Connect with us

Colorado

Colorado crews planning mitigation of second underground coal mine fire near Marshall Fire’s origin

Published

on

Colorado crews planning mitigation of second underground coal mine fire near Marshall Fire’s origin


State mining safety crews are moving forward with plans to unearth a second active underground fire later this year in the area where the most destructive wildfire in Colorado history was ignited. 

The Marshall Fire destroyed more than 1,000 homes on Dec. 30, 2021. It was pushed by 100 mph winds across open space and into the communities of Superior and Louisville. Two residents there were killed.

A view of the Marshall Fire in Louisville on Dec. 30, 2021.

Advertisement

Marc Piscotty/Getty Images


RELATED  Marshall Fire investigation reveals most destructive fire in Colorado history was composed of 2 fires (2023) 

Authorities, after an 18-month investigation, determined there were two ignition points – the first a smoldering wood pile on private property, the second below power lines. The latter is a point of contention, with Xcel Energy disagreeing with investigators’ conclusions. The company is fighting litigation blaming its lines for at least partially causing the blaze.

RELATED  Investigators: Burning remnants of underground coal mines are possible cause of Marshall Fire (2022) 

The investigation did not rule out the possibility that coal burning below ground for decades contributed to the fire. Winds as strong as those experienced during the Marshall Fire could conceivably draw heat from the underground coal fires to the surface. 

Advertisement

One such site contains the Lewis Mines that were abandoned and buried in 1946. A surface vent emitting heat measured at 120 degrees was discovered in 2018. 

lewis-coal-mine-fire-mitigation-3-drms.jpg

Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety


RELATED  Disaster declaration issued for area in Boulder County to mitigate underground coal mine fire (2023)

Crews from Colorado’s Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety started an overhaul of the Lewis Mine site in January. Excavators carefully extracted land adjacent to the Davidson Ditch, alternately digging and filling 10-foot “fingers” of steaming ground to keep the concrete irrigation channel from collapsing. 

Advertisement
lewis-coal-mine-fire-mitigation-1-drms.jpg

Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety


Crews dug 30 feet deep and encountered temperatures as high as 600 degrees. Where readings were greater than 90 degrees, crews mixed the heated soil with cool soil and rock until temperatures fell below that mark. 

lewis-coal-mine-fire-mitigation-2-drms.jpg

Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety

Advertisement


The project wrapped up in early April ahead of schedule.

Crews are now planning to turn ground 2,000 feet away above the Marshall Mines, a DRMS spokesman confirmed. The department is currently in the permitting process with Boulder County since the project, slated to start later this summer or fall, will affect access to county open space at the Marshall Mesa trailhead. 

It will be the second time mitigation efforts have occurred at the Marshall Mines. A vent from the mines there was blamed for starting a small brush fire in 2005. Three years later, 275 tons of rock was dumped on the site, raising its surface 18 inches. 

lewis-and-marshall-coal-mine-fire-sites-map.png

Boulder County

Advertisement


The recent Lewis Mines mitigation cost $316,002, according to the department’s spokesman, Chris Arend. The Marshall mitigation will be done now that additional federal money has been received by the department to address coal mine fires throughout the state. 

In a 2018 DRMS study, there are 1,736 know abandoned coal mines in Colorado. A contractor hired by the state to examine them found 38 were actively burning or were dormant and extinguished after previously burning. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Colorado

Colorado grocery workers could strike against King Soopers, again

Published

on

Colorado grocery workers could strike against King Soopers, again


Shutterstock

DENVER—After securing a lucrative contract for grocery workers three years ago, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7 is back at the bargaining table with King Soopers, an affiliate of grocery giant Safeway/Albertsons, and negotiations are stalling, again.

Last week, UFCW Local 7 units at King Soopers stores in Colorado Springs, Pueblo, Grand Junction and Northern Colorado agreed to a two week contract extension to continue bargaining. The King Soopers/City Market contract negotiations will resume January 15 and 16.

Advertisement

The extended contract will now expire on January 24 at midnight. Strike authorization votes could be held in the coming weeks.

“We’ve been negotiating with King Soopers City Market representatives for about three months, and we’ve made little to no progress with the company,” said Kim Cordova, president of the UFCW Local 7.

“The company has so much cash they have announced a plan to spend roughly $2 billion on stock buybacks. Instead of spending this money on its stock, the company should be investing in stores and workers,” the union said.

Late last year, in a blow to corporate interests and monopoly power, U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson in Portland, Ore., and King County Superior Court Judge Marshall Ferguson in Seattle, Wash., killed the Kroger-Albertson’s grocery chain mega-merger.

The resistance to the merger was spearheaded by the Stop the Merger campaign, a coalition of progressive UFCW locals, with little to no assistance from the International. Local 7 was part of the core of this coalition, along with Local 3000, Local 770 and Local 324. The other locals who were part of the coalition also will begin bargaining in late January and early February.

Advertisement

Even with excitement among UFCW members with the blocked merger, grocery workers are tired and have been overworked, Cordova said. “They have been really disregarded through this whole attempted merger that failed.” Immediately after the dissolution of the merger agreement, both Kroger and Albertsons announced billions of dollars of stock buybacks.

“It was a cynical move to line the pockets of CEOs and key shareholders rather than invest the money locally in sadder stores with fresher food,” Todd Crosby, who helped coordinate the Stop The Merger campaign, told People’s World. “This is money that could be invested in the workers who provided the service and safe food.”

Major issues continue to be low-staffing, unsafe working conditions in the stores, hours and wages for lower-tiered workers, a lack of a reasonable path to full-time employment, job protection from the use of artificial intelligence, and unreasonable quotas and shafting on overtime.

Says more help needed

“I would like to see more help in my department because I can’t continue to do the job of three clerks. We need help, we need workers!” a produce manager at the Denver King Soopers store said.

Advertisement

Roman V., who has worked at King Soopers for over eight years, said winning adequate staffing was the most important demand for him in this contract.

“It is so crazily understaffed there are hardly enough people there to do the job daily and people get in trouble constantly because of job performance. I don’t see how they can get in trouble for job performance when performing the job of several people,” he said.

“I transferred into the store two years ago, and we’ve been shorthanded the whole time that I’ve been here,” said grocery worker Irene. “We’re not meeting the standards because we don’t have enough people to do the required work. Since we’re not meeting the standards, they are taking away hours. This doesn’t make any sense to me.”

Throughout bargaining, Safeway/Albertsons has refused to provide the union with basic information and data concerning staffing models—the main grievance workers and their union have with the company.  And, as Local 7 points out, Safeway/Albertsons is doing well, but they are still cutting hours.

“Despite the company’s claims over the past two years that they need to merge with Kroger to do well, their sales numbers actually surpassed Kroger’s. This occurred even though Safeway/Albertsons gave away $4 billion in cash to wealthy shareholders back in early 2023. Adding insult to injury, the companies would be doing far better if they adequately staffed our stores,” the union said.

Advertisement

Chris Herrera, a 40-year UFCW member and bargaining committee member, said that so far in negotiations, Safeway/Albertsons has been unwilling to make the necessary improvements to staffing levels, angering the workers and prompting many to want to authorize a strike.

The strike three years ago was one of the largest strikes in Colorado history, with 8,000 workers walking out, and it marked the first time grocery workers have gone on strike in the state since the late 1990s.

Last time around, King Soopers hired scabs to work at higher wages during the strike. In response, the union filed Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) charges against the company. When the strike concluded, King Soopers had to fire all the scabs and was forced to promote more than 500 part-time workers to full-time by the end of that year.

It’s unclear whether or not King Soopers will try the same union-busting tactic this time and workers aren’t holding their breath that the company will bargain in good faith without breaking labor law. Like in 2022, Local 7 has filed a number of charges with the National Labor Relations Board concerning ULPs.

“The company seems set on continuing its pattern of illegal and unfair labor practices, including a continuing refusal and failure to provide information, a cover-up of a 2022 agreement with Kroger that undercut negotiating leverage, and implementing new policies without notifying or bargaining with the Union,” Local 7 said in a bargaining update last week.

Advertisement

“We remain focused on addressing staffing as a way to improve take-home pay and improve stores as places to work and shop. The company’s cutting of staff in Colorado is backfiring.”

We hope you appreciated this article. At People’s World, we believe news and information should be free and accessible to all, but we need your help. Our journalism is free of corporate influence and paywalls because we are totally reader-supported. Only you, our readers and supporters, make this possible. If you enjoy reading People’s World and the stories we bring you, please support our work by donating or becoming a monthly sustainer today. Thank you!


CONTRIBUTOR

Cameron Harrison






Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Colorado Department of Corrections program to equip parole officers with body cams is shelved

Published

on

Colorado Department of Corrections program to equip parole officers with body cams is shelved


Colorado Department of Corrections program to equip parole officers with body cams is shelved – CBS Colorado

Watch CBS News


Records obtained by CBS Colorado show the Colorado Department of Corrections purchased hundreds of Motorola cameras for the adult parole division.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Colorado

Gov. Polis welcomes federal agents’ help deporting undocumented criminals

Published

on

Gov. Polis welcomes federal agents’ help deporting undocumented criminals


DENVER, Colo. (KDVR) — Gov. Jared Polis said in his State of the State address that undocumented criminals in Colorado should be deported.

After his speech, FOX31 sat with the governor and asked how far Colorado would go to work with federal immigration agencies. The governor said local law enforcement agencies and state law enforcement agencies already work with ICE on a number of criminal investigations.

However, in 2024, a lawsuit determined Colorado law prevents deputies or officers from arresting or detaining anyone for federal civil immigration purposes, or for delaying release to help facilitate an ICE pickup. The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice in 2024 after it was decided in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado, and against the Teller County Sheriff’s Office.

ICE agents were alongside Aurora police recently when they arrested undocumented migrants at an apartment complex where gangs were said to be a problem. The governor acknowledged the presence and problems with undocumented criminals.

Advertisement

“Yeah. There’s been gang problems in Denver and Aurora for decades. We have gangs like the Bloods and Crips. Mexican gangs and now the risk of Venezuelan gangs,” Polis said.

FOX31 asked Polis if he would support an increased use of local and state law enforcement agencies for immigration-related cases.

“We make no distinction in apprehending criminals. If they are undocumented, ultimately the federal government would detain and deport that person,” Polis said.

FOX31 also asked the governor if he was worried about the threats the Trump Administration has made about starting “Operation Aurora” in Colorado.

“We don’t know what Operation Aurora is or would be. But the general principles I’ve laid out are that we appreciate and welcome more help from the federal government to go after criminals,” Polis said.

Advertisement

Operation Aurora was announced by President-elect Trump at a rally held in October in Aurora. The plan would remove migrants who entered the country illegally and may be involved in gangs through invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to “target and dismantle every migrant criminal network operating on American soil.”

“We will send elite squads of ICE, Border Patrol and federal law enforcement officers to hunt down, arrest and deport every last illegal alien gang member until there is not a single one left in this country,” Trump said at the October rally.

The governor also said he is hoping the incoming Trump administration and lawmakers create pathways for citizenship for Dreamers and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients, which was designed to prevent deportation of foreign children brought into the country not of their own will, but illegally.

Trump has previously opposed DACA and tried to end the program during his first term in office. But in December he said that he thinks the so-called “Dreamers” should be allowed to stay. On “Meet the Press,” Trump said many DACA recipients become successful and have a positive economic impact.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending