NFL Free Agency opens up on Wednesday, with the legal tampering period beginning on Monday. The top free agents usually all commit to a team during that period, so be ready to rock and roll to start next week.
Denver, CO
Mayor Mike Johnston says he’s trying to keep Denver from becoming San Francisco: “The stakes feel so high”
Mike Johnston took the stage at Denver’s historic Paramount Theatre last week for his first State of the City address just days after he’d marked a full year as mayor.
He was in a reflective mood, recapping progress on homelessness and other problems in the time since he took office on July 17, 2023, after winning a 17-way mayoral race. He also previewed what’s next, including by pitching his recently announced sales tax increase to fund affordable housing initiatives — a proposal that’s facing questions from the City Council on its way to the November ballot.
Johnston, 49, sat down recently with The Denver Post to delve deeper into his first year and to discuss what lies ahead, including whether he still sees his goal of ending street homelessness in four years as realistic.
In the interview, he also talked about shortcomings in his otherwise galvanizing homeless initiative, called All In Mile High, which has moved more than 1,600 people into hotels and other temporary shelters, and how it relates to broader affordable housing goals. Some of that will hinge on whether the council and Denver voters go for his proposed 0.5% sales tax, which would raise an estimated $100 million a year.
Below are several excerpts, with his responses lightly edited for length and clarity. Context has been added where necessary.
Question: What do you think your biggest success has been in your first year in office?
I think it’s been our breakthrough success on homelessness.
Q: Where have you come up short in your first year, in your estimation?
I think there are some things that aren’t done yet that we still want to get done and are coming soon. I also think there are some safety protections in place at our All In Mile High sites that we should have been more stringent about when we first moved people in. The two lives we lost at the DoubleTree hotel are certainly two that I’ll never forget — and that is a decision I wish we had back.
Context: On March 16, Dustin Nunn, 38, and Sandra Cervantes, 43 — two people living in one of the city homeless initiative’s hotel shelters, a former DoubleTree at 4040 N. Quebec St. — were shot and killed. It was later revealed that the shelter’s operator, the Salvation Army, had not yet billed the city for any security measures at the building.
Q: Critics have pointed out that people who have been sheltered through the All In Mile High program are ending up back on the streets at a rate faster than they are moving on to more stable housing. What do you feel is preventing more people from transitioning out of shelters and micro-communities and into more permanent housing? How can you increase the throughput?
First of all, I agree with that criticism. I think they’re right and we are deeply focused on getting better at that.
The major focus for this year is increasing that throughput — having better systems of case management at each of these sites so that we know who every person is, we know what their needs are and we’re getting them the right service from the right provider at the right moment.
And we also know part of that need is to make sure there are more available units of affordable housing out there for them to move into. So we knew the first step was getting people off the streets and into transitional housing. The next step was always more permanent affordable housing — and that need exists not just for people coming out of homelessness, that need exists for teachers and nurses and servers and retail workers across the city.
And those units take a little longer to develop, longer to build and more resources. That’s why we’re so focused on affordability now, at scale — that’s going to be our biggest need. But a big part of this will be us getting better and better at case management with our providers at these sites.
Q: Do you still believe you can end unsheltered homelessness in Denver by the end of your first term?
I have to say I feel more optimistic about that possibility than I did a year ago. I’m so proud of what we built together as a city, and we put the infrastructure in place to show we can move thousands of people off the streets in a single year.
I think we’re on a path to end street homelessness for veterans this year, which is generally the first big benchmark along the way to getting there. And yes, we think we can make homelessness brief and rare and nonrecurring. That is really what the field defines as ending street homelessness, or what sometimes is called “functional zero.” It’s the idea that if 30 people enter homelessness in one month, 30 people exit in the same month.
I think we have a real path to get there in three years. In fact, we’re ahead of schedule of where I thought we would be on our efforts on veteran homelessness. That’s been an encouraging function of, when you build this infrastructure and you have the housing units there and you have the support services, you can close those encampments, move them to housing and keep encampments closed.
So we think we’ve shown this cycle works. We just have to do more of it better and faster. And that’s the path ahead.
Q: Your predecessor, Michael Hancock, called working with then-President Donald Trump’s administration one of the biggest challenges of his 12-year tenure. Are you preparing for the possibility of a second Trump term if he wins this fall?
I am not. I am preparing for the opportunity to avoid a second Trump term.
One thing I love about this job is that it’s nonpartisan. We’re just here to solve problems — and problems don’t have a partisan label. Either the solutions work, or they don’t. But if you have a president who makes it a priority to divide the country and to wage war on parts of the country, that makes it very hard to do business.
I just remember that, for instance, in the first term he wrote an executive order to ban federal grants to any city that had a sanctuary status. It would have been every single federal dollar, denied to a great majority of the country’s largest cities that don’t believe it makes sense to try to deport someone who has a busted taillight.
So I would hate for this city or this country to be stuck in a bunch of unproductive battles like that when we have far more important things we can do, like how to work together to solve the affordable housing problem or public safety challenges or homelessness.
Context: Soon after taking office in 2017, Trump issued an executive order that sought to deny federal grants to cities like Denver that did not cooperate fully with federal immigration authorities. The order faced legal challenges before it was ultimately revoked by President Joe Biden in 2021.

Q: What keeps you up at night?
That’s one of them (a second Trump term). The affordability of the city also keeps me up at night. Public safety keeps me up at night. I literally get a text from our police chief and the team every time we have a murder or violent crime or death in the city. And so that is the last thing I read at night or the first thing every morning. Every time that happens in a neighborhood, I feel that.
I think those are the biggest ones. The good news is, while that keeps me up at night, the days are filled with reminders of just the incredible resilience and passion and spirit of the people of the city.
Q: What is at stake if Denver’s housing costs continue to climb?
I think a lot about this one. I think it would be a dramatic change in what it feels like to live in Denver because of who can live in Denver.
I think it would mean almost all of the working-class families that support this city would no longer live in this city. So your teacher, your nurse, your barista, your local retail staff member — you wouldn’t find one of them who lives in the city anymore. And as their commutes become longer and the hours become slower, I think they might decide to just leave the metro area altogether.
And then the population stops growing and the city stops growing — and you have a city with no middle-class families left in it that feels like a shadow of its former self. We’ve seen, already, places like San Francisco where the population has just started dropping and the people that are left there are only the very wealthy.
That’s not where we want Denver to go. And that’s why the stakes feel so high.
Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.
Originally Published:
Denver, CO
Ranking the Broncos free agent needs on offense
I figured now would be a good time to do a little discussion around the Denver Broncos and where we think their top priorities should be on offense when free agency kicks off.
Broncos top FA needs on offense
Tim Lynch: For free agency, I’d say running back and tight end are the highest on my wish list.
I’d say pay big for a top free agent running back and ensure you have a monster two-headed backfield next season. They need a superior run-blocking tight end and, if they move on from Evan Engram, a pass-catcher too.
Christopher Hart: I agree with Tim. Those are the biggest needs for the offense. Getting a top-notch running back and a tight end capable of playing inline to replace Adam Trautman is a must. The two players I advocated a few weeks ago were running back Travis Etienne and tight end Cade Otton. Both would be fantastic additions and help take Denver’s offense to the next level in 2026.
Scotty Payne: Playmaker is the top and biggest need. That includes a RB, TE, and/or WR in that order.
Need to improve the run game regardless, need some sort of production out of the TEs as well as improved blocking, and if they can get a true WR1, that would be great too.
Ross Allen: I think we’re all in agreement.
Getting someone who can be the dominant running back and have RJ Harvey serve that glamorous “joker” role would be huge for this offense. And given that they also don’t have a legitimate playmaker at the receiving position hurts them. A TE or WR can fill that role.
Sadaraine: The #1 need for the Broncos on offense is a top-notch running back. I will be blown away if the Broncos don’t sign a top-tier free agent running back to upgrade the offense (and no, J.K. Dobbins wouldn’t be that guy…not with his injury history).
There’s a significant gap in need after that until we start talking about tight ends and receivers. I think we’re more likely to see more money spent on a tight end than a receiver, but this offense could use both to be sure.
Ian St. Clair: Not to beat a dead horse, but running back is the biggest need and priority for this team when free agency starts. Having a consistent and effective running game will make Nix and the offense exponentially better. It will make the team better. After running back, the Broncos need to figure out their tight end.
Adam Malnati: Give Bo a weapon. I don’t care which position. Yes, RB is a need. Yes, TE is a need (thanks a lot Evan Engram). Still, a weapon would be nice.
Predictably, we’re all heavily keyed in on running back and tight end. That was a big part of our free agent profile coverage too and for good reason. There have been many rumors around Denver looking to target both positions next week and where there is smoke there is usually fire.
The question really becomes: go big or go affordable? With the championship window open, I’m leaning go big on premium play-maker positions this offseason.
Where do you stand on this discussion? Give us your top free agent needs on offense and how you hope the Broncos address them next week.
Denver, CO
Denver area events for March 5
Denver, CO
Report: Broncos expected to ‘make a splash’ at running back
The Denver Broncos are in the market for a running back.
Just two days after NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport reported that Denver wants to have the running back position addressed before the draft, Jonathan Jones of CBS Sports reported that the Broncos are “poised to make a splash” at running back during NFL free agency.
“Denver is the reason why the Jets used the franchise tag on Breece Hall rather than the transition tag, according to sources, making sure Denver wouldn’t get the opportunity to put together an offer the Jets would refuse to match,” Jones wrote for CBS Sports.
Jones said the Broncos would be an obvious potential landing spot for Kenneth Walker, and he noted that Travis Etienne could be a cheaper alternative. The Athletic’s Nick Kosmider also reported this week that Denver is expected to “closely examine” the RB market, and he name-dropped Walker, Etienne and Rico Dowdle.
The Broncos also have an in-house free agent at RB in J.K. Dobbins, who has expressed his desire to remain in Denver. The Broncos can begin negotiating with pending free agents from other clubs on March 9, but no deals can become official until the new league year begins on March 11. In-house free agents can be re-signed at any time.
Social: Follow Broncos Wire on Facebook and Twitter/X! Did you know: These 25 celebrities are Broncos fans.
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Wisconsin4 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Maryland5 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Florida5 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Oregon7 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling