Connect with us

Colorado

After 360 miles of whitewater and irrigation, the Arkansas River leaves Colorado as a trickle

Published

on

After 360 miles of whitewater and irrigation, the Arkansas River leaves Colorado as a trickle


The sky is wide open above these plains, where the autumn corn stalks are tall and dry, cattle prices and George Jones are on the radio, and a river meanders through it. 

Advertisement

In the last Colorado town before the Kansas state line, the Arkansas River is brown and slow, in some spots like a string of big mud puddles connected by sand bars. Ten miles into Kansas, it disappears, depleted this time of year by thirsty cities and farms along its 360-mile journey through Colorado.

By the time the Arkansas reaches the eastern edge of Colorado, far from its origin as a trickle of snowmelt on a 13,000-foot peak above Leadville, it is a different river. Slow flowing and serene, it’s no longer the wide rush of whitewater that descends from the Rocky Mountains and carves canyons.

This story first appeared in Colorado Sunday, a premium magazine newsletter for members. Experience the best in Colorado news at a slower pace, with thoughtful articles, unique adventures and a reading list that’s a perfect fit for a Sunday morning.

“You can walk across it and not get your ankles wet,” said Randy Holland, the town administrator of Holly, population 800. 

The river, and stories of lush fields where the wheat and corn came easy, drew people to Prowers County to settle and farm. Sandy-bottomed canals, dug by horses pulling slip scrapers more than 130 years ago, bring water from the Arkansas, giving farmers and ranchers a reason to plan for the next harvest. 

Advertisement

The canals are dry except when a gate upstream is opened and each farmer down the line takes their share. Now, though, the gate isn’t opened as often, the water doesn’t flow as far, and the farmers wonder how much longer the Arkansas will give them enough to continue.

The canals and ditches are a main conversation topic for the “coffee-ers,” the morning regulars at the diner. The ditches are a source of conflict — sometimes among neighbors, always among lawyers. Almost everyone here agrees that the cities upstream, and the politicians who live in them, don’t listen or don’t care when people on the Eastern Plains tell them the river is running dry. 

The Arkansas River, as it curves along the south end of town and runs parallel to a two-lane highway to Kansas, carries a resentment deeper than its waters.

“The further you get down the river,” Holland summed up, “the less you feel important.”

map visualization

“We use it to feed people”

Gary Melcher grows corn and alfalfa on the eight acres behind his house, across the street from the high school and Holly community pool. The gooseneck trailer he transformed into a barbecue truck to serve up brisket sandwiches with his special sauce is parked in the driveway, resting between festivals and county fairs. Restaurant-sized cans of baked beans and pickles wait on his kitchen counter.

Melcher grew up in Holly and has been farming since high school. Besides his small farming operation in town, he and his dad grow 460 acres of corn and wheat south of town, about 2 miles from Kansas. 

Advertisement

Water from the muddy Arkansas flows down a ditch near Melcher’s house, the last ditch in Colorado diverting water from the Arkansas, and he uses every drop he can to irrigate his fields. 

Some 20 years ago Melcher was in Denver to watch the Broncos play and, while sipping a beer in a bar, overheard city guys complaining about how much water is wasted on agriculture. It’s true, agriculture accounts for 89% of water consumed in Colorado, but what the Denver guys didn’t know is that plains farmers are so concerned about every raindrop that they use moisture probes to decide when and how to water, that the ditches are so regulated there is no room for waste.

A hand holds two halves of a freshly split ear of corn still attached to the plant, showing the yellow kernels and white core inside.
Gary Melcher shows off a soon-to-be-harvested ear of corn grown on his family’s farm south of Holly in September. The Melchers rely on water from the Ogallala Aquifer to irrigate this corn crop, but Gary also grows crops with water from the Arkansas River. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

“They just thought we wasted water,” Melcher said. “That’s the sentiment that Denver has. And the problem with farmers is we just put our heads down to work, and so sometimes we’re our worst enemy because we do not tell our story good enough. People do not waste water out here.”

The river’s slow flow through Holly is the result of drought and climate change, but also manmade reservoirs and dams, and the sale of water to cities 200 miles to the northwest. Decades of water deals that allowed cities to purchase water from farmers in the Lower Arkansas Valley, and take those shares from cleaner waters upstream, have dried up farmland and made the water that does reach the far eastern edge of the state saltier and more polluted. 

It’s like the rest of Colorado forgot about Holly, Melcher thinks. 

“The Front Range communities taking water greatly affects every piece of our life,” he said. “When they’re basically watering lawns and developing parks and golf courses and all that, that’s when it really stings. They’re using a lot of water just for beautification, where we use it to feed people.” 

Advertisement

“What is a river?” is the question The Colorado Sun has asked throughout its multi-part series from Leadville to Holly. 

Along the Arkansas, people look at the same river and see it differently. 

Just below Leadville, not far from its headwaters on the Continental Divide, a portion of the rushing waters of the Arkansas are claimed for the faucets of Aurora and Colorado Springs. Colorado Springs uses detention ponds on Fountain Creek, a tributary of the Arkansas, to temporarily hold off storm water and prevent flooding. In Salida and Buena Vista, the river is a playground, where rafters float through Browns Canyon and surfers hit the man-made Pocket Wave. Cañon City used the river to reinvent itself as an outdoors hub with riverside mountain bike trails. And Pueblo, the city that has long relied on the Arkansas for industry and agriculture, built a Riverwalk that made the downtown cool. 

By the time it reaches Holly, the river is concentrated with salts and other minerals, plus pollutants picked up along the way from wastewater treatment and agricultural runoff. Decreased snowpack and upstream dams and diversions have taken away the river’s ability to flush itself clean. 

“That has changed the health of our system,” Melcher said. “We need the flow, the flush. That’s the biggest problem with being the end-user. If anybody above you affects their water flow, it decreases ours.”

Advertisement

In high school, Melcher tested the salt content of the water from the Arkansas that he was using to water his corn and wheat. It was saltier than the Great Salt Lake. “So as you were watering your crops, you were actually starving them from water as well,” he said. 

Two main canals bring water from the Arkansas to farms in Holly and the rest of Prowers County — the Buffalo and the Amity. 

A shallow creek bordered by dense green bushes and trees, with a concrete block and metal post visible in the foreground.
A narrow dirt path runs through tall, dense grass on both sides, with patches of green vegetation visible in the background.

The nearly dry Buffalo Canal and the totally dry Amity Canal, shown near the north end of Holly on Sept. 24. Water rights holders in the region have felt the squeeze of water demands by upstream users as well as water sales to cities along Colorado’s Front Range. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

The Buffalo canal begins north of Grenada, about 20 miles west of Holly by road. A small, concrete dam across the river pools water until it rises high enough to open the gate and let it flow down the ditch. A flume tracks the flow to make sure the canal takes only what’s allowed. 

As water flows down the Buffalo, the first farmer in line opens their head gate and takes their share, a portion regulated by the “ditch rider,” work that decades ago was done on horseback but now by four-wheeler. Then that farmer closes their gate and the water flows down to the next farm. 

The Amity ditch takes water from the Arkansas between Las Animas and Lamar, just below the John Martin Reservoir. The water travels some 80 miles, bending around curves and under bridges. 

Advertisement

If the ditches dry up, Holly could, too. 

“Without water, I would say 25% to 40% of the economic stability of these small towns would be affected,” said Melcher, whose father and uncle moved from Texas to Prowers County to farm in the 1940s. “John Deere would have a hard time staying open. You would lose a lot of ag-support jobs here. Every life here in this area depends on the ag dollars — the grocery store, the gas station, the tire shop, the school.”

“Water is their 401(k)”

Water is worth more than land in the Lower Arkansas Valley. 

Nearly one-third of the farmland that was irrigated in the 1950s is dried up now because the water was sold to cities, according to the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District. Farmers on the Eastern Plains can sell water rights for hundreds of thousands of dollars, millions even, and cities have been allowed to take those purchased shares upstream, many miles from Holly.

“You hear farmers say water is their 401(k),” said Peter Nichols, a Boulder attorney who represents the water district. “Fewer and fewer of their children want to stick around and farm and ranch. They get to a point where they can’t do it.”

Advertisement

The district was formed in 2002 by a 2-to-1 vote of people in five southeastern Colorado counties willing to tax themselves to stand up against cities fueling their “unchecked urban growth” with the valley’s water. There have been some successes, including the thwarting of a 2009 plan by Aurora to buy more water from the Lower Arkansas Valley and use the federal Frying Pan-Arkansas Project to exchange it upstream for use in Aurora.

Another battle erupted when a Louisiana investment group bought irrigation water on the Fort Lyon Canal with plans to sell it for use in 20 Front Range counties, Nichols said. That plan was blocked by the Colorado Supreme Court in 2005. 

There are more fights to come. In Holly, people are paying attention to what happens to the water owned by Tri-State Generation, which bought up 49% of the shares on the Amity Canal as the company made plans to run a power plant outside Holly. The plans died when the state moved away from coal. The talk of the town is what would happen if Tri-State ever tried to sell those shares to cities upriver.

Any proposed sale to someone outside the valley would surely end up in court. 

Road signs at the edge of Holly, Colorado indicate city limit, US Route 50, Colorado Route 89, and note that it is the hometown of Governor Roy Romer.
A metal grain elevator building labeled "COOP" stands near a tall water tower marked "HOLLY COLO" under a partly cloudy sky. Trees and railroad tracks are visible in the foreground.

Holly, Colorado, is at the junction of U.S. Highway 50 and State Highway 89, along the Arkansas River and only a few miles from Kansas. It’s small, with a population of about 800 people, and has a long agricultural history in the region. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

“People who continue to farm and ranch in the Arkansas Valley say the big municipalities have swooped in when times were bad, taken the water rights, dried up a lot of land and damaged the economy in the process,” Nichols said. “They kind of feel like their water was stolen even though they followed Colorado law.”

Advertisement

The people who rely on a river of stillwater at the Colorado-Kansas border look at Turquoise Lake, with its blue-green glacier melt, and Pueblo Reservoir, with its 60 miles of shoreline, and wonder if they got their fair share. “Everybody’s suspicion is they are not getting the water they are entitled to,” Nichols said.

On paper, the Arkansas River around Holly should have just as much water today as it did decades ago, despite the water sales to cities. That’s because farmers are allowed to sell only the portion of water used on their crops, not the water that ended up back in the river after they irrigated their fields. If 40% of the water makes it back into the river, then the farmer can sell only 60% of their water. “That’s the way it’s supposed to work,” said Jack Goble, general manager of the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District.

The quality of the water, though, that’s different.

“By the time the water gets to Holly, the water quality is much, much worse than even 100 or 50 miles upstream,” Goble said. Farmers in the valley have adopted the attitude that “wet water with salt in it is better than no water,” he said. 

The salt leaches into the river from layers of sediment that 80 million years ago was covered by an ocean. That shale layer is full of sodium, magnesium and calcium, plus heavy metals including selenium, uranium and arsenic, that are absorbed by the river, Goble said. 

Advertisement

Colorado Springs buys water from the Fort Lyon Canal, around Las Animas, but through a water exchange, the city actually takes the water from the Pueblo Reservoir, which is cleaner and far less salty, Goble said. Colorado Springs uses the water, sends it through its treatment plant, into Fountain Creek and back to the Arkansas — returning the water at a lower quality than the city received it.

“It’s a compounding effect,” Goble said. “That’s what these folks are concerned about and should be.”

Even worse, he said, Aurora bought 95% of the water in the Rocky Ford Ditch, but takes the water way up by Buena Vista, where it’s near pristine. When Aurora is finished with it, the water flows into the South Platte, “gone forever” from the Arkansas River basin, Goble said. 

“It’s getting to where the cities are our enemies”

Jerome Seufer’s family came from Kansas to Prowers County after reading a newspaper ad in 1899 that said the land was better than anywhere else. The farmland was along the Amity Canal, the ad boasted, and connected to the “Greatest Reservoir System In the WORLD.” 

That system expanded with the John Martin Dam and Reservoir, built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the 1940s with a pause for World War II. The reservoir in nearby Bent County is a popular state park for boating and fishing, but the bigger point was to prevent flooding after gully washers, and to store water for farms in Colorado and Kansas. The two states signed the Arkansas River Compact in 1948 — not that it put an end to fighting over the water. 

Advertisement

Seufer’s grandfather, who remembered the days when water was so abundant he could irrigate all winter, was no fan of the reservoir. “All they did was build a bank of water that the Front Range can sell on paper,’” Seufer recalled him saying, often. 

“For my grandpa, the river ran so much water all the time that it was swept clean from a rain,” Seufer said. “They’d have to go check and see if they could cross it with their wagons and horses back in the day. Now, I mean, even if you had to cross it with a wagon, you could go probably about any time.

A man wearing a plaid shirt, cap, and sunglasses stands outdoors on a grassy path under a partly cloudy sky.
Holly resident Jerome Seufer has farmed in the region all his life. He relies on long-held water rights to Arkansas River water to irrigate crops, but decreased snowpack, upstream usage and water sales to cities have impacted his farming operation. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Colorado Sun)

“And so as years go on, it’s just getting less and less all the time. It used to just free flow all the way through. It’s getting to where the cities are our enemies.”

Seufer’s farm is the last on the Amity Canal. It’s up to the Colorado Division of Water Resources to determine when the gate that fills the Amity is lifted and how long it stays open, depending on snowpack and rain. Each farmer along the canal might get hours or three days, depending on their share. 

The gate used to open for the first time in April, but lately, it’s May or even June, said Seufer, who is a board member of the Amity Canal. It used to run 10 or 12 times a season, but not anymore. “We are averaging four to five runs of water, if we’re lucky, during the growing season.”

In 20 years, the price per share for water dues on the canal has climbed to about $55, up from about $5. The size of a share fluctuates depending on how much water is available, but traditionally is around one acre-foot — enough water to cover one acre of ground with one foot of water, or about the amount used by two suburban households per year. That means farms pay close to $9,000 per year in canal dues to irrigate each quarter section of land, or about 160 acres. They could sell the rights for far more, though. 

Advertisement

“I don’t know what our future is,” Seufer. “We talk to our lawyers all the time. Because we cannot keep paying more and more on our water rights to farm. We’ve got to figure this out in the next 10 years, or we won’t be able to continue.

Government subsidies that farmers receive for growing food, and that support the whole town, are decreasing as production decreases, he said. “It’s getting tougher. I hate to say it,” Seufer said. “But I don’t know if we’ve got enough to hold it here, unless somebody above at the state intervenes.” 

Prowers County people look to Crowley County, just to the west, as a cautionary tale. Most of the farms sold their water shares of the Arkansas to cities upstream, decimating local agriculture. “It left all these people with no water,” Seufer said. “It looks terrible.” 

The number of farms is dwindling in Prowers County, too. Seufer can tell by the number of people who come to Amity Canal annual meetings. “When I was little, you’d go to the annual meeting and there would be 80 to 100 farmers that showed up,” he said. “Now there isn’t 15.” 

Holly’s relationship with the river has been passed down for generations

At the Lower Valley Water Conservancy District, Goble is pushing farmers who want to sell their water rights to lease them instead. That way the money keeps coming back to the communities. 

Advertisement

Goble, who lives in Bent County, wonders when people who don’t live in farming areas will understand the broader consequences of dried-up farmland. 

“I’m worried that it won’t be until there is not adequate food in the grocery stores, or at least not at an affordable price,” he said. “Maybe our citizens will finally wake up at that point and go, ‘Why did we dry up all this land?’ Once the water leaves, it’s never coming back.” 

The people of Holly know this already, because their relationship with the river has been passed down for generations. 

Over the decades, Holly has been flooded by the Arkansas, smacked with dust storms and partially flattened by a tornado. In 1965, the town was evacuated when the river roared through and spilled over its banks, leaving much of Holly underwater. 

A field of tall green grasses under a partly cloudy sky, with distant buildings and structures visible on the horizon.
Acres of corn as far as the eye can see are grown by the Melcher family just south of Holly using water from the Ogallala Aquifer. (Mike Sweeney, Special to The Cdolorado Sun)

Holly became a town in 1903, named after a cattle rancher whose stone barn is now a historic building on Main Street. Settlers had come from Kansas and Oklahoma, drawn by the cheap and lucrative land. The Holly Sugar Plant opened in 1905, to turn sugar beets into sacks of white sugar. And from 1965 to 1995, Gateway Downs offered horse racing on a half-mile “bush track” oval just west of town. 

A sign reminds drivers entering on U.S. 50 that Holly is the hometown of former Gov. Roy Romer, and a trail along the banks of the Arkansas is named for a 4-year-old boy, Justin Harrington, who drowned in an irrigation ditch in 2006.

Advertisement

The Arkansas River doesn’t supply the town’s drinking water; that comes from deep-water aquifers, trapped under shale. And that has problems, too.

The town is facing a potential $10 million overhaul of its water treatment system after state and federal officials grew concerned about high levels of radium, a natural mineral that can cause health problems including cancer if people drink it for years. Town trustees send notes with water bills telling people that children should not drink the water and suggesting people buy bottled instead.

Some farmers in Prowers County pump their water from the Ogallala Aquifer, so large that its underground expanse stretches across eight states, including the eastern edge of Colorado. Those farmers don’t rely on the flow of water in diversion ditches from the Arkansas, but even so, the health of the river is related to the aquifer, which is shrinking. 

Holly’s population is shrinking, too, with about 400 fewer people today than in 1950.

After the Arkansas River leaves Colorado, the river that began as melting snow on a mountain top and flowed for hundreds of miles across the state barely trickles into Kansas. Exhausted by the journey, it even disappears underground for a stretch, until it’s replenished along the way by tributaries in Oklahoma and Arkansas. Then it disappears again, spilling into the Mississippi.

Advertisement



Source link

Colorado

Coworking firm Industrious takes former WeWork space in Denver

Published

on

Coworking firm Industrious takes former WeWork space in Denver


Industrious, a national coworking brand, is opening a new location in LoHi.

The company has snapped up 25,000 square feet at The Lab building at 2420 17th St., just off Platte Street. Industrious has an existing LoHi location just up the road at 2128 W. 32nd Ave.

“They are going to draw from different populations. … No doubt they’re close to each other, but [this is a] different product type, just in terms of build-out,” said Peri Demestihas, an Industrious executive.

Demestihas said the current LoHi location has been full for two years, which indicates demand for more space. That existing spot is more for established businesses with a greater emphasis on private offices. The new location will be geared more toward smaller companies and the solo entrepreneur.

Advertisement

In total, there will be 379 dedicated “office seats” and 18 “access seats,” which can be used by anyone.

Industrious has a conservative mindset when it comes to growth, Demestihas said. The company also operates in Upper Downtown and by I-25 and Colorado Blvd.

“These are the submarkets we like and if we can find the right building and we can get the right structure, … without those things, we’re not going to go to those submarkets. It’s got to suit our members.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

Contamination, climate change and political drama stall clean water for Colorado’s Arkansas Valley – High Country News

Published

on

Contamination, climate change and political drama stall clean water for Colorado’s Arkansas Valley – High Country News


The western stretch of the Arkansas River, which flows from its headwaters in the Rocky Mountains across the plains of southeastern Colorado, is in trouble. That trouble is compounded by uncertainty about what, exactly, is polluting and drying the river, and how such problems can be fixed. 

Overshadowed by the ongoing political brawl over the Colorado River, the Arkansas River Valley rarely appears in national news. But since Dec. 30, when President Donald Trump vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have secured favorable terms for funding to complete a $1.39 billion, 130-mile water pipeline, the region has become the stage for yet more drama about water in the Western U.S.

The Arkansas Valley Conduit is part of a decades-long effort to replace the dwindling, contaminated water in this stretch of the Arkansas Valley with clean water from Colorado’s Western Slope and the Pueblo Reservoir. If completed, it will supply water to roughly 50,000 valley residents, many of whom can no longer count on municipal supplies for safe drinking water.

Advertisement

Pundits portrayed Trump’s veto as retaliation against Colorado politicians: Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert, who helped force the November vote for the release of the Epstein files, and Democratic Gov. Jared Polis, who has resisted pressure to pardon Tina Peters, a county clerk in western Colorado convicted of tampering with voting machines during the 2020 election. Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, both Democrats, condemned the administration for “putting personal and political grievances ahead of Americans.” The Salida-based Ark Valley Voice declared a “Reign of Retribution Punishing Deep Red Southeastern Colorado.” The New York Times, emphasizing the same irony, observed that “A Trump Veto Leaves Republicans in Colorado Parched and Bewildered.” 

For those managing the project, the veto is a setback but not a showstopper. The first dozen miles of the conduit have already been completed, and enough capital is on hand for at least three more years of construction. “Some (coverage) has been saying it’s the end of the project, which is totally false,” said Chris Woodka, senior policy and issues manager of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District. “It’s still being built; the veto was not for any reason that had anything to do with the project, and we’re working in every way we can to make this affordable.” 

For valley residents, the issue is personal. This rural region is more culturally aligned with western Kansas than with Front Range cities. Like people throughout the Great Plains, the local residents are grappling with eroding social services and the rising cost of living. The scarcity of safe water magnifies uncertainty. “If you don’t have clean water,” said Jack Goble, general manager of the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District and a sixth-generation rancher, “you really don’t have anything.”

A resident prepares to fill jugs with purified water at the Rocky Ford Food Market in Rocky Ford, Colorado. The town’s water supply is contaminated with unsafe levels of radium and uranium. Credit: Michael Ciaglo
Lawrence Armijo, maintenance operator for the town of Manzanola’s water treatment plant. While the plant filters out most toxins, it is not equipped to remove radium and uranium from the groundwater.
Lawrence Armijo, maintenance operator for the town of Manzanola’s water treatment plant. While the plant filters out most toxins, it is not equipped to remove radium and uranium from the groundwater. Credit: Michael Ciaglo

“HOW EASY IT IS,” wrote William Mills in his 1988 book The Arkansas, “to take a river for granted.” 

The Arkansas Valley of Colorado is the ancestral homelands of the Plains Apache, Comanche, Kiowa, Cheyenne and Arapaho peoples. A geographical corridor across the Southern Plains, it was a route for incursions and ethnic cleansing by non-Native fur trappers, traders, military expeditions, hide hunters, railroad developers and settlers. Those settlers include my ancestors; I grew up in southwest Kansas, where generations of my family farmed and ranched along the dry Cimarron River. The Arkansas Valley, with its dwindling water and flatlands, feels like home.

By 1900, settlers had diverted the Arkansas into a maze of ditches. Irrigation and migrant labor supported sugar beet factories, vegetable cultivation and Rocky Ford’s famous melons. Such practices remade the riverbed, increased salinity, and reduced flow. As with the Colorado River, water rights were assigned partly on wishful thinking. Today, the Arkansas Valley is one of the region’s most over-appropriated basins, and the river’s annual flow has dramatically declined. A short distance past the Kansas line, the river is entirely dry.

Advertisement

The Arkansas is being drained in new ways. Climate change and a record-breaking snow drought are intensifying the scarcity. Over the last half-century, growing Front Range cities have purchased water rights from farmers in the valley. Exchange agreements allow cities to swap these rights for ones farther upstream, leaving the downstream flow diminished and dirtier. Between 1978 and 2022, nearly 44% of the irrigated farmland in the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District was taken out of production.

Critics call it “buy-and-dry.” They say the removal of water has disastrous consequences for an agricultural region. “If you take all of that water out of an economy that completely depends on it,” Goble said, “it just breaks a community.” Faced with the prospect of litigation from local water districts, cities like Aurora claim to be developing more sustainable arrangements.

“If you don’t have clean water, you really don’t have anything.”

THE ARKANSAS’ WATER is changing, too. The river is diverted into dozens of canals and fields. What doesn’t evaporate or get absorbed returns as runoff or sinks through the alluvial gravels that connect to the riverbed. Each time a drop of water returns, it carries more dissolved minerals. As the river’s volume lessens, the concentration increases in what is left. By the time the river reaches the Kansas border, the water regularly contains 4,000 milligrams or more per liter — making it about eight times saltier than a typical sports drink and unsuitable for growing many crops.

Minerals are not the only problem. The river basin and alluvial gravels are also contaminated with radium and uranium. Last year, a study by the Colorado Geological Survey found that the levels of radioactivity in more than 60% of the private wells sampled in the valley exceeded federal standards. 

The radionuclides are called “naturally occurring.” But natural uranium usually stays locked in rock. In the valley, irrigated agriculture sets it into motion. Uranium is mobilized by complex interactions between oxygen, sediments, water, microbes and nitrate. Nitrate is a common fertilizer. One study found that valley farmers had over-applied it for decades. This pulls out radionuclides, turns them loose, and flushes them into the river’s shallow aquifer. Levels rise as the river moves east through agricultural lands.

Advertisement

Contamination is not news in the valley. People have worked on cooperative solutions for decades. To meet safe water standards while the conduit is under construction, the towns of La Junta and Las Animas installed filtration systems. But cleaning the water creates hyper-contaminated wastewater, which is currently diluted and poured back into the river.  “The only true solution,” said Bill Long, president of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District board, “is a new source.”

Orlando Rodriguez, Pate Construction foreman, climbs out of a hole where sections of the Arkansas Valley Conduit will be connected.
Orlando Rodriguez, Pate Construction foreman, climbs out of a hole where sections of the Arkansas Valley Conduit will be connected. Credit: Michael Ciaglo

THE CONDUIT WOULD PROVIDE safe water to a region too often disregarded. But the project also raises questions about what can truly be bypassed and what cannot, and about the fate of the river itself.

Near Cañon City, upstream from the conduit, the Lincoln Park/Cotter Superfund site contains a former uranium mill, millions of tons of radioactive waste, coal mineworks and tailing ponds. The site sits less than two miles from the Arkansas River. It is known to be contaminated with the same compounds — radionuclides, selenium, sulfates — that affect communities downstream.  

Local residents have worked for decades to raise awareness and hold a revolving cast of agencies, regulators and owners accountable for the pollution. “It has taken us a lifetime,” said Jeri Fry, co-chair of Colorado Citizens Against Toxic Waste. “As the years have gone by, we have been the ones holding the memory.” 

“The only true solution is a new source.”

Without memory, they say, contamination is normalized as background, treated as an isolated issue, or denied. “We’ve been stonewalled on many of our legitimate concerns,” said Carol Dunn, vice-chairperson of the Lincoln Park/Cotter Community Advisory Group. She believes state regulators avoid testing for fear of uncovering inconvenient facts.

Advertisement

The most inconvenient would suggest connections between contamination in the valley and industrial pollution upstream, which affects not only Cañon City but the communities of Leadville, Pueblo and Fountain Creek. For Fry, all of the known and unknown pressures on the river point to the same fundamental problem. “We are not treating our water as though it is a sacred thing,” she said. “And it is. It’s got to be.” 

Russell Van Dyk, owner of Lloyd’s Ice and Water in Rocky Ford, Colorado, closes up his store at the end of the day. The residents of Rocky Ford and surrounding towns rely on purified drinking water because the area’s groundwater has been contaminated by uranium and radium.
Russell Van Dyk, owner of Lloyd’s Ice and Water in Rocky Ford, Colorado, closes up his store at the end of the day. The residents of Rocky Ford and surrounding towns rely on purified drinking water because the area’s groundwater has been contaminated by uranium and radium. Credit: Michael Ciaglo

We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

This article appeared in the May 2026 print edition of the magazine with the headline “The absence of clean water.”   

This story is part of High Country News’ Conservation Beyond Boundaries project, which is supported by the BAND Foundation and the Mighty Arrow Family Foundation.

Spread the word. News organizations can pick-up quality news, essays and feature stories for free.

Advertisement

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.





Source link

Continue Reading

Colorado

2026 Rockies’ good, bad and tradeable at the season’s quarter mark

Published

on

2026 Rockies’ good, bad and tradeable at the season’s quarter mark


By almost every measure, the 2026 Rockies are better than the ’25 Rockies. And, by almost every measure, the Rockies have a long way to go to become a contending big-league baseball team.

After getting bludgeoned by Kyle Schwarber and shut down by ace lefty Cristopher Sanchez in a 6-0 loss at Philadelphia on Sunday, the Rockies are 16-25 with one-quarter of the season in the books.

Schwarber hit solo home runs in the first and second innings off right-hander Tomoyuki Sugano, who gave up five runs on seven hits over five innings. Sanchez dominated Colorado for seven innings, giving up six hits, striking out seven, and walking none. He reduced his ERA to 2.11.

It was a step back for Colorado, but a week ago, Paul DePodesta, president of baseball operations, said, “We’re certainly encouraged by a lot of what’s going on, but at the same time, far from satisfied.”

Advertisement

Here’s a look at the state of the Rockies at the quarter pole:

• On pace: The Rockies’ .390 winning percentage has them pointed toward a 63-99 record. That would be a 20-game improvement over their 119-loss season in 2025 and enable them to avoid the infamy of being the first team since the 1961-64 Washington Senators to post four consecutive 100-loss seasons.

• White Sox meter: Chicago’s Southsiders lost a major league record 121 games in 2024. At the quarter pole last year, they were a miserable 12-29, but they eventually finished with a 60-102 record. That was a 19-game improvement.

• Road conditions: Colorado was laughably bad on the road last season, going 18-63, averaging just 2.81 runs per game, and getting outscored by 213 runs. The ’26 Rockies no longer look like automatic roadkill. They are 8-14 away from Coors Field but 6-4 over their last 10 games. They are averaging 3.95 runs per game on the road.

• Rotation in motion: The ’25 Rockies finished with a starters ERA of 6.65, the worst in the majors since ERA became an official statistic in 1913. This season’s starters own a 5.27 ERA, still the worst in the majors, but an improvement. Toss out the innings thrown by “openers” and the starters’ ERA is 5.11.

Advertisement

• Ace in the making? Right-hander Chase Dollander, who has the pure best stuff on the staff, is exponentially better this season than last — 3.35 ERA vs. 6.98 ERA as a rookie. On Friday, he held the Phillies to two runs and three hits in 5 2/3 innings, but walked five in the Rockies’ wild, 9-7, 11-inning victory. Dollander’s command was not sharp, but he didn’t implode as he might have last season.

“Every outing is different, for everybody,” Rockies manager Warren Schaeffer told MLB.com. “Today, for Chase, he had to battle command issues, but his stuff is so good that he was able to stay in it. He competed, and he kept grinding without his best command.”

Colorado Rockies’ Chase Dollander pitches during the first inning of a baseball game against the Philadelphia Phillies, Friday, May 8, 2026, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Trade material: Except for Dollander, Colorado’s four other starters are all veterans in the final year of their contracts. That makes them possible trade candidates at the Aug. 3 deadline, if not before.

However, after a strong start to the season, the starters are beginning to fade. Lefty Kyle Freeland (1-4, 6.00 ERA) has a vesting option worth $17 million for 2027, but he needs to pitch 170 innings to activate that option, and it’s doubtful he will. There is a $9 million team option for right-hander Michael Lorenzen, but considering that he is 2-4 with a 6.92 ERA and a 3.56 batting average against, it’s doubtful the Rockies would pick up his option. But are either Lorenzen or Freeland tradeable?

That leaves lefty Jose Quintana (1-2, 3.90 ERA) and Sugano (3-3, 4.07 ERA) as the most attractive trade pieces. And throw in reliever Antonio Senzatela (2-0, 1.11 ERA), too, because he’s also in the final year of his contract.

Advertisement

Somehow, someway, the Rockies are going to have to restock their pitching cupboard for next season and beyond. It’s a predicament that DePodesta and company will have to solve.

Men of mystery: The hope was that this would be corner outfielder Jordan Beck’s breakout season, and that centerfielder Brenton Doyle and shortstop Ezequiel Tovar would bounce back. It’s early, but it’s not happening.

After going 1 for 3 on Sunday, Beck is hitting .169 with a .490 OPS. Doyle (.196, .529, 33.6% strikeout rate) is showing signs of rebounding, as is Tovar (.197, .277, 28.6%), who had two singles on Sunday. Still, the trio is underperforming. Beck and Doyle are often supplanted in the lineup by Mickey Moniak and newcomers Troy Johnston and Jake McCarthy.

The Rockies' Mickey Moniak heads up the first base line after hitting a triple off New York Mets relief pitcher Craig Kimbrel in the eighth inning of a baseball game Monday, May 4, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)
The Rockies’ Mickey Moniak heads up the first base line after hitting a triple off New York Mets relief pitcher Craig Kimbrel in the eighth inning of a baseball game Monday, May 4, 2026, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

After a 1-for-4 performance on Sunday, Moniak is hitting .303 with a 1.004 OPS and leads the Rockies with 11 home runs. Moniak has had hot streaks before with the Angels, but then faded. However, the Rockies believe he can sustain his success.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending