Connect with us

California

California passes ban on plastic grocery bags again, this time nixing thicker plastic bags

Published

on

California passes ban on plastic grocery bags again, this time nixing thicker plastic bags


California lawmakers have passed a second plastic bag ban after admitting the state’s first ban failed its goal of reducing plastic waste.

State Sen. Catherine Blakespear, D-Encinitas, and Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, D-Orinda, told The Los Angeles Times more sweeping legislation was needed to address a “loophole” in the initial legislation, which actually led consumers to use more plastic over the past decade.

The Democrats’ new proposal, offered in bills Senate Bill 1053 and Assembly Bill 2236, revises the state’s single-use bag ban to stop grocery stores from selling thicker plastic grocery bags and requires grocery stores to only offer recycled paper bags at checkout. 

The legislation was passed in late August and now sits on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk awaiting his signature. If signed into law, the ban would become effective in 2026.

Advertisement

California’s new plastic bag ban would only pertain to checkout bags at grocery stores. (Photo by ROMEO GACAD/AFP via Getty Images) (Getty Images)

CALIFORNIA PLASTIC BAG BAN LED TO MORE PLASTIC WASTE, CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP CLAIMS

“Instead of being asked do you want paper or plastic at checkout, consumers will simply be asked if they want a paper bag,” Blakespear told the Times. “This easy change eliminates plastic bags from the point of sale and helps California significantly reduce the plastic waste that is contaminating our environment and waters.”

In 2014, the Golden State passed SB 270, a statewide ban on single-use plastic bags at grocery, drug and convenience stores, in efforts to reduce the amount of plastic waste and encourage the public to use reusable bags. However, Democrats admitted the plastic bag ban failed to reduce waste, because consumers would opt to pay a small fee for the heavier “reusable” plastic bags offered by grocery stores instead. However, consumers typically threw these bags away.

As a result, consumer advocacy group CALPIRG claimed there’s been a 47% jump in plastic bag waste tonnage over the past decade.

Advertisement

“157,385 tons of plastic bag waste was discarded in California the year the law was passed. By 2022, however, the tonnage of discarded plastic bags had skyrocketed to 231,072 — a 47% jump. Even accounting for an increase in population, the number rose from 4.08 tons per 1,000 people in 2014 to 5.89 tons per 1,000 people in 2022,” the Times said of the report’s findings in February.

The new legislation received support from both environmental groups and the California Grocers Association, the Times report said.

The paper pleaded for lawmakers to pass the “do-over” plastic ban in an editorial last month.

Delivery to senior man

California grocery stores would only be allowed to sell paper bags at checkout under the new bill. (iStock)

LA TIMES ADMITS CALIFORNIA PLASTIC BAG BANS ACTUALLY MADE WASTE PROBLEM WORSE: ‘UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES’

“Retailers handed them out like candy, and consumers couldn’t have recycled them even if they wanted to. No recycling facility in the state accepts these bags,” the editorial read.

Advertisement

“This can’t go on,” it continued. “We need a do-over — a second plastic bag ban that fulfills the promise that lawmakers made in 2014 by passing Senate Bill 270, and that voters embraced two years later when they rejected an industry-led ballot measure to overturn it.”

An alliance of California recyclers and manufacturers announced they were disappointed by the bills.

“This ill-advised approval will create a cascade of problems for every Californian. These lawmakers chose to enact legislation that they know is flawed despite specific examples, studies, and polls that show banning plastic film grocery bags hurts consumers, businesses, is not what Californians want, and does not help the environment or limit plastic waste,” Roxanne Spiekerman, spokesperson for the RRA and Vice President of Public Affairs for PreZero US, said in a statement.

Fox News’ Kendall Tietz contributed to this report.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California will require insurers to offer home coverage in wildfire-prone areas

Published

on

California will require insurers to offer home coverage in wildfire-prone areas


Insurance companies that stopped providing home coverage to hundreds of thousands of Californians in recent years as wildfires became more destructive will have to again provide policies in fire-prone areas if they want to keep doing business in the state.

The new state regulation, announced on Monday, will require home insurers to offer coverage in high-risk areas, something the state has never done, the office of the California insurance commissioner, Ricardo Lara, said in a statement.

Insurers will have to start increasing their coverage by 5% every two years until they hit the equivalent of 85% of their market share. That means if an insurer writes 20 out of every 100 state policies, they’d need to write 17 in a high-risk area, Lara’s office said.

Major insurers such as State Farm and Allstate have stopped writing new policies in California due to fears of huge losses from wildfires and other natural disasters.

Advertisement

In exchange for increasing coverage, the state will let insurance companies pass on the costs of reinsurance to California consumers. Insurance companies typically buy reinsurance to avoid huge payouts in case of natural disasters or catastrophic loss. California is the only state that doesn’t already allow the cost of reinsurance to be borne by policyholders, according to Lara’s office.

Opponents of the rule say that could increase premiums by 40% and doesn’t require new policies to be written at a fast enough pace. The state did not provide a cost analysis for the potential impact on consumers.

“This plan is of the insurance industry, by the insurance industry and for the industry,” Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog, said in a statement.

The requirement is under review by California’s office of administrative law before it takes effect within 30 days.

“Californians deserve a reliable insurance market that doesn’t retreat from communities most vulnerable to wildfires and climate change,” Lara said in a statement. “This is a historic moment for California.”

Advertisement

The new rule is part of Lara’s effort to persuade insurers to continue doing business in the country’s most populous state. He presented another rule earlier this month to let insurers consider the climate crisis when setting their prices. Insurance companies have said that because they can’t consider the climate crisis in their rates, many opted to either pause or restrict new business in the state. The new rule to include the climate crisis in rates will take effect later this week.

The ultimate goal of the new rules is to get homeowners out of the California Fair Access to Insurance Requirements (Fair) plan, which often serves as the last resort when insurance companies stop providing coverage for those living in areas threatened by wildfires, Lara’s office said. The Fair plan could help a homeowner fulfill insurance requirements imposed by mortgage companies, but it is mainly designed as a temporary safety net with basic coverage until policyholders find a more permanent option. The number of people on California’s Fair plan more than doubled between 2020 and this year, reaching nearly 452,000 policies.

Wildfires have always been part of life in California. But as the climate has gotten hotter and dryer, it has made those fires much larger and more intense. Of the top 20 most destructive wildfires in state history, 14 have occurred since 2015, according to the California department of forestry and fire protection (CalFire).

A 2018 fire in Paradise, California, killed 85 people and destroyed about 11,000 homes, and some residents have struggled to find home insurance since.

Steve Crowder, the town’s mayor, lost his house and business. Since then, his family has rebuilt their home but struggled to find insurance. The Crowders were forced to enroll in the Fair plan earlier this month. Despite paying roughly $5,000, the mayor said his home is insured for about $100,000 less than its value and the house’s contents are only half covered.

Advertisement

“You couldn’t rebuild what you got for what it’s insured for,” he said.

His constituents face similar problems. With policies skyrocketing from approximately $1,200 annually before the Camp fire to $5,000 now – or even up to $20,000 a year for large homes – some have abandoned attempts to find coverage altogether.

In the years after the Camp fire, Crowder said the town has successfully brought back some insurers after enacting new ordinances with high standards to keep structures safe, such as rules regarding clearances, vegetation and fences.

While the mayor welcomed the state’s new rules, he said he and his constituents are skeptical things will improve.

“Anything that will help get insurance in California, period, is helpful,” he said, but added: “Let’s wait and make sure it happens before we get excited.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Developers making millions from ‘affordable housing’ program lobbied California lawmakers to shut down regulation

Published

on

Developers making millions from ‘affordable housing’ program lobbied California lawmakers to shut down regulation


With their profitable ‘middle-income housing’ deals under threat, developers spent thousands lobbying legislators who wanted to ensure that rents would actually be affordable to renters

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

California

New CA laws target street takeover spectators and their vehicles

Published

on

New CA laws target street takeover spectators and their vehicles


LOS ANGELES (KABC) — New California state laws hope to curb dangerous street takeovers and street racing in the New Year.

“Takeovers are such a huge problem in our communities,” explained California Highway Patrol Lt. Steve Carapia. “It’s a public nuisance. They create thousands of dollars of damages onto the roadway, crashed cars.”

Carapia commands CHP’s Southern Division Street Racing Enforcement unit and said combating street racing is challenging.

Under Assembly Bill 3085, spectators’ vehicles can be seized for up to 30 days.

Advertisement

“Anybody now that purposely or intentionally blocks a roadway, either with their vehicle or with their persons, or create a blockade preventing law enforcement from entering these active takeovers; those individuals are going to be held liable as well,” said Carapia.

In addition, Assembly Bill 2186 allows authorities to go after those participating in illegal activity in off-street spaces.

“If they’re in a parking lot actively displaying reckless behavior, doing donuts in the parking lot, now we can actually do the same thing that we would do on any public roadway,” said Carapia.

He believes these new laws will strengthen enforcement on those who take part in the reckless culture.

CHP will continue to use other tools they have including helicopters and airplanes to monitor and takedown these street takeovers.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2024 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending