Colorado
After 360 miles of whitewater and irrigation, the Arkansas River leaves Colorado as a trickle
What is a river?
It depends on your point of view. Sun reporters have fanned out along the Arkansas River, from the headwaters near Leadville to the border with Kansas, to learn what the river means to people in the places it runs through.
▶ Follow along for more from this series
ㅤ⚲ㅤ HOLLY
The sky is wide open above these plains, where the autumn corn stalks are tall and dry, cattle prices and George Jones are on the radio, and a river meanders through it.
In the last Colorado town before the Kansas state line, the Arkansas River is brown and slow, in some spots like a string of big mud puddles connected by sand bars. Ten miles into Kansas, it disappears, depleted this time of year by thirsty cities and farms along its 360-mile journey through Colorado.
By the time the Arkansas reaches the eastern edge of Colorado, far from its origin as a trickle of snowmelt on a 13,000-foot peak above Leadville, it is a different river. Slow flowing and serene, it’s no longer the wide rush of whitewater that descends from the Rocky Mountains and carves canyons.
This story first appeared in Colorado Sunday, a premium magazine newsletter for members. Experience the best in Colorado news at a slower pace, with thoughtful articles, unique adventures and a reading list that’s a perfect fit for a Sunday morning.
“You can walk across it and not get your ankles wet,” said Randy Holland, the town administrator of Holly, population 800.
The river, and stories of lush fields where the wheat and corn came easy, drew people to Prowers County to settle and farm. Sandy-bottomed canals, dug by horses pulling slip scrapers more than 130 years ago, bring water from the Arkansas, giving farmers and ranchers a reason to plan for the next harvest.
The canals are dry except when a gate upstream is opened and each farmer down the line takes their share. Now, though, the gate isn’t opened as often, the water doesn’t flow as far, and the farmers wonder how much longer the Arkansas will give them enough to continue.
The canals and ditches are a main conversation topic for the “coffee-ers,” the morning regulars at the diner. The ditches are a source of conflict — sometimes among neighbors, always among lawyers. Almost everyone here agrees that the cities upstream, and the politicians who live in them, don’t listen or don’t care when people on the Eastern Plains tell them the river is running dry.
The Arkansas River, as it curves along the south end of town and runs parallel to a two-lane highway to Kansas, carries a resentment deeper than its waters.
“The further you get down the river,” Holland summed up, “the less you feel important.”
“We use it to feed people”
Gary Melcher grows corn and alfalfa on the eight acres behind his house, across the street from the high school and Holly community pool. The gooseneck trailer he transformed into a barbecue truck to serve up brisket sandwiches with his special sauce is parked in the driveway, resting between festivals and county fairs. Restaurant-sized cans of baked beans and pickles wait on his kitchen counter.
Melcher grew up in Holly and has been farming since high school. Besides his small farming operation in town, he and his dad grow 460 acres of corn and wheat south of town, about 2 miles from Kansas.
Water from the muddy Arkansas flows down a ditch near Melcher’s house, the last ditch in Colorado diverting water from the Arkansas, and he uses every drop he can to irrigate his fields.
Some 20 years ago Melcher was in Denver to watch the Broncos play and, while sipping a beer in a bar, overheard city guys complaining about how much water is wasted on agriculture. It’s true, agriculture accounts for 89% of water consumed in Colorado, but what the Denver guys didn’t know is that plains farmers are so concerned about every raindrop that they use moisture probes to decide when and how to water, that the ditches are so regulated there is no room for waste.

“They just thought we wasted water,” Melcher said. “That’s the sentiment that Denver has. And the problem with farmers is we just put our heads down to work, and so sometimes we’re our worst enemy because we do not tell our story good enough. People do not waste water out here.”
The river’s slow flow through Holly is the result of drought and climate change, but also manmade reservoirs and dams, and the sale of water to cities 200 miles to the northwest. Decades of water deals that allowed cities to purchase water from farmers in the Lower Arkansas Valley, and take those shares from cleaner waters upstream, have dried up farmland and made the water that does reach the far eastern edge of the state saltier and more polluted.
It’s like the rest of Colorado forgot about Holly, Melcher thinks.
“The Front Range communities taking water greatly affects every piece of our life,” he said. “When they’re basically watering lawns and developing parks and golf courses and all that, that’s when it really stings. They’re using a lot of water just for beautification, where we use it to feed people.”
“What is a river?” is the question The Colorado Sun has asked throughout its multi-part series from Leadville to Holly.
Along the Arkansas, people look at the same river and see it differently.
Just below Leadville, not far from its headwaters on the Continental Divide, a portion of the rushing waters of the Arkansas are claimed for the faucets of Aurora and Colorado Springs. Colorado Springs uses detention ponds on Fountain Creek, a tributary of the Arkansas, to temporarily hold off storm water and prevent flooding. In Salida and Buena Vista, the river is a playground, where rafters float through Browns Canyon and surfers hit the man-made Pocket Wave. Cañon City used the river to reinvent itself as an outdoors hub with riverside mountain bike trails. And Pueblo, the city that has long relied on the Arkansas for industry and agriculture, built a Riverwalk that made the downtown cool.
By the time it reaches Holly, the river is concentrated with salts and other minerals, plus pollutants picked up along the way from wastewater treatment and agricultural runoff. Decreased snowpack and upstream dams and diversions have taken away the river’s ability to flush itself clean.
“That has changed the health of our system,” Melcher said. “We need the flow, the flush. That’s the biggest problem with being the end-user. If anybody above you affects their water flow, it decreases ours.”
In high school, Melcher tested the salt content of the water from the Arkansas that he was using to water his corn and wheat. It was saltier than the Great Salt Lake. “So as you were watering your crops, you were actually starving them from water as well,” he said.
Two main canals bring water from the Arkansas to farms in Holly and the rest of Prowers County — the Buffalo and the Amity.


The nearly dry Buffalo Canal and the totally dry Amity Canal, shown near the north end of Holly on Sept. 24. Water rights holders in the region have felt the squeeze of water demands by upstream users as well as water sales to cities along Colorado’s Front Range. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)
The Buffalo canal begins north of Grenada, about 20 miles west of Holly by road. A small, concrete dam across the river pools water until it rises high enough to open the gate and let it flow down the ditch. A flume tracks the flow to make sure the canal takes only what’s allowed.
As water flows down the Buffalo, the first farmer in line opens their head gate and takes their share, a portion regulated by the “ditch rider,” work that decades ago was done on horseback but now by four-wheeler. Then that farmer closes their gate and the water flows down to the next farm.
The Amity ditch takes water from the Arkansas between Las Animas and Lamar, just below the John Martin Reservoir. The water travels some 80 miles, bending around curves and under bridges.
If the ditches dry up, Holly could, too.
“Without water, I would say 25% to 40% of the economic stability of these small towns would be affected,” said Melcher, whose father and uncle moved from Texas to Prowers County to farm in the 1940s. “John Deere would have a hard time staying open. You would lose a lot of ag-support jobs here. Every life here in this area depends on the ag dollars — the grocery store, the gas station, the tire shop, the school.”
“Water is their 401(k)”
Water is worth more than land in the Lower Arkansas Valley.
Nearly one-third of the farmland that was irrigated in the 1950s is dried up now because the water was sold to cities, according to the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District. Farmers on the Eastern Plains can sell water rights for hundreds of thousands of dollars, millions even, and cities have been allowed to take those purchased shares upstream, many miles from Holly.
“You hear farmers say water is their 401(k),” said Peter Nichols, a Boulder attorney who represents the water district. “Fewer and fewer of their children want to stick around and farm and ranch. They get to a point where they can’t do it.”
The district was formed in 2002 by a 2-to-1 vote of people in five southeastern Colorado counties willing to tax themselves to stand up against cities fueling their “unchecked urban growth” with the valley’s water. There have been some successes, including the thwarting of a 2009 plan by Aurora to buy more water from the Lower Arkansas Valley and use the federal Frying Pan-Arkansas Project to exchange it upstream for use in Aurora.
Another battle erupted when a Louisiana investment group bought irrigation water on the Fort Lyon Canal with plans to sell it for use in 20 Front Range counties, Nichols said. That plan was blocked by the Colorado Supreme Court in 2005.
There are more fights to come. In Holly, people are paying attention to what happens to the water owned by Tri-State Generation, which bought up 49% of the shares on the Amity Canal as the company made plans to run a power plant outside Holly. The plans died when the state moved away from coal. The talk of the town is what would happen if Tri-State ever tried to sell those shares to cities upriver.
Any proposed sale to someone outside the valley would surely end up in court.


Holly, Colorado, is at the junction of U.S. Highway 50 and State Highway 89, along the Arkansas River and only a few miles from Kansas. It’s small, with a population of about 800 people, and has a long agricultural history in the region. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)
“People who continue to farm and ranch in the Arkansas Valley say the big municipalities have swooped in when times were bad, taken the water rights, dried up a lot of land and damaged the economy in the process,” Nichols said. “They kind of feel like their water was stolen even though they followed Colorado law.”
The people who rely on a river of stillwater at the Colorado-Kansas border look at Turquoise Lake, with its blue-green glacier melt, and Pueblo Reservoir, with its 60 miles of shoreline, and wonder if they got their fair share. “Everybody’s suspicion is they are not getting the water they are entitled to,” Nichols said.
On paper, the Arkansas River around Holly should have just as much water today as it did decades ago, despite the water sales to cities. That’s because farmers are allowed to sell only the portion of water used on their crops, not the water that ended up back in the river after they irrigated their fields. If 40% of the water makes it back into the river, then the farmer can sell only 60% of their water. “That’s the way it’s supposed to work,” said Jack Goble, general manager of the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District.
The quality of the water, though, that’s different.
“By the time the water gets to Holly, the water quality is much, much worse than even 100 or 50 miles upstream,” Goble said. Farmers in the valley have adopted the attitude that “wet water with salt in it is better than no water,” he said.
The salt leaches into the river from layers of sediment that 80 million years ago was covered by an ocean. That shale layer is full of sodium, magnesium and calcium, plus heavy metals including selenium, uranium and arsenic, that are absorbed by the river, Goble said.
Colorado Springs buys water from the Fort Lyon Canal, around Las Animas, but through a water exchange, the city actually takes the water from the Pueblo Reservoir, which is cleaner and far less salty, Goble said. Colorado Springs uses the water, sends it through its treatment plant, into Fountain Creek and back to the Arkansas — returning the water at a lower quality than the city received it.
“It’s a compounding effect,” Goble said. “That’s what these folks are concerned about and should be.”
Even worse, he said, Aurora bought 95% of the water in the Rocky Ford Ditch, but takes the water way up by Buena Vista, where it’s near pristine. When Aurora is finished with it, the water flows into the South Platte, “gone forever” from the Arkansas River basin, Goble said.
“It’s getting to where the cities are our enemies”
Jerome Seufer’s family came from Kansas to Prowers County after reading a newspaper ad in 1899 that said the land was better than anywhere else. The farmland was along the Amity Canal, the ad boasted, and connected to the “Greatest Reservoir System In the WORLD.”
That system expanded with the John Martin Dam and Reservoir, built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1940s with a pause for World War II. The reservoir in nearby Bent County is a popular state park for boating and fishing, but the bigger point was to prevent flooding after gully washers, and to store water for farms in Colorado and Kansas. The two states signed the Arkansas River Compact in 1948 — not that it put an end to fighting over the water.
Seufer’s grandfather, who remembered the days when water was so abundant he could irrigate all winter, was no fan of the reservoir. “All they did was build a bank of water that the Front Range can sell on paper,’” Seufer recalled him saying, often.
“For my grandpa, the river ran so much water all the time that it was swept clean from a rain,” Seufer said. “They’d have to go check and see if they could cross it with their wagons and horses back in the day. Now, I mean, even if you had to cross it with a wagon, you could go probably about any time.

“And so as years go on, it’s just getting less and less all the time. It used to just free flow all the way through. It’s getting to where the cities are our enemies.”
Seufer’s farm is the last on the Amity Canal. It’s up to the Colorado Division of Water Resources to determine when the gate that fills the Amity is lifted and how long it stays open, depending on snowpack and rain. Each farmer along the canal might get hours or three days, depending on their share.
The gate used to open for the first time in April, but lately, it’s May or even June, said Seufer, who is a board member of the Amity Canal. It used to run 10 or 12 times a season, but not anymore. “We are averaging four to five runs of water, if we’re lucky, during the growing season.”
In 20 years, the price per share for water dues on the canal has climbed to about $55, up from about $5. The size of a share fluctuates depending on how much water is available, but traditionally is around one acre-foot — enough water to cover one acre of ground with one foot of water, or about the amount used by two suburban households per year. That means farms pay close to $9,000 per year in canal dues to irrigate each quarter section of land, or about 160 acres. They could sell the rights for far more, though.
“I don’t know what our future is,” Seufer. “We talk to our lawyers all the time. Because we cannot keep paying more and more on our water rights to farm. We’ve got to figure this out in the next 10 years, or we won’t be able to continue.
Government subsidies that farmers receive for growing food, and that support the whole town, are decreasing as production decreases, he said. “It’s getting tougher. I hate to say it,” Seufer said. “But I don’t know if we’ve got enough to hold it here, unless somebody above at the state intervenes.”
Prowers County people look to Crowley County, just to the west, as a cautionary tale. Most of the farms sold their water shares of the Arkansas to cities upstream, decimating local agriculture. “It left all these people with no water,” Seufer said. “It looks terrible.”
The number of farms is dwindling in Prowers County, too. Seufer can tell by the number of people who come to Amity Canal annual meetings. “When I was little, you’d go to the annual meeting and there would be 80 to 100 farmers that showed up,” he said. “Now there isn’t 15.”
Holly’s relationship with the river has been passed down for generations
At the Lower Valley Water Conservancy District, Goble is pushing farmers who want to sell their water rights to lease them instead. That way the money keeps coming back to the communities.
Goble, who lives in Bent County, wonders when people who don’t live in farming areas will understand the broader consequences of dried-up farmland.
“I’m worried that it won’t be until there is not adequate food in the grocery stores, or at least not at an affordable price,” he said. “Maybe our citizens will finally wake up at that point and go, ‘Why did we dry up all this land?’ Once the water leaves, it’s never coming back.”
The people of Holly know this already, because their relationship with the river has been passed down for generations.
Over the decades, Holly has been flooded by the Arkansas, smacked with dust storms and partially flattened by a tornado. In 1965, the town was evacuated when the river roared through and spilled over its banks, leaving much of Holly underwater.

Holly became a town in 1903, named after a cattle rancher whose stone barn is now a historic building on Main Street. Settlers had come from Kansas and Oklahoma, drawn by the cheap and lucrative land. The Holly Sugar Plant opened in 1905, to turn sugar beets into sacks of white sugar. And from 1965 to 1995, Gateway Downs offered horse racing on a half-mile “bush track” oval just west of town.
A sign reminds drivers entering on U.S. 50 that Holly is the hometown of former Gov. Roy Romer, and a trail along the banks of the Arkansas is named for a 4-year-old boy, Justin Harrington, who drowned in an irrigation ditch in 2006.
The Arkansas River doesn’t supply the town’s drinking water; that comes from deep-water aquifers, trapped under shale. And that has problems, too.
The town is facing a potential $10 million overhaul of its water treatment system after state and federal officials grew concerned about high levels of radium, a natural mineral that can cause health problems including cancer if people drink it for years. Town trustees send notes with water bills telling people that children should not drink the water and suggesting people buy bottled instead.
Some farmers in Prowers County pump their water from the Ogallala Aquifer, so large that its underground expanse stretches across eight states, including the eastern edge of Colorado. Those farmers don’t rely on the flow of water in diversion ditches from the Arkansas, but even so, the health of the river is related to the aquifer, which is shrinking.
Holly’s population is shrinking, too, with about 400 fewer people today than in 1950.
After the Arkansas River leaves Colorado, the river that began as melting snow on a mountain top and flowed for hundreds of miles across the state barely trickles into Kansas. Exhausted by the journey, it even disappears underground for a stretch, until it’s replenished along the way by tributaries in Oklahoma and Arkansas. Then it disappears again, spilling into the Mississippi.
Colorado
Colorado Parks and Wildlife advances controversial fur ban petition during packed meeting
A contentious fight over fur stole the show at day one of the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission March meeting. The drama centered around a citizen petition to prohibit the sale of some wild animals furs.
The public meeting was packed with hunting advocates and animal rights groups. A total of 120 people signed up to speak during public comment at the hours-long meeting, not including those who submitted written or virtual comments.
The turnout was so big that Colorado Parks and Wildlife increased security. The meeting was held at the DoubleTree Denver-Westminster. CPW said they conducted security checks at the entrance at the hotel’s request to enforce the venue’s ban on weapons.
Ultimately, the commission voted 6-4 to move a proposed fur ban into the rulemaking phase.
It’s a win for the animal rights groups that submitted the petition.
While the commission did not all-out adopt the petition as it was submitted. They chose to initiate a rulemaking process for a potential ban to be approved down the line.
When the motion was advanced, it was met by jeers and some cheers from an audience full of hunters, trappers and advocates.
“We were hoping that there would be an opposition to moving the petition forward for the variety of reasons,” said Dan Gates, executive director of Coloradans for Responsible Wildlife Management. “It’s kind of frustrating that you sit there that long and you go through that much back and forth. On so many different levels. So it’s kind of disappointing.”
“This is a win. So it’s a good day,” said Samantha Miller, the senior carnivore campaigner for the Center for Biological Diversity.
Miller submitted the petition, which sought to ban the for-profit sale of fur from Colorado wildlife known as furbearers.
Those are 17 species including fox, bobcat, beaver, raccoon and coyote.
“Right now, furbearers are hunted and trapped in unlimited numbers in the state of Colorado, they also don’t enjoy the same protections against commercial markets that other big game species do enjoy, and in a time of biodiversity crisis and climate change, it’s critical that we up our management levels, modernize them, to reflect the crises we’re facing at the time, and ally for align for rare management with other species,” Miller said.
Colorado law already bans the commercial sale of big game.
As submitted, the petition would not limit the trapping or hunting of furbearers, just the sale of their furs and other parts, including hides, pelts, skins, claws and similar items. The sale of furs from farmed animals or wild animals killed outside Colorado would not be impacted.
The petition proposes exceptions, including fishing flies, western hats and scientific or educational materials.
The petition argues that commercial wildlife markets historically contributed to severe wildlife declines in North America and that modern conservation under the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation calls for eliminating markets for wildlife products.
“So what we’re saying is, let’s at least take this commercial piece off the table. We don’t allow this for any other wild animals, and let’s move forward with this petition,” Miller said.
Public comment speakers who supported the petition urged CPW to put compassion for animals ahead of commercial profits.
While the majority of speakers spoke against the proposed ban, saying the existing science-based wildlife management is working, and pointing out the Coloradans who rely on this industry for their livelihood.
Many pointed out that Denver voters rejected a similar fur ban in 2024.
“As a personal furbearer harvester over the course of the last 50 years, and a wildlife control operator and the president for the Colorado Trappers and Predator Hunters Association as well. We can adamantly say that we are for science-based wildlife management, and there’s been no indication whatsoever from the science-based wildlife managers that there’s a problem with any one of the 17 furbearers in the state of Colorado,” Gates said.
CPW staff recommended denial of the petition, saying the division does not have solid evidence that commercial fur sales are leading to unsustainable harvest levels of these animals.
Staff also worried about potential enforcement issues with proposed exemptions, and that the petition contradicts a state law allowing landowners to hunt, trap, and sell furs from furbearers causing damage to property.
“Colorado Parks and Wildlife laid a very good synopsis down when they were putting that recommendation for denial together, and some of these things will play out, and we’ll just have to see how it does,” Gates said.
The commission’s vote to initiate rulemaking leaves the door open for those concerns to be addressed.
“Rulemaking will clear up all of those misalignments that they have found or identified and make sure that it goes forward to the letter of the law and honoring the intent of the visit of the petition,” Miller said. “It’s a good day, I think, for wildlife to bring our regulations consistent and to start modernizing our furbearer management.”
“It seemed today that the vote was more social minded, more personal preference or ideological minded, as opposed to looking at the science and the data that was given by the agency,” Gates said.
See the petition below:
Colorado
Colorado breweries warn new tax hike bills could lead to more small business closures, job losses
Andrew Maciejewski/Summit Daily News
Colorado brewers are raising red flags over new bills that could increase taxes and fees on small alcohol businesses, many of which are already struggling to keep their doors open.
House Bill 1271, known as the Alcohol Impact & Recovery Enterprises bill, creates three government-run enterprises designed to fund programs for alcohol-related addiction prevention, treatment and recovery programs — all funded through fees imposed on alcoholic beverages. The bill is sponsored by four Democratic lawmakers.
Colorado per capita alcohol consumption is higher than the national average. The state also has one of the higher alcohol-related death rates in the country, with around 24 deaths per 100,000 residents as of 2023, according to data from Trust for America’s Health.
Data from the Colorado Health Institute shows not everyone who could benefit from treatment for alcohol use disorders currently receives it, largely due to factors like cost, accessibility and stigma.
Were the bill to pass, manufacturers and wholesale distributors would have to pay five cents in fees per gallon of beer, cider and apple wine, seven cents per liter of wine and 35 cents per liter of spirits to be used toward alcohol-related treatment and recovery programs. As state lawmakers plan cuts to balance a $850 million budget deficit, advocates for these programs argue the funding from the bill could help offset any potential losses.
For local breweries and wineries in the mountains, however, this would be a significant financial blow to an already struggling industry.
“This is not the time for us to be implementing new taxes on an industry that is hurting right now,” said Carlin Walsh, owner of Elevation Beer Company and chair of the Colorado Brewers Guild. “As a brewer, I feel like the state is looking a gift horse in the mouth.”
Beer, wine, cider and spirits generate around $22 billion in economic activity for Colorado, according to the Colorado Beverage Coalition. The state is home to nearly 420 breweries, 145 wineries, nearly 20 cideries and 100 distilleries.
Faced with rising costs and waning appetites, however, over 100 Colorado breweries have shuttered their doors since 2024, marking the first time since 2005 that more breweries closed than opened. Meanwhile, national surveys confirmed alcohol consumption in the U.S. is at a 90-year low.
Walsh said breweries already pay eight cents per gallon in taxes, which for a company like Elevation translates to roughly $30,000 in taxes annually. Fees from the new bill would add another $12,000 to its yearly expenses.
“The alcohol industry at large is one of the most regulated industries in the United States, period. We already pay a very heavy tax,” Walsh said, adding that breweries provide tens of millions of dollars to Colorado’s general fund. “Our position is that there’s already money available. Those dollars go to the general fund, and it’s really up to the state to manage what we already provide and to decide what is their priority. We don’t feel like it should be on our shoulders to increase the amount that we pay to the state just because the state wants to endeavour on new programs.”
The Colorado Beverage Coalition said the imposed fees would be a 60% cost increase on alcohol businesses. Paired with an estimated 100% increase in taxes from a referred ballot measure proposed last week — House Bill 1301 — the impacts would be disastrous for the industry, Walsh said.
House Bill 1301 would refer a measure to the November ballot that would increase excise taxes on alcohol and increase sales and excise taxes on marijuana in order to fund a mental health hospital in Aurora.
“Our brewery and so many other breweries, we just don’t have capacity for that. We’re already a low margin business to begin with,” Walsh said. “If this happens, this is going to drive further consolidation amongst our members. It’s going to drive further closures.”
Larger alcohol companies may be in a better position to absorb some of the costs from increased fees, said Shawnee Adelson, executive director for the Colorado Brewers Guild. Small businesses in rural resort markets, on the other hand, are not in that position.
“At a certain point when costs just keep going up and up and up, there’s no more place to cut,” Adelson said.
Colorado jobs, tourism could see ripple effects
The Colorado Beverage Coalition estimates House Bill 1271 would jeopardize 131,000 brewery, winery and distillery jobs in the state, in addition to “greatly increasing cost on consumers.” Walsh said an average brewery would “no doubt” have to cut jobs if either, or both, bills were to pass.
“Depending on the size of a brewery, it could be the cost of a full-time staff or multiple full-time staff to cover the cost of these (fees), so there is a real concern about job losses due to increased costs,” Adelson added.
The Colorado Distillers Guild also argues the bill would be a blow to the tourism industry, as visitors could be deterred by increased consumer costs and a dwindling beer culture.
“A lot of (breweries) will either have to absorb that cost or pass it on to the consumer. And right now, in the current state of the economy, we understand that a lot of consumers are price conscious right now, which is also contributing to lower consumption,” Adelson said. “Passing on that price is going to be really hard for consumers to swallow as well.”
The bill is not entirely new, as similar legislation by the same name was proposed in 2024. The original bill, which died in committee, received significant pushback from Gov. Jared Polis due to concerns that it would end up raising prices for consumers. Polis also requested that sponsors exempt beer companies from the fees.
Aside from a stakeholder meeting ahead of the bill’s introduction, Adelson said the Colorado Brewers Guild had not been contacted by lawmakers about the plan for an excise fee increase.
“We’ve had two years to sit down and have discussions with lawmakers about this. Nobody has reached out. Nobody has sat down with us to say, ‘Hey, this is our goal. We wanna get this done. How can you guys meet us halfway?’” Walsh said.
Being an enterprise fee rather than a tax, House Bill 1271 would not go to voters for approval. Instead, the change would be implemented through legislation only and automatically go live in July 2027. Because the bill would create three separate enterprise fees for beer, wine and spirits — each capped at $20 million annually per state law — the state could collect up to $60 million from all three.
The bill would also create a new 11-member board appointed by the governor to oversee the three enterprises, which would be made up of alcohol industry representatives, behavioral health professionals, public health experts and individuals in recovery.
On top of feeling that a financial change of that magnitude should be left up to voters, Walsh said he’s heard from businesses that are concerned about the potential for the board to increase fees in the future.
“There are very few guard rails around how this enterprise can operate, including the ability for them to raise the tax price that we’re currently paying. There’s very few restrictions within this bill that control how much they can increase that tax,” Walsh said. “In two years they could come back and say, ‘Oh we’re going to increase it another five cents or 10 cents.’”
For Adelson, the fees would impact more than just manufacturing facilities and business operations.
“They’re community gathering spaces and they’re third places,” Adelson said. “They give back a lot and so I think I just want to make sure that the consumer realizes that we’re not just talking about production facilities, but your local neighborhood brewery that’s down the street and that your neighbours own or your friends work at.”
Colorado
New affordable housing communities in Colorado aim to serve families with the greatest need
LONGMONT, Colo. — For Skye Beck and her husband, the decision to uproot their family of five from Nebraska and relocate to Colorado for a new job wasn’t easy — especially when it came to the cost of living.
“It was looking like it maybe was not going to be an affordable option for us to come out here,” she said. “We did find one eventually, but it was still just the two-bedroom apartment, and that was just a little tight for us for the year.”
After a year of cramped living, the Beck family moved into a much more spacious apartment at Ascent at Hover Crossing in Longmont. The newest affordable housing development in Boulder County, which officially opened its doors on Tuesday, includes four-bedroom units — a rarity in affordable housing.
“I think they only have six of those [units],” said Beck. “To have that much space for the five of us is a blessing.”
Katie Pung, housing development project manager for the City of Longmont, said the larger units were a deliberate priority.
“Having those larger units for families really came together in a way that we feel like is going to be meaningful for Longmont families,” Pung said.
The mixed-income apartments are available for a variety of incomes, with units ranging from 30% to 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) — about $31,650 to $84,400 for a one-person household.
The development also includes an early childhood education (ECE) center on site, giving families an affordable childcare option.
OUR Center, a longtime local nonprofit specializing in subsidized early education for low-income families, will operate the center. The facility is set to open later this year, with availability for both residents and the broader Longmont community.
It reflects a growing statewide push to incorporate childcare into housing projects through state funding and technical assistance for developers.
p2-aff-housing-projects_030326AKB.mp4
A similar effort is underway in Denver’s Berkeley neighborhood, where the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless is partnering with the Denver Housing Authority to develop Charity’s House, a family housing development with 135 new units — also with an on-site child care center.
At least 40% of the units will be reserved for families earning 30% of the Area Median Income (AMI) — currently $37,850 for a family of three and $42,050 for a family of four in Denver. All units will be income-restricted to those at or below 60% AMI.
Cathy Alderman, chief communications and public policy officer for the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, said land partnerships help reduce both cost and construction time.
“If we can enter into a partnership with another organization that owns land, and we can build on that, that cuts our cost and time down considerably,” Alderman said.
The DHA Delivers for Denver (D3) bond program, a partnership between DHA and the City of Denver, has funded 11 property acquisitions since its inception in 2019, according to Denver Housing Authority Chief Real Estate Officer Erin Clark.
“It is public partnerships like that and public-private partnerships that, even us, working with a nonprofit here, that are what deliver more housing across the community,” said Clark. “It’s just people thinking outside of the box and leveraging resources and saying, ‘What do you do best, and what do we do best, and how can we work together to make all this happen?’”
Construction is slated to begin in late 2027.
Denver7 has heard from multiple experts through the years about the lack of affordable housing options for families and seniors.
Years-long waitlists and housing lottery odds often make it tougher. More than 15,000 children and youth are currently experiencing homelessness in Denver.
Colorado has been making significant housing investments since the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to more affordable housing developments across the state. But Alderman said there is still more work to be done.
“My biggest concern is that not all of that housing is being targeted for those households in the greatest need,” Alderman said.
Longtime Longmont resident Karen Howerton remembers a time when rents hovered in the $600 range.
“When I came back to Longmont six years ago, I was surprised at how much inflation had happened here and how big the town had grown,” she said.
The last affordable housing development she lived in didn’t quite fit all her needs.
Now, she joins the Becks as one of the first tenants at Ascent at Hover Crossing.
“What I wanted to come over here for was a washer and dryer — I didn’t have that at my other place — and the little balcony, you know,” she said. “I’ve met a few of the neighbors already, and I can’t say enough about it. It’s just a great place to be, for sure.”
Howerton and Beck say the little comforts go a long way toward making a place feel like home.
“I mean, everyone deserves to have a space and be able to afford it without worrying about all the other parts of life,” Beck said. “I feel like here we’re able to finally rest a bit and able to enjoy life, but it shouldn’t be limited to just a waitlist.”
Coloradans making a difference | Denver7 featured videos
Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what’s right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Wisconsin4 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Maryland4 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida4 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Oregon6 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
