California
Majority of California renters aren’t backing rent control plan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5735b/5735b0efca82e5e5e401441cb155c52a1c819f7f" alt="Majority of California renters aren’t backing rent control plan Majority of California renters aren’t backing rent control plan"
A majority of Californian renters do not support a proposal to allow local authorities to enforce rent control, according to a new poll.
Ahead of the November election, Californians will have a few propositions on the ballot. One of the proposals, Proposition 33, calls for giving local authorities more power to enact rent control ordinances.
A 3,000-person Berkeley IGS Poll discovered that 37 percent of voters would support the initiative, 36 percent said they were against the proposition, and 27 percent were undecided.
However, there wasn’t necessarily stronger support for the law when it came to renters specifically.
While 48 percent of renters said they would vote for the proposal, 26 percent said they were against the idea, and another 26 percent were undecided.
Alan Chang, a title and escrow expert, said this lack of support could be due to the long-term negative impact of rent control on the renter population.
Chang called Proposition 33 a “short-term effort to appear like they are doing something about housing affordability.”
“Ultimately, rent ends up being high when there is more demand than supply,” Chang told Newsweek. “If you improve the supply of rental housing units, the rent goes down. Adding restrictions to the amount of rent a landlord can charge as well as how much they can raise rents will generally dissuade them to build more as they could not predict the costs down the road.”
Many voters are weary of the promise that rent controls would automatically eliminate concerns over higher living costs, said Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin.
“While rental controls in other locations have stabilized the average yearly increases in rent, they’ve had largely negative implications outside of those limits,” Beene told Newsweek.
“Establishing controls not only limits the development of new rental properties because potential landlords now question the economic promise they would normally bring, but they also lead to less mobility, as renters enjoying the controlled pricing are less likely to leave that property and, in the process, open it up to new renters. There’s a lot more to consider here than just saving a few dollars on your rent,” he said.
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images
Some tenants may also be homeowners who rent out a property they can afford while renting a place in a pricier location.
Other renters might generally be against the government intervening in how the market functions, said Kevin Thompson, a finance expert and the founder and CEO of 9i Capital Group.
“I believe many have seen these policies enacted in other states and heard stories of landlords neglecting properties, which can lead to higher crime rates,” Thompson told Newsweek. “The history of rent control is mixed. While it’s helped prevent skyrocketing rents in places like New York, it has also left behind dilapidated buildings.”
The median rent in California is $2,850, according to Zillow, and the state continues to boast some of the most competitive housing markets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6781a/6781a0fd8834eed59ed9ab9ebc47c1517b716739" alt=""
California
California Gov. Newsom launches homeless accountability website
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69457/69457232f4b03edb65aefc735ad96de2ed5f441c" alt="California Gov. Newsom launches homeless accountability website California Gov. Newsom launches homeless accountability website"
SACRAMENTO — Governor Gavin Newsom launched a new state website Monday offering Californians a way to track county progress on the homeless crisis.
The website provides county-by-county snapshots of spending on behavioral health, homelessness, and housing. The website provides information on spending in all 58 counties across the state.
“We’ll continue to update this tool and we want to make sure this is a dynamic tool and it actually adds value, gives people meaning, gives them a little more sense of confidence that good things are happening at the local level, but not everywhere,” Newsom said during a virtual press conference to launch the website.
The California State Association of Counties shared a statement shortly after the announcement, calling the website a “spin without substance to back it up.”
“Counties aren’t the bottleneck to addressing housing and homelessness. The real barriers to progress are the state-mandated bureaucratic hurdles that slow local governments down, forcing them to navigate a maze to get resources on the ground.” the California State Association of Counties said.
The announcement also came with Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention funding to support local homelessness efforts, tied to performance benchmarks and the ability for the state to withhold funding allocations if local communities do not make progress.
California
'Limited to no impact': Why a pro-housing group says California’s pro-housing laws aren’t producing more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6692a/6692ac6a14d3d75e302972306bd74b8b618eb193" alt="'Limited to no impact': Why a pro-housing group says California’s pro-housing laws aren’t producing more 'Limited to no impact': Why a pro-housing group says California’s pro-housing laws aren’t producing more"
In summary
A passel of recent California laws were supposed to supercharge the construction of desperately needed housing. According to YIMBY Law, they haven’t even come close.
One California law was supposed to flip defunct strip malls across California into apartment-lined corridors.
Another was designed to turn under-used church parking lots into fonts of new affordable housing.
A third would, according to supporters and opponents alike, “end single-family zoning as we know it.”
Fast-forward to 2025 and this spate of recent California laws, and others like it intended to supercharge the construction of desperately needed housing, have had “limited to no impact on the state’s housing supply.”
That damning conclusion comes from a surprising source: A new report by YIMBY Law, a pro-development nonprofit that would very much like to see these laws work.
The analysis, released today, studied five state laws passed since 2021 that have swept away regulatory barriers to building apartment buildings and other dense residential developments in places where such housing has been historically barred.
The laws under review include:
- SB 9 from 2021, which allows people to split their single-family homes into duplexes, thus ending single-family-home-only zoning across California. In practice, according to the report, building permits for only 140 units were issued under the law in 2023.
- AB 2011 from 2022 was designed to make it easier for developers to convert office parks, strip malls and parking lots into apartment buildings. In 2023, developers on just two projects were given local regulatory approval to start work under the law. In 2024, the total was eight. The report found no projects that have made use of SB 6, a similar bill passed that same year but with stricter labor requirements.
- SB 4 from 2024, the so-called Yes In God’s Backyard law, which lets churches, other houses of worship and some schools to repurpose their land for affordable housing. The report found no takers on that bill too.
“It’s grim,” said Sonja Trauss, executive director of YIMBY Law. Though she acknowledged some of the laws are still new, she blamed their early ineffectiveness on the legislative process which saddled these bills with unworkable requirements and glaring loopholes.
“Everybody wants a piece,” she said. “The pieces taken out during the process wind up derailing the initial concept.”
What are these requirements and loopholes that have prevented these laws from succeeding? Maybe not surprisingly, they are the frequent objects of critique by YIMBY Law and the Yes In My Backyard movement more generally.
One is the inclusion of requirements that developers only hire union-affiliated workers or pay their workers higher wages.
Another are affordability mandates which force developers to sell or rent the units they build at below-market prices.
A third is the strenuous opposition by local governments and the failure of these state laws to override it. In the two years following the passage of SB 9, for example, YIMBY Law tracked 140 local ordinances that, in the view of the report, were “designed to reduce or prevent” the bill from working on the ground. They included tight limits on the size of buildings, affordability requirements, or restrictions on which types of owners can make use of the law.
“The ADU boom stands alone. No other form of housing production took off in California during this period.”Law paper by UC Davis professor Chris Elmendorf and UC Santa Barbara professor Clayton Nall
Last year, the state Legislature passed a “clean up” bill meant to void some of these local add-ons.
There are plenty of other possible impediments to construction in California, which may explain why these bills have seen such tepid uptake. Sky high interest rates, chronic shortages of construction workers and high material costs (all of which could be exacerbated by current or expected changes to federal tariff, immigration and fiscal policy) all work to make residential housing development a less appealing financial proposition. Insufficient public funds and expected cuts to federal housing programs may weigh down on the affordable housing sector too.
But the report is not the first to point to the preconditions and omissions included in so many of the state’s legislative efforts to goose housing development as the reason for their lack of impact.
In a recent law paper, UC Davis law professor Chris Elmendorf and UC Santa Barbara political scientist Clayton Nall wrote that the relative success of California’s efforts to boost the construction of accessory dwelling units is the exception that proves the rule. Over the last decade, a cavalcade of state laws have stripped local governments of their ability to subject backyard cottage projects with environmental review mandates, significant fees, affordability mandates, union-hire rules, confining size or aesthetic limitations or added parking requirements.
“The ADU boom stands alone. No other form of housing production took off in California during this period,” the authors wrote. A likely reason why, they argue, is that ADU projects don’t come with nearly as many strings attached as other forms of dense development permitted by various California laws.
In 2023, the state permitted more than 28,000 ADUs, according to state data.
The history of ADU legislation in California is instructive, said Trauss. “It took about like five years of revisions before they were really getting going.”
The YIMBY Law report is based on self-reported permitting data submitted by cities and counties to the California Housing and Community Development department. The nonprofit complemented that messy database with its own internal collection harvested from its own litigation and activism. That means the data on what is actually getting built — and therefore how effective any of these laws really are — is imperfect.
That fact isn’t lost on many legislators.
The Assembly housing committee’s first hearing of the year was dedicated not to new legislation, but to evaluating the state’s existing “pro-production” laws.
“We shouldn’t just keep passing more and more bills just because we can,” Chair Matt Haney, a San Francisco Democrat, said. “We should actually look at what is working, why it’s working, how we can do more of what’s working and if it’s not working, we should do more to fix it or change it.”
Source link
California
New program aims to boost salmon in Northern California river
For the first time in more 80 years, Chinook salmon are swimming in the North Yuba River in Northern California thanks to an innovative wildlife program.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, along with federal and local agencies, launched a pilot program to reintroduce Chinook salmon into their historic spawning grounds in the North Yuba River in Plumas County. This stretch of cool water, according to the state, is considered some of the highest quality and most climate-resilient in California.
But Chinook salmon disappeared from the waterway after the construction of the Englebright Dam prevented fish from swimming upstream.
In October, the state Department of Fish and Wildlife constructed a series of nests along the 12-mile stretch of gravel riverbed and then filled them with fertilized Chinook salmon eggs from a nearby hatchery. Four months later, these salmon eggs have begun to hatch and the first young salmon were observed Feb. 11, according to the state Department of Fish and Wildlife.
“The North Yuba represents a really unique location for us. Between the main stem and its tributaries there is somewhere around 40 to 50 miles of habitat that is ideal for spring-run Chinook salmon for holding, spawning and rearing,” said Colin Purdy, a fisheries environmental program manager for the state. “If we can develop this pilot effort into a full reintroduction program, we would be able to more than double the amount of available salmon habitat in the Yuba River watershed. And that’s a huge win for spring-run Chinook salmon.”
The state project is one of many initiatives that aim to reintroduce salmon to California’s cold-water habitats upstream of dams and other fish barriers. This includes several dam removal projects, including along the Klamath River, the largest dam removal in U.S. history.
However, unlike the Klamath River, there are no plans to remove dams in the Yuba River, which the state says are critical to maintaining water supply and flood protection. Because dams will remain in place, the state is collecting the newly hatched Chinook salmon in the North Yuba River, and they will be trucked downstream and released in the lower Yuba River, where they can continue their migration to the Pacific Ocean.
“This is a habitat that salmon haven’t been into for a long time so we have very little data to understand how salmon will respond,” Purdy said. “… So there are a number of different things that we’re going to be able to learn from this.”
-
Culture1 week ago
The impact of being only player from your country to play in the Premier League
-
Technology1 week ago
YouTube TV has a deal to keep Paramount content
-
Culture1 week ago
Tilted Axis Press Took a Big Risk on Translated Literature. It Paid Off.
-
Politics1 week ago
Some Dems already turning on Hogg two weeks into DNC vice chair gig: report
-
Culture1 week ago
Q&A: Rose Zhang on her TGL investment, the LPGA’s future and slow play
-
News6 days ago
Kamala Harris Has Scrambled the California Governor’s Race Without Entering It
-
Business1 week ago
One Fix for Ailing Movie Theaters? Becoming Nonprofits.
-
Politics1 week ago
Top federal agency exposed for spending billions on migrants in a single year