Connect with us

California

Feinstein, Padilla, Booker, Stabenow to Secretary Vilsack: Support California Prop 12

Published

on


Washington—Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) right now referred to as on Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to help California’s Proposition 12 earlier than the Supreme Courtroom.

In 2018, California voters handed Proposition 12, which set humane requirements for farm animal merchandise bought in California. Final month, the Supreme Courtroom agreed to listen to Nationwide Pork Producers Council v. Ross, a lawsuit difficult Proposition 12.

“Given the impacts of the legislation, we urge your Division to help California and different states that prohibit gross sales of a product with the intent of defending the well being and security of shoppers inside their state,” the senators wrote. “States shouldn’t be stripped of their authority to mitigate the hurt that inhumane farm animal confinement poses to animals, folks, and the surroundings.

“Additional, overturning this common California legislation would battle with longstanding judicial precedent and jeopardize established well being, security, environmental safety, and animal welfare laws in dozens of states.  In our federal system, states have important autonomy within the institution of social and financial coverage in a spread of areas, from local weather change (e.g., use of renewable power), to labor, to air pollution (e.g., necessary recycled-content legal guidelines).  Increasing the Dormant Commerce Clause as NPPC seeks to do on this case would have ramifications far past the pork, hen, and veal industries.”

Advertisement

Full textual content of the letter is obtainable right here and under: 

April 15, 2022 

The Honorable Thomas J. Vilsack
Secretary
U.S. Division of Agriculture
1400 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20250

Pricey Secretary Vilsack:

We write to induce you to help California’s Proposition 12 earlier than the Supreme Courtroom, and to help all states’ authority to guard the well-being of their residents and animal welfare. As you already know, on March 28, 2022, the Supreme Courtroom agreed to listen to Nationwide Pork Producers Council v. Ross, the Nationwide Pork Producers Council’s (NPPC) problem to California’s Proposition 12 that units humane requirements for farm animal merchandise bought in California.  This legislation is meant to forestall animal cruelty, shield the well being and security of California shoppers, and reduce the danger of foodborne sickness by phasing out excessive strategies of farm animal confinement. California’s Proposition 12 solely regulates in-state gross sales of sure pork merchandise at challenge on this case (in addition to in-state gross sales of sure egg and veal merchandise) and doesn’t regulate out-of-state producers. 

Advertisement

We imagine that the earlier Administration’s place on California’s Proposition 12 was based mostly on a false impression of the legislation. As is said within the poll measure textual content itself, the aim of Proposition 12 was not solely to enhance animal welfare, however to “section out excessive strategies of farm animal confinement, which additionally threaten the well being and security of California shoppers, and improve the danger of foodborne sickness and related destructive fiscal impacts on the State of California.” Given the impacts of the legislation, we urge your Division to help California and different states that prohibit gross sales of a product with the intent of defending the well being and security of shoppers inside their state.  States shouldn’t be stripped of their authority to mitigate the hurt that inhumane farm animal confinement poses to animals, folks, and the surroundings.

Additional, overturning this common California legislation would battle with longstanding judicial precedent and jeopardize established well being, security, environmental safety, and animal welfare laws in dozens of states.  In our federal system, states have important autonomy within the institution of social and financial coverage in a spread of areas, from local weather change (e.g., use of renewable power), to labor, to air pollution (e.g., necessary recycled-content legal guidelines).  Increasing the Dormant Commerce Clause as NPPC seeks to do on this case would have ramifications far past the pork, hen, and veal industries.

Contemplating the intense and unnecessary threats to animal welfare and states’ authority to guard the well-being of their residents, we request that you just help California’s Proposition 12 in additional actions by your Division earlier than the Supreme Courtroom.  Thanks on your consideration of our request. 

Sincerely,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator 

Advertisement

Alex Padilla
United States Senator 

Cory Booker
United States Senator 

Debbie Stabenow
United States Senator

###



Source link

Advertisement

California

Laura Richardson completes a political comeback, winning tight race to represent South L.A. in the California Capitol

Published

on

Laura Richardson completes a political comeback, winning tight race to represent South L.A. in the California Capitol


Laura Richardson emerged the victor of the competitive, costly and feisty election to win a South Los Angeles seat in the state Senate — completing her political comeback more than 10 years after a tumultuous tenure in the House of Representatives.

Richardson narrowly won the race against Michelle Chambers, a community justice advocate who faced accusations of misconduct in prior public office. The Associated Press called the race Friday after weeks of ballot counting.

The contest between two Democrats with similar social policies but differing views on crime and business attracted huge spending by special interests.

Independent expenditure committees poured more than $7.6 million into the race, making it the most expensive election for state Legislature this year, according to California Target Book, a political database. Negative campaigning dominated the race as business interests and labor unions battled for their favored candidate.

Advertisement

Richardson, a moderate Democrat, will join a Democratic supermajority in the Legislature. But Republicans are on track to flip three legislative seats this year, one in the Senate and two in the Assembly.

Richardson’s biggest supporters were businesses, including PACs funded by oil companies, and law enforcement associations that said they advocated for candidates who shared their beliefs on free enterprise and public safety. Meanwhile, Chambers’ biggest portion of support came from healthcare workers and teachers unions, who spent millions of dollars backing her.

Chambers wrote in a statement she was “proud of the campaign we ran,” thanking supporters who canvassed, phone-banked or cast votes for her “vision of better jobs, better wages and a California that works for everybody, not just the wealthy and well-connected.”

“This was the closest state senate race in the state, but unfortunately it appears that we will fall just short of victory,” she added. “Our people-powered efforts were not quite enough to overcome millions of dollars in outside spending on lies from the oil and tobacco industry and their allies.“

Richardson will succeed Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) in the 35th District, which encompasses the cities of Carson, Compton and stretches down to the harbor. Bradford, who had endorsed Chambers, said he believed both candidates were “qualified to do the job.”

Advertisement

Bradford, who championed reparations legislation during his tenure, hoped the future senator would be “willing to meet with all factions of the community, because it’s a great diverse need in this district.”

“I’m also deeply sad to see how negative this campaign was, probably one of the most negative campaigns I’ve experienced in my 30-plus years of being involved with elections,” he said. “I just hope that we can come together after such a negative campaign, regardless of who the victor is, and understand that we have to work together.”

Richardson and Chambers took aim at each other’s past controversies. For Chambers, who had picked up the endorsement of various state and local elected officials, opposition groups seized on a criminal misdemeanor charge from 30 years ago. She was also accused of bullying and intimidation from her time as a Compton City Council member, allegations that she has repeatedly denied.

Richardson faced criticism over her tenure in Congress, where a House Ethics Committee investigation found her guilty in 2012 of compelling congressional staff to work on her campaign. The committee report also accused Richardson of obstructing the committee investigation “through the alteration or destruction of evidence” and “the deliberate failure to produce documents.”

Richardson admitted to wrongdoing, according to the report, and accepted a reprimand and $10,000 fine for the violations. She previously said that during her time in Congress, Republicans frequently targeted members of the Black Caucus. After she lost her reelection bid for a fourth term, Richardson said she worked at an employment firm to improve her managerial skills and has recognized previous mistakes.

Advertisement

“It’s been said voters are very forgiving, and if you stand up and you accept responsibility and you improve in the work that you do — we need people who’ve been through things, who understand what it’s like to have had difficulties,” she previously told The Times. “And so that’s exactly what I did. I didn’t shy away from it.”



Source link

Continue Reading

California

72-hour rain totals across Northern California

Published

on

72-hour rain totals across Northern California


72-hour rain totals across Northern California – CBS Sacramento

Watch CBS News


Here is a look at how much rain has accumulated across Northern California as of Friday night.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Magnitude 3.5 earthquake recorded in Malibu, California Friday afternoon

Published

on

Magnitude 3.5 earthquake recorded in Malibu, California Friday afternoon


An earthquake shook along the Southern California coast Friday afternoon.

The earthquake reportedly occurred in Malibu, west of Los Angeles, at 2:15 p.m. local time, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

The temblor, which was recorded at a depth of nearly 6 miles, measured a preliminary magnitude of 3.5.

It was not immediately clear if there was any damage.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending