California
California home sales and price curb in June as housing demand cools, C.A.R. reports
Closed escrow gross sales of present, single-family indifferent properties in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized fee of 344,970 in June, in line with info collected by C.A.R. from greater than 90 native REALTOR® associations and MLSs statewide. The statewide annualized gross sales determine represents what could be the full variety of properties bought throughout 2022 if gross sales maintained the June tempo all year long. It’s adjusted to account for seasonal elements that sometimes affect house gross sales. June’s gross sales tempo was down 8.4 % on a month-to-month foundation from 376,560 in Could and down 20.9 % from a 12 months in the past, when 436,020 properties have been bought on an annualized foundation.
“California’s housing market continues to reasonable from the frenzied ranges seen previously two years, which is creating favorable situations for patrons who misplaced provides or sat out through the fiercely aggressive market,” stated C.A.R. President Otto Catrina, a Bay Space actual property dealer and REALTOR®. “With rates of interest transferring sideways in current weeks and fewer properties now promoting above itemizing value, potential patrons have the uncommon alternative to see extra listings coming onto the market and face much less competitors that might drive them to interact in a bidding conflict.”
California’s median house value declined 4.0 % in June to $863,790 from the revised record-high of $900,170 recorded in Could. The June value was 5.4 % increased than the $819,630 recorded final June. The moderation within the median house value was due partly to a change within the mixture of gross sales in June, because the high-end market began pulling again.
After rising for 4 consecutive months, the share of million-dollar house gross sales dipped as gross sales within the higher-price section dropped 8.3 % from the prior month. Gross sales of properties priced $2 million and up, in truth, plummeted 17.9 % from Could 2022. The sub-$500,000 market, alternatively, elevated 2.1 % on a month-to-month foundation in June. Extra moderation will probably are available in July as sharp declines in pending gross sales within the upper-price segments counsel a drag on the statewide median value within the upcoming months.
“Excluding the three-month pandemic lockdown interval in 2020, June’s gross sales degree was the bottom since April 2008. Pending gross sales information additionally suggests we will count on further retreating within the coming months,” stated C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Jordan Levine. “With inflation remaining excessive and rates of interest anticipated to climb additional within the coming months, the market will normalize additional within the second half of the 12 months with softer gross sales and extra reasonable value progress.”
As such, C.A.R. has revised its 2022 housing forecast and initiatives present single-family house gross sales to achieve 380,630 items in 2022, a decline of 14.4 % from the 444,520 items bought in 2021. The most recent estimate is a revision from the projection of 416,810 items bought launched in October 2021. Regardless of a extra reasonable progress fee within the second half of the 12 months, the California median house value is projected to extend 9.7 % to $863,390 in 2022, a stable acquire from the annual median of $786,750 in 2021. The up to date projection on the statewide median value is a rise from the estimate of $834,440 forecast final October. C.A.R. additionally initiatives the common 30-year fastened mortgage rate of interest to rise to the vary between 6.25 % to six.5 % by the tip of 2022 and averaging 5.2 % for the 12 months.
With the market shifting, customers have been much less optimistic in June concerning the state’s housing market situations, in line with C.A.R.’s month-to-month Client Housing Sentiment Index. Carried out in June, 79 % of respondents believed that the general financial situations in California won’t enhance within the subsequent 12 months, whereas 85 % believed that rates of interest won’t fall inside a 12 months. Solely 14 % of the respondents thought it was a superb time to purchase a house, a slight enhance from the file low reached in Could, however nonetheless a sizeable decline from final June’s 19 %. Whereas those that believed it was a superb time to promote a house remained above pre-pandemic ranges, the sharp month-to-month decline of seven proportion factors from 68 % in Could dragged the index all the way down to the bottom degree in 16 months.
Different key factors from C.A.R.’s June 2022 resale housing report embrace:
- On the regional degree, all main areas skilled double-digit gross sales declines from final 12 months, with three of the 5 areas falling by greater than 25 % on a year-over-year foundation. Southern California had the most important drop of all areas, with gross sales plunging 27.1 % from a 12 months in the past. All six counties throughout the area dipped greater than 20 % year-over-year, with Orange County declining probably the most at 36.1 %. The San Francisco Bay Space (-26.8 %) had the second largest drop of all areas, adopted by the Central Coast (-26.3 %), the Central Valley (-19.6 %), and the Far North (-18.5 %).
