Connect with us

Colorado

Federal judge rejects Colorado voter intimidation lawsuit midway through trial

Published

on

Federal judge rejects Colorado voter intimidation lawsuit midway through trial


A federal judge in Denver ruled against the plaintiffs in a voter intimidation lawsuit Thursday, ending a trial early after finding the organizations behind the suit hadn’t presented sufficient evidence against a group of Donald Trump supporters.

U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney issued her ruling Thursday morning. The trial had started Monday, more than two years after the lawsuit was filed by a trio of voting and civil rights organizations, including the local chapters of the NAACP and the League of Women Voters, against the U.S. Election Integrity Plan.

That group, made up of supporters of the Republican former president and tied to prominent and discredited election conspiracy theorists, had been accused of questioning residents of high-density areas and places where ethnic and racial minorities live about their votes.

The lawsuit said the group, which has made false claims of mass voter fraud, also photographed voters’ homes as part of a pattern of “door-to-door voter intimidation.”

Advertisement

But Sweeney found that the evidence and testimony presented by the plaintiffs at trial to prove intimidation were insufficient, according to Colorado Newsline, which first reported the ruling Thursday morning. The defense had made a motion to end the trial early. Sweeney was appointed to the bench by Democratic President Joe Biden.

“We are disappointed in this ruling and are exploring all appeal options,” said Courtney Hostetler, one of the attorneys representing the civil and voting rights groups, in a statement.

Cameron Powell and Michael Wynne, attorneys for one of the three defendant members of the election group, praised the decision Thursday morning. They said the allegations against their client were related to speech, not any actual conduct.

Wynne said the three members of the group had been “dragged through the mud” by the lawsuit.

The case relied in part on a post-Civil War anti-Ku Klux Klan law that sought to protect Black voters who were being intimidated from using the ballot box by white Americans.

Advertisement

Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Colorado

Elephants can't pursue their release from a Colorado zoo because they're not human, court says

Published

on

Elephants can't pursue their release from a Colorado zoo because they're not human, court says


DENVER (AP) — Five elephants at a Colorado zoo may be “majestic” but, since they’re not human, they do not have the legal right to pursue their release, Colorado’s highest court said Tuesday.

The ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court follows a similar court defeat in New York in 2022 for an elephant named Happy at the Bronx Zoo in a case brought by an animal rights group. Rulings in favor of the animals would have allowed lawyers for both Happy and the elephants at the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo in Colorado Springs — Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou and Jambo — to pursue a long-held legal process for prisoners to challenge their detention and possibly be sent to live in an elephant sanctuary instead.

“It bears noting that the narrow legal question before this court does not turn on our regard for these majestic animals generally or these five elephants specifically. Instead, the legal question here boils down to whether an elephant is a person as that term is used in the habeas corpus statute. And because an elephant is not a person, the elephants here do not have standing to bring a habeas corpus claim,” the court said in its ruling.

Trusted news and daily delights, right in your inbox

See for yourself — The Yodel is the go-to source for daily news, entertainment and feel-good stories.

Advertisement

The same animal rights group that tried to win Happy’s release, the Nonhuman Rights Project, also brought the case in Colorado.

The group argued that the Colorado elephants, born in the wild in Africa, have shown signs of brain damage because the zoo is essentially a prison for such intelligent and social creatures, known to roam for miles a day. It wanted the animals released to one of the two accredited elephant sanctuaries in the United States because the group doesn’t think they can no longer live in the wild.

The zoo argued moving the elephants and potentially placing them with new animals would be cruel at their age, possibly causing unnecessary stress. It said they aren’t used to being in larger herds and, based on the zoo’s observations, the elephants don’t have the skills or desire to join one.

In a statement, the Nonhuman Rights Project said the latest ruling “perpetuates a clear injustice” and predicted future courts would reject the idea that only humans have a right to liberty.

“As with other social justice movements, early losses are expected as we challenge an entrenched status quo that has allowed Missy, Kimba, Lucky, LouLou, and Jambo to be relegated to a lifetime of mental and physical suffering,” it said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado politicians at federal, state, and local levels react to Trump’s executive actions

Published

on

Colorado politicians at federal, state, and local levels react to Trump’s executive actions


President Donald Trump is wasting no time putting his agenda for a second term into place after his inauguration on Monday. Shortly after being sworn in, he announced pardons for 1,500 people convicted in the attack on the US Capitol in 2021 and signed roughly 200 executive actions, memoranda and proclamations.

Many of those focused on immigration – declaring a national emergency at the southern border, resuming construction of the border wall, ending birthright citizenship, and classifying drug cartels and certain gangs as foreign terrorist organizations subject to immediate arrest and deportation.

Colorado Congressman Gabe Evans, a Republican representing Colorado’s 8th Congressional District, says it’s about saving lives. 

“And when we look at the death toll of Americans who have died as a result of things like fentanyl poisoning, it’s well in excess of the Americans who were killed in the attack on Sept. 11,” said Evans.

Advertisement
The Inauguration Of Donald J. Trump As The 47th President
WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 20: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up an executive order after signing it during an indoor inauguration parade at Capital One Arena on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States.

/ Getty Images


The President also restored an order withholding federal funds from local agencies that don’t cooperate with federal immigration agents.

In Aurora, where a Venezuelan gang has grabbed national attention, Mayor Mike Coffman welcomed the help.

“The City of Aurora has never been a sanctuary city which means we will fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities,” said Coffman. 

Advertisement

But some worry federal agents won’t discern between criminals and non-criminals. Jennifer Piper works with the immigrant community in Colorado, “We’re seeing a record number of people sign up for our ‘know your rights’ and sign up for our rapid response network.” 

Trump also signed a sweeping order to unleash American energy, directing federal agencies to simplify and expedite permits for drilling on federal lands and waters.

Colorado Congressman Jeff Hurd, a Republican for Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, says it’s good for the Western Slope and for our climate. 

“The best and most responsible way to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions is in the state of Colorado, in the third congressional district, is responsibly developing these resources that we’ve been blessed with,” said Hurd.

The president also abolished environmental justice and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs in federal agencies and restored a policy recognizing only male and female genders. 

Advertisement

State Representative Matt Soper says Democrats in the state Legislature are sure to push back.

“So we can expect things like what’s on your driver’s license to change, certainly federal law can’t dictate what Colorado defines as accessible bathrooms,” said Soper. “So I’ll be curious what the Democrats present us to debate.” 

Trump’s other executive actions included withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris Climate Treaty and World Health Organization, delaying a federal ban on TikTok, enacting a federal hiring freeze, renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America, and pausing disbursement of funds from the Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment Act.

Some of his executive actions, like ending birthright citizenship, which is in the U.S. Constitution, are sure to result in legal challenges.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado politicians say Trump starts with bold transition, signing flurry of executive orders

Published

on

Colorado politicians say Trump starts with bold transition, signing flurry of executive orders


Colorado politicians say Trump starts with bold transition, signing flurry of executive orders – CBS Colorado

Watch CBS News


Politicians in Colorado agreed that the president’s inaugural address was bold, calling for everything from landing a man on Mars to taking back the Panama Canal and renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. But no topic received more attention than immigration.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending