California
California Moves To Delay Corporate Climate Reporting Requirement Until 2028
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA – OCTOBER 06: (L-R) California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press … [+]
In September 2023, California passed legislation requiring large companies to file sustainability disclosures beginning in 2026. The move was part of a global trend of sustainability reporting and environmental, social and governance reporting focused on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. However, a new proposal by Governor Gavin Newsom will delay implementation by two years.
As international focus on climate change increased in the wake of the Paris Agreement, there was a simultaneous increase in pressure on businesses to be more accountable for their climate and environmental policies. This translated into a rise in ESG reports and sustainability reports created by companies to attempt to showcase their green initiatives.
Around 2020, the production of these reports became standard practice by both publicly traded and privately held companies. However, there was no standardization of content. Regulators scrambled to create sustainability reporting standards. This was generally done at a national or international level.
In 2021, the International Sustainability Standards Board drafted the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation’s Sustainability Disclosure Standards. The IFRS Standards were adopted in June 2023 as the global standard for sustainability and climate change reporting, including GHG emissions.
That same month, the European Union announced the adoption of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards. The ESRS incorporated the IFSR Standards for climate related disclosure
In March 2022, the SEC proposed the development of a Climate-Related Disclosure Rule. The final rule, adopted in March, 2024, required large publicly traded companies to disclose climate action, GHG emissions, and the financial impacts of severe weather events. The rule was initially set to go into effect in 2026.
In September 2023, California approved the Climate Accountability Package, a pair of bills aimed at creating sustainability reporting requirements. The bills require reporting standards far beyond the SEC standards.
Senate Bill 253 requires companies who do business in California and have an excess of $1 billion in revenue, defined as “reporting entities”, to submit an annual report for Scope 1 and Scope 2 starting in 2026. Scope 3 reporting will begin in 2027. The State Air Resources Board must create the details of the reporting requirement by January 1, 2025.
Senate Bill 261 requires companies who do business in California and an excess of $500 million in revenue, defined as “covered entities”, to submit a biennial climate-related financial risk report. The report is based on the work of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, established by the Financial Stability Board.
Implementation of sustainability reporting standards has been bumpy at best. The drafting of the regulations was more complicated than lawmakers originally envisioned. The result has been delays in the implementation timelines as governments struggle to find a balance between the desire to require reporting and the complexities of a regulatory scheme. The EU has delayed parts of the ESRS to allow companies to adjust to the existing standards and to allow time for additional drafting.
This became even more problematic, especially in the U.S., as regulations were challenged in the courts. The SEC rule was delayed indefinitely as challenges work through the legal system.
The California requirements faced similar challenges. However, it was not the legal challenges that delayed implementation, but rather the inability to draft the details in time. This is not a new concern, and it is not surprising the Newsom is now pushing the delay.
Newsom signed the bill into law on October 7 but questioned the feasibility of implementation at the time. The Governor’s message with the bill singing, which becomes part of the official record, stated (in full).
“I am signing Senate Bill 253 which would require, among other things, the California Air resources Board (CARB), by January 1, 2025, to develop and adopt regulations requiring businesses with total annual revenues over $1 billion and operating in California to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions to an emissions reporting organization.
“This important policy, once again, demonstrates California’s continued leadership with bold responses to the climate crisis, turning information transparency into climate action. However, the implementation deadlines in this bill are likely infeasible, and the reporting protocol specified could result in inconsistent reporting across businesses subject to the measure. I am directing my Administration to work with the bill’s author and the Legislature next year to address these issues.
“Additionally, I am concerned about the overall financial impact of this bill on businesses, so I am instructing CARB to closely monitor the cost impact as it implements this new bill and to make recommendations to streamline the program. I look forward to working with the Legislature on these modifications to ensure we achieve this bill’s goals of ‘full transparency and consistency’.”
The proposal will delay Scope 1 and Scope 2 reporting until 2028. Scope 3 will be delayed until 2029. It is unclear if the delays will be adopted. However, given the global trend of delays in implementation, it is not unreasonable to assume that California will follow the same path.
California
Driverless Waymo strikes child in California
-
Car rams into Jewish center in Brooklyn
01:13
-
Now Playing
Driverless Waymo strikes child in California
01:28
-
UP NEXT
New dangerous winter storm threat
02:09
-
Husband accused of murdering wife cross-examined
01:57
-
Students come together for proposal surprise
01:25
-
Border czar says there could be a drawdown of federal agents in Minneapolis
02:10
-
Minnesota man’s plot to break Luigi Mangione out of jail
01:40
-
‘Melania’ documentary premieres at Kennedy center
01:42
-
Close call on San Antonio runway
01:29
-
Race to restore power in freezing South
02:28
-
Husband testifies in au pair murder trial
01:39
-
Firefighter who saved puppies in house fire adopts them
01:21
-
New video shows Alex Pretti interacting with federal agents days before fatal shooting
02:32
-
FBI raids election center near Atlanta
01:21
-
U.S. health officials monitor deadly virus
00:54
-
Rep. Omar sprayed with unknown substance during town hall
00:53
-
Al Roker celebrates 30 years at TODAY
01:33
-
Death toll rising from dangerous winter weather
02:22
-
DHS: Two officers fired weapons in Pretti shooting
03:00
-
New video shows moments before Pretti shooting
02:03
Nightly News
-
Car rams into Jewish center in Brooklyn
01:13
-
Now Playing
Driverless Waymo strikes child in California
01:28
-
UP NEXT
New dangerous winter storm threat
02:09
-
Husband accused of murdering wife cross-examined
01:57
-
Students come together for proposal surprise
01:25
-
Border czar says there could be a drawdown of federal agents in Minneapolis
02:10
Top Story
Play All
California
San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan announces run for California governor
San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan is joining the crowded race for California governor.
After teasing a potential run for the last few weeks, Mahan confirmed the news in an interview with the San Francisco Standard.
The 43-year-old became mayor of San Jose in 2023.
In a quote to the Standard, he said, “The past three years that I’ve been mayor have become a model for how we start to move the needle on issues that many people have thought were intractable.”
Mahan joins a very crowded field with 10 other candidates, including former Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, former Rep. Katie Porter and investor Tom Steyer.
Mahan made it official Thursday morning via a post on social media.
California
Letters to the Editor: The entire premise of California’s proposed one-time wealth tax is misleading
To the editor: Having been a tax practitioner now for more than 60 years — much of it involving the very wealthy — the entire project of the California wealth tax is ludicrous because the premise for its one-time imposition is misleading, if not dishonest (“Is California’s proposed billionaire tax smart policy? History holds lessons,” Jan. 26).
The proposed tax is being sold as a replacement for the imminent loss of federal Medicaid. Any “tax expert” with common sense is well aware that many — perhaps a significant majority — of the targets of the tax will contest it (and aggressively discount their assets in self-assessing their tax) at the administrative (appeals) level and, if not satisfied, will proceed with litigation.
This process takes years to play out. The state administrative behemoth will be spending enormous amounts of (non-billionaire) taxpayer dollars to collect money that will arrive far into the future and long after the alleged need for imminent spending on any healthcare needs — if it arrives at all.
The proponents should know this quite well, indicating that the entire initiative is an asset seizure masquerading as moral virtue.
Kip Dellinger, Santa Monica
This writer is the former tax policy and practice columnist for Tax Notes magazine.
..
To the editor: Rather than imposing a “wealth tax,” wouldn’t it make more sense to just rewrite the tax code so that the loopholes that essentially give multimillionaires and billionaires a free ride were sewn up so that they had to pay their fair share?
Susan Greenberg, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: The backers of the wealth tax bill claimed that they learned from Europe’s experience. But why did the European countries that repealed such wealth taxes repeal them outright instead of learning from what happened and improving on how the taxes were implemented?
Ming Lai, Frisco, Texas
-
Illinois1 week agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pennsylvania4 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Science1 week agoContributor: New food pyramid is a recipe for health disasters
-
Technology1 week agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras
-
Science1 week agoFed up with perimenopause or menopause? The We Do Not Care Club is here for you
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: In ‘Mercy,’ Chris Pratt is on trial with an artificial intelligence judge
-
Politics1 week agoSupreme Court appears ready to keep Lisa Cook on Federal Reserve board despite Trump efforts to fire her
-
News7 days agoVideo: Jack Smith Defends His Trump Indictments During House Hearing