- All however two counties tracked by C.A.R. posted gross sales drops in June from a 12 months in the past. Of the 49 counties that skilled a gross sales decline, 48 of them fell by double-digits from final 12 months, and 36 California counties had a year-over-year gross sales plunge of greater than 20 %. San Benito had the most important gross sales drop from final June at -48.6 %, adopted by Siskiyou (-45.2 %), Orange (-36.1 %), and Santa Cruz (-36.1 %). Counties with a gross sales decline decreased a mean of -23.9 % in June. Solely two counties recorded a year-over-year gross sales enhance in June, in comparison with 12 counties in Could. Glenn (22.2 %) and Mendocino (17.2 %) have been the one counties with a gross sales acquire from final 12 months. For the primary six months of 2022, Plumas had the most important gross sales decline of -31.2 %, whereas Yuba (+26.5 %) continued to have one of the best gross sales efficiency of all counties.
- On the regional degree, house costs in all main California areas elevated in value from final 12 months, with the Central Coast main the way in which at a ten.1 % enhance, adopted by Central Valley (10.0 %) and Southern California at 8.4 %.
- On the county degree, whereas median costs in most counties could have already hit their peak for the 12 months, almost 9 out of 10 California counties continued to file a rise of their median value from a 12 months in the past. Santa Barbara had the most important year-over-year acquire in its median value at 33.7 %, adopted by Siskiyou (30.2 %) and Madera (17.8 %). Seven counties posted a dip in median value from final 12 months, with Amador main the pack (-7.9 %), adopted by San Mateo (-5.3 %) and Mono (-4.1 %).
- The general provide situations in California improved once more in June, with the statewide unsold stock index (UII) rising to the very best degree in two years. The advance within the index was partly as a result of a rise in provide and partly as a result of a pullback in demand. With each closed gross sales and pending gross sales slowing by greater than 20 %, whole energetic listings surged 64.4 % in June, the most important year-over-year progress in additional than seven years. Lively listings in June additionally climbed to the very best degree since November 2019, with a month-to-month enhance of 28.8 % from Could.
- Forty-six of the 51 counties tracked by C.A.R. registered a year-over-year enhance in energetic listings in June, in comparison with 44 counties in Could. 9 counties had triple-digit positive aspects in properties on the market from final 12 months, with Yolo main the pack at 126.8 % year-over-year, adopted by Solano (122.3 %) and Merced (112.5 %). Solely 5 counties skilled a decline in energetic listings from final 12 months, with Del Norte dropping probably the most at -29.3 %, adopted by Plumas (-11.9 %) and Lassen (-10.9 %).
- The median variety of days it took to promote a California single-family house was 11 days in June and eight days in June 2021.
- C.A.R.’s statewide sales-price-to-list-price ratio* was 101.3 % in June 2022 and 104.1 % in June 2021.
- The statewide common value per sq. foot** for an present single-family house was $424, up from $391 in June a 12 months in the past.
- The 30-year, fixed-mortgage rate of interest averaged 5.52 % in June, up from 2.98 % in June 2021, in line with Freddie Mac. The five-year, adjustable mortgage rate of interest averaged 4.28 %, in comparison with 2.56 % in June 2021.
Observe: The County MLS median value and gross sales information within the tables are generated from a survey of greater than 90 associations of REALTORS® all through the state and signify statistics of present single-family indifferent properties solely. County gross sales information will not be adjusted to account for seasonal elements that may affect house gross sales. Actions in gross sales costs shouldn’t be interpreted as modifications in the price of a regular house. The median value is the place half bought for extra and half bought for much less; medians are extra typical than common costs, that are skewed by a comparatively small share of transactions at both the decrease finish or the higher finish. Median costs will be influenced by modifications in price, in addition to modifications within the traits and the scale of properties bought. The change in median costs shouldn’t be construed as precise value modifications in particular properties.
*Gross sales-to-list-price ratio is an indicator that displays the negotiation energy of house patrons and residential sellers beneath present market situations. The ratio is calculated by dividing the ultimate gross sales value of a property by its final listing value and is expressed as a proportion. A sales-to-list ratio with 100% or above means that the property bought for greater than the listing value, and a ratio beneath 100% signifies that the value bought beneath the asking value.
**Value per sq. foot is a measure generally utilized by actual property brokers and brokers to find out how a lot a sq. foot of area a purchaser can pay for a property. It’s calculated because the sale value of the house divided by the variety of completed sq. toes. C.A.R. presently tracks price-per-square foot statistics for 50 counties.
Main the way in which…® in California actual property for greater than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.automobile.org) is without doubt one of the largest state commerce organizations in the USA with greater than 217,000 members devoted to the development of professionalism in actual property. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
June 2022 County Gross sales and Value Exercise |
||||||||||||||||||
June 2022 |
Median Offered Value of Present Single-Household Houses |
Gross sales |
||||||||||||||||
State/Area/County |
June 2022 |
Could 2022 |
June 2021 |
Value |
Value |
Gross sales |
Gross sales |
|||||||||||
Calif. Single-family house |
$863,790 |
$900,170 |
r |
$819,630 |
-4.0 % |
5.4 % |
-8.4 % |
-20.9 % |
||||||||||
Calif. Apartment/Townhome |
$660,000 |
$678,000 |
$600,000 |
-2.7 % |
10.0 % |
-10.1 % |
-27.0 % |
|||||||||||
Los Angeles Metro Space |
$800,000 |
$805,000 |
r |
$737,500 |
-0.6 % |
8.5 % |
-3.9 % |
-26.2 % |
||||||||||
Central Coast |
$980,000 |
$995,000 |
$890,000 |
-1.5 % |
10.1 % |
3.3 % |
-26.3 % |
|||||||||||
Central Valley |
$497,000 |
$500,000 |
$452,000 |
-0.6 % |
10.0 % |
1.3 % |
-19.6 % |
|||||||||||
Far North |
$400,000 |
$425,000 |
$380,000 |
-5.9 % |
5.3 % |
-0.8 % |
-18.5 % |
|||||||||||
Inland Empire |
$585,000 |
$596,980 |
r |
$525,000 |
-2.0 % |
11.4 % |
-4.8 % |
-27.5 % |
||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Space |
$1,400,000 |
$1,505,000 |
$1,350,000 |
-7.0 % |
3.7 % |
-8.4 % |
-26.8 % |
|||||||||||
Southern California |
$830,000 |
$845,000 |
r |
$766,000 |
-1.8 % |
8.4 % |
-4.4 % |
-27.1 % |
||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Space |
||||||||||||||||||
Alameda |
$1,420,000 |
$1,545,000 |
$1,300,000 |
-8.1 % |
9.2 % |
-5.4 % |
-21.0 % |
|||||||||||
Contra Costa |
$976,940 |
$1,025,000 |
$990,000 |
-4.7 % |
-1.3 % |
-18.0 % |
-31.0 % |
|||||||||||
Marin |
$1,800,000 |
$2,100,305 |
$1,712,500 |
-14.3 % |
5.1 % |
1.7 % |
-21.3 % |
|||||||||||
Napa |
$975,000 |
$1,048,500 |
$955,500 |
-7.0 % |
2.0 % |
-1.0 % |
-25.7 % |
|||||||||||
San Francisco |
$1,900,000 |
$2,015,000 |
$1,950,000 |
-5.7 % |
-2.6 % |
-14.6 % |
-21.3 % |
|||||||||||
San Mateo |
$2,155,000 |
$2,231,500 |
$2,275,000 |
-3.4 % |
-5.3 % |
-19.3 % |
-31.3 % |
|||||||||||
Santa Clara |
$1,820,000 |
$1,927,500 |
$1,750,000 |
-5.6 % |
4.0 % |
-4.6 % |
-31.4 % |
|||||||||||
Solano |
$625,000 |
$615,530 |
$575,000 |
1.5 % |
8.7 % |
-6.4 % |
-18.8 % |
|||||||||||
Sonoma |
$850,000 |
$869,000 |
$825,000 |
-2.2 % |
3.0 % |
8.3 % |
-26.5 % |
|||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles |
$860,230 |
$798,720 |
$796,120 |
7.7 % |
8.1 % |
-3.0 % |
-20.6 % |
|||||||||||
Orange |
$1,265,000 |
$1,295,000 |
$1,138,000 |
-2.3 % |
11.2 % |
-6.2 % |
-36.1 % |
|||||||||||
Riverside |
$645,000 |
$650,000 |
$575,000 |
-0.8 % |
12.2 % |
-10.5 % |
-27.4 % |
|||||||||||
San Bernardino |
$490,000 |
$490,000 |
r |
$435,000 |
0.0 % |
12.6 % |
6.6 % |
-27.5 % |
||||||||||
San Diego |
$950,000 |
$970,000 |
$865,000 |
-2.1 % |
9.8 % |
-6.4 % |
-30.5 % |
|||||||||||
Ventura |
$930,000 |
$915,000 |
$840,000 |
1.6 % |
10.7 % |
1.4 % |
-22.6 % |
|||||||||||
Central Coast |
||||||||||||||||||
Monterey |
$854,000 |
$900,500 |
$862,500 |
-5.2 % |
-1.0 % |
5.6 % |
-20.2 % |
|||||||||||
San Luis Obispo |
$905,000 |
$931,000 |
$799,000 |
-2.8 % |
13.3 % |
1.7 % |
-32.7 % |
|||||||||||
Santa Barbara |
$1,250,000 |
$900,000 |
$935,000 |
38.9 % |
33.7 % |
11.6 % |
-15.6 % |
|||||||||||
Santa Cruz |
$1,325,500 |
$1,312,500 |
$1,175,000 |
1.0 % |
12.8 % |
-7.9 % |
-36.1 % |
|||||||||||
Central Valley |
||||||||||||||||||
Fresno |
$425,000 |
$420,000 |
$375,000 |
1.2 % |
13.3 % |
6.4 % |
-14.1 % |
|||||||||||
Glenn |
$325,000 |
$417,000 |
$310,000 |
-22.1 % |
4.8 % |
-15.4 % |
22.2 % |
|||||||||||
Kern |
$380,000 |
$385,000 |
$325,000 |
-1.3 % |
16.9 % |
2.7 % |
-18.1 % |
|||||||||||
Kings |
$327,000 |
$381,500 |
$295,000 |
-14.3 % |
10.8 % |
2.4 % |
-22.2 % |
|||||||||||
Madera |
$421,000 |
$430,000 |
$357,500 |
-2.1 % |
17.8 % |
-12.4 % |
-24.0 % |
|||||||||||
Merced |
$400,000 |
$414,250 |
$360,000 |
-3.4 % |
11.1 % |
8.7 % |
-20.4 % |
|||||||||||
Placer |
$720,000 |
$735,000 |
$670,500 |
-2.0 % |
7.4 % |
1.2 % |
-22.9 % |
|||||||||||
Sacramento |
$560,000 |
$580,000 |
$525,000 |
-3.4 % |
6.7 % |
0.2 % |
-24.3 % |
|||||||||||
San Benito |
$854,000 |
$840,000 |
$794,690 |
1.7 % |
7.5 % |
-25.5 % |
-48.6 % |
|||||||||||
San Joaquin |
$560,000 |
$555,000 |
$515,000 |
0.9 % |
8.7 % |
0.0 % |
-21.6 % |
|||||||||||
Stanislaus |
$480,000 |
$475,000 |
$430,000 |
1.1 % |
11.6 % |
-5.4 % |
-12.9 % |
|||||||||||
Tulare |
$378,000 |
$370,000 |
$335,000 |
2.2 % |
12.8 % |
15.1 % |
-3.7 % |
|||||||||||
Far North |
||||||||||||||||||
Butte |
$445,000 |
$500,000 |
$438,000 |
-11.0 % |
1.6 % |
0.6 % |
-10.6 % |
|||||||||||
Lassen |
$260,000 |
$302,500 |
$244,950 |
-14.0 % |
6.1 % |
-3.8 % |
-26.5 % |
|||||||||||
Plumas |
$400,000 |
$504,000 |
$395,000 |
-20.6 % |
1.3 % |
48.3 % |
-15.7 % |
|||||||||||
Shasta |
$395,000 |
$406,000 |
$365,000 |
-2.7 % |
8.2 % |
1.8 % |
-15.9 % |
|||||||||||
Siskiyou |
$390,500 |
$368,000 |
$300,000 |
6.1 % |
30.2 % |
-39.4 % |
-45.2 % |
|||||||||||
Tehama |
$341,000 |
$377,500 |
$318,500 |
-9.7 % |
7.1 % |
5.3 % |
-23.1 % |
|||||||||||
Different Calif. Counties |
||||||||||||||||||
Amador |
$424,750 |
$445,000 |
$461,000 |
-4.6 % |
-7.9 % |
-8.8 % |
-24.6 % |
|||||||||||
Calaveras |
$495,000 |
$525,000 |
$488,280 |
-5.7 % |
1.4 % |
22.1 % |
-20.5 % |
|||||||||||
Del Norte |
$400,690 |
$320,000 |
$358,500 |
25.2 % |
11.8 % |
-25.9 % |
-25.9 % |
|||||||||||
El Dorado |
$715,000 |
$728,750 |
$702,000 |
-1.9 % |
1.9 % |
-10.3 % |
-32.2 % |
|||||||||||
Humboldt |
$435,000 |
$458,500 |
$420,000 |
-5.1 % |
3.6 % |
-10.2 % |
-31.2 % |
|||||||||||
Lake |
$365,000 |
$360,000 |
$335,000 |
1.4 % |
9.0 % |
-5.6 % |
-20.6 % |
|||||||||||
Mariposa |
$470,000 |
$465,000 |
$409,700 |
1.1 % |
14.7 % |
-54.5 % |
-16.7 % |
|||||||||||
Mendocino |
$582,000 |
$597,500 |
$582,500 |
-2.6 % |
-0.1 % |
21.4 % |
17.2 % |
|||||||||||
Mono |
$788,500 |
$870,000 |
$822,500 |
-9.4 % |
-4.1 % |
40.0 % |
-22.2 % |
|||||||||||
Nevada |
$590,000 |
$560,000 |
$566,000 |
5.4 % |
4.2 % |
8.8 % |
-15.8 % |
|||||||||||
Sutter |
$450,000 |
$450,000 |
$395,000 |
0.0 % |
13.9 % |
-32.1 % |
-17.9 % |
|||||||||||
Tuolumne |
$430,000 |
$449,000 |
$413,820 |
-4.2 % |
3.9 % |
-22.0 % |
-33.1 % |
|||||||||||
Yolo |
$667,500 |
$660,000 |
$616,000 |
1.1 % |
8.4 % |
-5.8 % |
-24.7 % |
|||||||||||
Yuba |
$450,000 |
$449,500 |
$430,100 |
0.1 % |
4.6 % |
-9.3 % |
-19.3 % |
r = revised
June 2022 County Unsold Stock and Days on Market |
||||||||||||||||||||
June 2022 |
Unsold Stock Index |
Median Time on Market |
||||||||||||||||||
State/Area/County |
June 2022 |
Could 2022 |
June 2021 |
June 2022 |
Could 2022 |
June 2021 |
||||||||||||||
Calif. Single-family house |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
11.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Calif. Apartment/Townhome |
2.2 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Los Angeles Metro Space |
2.6 |
2.2 |
1.7 |
11.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Central Coast |
2.4 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Central Valley |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Far North |
3.2 |
2.9 |
2.3 |
15.0 |
10.5 |
11.0 |
||||||||||||||
Inland Empire |
2.8 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
12.0 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Space |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
12.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
Southern California |
2.5 |
2.2 |
1.7 |
10.0 |
9.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Space |
||||||||||||||||||||
Alameda |
2.0 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
12.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Contra Costa |
2.2 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Marin |
1.6 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
11.0 |
||||||||||||||
Napa |
2.8 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
31.0 |
28.0 |
33.5 |
||||||||||||||
San Francisco |
1.9 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
12.5 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Mateo |
2.1 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Santa Clara |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Solano |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
24.0 |
21.0 |
21.0 |
||||||||||||||
Sonoma |
2.0 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
26.0 |
24.0 |
31.0 |
||||||||||||||
Southern California |
||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles |
2.5 |
2.3 |
1.8 |
10.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Orange |
2.4 |
2.0 |
1.5 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Riverside |
2.6 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
12.0 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Bernardino |
2.9 |
2.8 |
r |
1.9 |
11.0 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
|||||||||||||
San Diego |
2.4 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
6.0 |
||||||||||||||
Ventura |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.8 |
19.0 |
17.0 |
21.0 |
||||||||||||||
Central Coast |
||||||||||||||||||||
Monterey |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
12.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Luis Obispo |
2.4 |
2.3 |
1.8 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
6.0 |
||||||||||||||
Santa Barbara |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
Santa Cruz |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
11.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
Central Valley |
||||||||||||||||||||
Fresno |
2.4 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.0 |
||||||||||||||
Glenn |
4.6 |
2.9 |
5.0 |
26.0 |
10.0 |
4.0 |
||||||||||||||
Kern |
2.4 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Kings |
2.4 |
1.9 |
1.5 |
8.0 |
6.0 |
5.0 |
||||||||||||||
Madera |
3.1 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
10.0 |
11.5 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Merced |
2.7 |
2.7 |
1.6 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Placer |
2.5 |
2.1 |
1.4 |
10.0 |
7.0 |
6.0 |
||||||||||||||
Sacramento |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.4 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
6.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Benito |
3.5 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
17.5 |
12.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
San Joaquin |
2.6 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Stanislaus |
2.3 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
9.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Tulare |
2.4 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
9.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Far North |
||||||||||||||||||||
Butte |
2.4 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
10.0 |
6.5 |
6.0 |
||||||||||||||
Lassen |
4.9 |
4.5 |
3.9 |
69.0 |
73.0 |
72.0 |
||||||||||||||
Plumas |
4.2 |
4.9 |
4.0 |
61.0 |
60.0 |
63.0 |
||||||||||||||
Shasta |
2.9 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
12.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
Siskiyou |
5.5 |
3.1 |
2.5 |
15.5 |
13.0 |
7.5 |
||||||||||||||
Tehama |
4.3 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
25.0 |
28.0 |
28.5 |
||||||||||||||
Different Calif. Counties |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amador |
4.5 |
3.5 |
2.4 |
11.0 |
12.0 |
11.0 |
||||||||||||||
Calaveras |
3.0 |
3.5 |
2.1 |
47.0 |
40.5 |
49.0 |
||||||||||||||
Del Norte |
4.9 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
71.5 |
56.0 |
92.5 |
||||||||||||||
El Dorado |
3.2 |
2.6 |
1.8 |
18.0 |
12.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
Humboldt |
4.3 |
3.4 |
2.1 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
8.5 |
||||||||||||||
Lake |
4.6 |
4.1 |
3.0 |
32.0 |
19.5 |
12.0 |
||||||||||||||
Mariposa |
5.6 |
2.0 |
3.8 |
9.0 |
7.0 |
7.5 |
||||||||||||||
Mendocino |
4.2 |
5.2 |
3.4 |
50.5 |
42.5 |
36.0 |
||||||||||||||
Mono |
5.2 |
5.2 |
3.9 |
62.5 |
51.5 |
57.5 |
||||||||||||||
Nevada |
3.7 |
3.6 |
2.1 |
15.0 |
11.0 |
9.0 |
||||||||||||||
Sutter |
3.4 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
11.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
||||||||||||||
Tuolumne |
3.6 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
44.0 |
48.0 |
10.0 |
||||||||||||||
Yolo |
2.2 |
1.8 |
1.2 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
||||||||||||||
Yuba |
3.1 |
2.5 |
1.7 |
10.5 |
9.0 |
6.0 |
r = revised
SOURCE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS
California
Top 25 California high school boys basketball rankings (12/26/2024)
The week between Christmas and New Year’s Day is always revealing for the best boys basketball teams in California and final days of the 2024 calendar year should be no different.
The Damien Classic and Torrey Pines Holiday Classic always present a window of what is in store for the rest of the season and separates the contenders and pretenders. Next weekend at the HoopHall Classic West in Gilbert (Ariz.), Jan. 2-4, will also give the elite teams time to strut their stuff.
There are nine teams among California’s Top 25 still unbeaten at Christmas, a pretty high number, including top-ranked St. John Bosco, No. 6 Riordan and No. 8 De La Salle and No. 9 Montgomery.
Note: Only teams that play for a CIF State California title were considered for this rankings, thus eliminating Prolific Prep of Napa Christian, which can and will play for a mythical national title. Notes and rankings below from Southern Section teams supplied by SBLive’s Tarek Fattal.
The Braves win their Trinity League opener over Orange Lutheran without Brandon McCoy and Elzie Harrington. Christian Collins and Max Ellis led the way. Next up: Platinum Division in Classic at Damien.
Roosevelt wins the Tarkanian Classic in Las Vegas, beating Notre Dame/Sherman Oaks in the final. Brayden Burries scored 26 points and Issac Williamson had 19.
Nik Khamenia notches 26 points, 10 rebounds and eight assists in a convincing win over JSerra, a team expected to earn an Open Division berth.
Notre Dame suffers its first loss in the Tarkanian Classic final to Roosevelt despite Tyran Stokes scoring 20 points. Lino Mark played just four minutes in an attempt to play while injured. (TYRAN STOKES DEBUT)
Four more wins started with 90-65 blowout of defending state D2 champion Oakland Tech behind 33 points and 10 points from Tounde Yessoufou, and a combined 45 from Julius and Malcolm Price along with Gunner Morinini. Yessoufou is averaging 29.8 points and 7.7 rebounds per game.
Won the Gridley Classic with wins over Branson (68-27), Clovis North (54-52) and previous No. 6 Salesian (52-51) thanks in part to tournament MVP Andrew Hilman (19 points). Texas Tech-bound Jasir Rencher and Irvine signee Nex Emeneke was also All-Tourney.
Pride lost their first regular-season game since 2022, 52-51 to Riordan, in finals of the Gridley Classic. Salesian missed two free throws with 1.2 seconds to play.
Win over Santa Margarita (61-57) to win the Vountour Classic was team’s most impressive. David Balogun, a rapidly improving 6-6 post, scored 29 to lead the way. Since then breathers over Mountain House (67-35), La Salle (76-26) and Sacred Heart Cathedral (79-39).
The Aztecs from San Diego won five games last week, including four at the Tarkanian Classic to take the Nike Division championship behind division’s Most Outstanding Player J.J. Sanchez, who had 22 points in the finals.
Eagles’ only loss comes this week to unbeaten NorCal power De La Salle, but bounces back with a win over Murrieta Valley.
Trailblazers beat Millikan 87-33 this past week.
The Lions get a taste of Open Division-level hoops in a 65-50 loss to Harvard-Westlake.
Redondo Union is picking up Open Division playoff buzz.
La Mirada has been idle since Dec. 14.
Coach Paul Tait is enthused by the play of sophomore point guard Dominic Loehle.
After lopsided win over St. Augustine (77-54), recorded tough wins over Sage Creek (75-66), Mission Hills (67-59) and La Jolla Country Day (80-68).
Monarchs have won five of their last six.
Pius went 2-2 at the Tarkanian Classic.
Jasone Crowe Jr. is averaging 37 points per game.
Had won four straight before losing 63-54 to Brophy College Prep of Phoenix Ariz. (63-54).
Quality win over Pacifica Christian of Orange County without Jeremiah Hampton was impressive. JJ Harris and Louis Bond impressed.
Canyon has won five straight. Brandon Benjamin averaging 30+ points a game.
Damien without big man Nate Garcia (injured).
Twelve straight wins isn’t a bad way to start the season. Defense a big key, holding opponents under 50 seven times, including three straight games limiting opponents to 49 in wins over Riverside poly (61-49), Salesian Los Angeles (93-49) and Wiseburn-Da Vinci (61-49).
Cougars last win came against Long Beach Poly on Dec. 14.
California
California has 15 of 25 priciest places to live in US
No. 1 San Francisco costs 18.2% more than typical US metro. No. 2 LA-OC is 15.5% more expensive.
Subscribe to continue reading this article.
Already subscribed? To login in, click here.
Originally Published:
California
California Roots Threaten JuJu Watkins’ NCAA Road to Rivaling Caitlin Clark
Ever since Caitlin Clark left the NCAA to set records in the WNBA, the hunt for the next generational basketball talent has intensified. Among the emerging stars, JuJu Watkins stands out with her electrifying performances for USC and record-breaking milestones. But while her game dazzles on the court, her California roots and unique circumstances create hurdles that may hinder her quest to rival Clark’s legendary NCAA career.
On the latest episode of Fearless with Jason Whitlock, Whitlock tackled the issue, highlighting the contrasting environments between Clark’s Iowa and Watkins’ Los Angeles.
“Well, Caitlin Clark was in Iowa in the middle of nowhere. She wasn’t in the entertainment capital of the world. She wasn’t in a city that had 75-degree weather year-round and open beaches. She went off or she grew up in and continued to play in a little isolated area of the country where people are starved for entertainment. And so she built a huge following right there in the state of Iowa, her home state,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
The deeper issue, according to Whitlock, is the cultural and entertainment saturation of Los Angeles, where sports often compete with numerous distractions for attention. In contrast, Clark thrived in a basketball-centric environment, with little competition for local and statewide support. While Watkins’ environment may pose unique challenges, her talent remains undeniable.
She recently made history as the fastest Power Five player in women’s college basketball to reach 1,000 career points, accomplishing the feat in just 38 games—two fewer than Clark’s record. With season averages of 24.8 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 3.8 assists on 46.2% shooting, Watkins is unquestionably a dominant force. Yet, as Jason Whitlock put it, the question persists: Can she cultivate the same level of national adoration that Clark commanded?
Balancing brilliance: Can JuJu Watkins thrive amid criticism and California’s spotlight?
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Adding to the debate, Rachel DeMita voiced concerns over how USC is managing Watkins’ playing time on her own podcast. “I don’t think that’s what JuJu needs for the development of her game,” DeMita said, suggesting that keeping Watkins on the court for extended minutes might be more about stat-padding than fostering her growth as a player.
Such a strategy could also increase her risk of injury, a significant concern given Watkins’ pivotal role for USC.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad
Despite these challenges, Watkins has demonstrated resilience and poise. Her performance this season reflects her ability to adapt and excel under pressure. However, her journey to rival Caitlin Clark’s legacy will require more than individual brilliance. Watkins must navigate the complexities of playing in a city where attention is fragmented, balancing her development with the need to draw a larger following.
Whether she can carve out her own path and emerge as a player of Clark’s stature remains uncertain. For now, her record-breaking performances and undeniable talent keep her firmly in the conversation, as the basketball world watches to see if she can overcome the challenges of her California roots and fulfill her potential as the next NCAA superstar.
-
Technology6 days ago
Google’s counteroffer to the government trying to break it up is unbundling Android apps
-
News7 days ago
Novo Nordisk shares tumble as weight-loss drug trial data disappoints
-
Politics7 days ago
Illegal immigrant sexually abused child in the U.S. after being removed from the country five times
-
Entertainment1 week ago
'It's a little holiday gift': Inside the Weeknd's free Santa Monica show for his biggest fans
-
Lifestyle7 days ago
Think you can't dance? Get up and try these tips in our comic. We dare you!
-
Technology2 days ago
There’s a reason Metaphor: ReFantanzio’s battle music sounds as cool as it does
-
Technology1 week ago
Fox News AI Newsletter: OpenAI responds to Elon Musk's lawsuit
-
News3 days ago
France’s new premier selects Eric Lombard as finance minister