California
Proposed regulations threaten on-demand pay benefits in California
One new benefit California employers are using to attract workers is something called Earned Wage Access (EWA). EWA—also known as on-demand pay—gives employees access to their earned wages before a traditional, scheduled payday.
Many on-demand pay platforms link into an employer’s payroll system. Workers can log in and see how much pay they have accrued. If a worker needs money to pay for an unexpected cost, they can tap into their wages ahead of payday. Most on-demand pay providers offer next-day deposits for free. Instant access typically comes with a small ATM-like fee.
Employees have reported using on-demand pay for a variety of reasons. Testimonials have highlighted how access to earned wages can help workers pay bills on time without incurring late fees, or pick up new prescriptions, or help manage the many unforeseen costs that come with raising kids.
Employers that offer the benefit include major national retail chains like the Kroger family of grocery stores, as well as hospitality and healthcare leaders like Los Angeles-based Behavior Frontiers. This last company took the initiative to offer earned wage access benefits in 2022 to boost employees’ financial health and mental wellness.
Research shows on-demand pay benefits both employers and employees. One 2022 study by payroll provider ADP found 96 percent of employers who offer on-demand pay had an easier time attracting talent. In another study, 95 percent of employees with access to on-demand pay stopped or reduced use of payday loans.
As on-demand pay has grown in popularity, so too has government interest in regulating the product. Proposed regulations in California carry major consequences. In May of 2023, the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) began the process of drafting rules to regulate on-demand pay in the state.
For California employers and workers, DFPI’s proposed regulations are bad news, as they would treat earned wage access as a loan. If enacted, the regulations would take a simple benefit with transparent, low fees and turn it into a complex lending product.
Shoe-horning an innovative benefit like on-demand pay into California’s legacy credit regulations does not make sense. This classification would hurt consumers by encouraging new terms, fees, and penalties. It would also make the benefit more complex and less attractive for employers to offer.
The Los Angeles County Business Federation “BizFed,” an advocacy alliance that unites 240 diverse business organizations representing 420,000 employers with 5 million employees in Southern California, urged state regulators to modify their proposal. BizFed supports DFPI’s attempt to put safeguards around on-demand pay but believe a product shown to help both employers and workers deserves tailored regulations.
The good news is that DFPI has options at its disposal. The on-demand pay industry has proposed a common-sense compromise that allows employers to continue offering the benefit without a lending classification. This solution, which also guarantees clear fee disclosures and bans interest, late fees and debt collections, keeps things simple for both consumers and businesses.
DFPI is expected to finalize its on-demand pay rules soon. California employers and employees who have come to rely on on-demand pay are counting on regulators to acknowledge the negative consequences of treating the product as a loan.
Regulations that squelch job growth are not in the state’s best interests. DFPI must pivot to a plan that accommodates earned wage access benefits. If the department is not capable of mapping out a more productive path, employers and employees are depending on Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature to step in with solutions.
Tracy Hernandez is Founding CEO of the Los Angeles County Business Federation, widely known as “BizFed.”
California
California Continues Targeting Food Additives, Dyes With Executive Order on Ultra-Processed Foods
California Governor Gavin Newsom has issued an executive order that mandates state agencies explore the food safety of ultra-processed foods, food dyes, and “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) ingredients, and recommend actions to mitigate the adverse health effects.
The executive order characterizes ultra-processed foods and ingredients as “industrial formulations of chemically modified substances extracted from foods, along with additives to enhance taste, texture, appearance, and durability, with minimal to no inclusion of whole foods.” Common examples include packaged snacks, chips, crackers, cookies, candy, sugary beverages, and highly processed meats like hot dogs and lunch meats. It also calls attention to the myriad chemicals, such as food colorants, authorized for food use in the U.S., claiming that more than 10,000 such substances are currently present in the U.S. food supply, in comparison to the 300 authorized for use in the EU.
Many food chemicals enter the nation’s food supply through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) GRAS process, which lawmakers and scientists have criticized as a “loophole” allowing potentially toxic additives in food. In a recent article by Harvard medical and law experts, the authors called GRAS a “laissez-faire approach to monitoring the safety of ingredients” that poses a threat to public health.
In this context, California has passed several precedent-setting pieces of state legislation on chemical food additives and colorants in recent years, such as the California Food Safety Act and the California School Food Safety Act.
Continuing state efforts to crack down on chemical food additives, Gov. Newsom’s latest executive order includes, but is not limited to, the following mandates:
- No later than April 1, 2025, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) will provide recommendations to the Governor’s office regarding potential actions to limit the harms associated with ultra-processed foods and food ingredients that pose a public health risk (e.g., the inclusion of warning labels on certain ultra-processed foods)
- The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), in consultation with CDPH, will investigate the adverse human health impacts of food dyes, and provide a briefing to the Governor’s office no later than April 1
- No later than April 1, CDPH and OEHHA will report to the Governor’s office on the feasibility of state-level evaluation of food additives considered GRAS, as well as state actions that can be taken if companies fail to notify FDA of certain food additives through the GRAS process
The executive order also includes actions aimed at decreasing the purchase of ultra-processed foods; increasing access to healthy foods; and improving the nutrition of and increasing the amount of fresh, local-grown ingredients used in California school meals.
Some groups have previously criticized California’s approach to food additives regulation for leading the charge on an emerging patchwork of state regulations, however. For example, prior to the passage of the California School Food Safety Act, the Consumer Brands Association (CBA) stated, “[The bill] sets a dangerous precedent for state politicians to substitute their own views on food safety ahead of the scientists and risk-based review system that stringently protects America’s food supply. Americans deserve unified guidance that follows the science, not a patchwork of confusing laws.”
California
High wind warning for California for Tuesday and Wednesday, according to the NWS
California
Perry, real-life donkey who inspired iconic 'Shrek' character, dies at 30
Monday, January 6, 2025 12:57AM
Perry, a famous donkey from Palo Alto that helped inspire the movie character “Donkey” in “Shrek,” has died.
PALO ALTO, Calif. — A famous donkey from California that helped inspire the movie character “Donkey” in “Shrek” has died.
Perry was 30 years old.
In an Instagram post, BPDonkeys, wrote on Friday, “We are heartbroken to share that our beloved Barron Park donkey, Perry, passed away yesterday at the age of 30. He was a beloved member of our community and we know many people will be touched by his passing. Memorial plans will be announced soon.”
Perry resided at Cornelis Bol Park in Palo Alto, California and served as a support animal.
Paying for his care, and for the other donkeys, slowly became a point of controversy overtime. The city faced a budget deficit last year. A city councilmember pushed back at paying tens of thousands of dollars.
A memorial will be held for Perry at a later date.
Copyright © 2025 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business6 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture6 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports5 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics4 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics4 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics2 days ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?