complications it created as a student, making up missed P.E. credits with laps around the track at Punahou School.  “Surfing is a very individual sport, and I think this team aspect is so important and something that I missed out on as a young person.”

The May 2026 event will include competition categories for both boys and girls in three different disciplines: shortboard, longboard, and bodyboard.

“The Maui high schools have competed for 19 years as an unofficial club sport and then from 10 years ago, we’ve been competing as an official MIL sport,” said Maui Interscholastic League surfing co-coordinator Kim Ball. “So you can imagine the enthusiasm and excitement after 29 years that we’re finally going to have a state championship. The county of Maui and our MIL surf crew will do all we can to make it a memorable event.”

The news is being celebrated around Hawaii for the sport’s importance within the state’s culture and history. Beyond that, however, it makes Hawaii the first state in the U.S. to recognize surfing as a state champion team event.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Shohei Ohtani’s lawyers claim he was victim in Hawaii real estate deal

Published

on

Shohei Ohtani’s lawyers claim he was victim in Hawaii real estate deal


Dodgers star Shohei Ohtani and his agent, Nez Balelo, moved to dismiss a lawsuit filed last month accusing them of causing a Hawaii real estate investor and broker to be fired from a $240-million luxury housing development on the Big Island’s Hapuna Coast.

Ohtani and Balelo were sued Aug. 8 in Hawaii Circuit Court for the First Circuit by developer Kevin J. Hayes Sr. and real estate broker Tomoko Matsumoto, West Point Investment Corp. and Hapuna Estates Property Owners, who accused them of “abuse of power” that allegedly resulted in tortious interference and unjust enrichment.

Hayes and Matsumoto had been dropped from the development deal by Kingsbarn Realty Capital, the joint venture’s majority owner.

In papers filed Sunday, lawyers for Ohtani and Balelo said Hayes and Matsumoto in 2023 acquired rights for a joint venture in which they owned a minority percentage to use Ohtani’s name, image and likeness under an endorsement agreement to market the venture’s real estate development at the Mauna Kea Resort. The lawyers said Ohtani was a “victim of NIL violations.”

Advertisement

“Unbeknownst to Ohtani and his agent Nez Balelo, plaintiffs exploited Ohtani’s name and photograph to drum up traffic to a website that marketed plaintiffs’ own side project development,” the lawyers wrote. “They engaged in this self-dealing without authorization, and without paying Ohtani for that use, in a selfish and wrongful effort to take advantage of their proximity to the most famous baseball player in the world.”

The lawyers claimed Hayes and Matsumoto sued after “Balelo did his job and protected his client by expressing justifiable concern about this misuse and threatening to take legal action against this clear misappropriation.” They called Balelo’s actions “clearly protected speech “

In a statement issued after the suit was filed last month, Kingsbarn called the allegations “completely frivolous and without merit.”

Ohtani is a three-time MVP on the defending World Series champion Dodgers.

“Nez Balelo has always prioritized Shohei Ohtani’s best interests, including protecting his name, image, and likeness from unauthorized use,” a lawyer for Ohtani and Balelo, said in a statement. “This frivolous lawsuit is a desperate attempt by plaintiffs to distract from their myriad of failures and blatant misappropriation of Mr. Ohtani’s rights.”

Advertisement

Lawyers for Hayes and Matsumoto did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



Source link

Continue Reading

Hawaii

Hawaii justices offer mixed ruling on Green’s housing proclamation | Honolulu Star-Advertiser

Published

on

Hawaii justices offer mixed ruling on Green’s housing proclamation | Honolulu Star-Advertiser




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending