Connect with us

California

California must stop law that would authorize placing pregnant women in solitary confinement

Published

on

California must stop law that would authorize placing pregnant women in solitary confinement


California is often hailed as a leader amongst states on progressive issues, particularly those related to women’s rights. Yet California is now on the verge of passing a law that facilitates placing pregnant women in solitary confinement. As someone who experienced the dehumanizing and degrading effects of being placed in solitary confinement while pregnant, I feel compelled to speak up and speak out.

I was arrested when I was six months pregnant, and placed into solitary confinement. When I was taken to court my arms were shackled to my waist, despite the fact that I was pregnant. When I gave birth I was handcuffed to the hospital bed, and treated like I was less than human. Giving birth can be one of the most beautiful and sacred experiences a person can have, yet for me it became a dark and degrading experience because of how I was treated.

Across the world, in all different countries and cultures, pregnant women are viewed as a symbol of life, and are cared for, accommodated, honored and respected. Yet in California jails and prisons, placing them in isolation is somehow viewed as acceptable. California has no law on the books that prevent pregnant women from being placed in solitary confinement, a practice that most of the enlightened world views as a form of torture.

What is perhaps most shocking to learn, is that attempts to legislate protections for pregnant women have not only been undermined, but they have been transformed from a ban on placing pregnant women in solitary confinement, to legislation that facilitates this placement for up to five days, with no medical or third party oversight.

Advertisement

I am referring to AB 2527, a bill by Asm. Bauer-Kahan that started out as a blanket ban on the use of solitary confinement for pregnant women in jails and prisons. Speaking about the bill, Asm. Bauer-Kahan was quoted as saying: “To be pregnant, to remain healthy, I really, truly believe that restrictive housing shouldn’t be a part of the equation.”

Just days later, Bauer-Kahan accepted amendments by correctional authorities that fundamentally altered the bill from ending solitary confinement for pregnant women in jails and prisons, to empowering CDCR to place pregnant women in solitary for up to five days based on when there is a security concern.

To be clear, the legislature is proposing solitary confinement if a pregnant woman, and an unborn child, is facing a security concern. They are not providing a safe alternative to solitary, such as a trauma informed unit that can house a pregnant woman individually, but provide them with guaranteed time out of cell, and access to medical care and programming. Instead the proposed legislation places complete power in the hands of CDCR, without even requiring the development of a medical plan, or a cumulative limit to how many five day stretches of isolation can occur in a particular period.

The bill also completely eliminated all protection to pregnant women in county jails, so it would not have applied to me. Based on available information, instead the supposed “protections” of AB 2527 would apply to seven people in the entire state of California.

These amendments all took place during a period where the legislature quietly prevented the California Mandela Act from being sent to the desk of Governor Newsom. The Mandela Act twice received broad support in the legislature, and included a provision that would completely eliminate the use of solitary confinement for pregnant women in jails, prison and private detention facilities.

Advertisement

Now California appears to be moving backwards on this issue. Why? Apparently to send a bill that purports to care about pregnant women to Governor Newsom’s desk, in order for him to turn them into a tool to undermine real conversations for change.

This past week, I attended the military graduation of my son, who was born while I was in solitary confinement. Since my incarceration I have started a successful business, become an advocate, and am in the process of finishing my college degree. I am proud to reflect on my own resilience through the face of adversity, and honor my the strength that both my son and I have as survivors of solitary confinement. This reflection also includes a commitment to prevent what happened to me from ever happening to anyone else in California.

Cynthia Mendoza is a formerly incarcerated advocate and solitary survivor and is currently completing her education at California State University, Los Angeles



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California Highway Patrol warns against attempted ‘Amber Alert' scam

Published

on

California Highway Patrol warns against attempted ‘Amber Alert' scam


The California Highway Patrol is warning the public to beware of fraudsters posing as “AMBER Alert representatives” offering to “register” children.

“They ask for confidential info and to meet at your home,” the CHP said Saturday on social media. “This is not how the AMBER Alert system works.”

No registration is ever required, the CHP said.

AMBER — which stands for America’s Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response — is only activated by law enforcement agencies investigating reports of an abducted or missing child.

Advertisement

The alerts are intended to provide the public with immediate information about a child abduction.

The CHP said it is the only agency authorized to activate AMBER Alerts.

“Never provide personal information or answer calls from unknown or ‘possible scam’ numbers,” the highway patrol said.

If contacted by a scammer, the CHP said, report it to your local law enforcement agency immediately.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Opinion: California utilities have lofty climate goals. Too bad their customers are in the dark

Published

on

Opinion: California utilities have lofty climate goals. Too bad their customers are in the dark


Regardless of the presidential election results, the clean energy transition is still a major priority for the nation’s electric utilities. Perhaps nowhere in the world is the pressure more intense than in Southern California, where the demands on the power grid are high and many residents are well acquainted with the consequences of aging, unsuitable infrastructure.

Many electric utilities now consider sustainability crucial to their overall strategy. However, as evidenced by countless examples of conservatives being elected on anti-environmental platforms, the majority of consumers just aren’t thinking that much about clean energy.

For the past four years, my team at J.D. Power and I have been analyzing customer awareness of and support for utilities’ climate programs and goals in an annual Sustainability Index. Without fail, we found that very few customers have any awareness of their utilities’ clean energy goals. This year’s index found that just 22% of customers knew their utilities had such goals, a figure that was even lower in previous years.

I experienced one aspect of this phenomenon as a consumer when I went through the grueling process of learning about and applying for California and federal rebates for an energy-efficient heat pump system I installed in my home last year. Even though I wrote about that ordeal for The Times and heard from consumers who had similar experiences, I have yet to get any response from my utility. Heat pumps have been a cornerstone of clean energy transition efforts, but when it comes to installing and using them and understanding their benefits, utilities are leaving consumers on their own.

Advertisement

A deep dive into my combined electric and gas bills showed that my total expenses dropped 3% in 2024 compared with the same period in 2022, before I began installing the system. And because average unit electricity prices increased by more than 20% in the interim, my adjusted heating costs are down more than 23%. In addition, I now have the benefit of air conditioning during summer heat waves, which I did not have prior to the conversion.

But before I could even begin to understand the extent of these benefits, I had to download reams of data from Pacific Gas & Electric Co.’s data hub, build a spreadsheet to organize and chart my energy use and utility billing trends, and cross-reference everything with federal greenhouse gas equivalency calculations. Does anyone think an average consumer would go through all this?

The experience illustrated the chasm between the way utilities communicate about environmental responsibility and the way consumers live it. The fact is, if any utilities are ever going to meet their sustainability targets — many of which call for reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 — they are going to need their customers to change their behavior. But given that few customers are even aware of these priorities, and that most are far more concerned about affordability than they are about sustainability, there is a complete disconnect between utility and customer goals.

But these goals can be aligned if the companies explain and promote them clearly and convincingly. We’re living through a historic transformation that has the potential to reinvent heating and cooling, travel and more. Smart-grid technologies can put individual homeowners at the center of the energy storage and transmission system. None of that will happen without massive consumer buy-in.

Utilities should be launching bold outreach strategies, investing in customer education on how to save money (and pollution) by adopting new technologies, and making it easy for consumers to help them reach their environmental goals. But most utilities are instead wasting their time talking about lofty sustainability targets that lack the substance and support they need to become reality.

Advertisement

Electric utilities have a huge opportunity to help customers save money and improve their experience, increase their own revenue and meet their clean energy goals. To do so, they need to start understanding and communicating effectively with their customers.

Andrew Heath is the vice president of utilities intelligence at J.D. Power.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California’s new ‘Daylighting’ law forces change to Davis parking

Published

on

California’s new ‘Daylighting’ law forces change to Davis parking


(FOX40.COM) — To comply with a new California law, the City of Davis announced changes that have been implemented on public parking. The law, Assembly Bill 413, also known as the “Daylighting Law,” prohibits vehicle parking or idling within 20 feet of any crosswalk. It’s also restricted within 15 feet of any crosswalk where a […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending