Connect with us

California

Report Details Benefits of California Clean Air Policies

Published

on

Report Details Benefits of California Clean Air Policies


The American Lung Association released its “Living and Breathing in California: Health Benefits of Clean Air Programs” report to illustrate the potential for major health benefits from recently approved clean air policies in California.

California has the worst air pollution challenges in the United States and is home to several of the most polluted cities in the nation. Policies designed to help the Golden State attain health-protective clean air and climate standards will cumulatively provide $200 billion in public health benefits while saving over 20,000 lives over the coming decades. This report is based on a review of California Air Resources Board (CARB) analyses of eleven recently approved regulations related to on-road passenger vehicles and trucks as well as off-road equipment like locomotives, leaf blowers and harbor craft. Each policy is projected to deliver significant health protections, cut climate pollution and advances efforts to deliver clean air to California’s most impacted communities.

“There is no question that California’s clean air programs are designed to save lives,” says Mariela Ruacho, senior clean air advocacy manager for the American Lung Association, “but there is a lot of work ahead if California’s programs are going to truly deliver real-world health protections. California’s budget must continue to reflect lifesaving investments in clean air, zero-emission transportation infrastructure and strong enforcement programs to meet the mark.”

Robust implementation of programs to curb harmful pollution will greatly benefit the health of those in California, especially those with lower incomes and people of color who often face disproportionate pollution burdens. Notably, the policies designed to transition new on-road vehicle sales to zero-emissions or ensure that vehicles are meeting their clean air requirements add up to an estimated $150 billion in health benefits and are projected to save 15,000 lives by cutting pollution. Similarly, policies crafted to clean up sources of off-road pollution including leaf blowers, locomotive operations, ferries and other commercial harbor craft are estimated to provide $54 billion in health benefits and save over 5,400 lives. In addition to these benefits, there are significant cancer risk reductions projected in environmental justice communities.

Advertisement

“California has made great strides in cleaning the air, but much more must be done,” says Dr. Afif El-Hasan, volunteer pediatrician with the American Lung Association. “Especially for kids growing up in the shadow of clouds of diesel exhaust, California must continue to invest in clean air.”

California’s policies are developed through years of public process and debate, and need ongoing attention to ensure they deliver healthier air. Legislative actions to boost state investments in equitable clean air programs must be maintained while regulatory agencies must coordinate to ensure full implementation delivers relief. In addition, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must act swiftly to consider and approve pending and future Clean Air Act waivers to allow implementation of many of the programs included in this report.

“Adoption and successful implementation are two different animals,” says Will Barrett, national senior director of Clean Air Advocacy with the American Lung Association. “The governor, legislature and federal partners must act to ensure the promise of clean air becomes a reality. CARB, EPA and our local air districts must establish standards to protect public health and address health disparities while investing in programs to accelerate pollution clean up.”  

Check out the complete report here.

Advertisement




Source link

California

California gets Bruce Lee Day in a first for US state’s Chinese Americans

Published

on

California gets Bruce Lee Day in a first for US state’s Chinese Americans


Bruce Lee Day aims to honour the San Francisco-born martial arts legend as a cultural bridge and Asian-American icon.

Martial arts icon Bruce Lee will become the first Chinese American in California history to be honoured with an annual namesake day.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law on Tuesday afternoon, officially designating May 17 as Bruce Lee Day.

Advertisement

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Lee was born in San Francisco in 1940 and returned to the city on May 17, 1959, aged 18, after spending his childhood in Hong Kong.

His daughter, Shannon Lee, CEO of the Bruce Lee Foundation, said the honour reflects her father’s enduring legacy as a bridge between cultures.

“From young people who found confidence and possibility in his philosophy, to families who finally saw themselves represented on screen, to athletes who still draw on his teachings of discipline and inner strength, his reach is profound,” she said in a statement.

State Assembly member Matt Haney, who represents San Francisco, called Lee the “epitome of the best of California”.

“At a time when Asian Americans were too often absent from or stereotyped on screen, Bruce Lee helped generations see themselves represented with strength and dignity,” he said.

Advertisement

The Bruce Lee Foundation and Asian-American groups hope Bruce Lee will be celebrated each year with voluntary activities, including cultural exhibits, public events and classroom lessons.

Born to Chinese parents touring the US with an opera, Lee held birthright citizenship. He moved to Hong Kong as an infant, became a child actor, and studied Chinese kung fu before returning to the US in 1959.

He enrolled at the University of Washington in Seattle in 1961, but dropped out to teach martial arts.

In the 1960s, Lee appeared in Hollywood, most notably as Kato in the TV series The Green Hornet, but said studios typecast him in racist roles and paid him less than white actors.

He returned to Hong Kong and starred in martial arts films, including The Big Boss and Fist of Fury.

Advertisement

Lee died tragically in 1973 at the age of 32 after an allergic reaction to pain medication.

His name and likeness remain widely popular.

Fans gather on his birthday, and a treatment he wrote for a television series inspired the HBO Max show “Warrior”.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

As fireworks pop off for July 4, which are legal to use in California?

Published

on

As fireworks pop off for July 4, which are legal to use in California?


play

Each year, fireworks light up the sky across the United States for the nation’s Independence Day. With 2026 marking the nation’s 250th birthday, fireworks shows may be a bigger draw.

With California being so fire-prone, the state has strict fireworks laws, but does that mean that people won’t enjoy fireworks without risking jail time on July 4?

Advertisement

Are fireworks illegal in California?

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or CalFire, is the agency in charge of managing fireworks and classifying which ones are safe to light.

The California Fireworks Law was passed in 1938 and designated the Office of the State Fire Marshal as the only fireworks classification authority in the state, according to CalFire.

The fire marshal’s office classifies fireworks through lab analysis and field testing. It also requires that all parties dealing in fireworks, such as pyrotechnic operators, manufacturers, and retailers, have licensing.

Along with the aforementioned law, the State’s Explosive Law authorizes the fire marshal to “adopt regulations for the safe use, handling, storage and transportation of explosives,” CalFire says.

Advertisement

“Safe and Sane” fireworks are less likely to cause injury and generally mean that the fireworks do not explode or fly, according to the City of Fontana.

There are almost 300 communities in the state that allow “Safe and Sane” fireworks.

It is illegal in the state to sell, transport, or use fireworks that don’t carry the “Safe and Sane” seal or use any in a nonpermitted community. If convicted, you can face a fine up to $50,000, a year in jail or both, according to CalFire.

All other fireworks are considered illegal in the state and are prohibited from being operated by unauthorized parties in most jurisdictions.

Some illegal fireworks include:

Advertisement
  • Wire Core Sparklers
  • Sky rockets
  • Bottle rockets
  • Roman candles
  • Aerial shells
  • Firecrackers
  • Other fireworks that explode, go into the air, or move on the ground in an “uncontrollable manner.”

How to safely use fireworks

CalFire has put out a list of safety tips to avoid injury when handling fireworks.

CalFire recommends:

  • Use only State Fire Marshal-approved fireworks
  • Verify local ordinances before purchasing or using fireworks.
  • Always read the directions on labels.
  • Children should always have an adult present.
  • Only use fireworks outdoors.
  • Avoid using fireworks near dry grass or other flammable materials.
  • Only light one firework at a time.
  • Have a bucket of water and a hose nearby in case of fire.
  • During a drought, it is recommended that you use a bucket of reused water to submerge your firework after use to ensure it’s completely extinguished.
  • Never place any part of your body directly over a fireworks device when lighting the fuse.
  • Back up several feet immediately after lighting a firework.
  • Never point or throw fireworks at another person.
  • Never attempt to relight or fix fireworks.
  • Never experiment with fireworks.
  • Do not wear loose-fitting clothing while lighting fireworks.
  • Never carry fireworks in your pockets.

Ernesto Centeno Araujo covers breaking news for the Ventura County Star. He can be reached at ecentenoaraujo@vcstar.com, 805-437-0224 or @ecentenoaraujo on Instagram and X.





Source link

Continue Reading

California

California bill to block registered sex offenders from local office rejected by Senate committee

Published

on

California bill to block registered sex offenders from local office rejected by Senate committee


FRESNO, Calif. (KFSN) — California bill aimed at preventing registered sex offenders from holding local elected office was halted Tuesday after a Senate committee declined to advance the measure without changes opposed by its author.

Assembly Bill 2753, introduced by Assemblywoman Esmeralda Soria in February, would have prohibited anyone who is or has been required to register as a sex offender from running for local elective office.

“This issue is critical. We have heard loud and clear from the community that we must do something,” Soria said.

The proposal came to a stop in the Senate Elections Committee, where lawmakers argued the bill’s restrictions were too broad.

Advertisement

California’s sex offender registration system is divided into three tiers. Tier 1 offenders are generally required to register for 10 years, Tier 2 offenders for 20 years and Tier 3 offenders for life.

According to Soria, committee members proposed limiting the bill to Tier 3 offenders. She rejected those amendments, arguing that the legislation should apply more broadly.

“For this not to be the law today, where we’re banning people that have committed some of the most horrific crimes against children, against other people, you know, and we have survivors out there, I think it’s a disservice,” Soria said.

The bill had attracted significant support before reaching the Senate. It was backed by the Fresno City Council and passed the Assembly floor in April.

Fresno City Council President Nelson Esparza traveled to Sacramento to testify in favor of the measure and said he was disappointed by the outcome.

Advertisement

“I call it really a gut punch for our community, and what we had experienced here, and sort of the upheaval… I don’t think we want that to happen again here at Fresno,” Esparza said.

Esparza referenced controversy earlier this year involving registered sex offender Rene Campos, who sought a seat on the Fresno City Council but ultimately did not qualify for the ballot.

Opponents of the bill argued that candidacies should be decided by voters rather than restricted by law.

“It should be a decision made by the voters, so a person should not be barred from running for office and let the voters make the decision that makes the most sense for them,” said civil rights attorney Janice Bellucci.

With the committee declining to move the bill forward under its current language, efforts to enact the proposed restrictions have stalled for now.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 KFSN-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending