Connect with us

California

California has an income gap problem

Published

on

California has an income gap problem


Income inequality in California has reached one of the highest levels in the nation, with the wealthiest families earning significantly more than those at the bottom, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS) data for 2023.

Why It Matters

California’s cost of living is among the highest in the United States, driven significantly by elevated housing expenses. In 2017, the median home price in California was more than 2.5 times the national median, with coastal urban areas experiencing even higher prices.

As a result, less than a third of Californians can afford a median-priced home, and homelessness per capita is the third highest in the nation. This high cost of living, particularly in housing, exacerbates the state’s growing income gap. While the wealthiest residents continue to accumulate significant wealth, the state’s low- and middle-income families face increasing financial pressure.

What To Know

According to 2023 CPS data, California’s wealth divide has reached one of the highest levels in the nation. In 2023, the highest-earning families earned an average of $336,000, which is 11 times more than the lowest-earning families, who earned just $30,000.

Advertisement

Only Washington, D.C., and Louisiana reported wider income gaps.

Income disparity has grown significantly in California since 1980, when the top earners made seven times more than those at the bottom. Over the past four decades, the incomes of the highest earners have increased by 68 percent, while the incomes of the lowest earners have grown by 10 percent.

The divide is also widening between high- and middle-income earners, with top-income families now making three times more than the median income of $114,000, compared to twice as much in 1980.

California’s income gap is strongly linked to education levels, with families of college graduates earning significantly more than those without degrees.

Since 1980, median income has increased by 40 percent for families where at least one member holds a four-year degree, while it has declined by 9 percent for families without a college graduate. On average, families with a degree earn $2.36 for every $1 earned by families without one.

Advertisement

In recent years, however, the gap has narrowed slightly. Since 2016, median incomes for families without high school diplomas have grown by 17 percent, compared to 6 percent for those with college degrees. From 2020 to 2023, incomes for non-high school graduates rose 7 percent, while incomes for college graduates increased by just 2 percent.

Income disparities are also sharply divided along racial and ethnic lines. Black and Latino families, who make up 44 percent of California’s population, represent 55 percent of the lowest-income families but only 12 percent of the highest-income households. In contrast, white and Asian families make up 40 percent of the lowest earners but 83 percent of the highest-income households.

On average, for every $1 earned by white families, Asian families earn $0.94, Black families earn $0.63, and Latino families earn $0.52.

Increasing income inequality in California is occurring at the same time that the number of people in the state living below the poverty line is growing.

California’s poverty rate increased from 11.7 percent in 2021 to 13.2 percent in early 2023, with about 5 million residents living below the poverty line, according to the Public Policy Institute of California’s California Poverty Measure. Child poverty saw an even sharper rise, jumping from 9 percent to 13.8 percent in the same period. Despite this, poverty remains lower than pre-pandemic levels, when it stood at 16.4 percent in 2019.

Advertisement

Nonetheless, nearly one-third of Californians are now either poor or near poor, with 31.1 percent living close to the poverty line. Poverty rates are highest among Latinos (16.9 percent), seniors (15.2 percent), and foreign-born residents (17.6 percent), particularly undocumented immigrants (29.6 percent). Education also plays a key role: while only 6.4 percent of college graduates live in poverty, the rate is 22.3 percent for those without a high school diploma.

Most poor Californians are part of working families, with 76 percent living in households where at least one adult is employed. However, full-time workers face significantly lower poverty rates (5.3 percent) compared to part-time workers (18.5 percent).

File photo of a stack of $1 bills.

Mark Lennihan/AP

What People Are Saying

Tess Thorman, research associate at the Public Policy Institute of California, told Newsweek: “When we compare trends in California to the rest of the country (so, not looking at individual states, but at all other states combined), inequality in California has really surged during recessions on a scale that it has not in the rest of the country.

“Overall, California’s long-term growth in inequality has been characterized by top incomes rising more quickly and consistently than low incomes. Top incomes have rebounded relatively quickly from recessions, while low incomes have seen larger declines and then taken longer to return to their pre-recession levels.

“A number of factors that are specific to California likely play into this variation, including the state’s high cost of living (including housing), a tech- and finance-heavy economy, and immigration patterns.”

Advertisement

What Happens Next

Data for 2024 has not yet been released. Thorman told Newsweek that it is “difficult to predict” if income inequality will continue to grow in California due to “technological advancements, international trade, and institutional changes.”

“These elements shape jobs and earnings, making future trends in inequality uncertain. Other factors like economic growth and education can also shape inequality and is hard to know what will be happening on those fronts,” Thorman added.



Source link

Advertisement

California

It rained a lot in October. Is fire season over now?

Published

on

It rained a lot in October. Is fire season over now?


This autumn brought something that isn’t always common for much of California — a decent amount of rain in October. Rather than heat waves, there have been umbrellas.

After years in which some of the worst wildfires in state history happened in the fall, a lot of people are wondering: Is fire season over?

It depends on where you live, fire experts say. And simply put, there’s more risk in Southern California right now than Northern California.

“We have not yet seen enough rain in Southern California to end fire season,” said Daniel Swain, a climate scientist with the University of California division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. “But we probably have in Northern California.”

Advertisement
A car traverses a flooded stretch of Interstate 880 on Monday, Oct. 13, 2025, in Oakland.(AP Photo/Noah Berger) 



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Exclusive: FBI searched California real estate firm linked to bad bank loans

Published

on

Exclusive: FBI searched California real estate firm linked to bad bank loans


NEW YORK, Oct 30 (Reuters) – The FBI last month searched the offices of a California real estate investment firm Continuum Analytics, which is linked to bad loans recently disclosed by Zions (ZION.O), opens new tab and Western Alliance (WAL.N), opens new tab, according to legal correspondence seen by Reuters.
Continuum Analytics is an affiliate of the little-known Cantor Group funds which Zions and Western Alliance have said defaulted on about $160 million in loans, spooking markets already on alert for signs corporate credit is weakening.

Sign up here.

On September 11, FBI agents searched Continuum’s Newport Beach, California, offices, law firm Paul Hastings wrote in a September 12 letter seen by Reuters.

Representatives for Continuum did not respond to emails and calls seeking comment. The FBI is an enforcement arm of the Justice Department. Spokespeople for the agencies did not respond to requests for comment. An attorney for Cantor Group said the firm upheld the terms of the Zions and Western Alliance loans and did not provide comment on the government scrutiny.

Advertisement

Allen Matkins, a law firm that represents other entities linked to Continuum, wrote in an October 2 letter that it learned on September 11 that certain of its clients were the subject of search warrants “in connection with a pending criminal investigation,” and that a grand jury had been convened in the case.

Prosecutors typically convene a grand jury when they intend to gather more evidence. The letters did not say which specific criminal authority was leading the case or what potential misconduct or individuals it was focused on.

Criminal investigations do not necessarily mean any wrongdoing has occurred and many do not result in charges.

Reuters is reporting the FBI search and probe for the first time. The government scrutiny could have ripple effects for what legal filings and public records show is a complex web of investors and lenders tied to Continuum’s real estate dealings, some of which are entangled in civil litigation.

Paul Hastings and Allen Matkins are representing parties embroiled in a complex real estate dispute. The letters relate to those proceedings. The Allen Matkins letter was disclosed in a California court.

Advertisement

When asked about the letter by Reuters, a lawyer for Paul Hastings said the firm was “working to unravel multiple levels of alleged fraud,” but did not provide more details.

Allen Matkins did not respond to calls and emails seeking comment.

PASSIVE INVESTORS

Zions on October 15 sued Cantor Group fund guarantors Andrew Stupin and Gerald Marcil, among others, to recover more than $60 million in soured commercial and industrial loans. The next day, Western Alliance flagged that it had sued the pair and a different Cantor fund in August to recover nearly $100 million.

Both suits allege key information was misrepresented or not disclosed, breaching the loan terms. Western Alliance also alleges fraud on the part of the Cantor fund.

Continuum acquires and manages distressed real estate assets for groups of investors, and its largest investors include Stupin and Marcil, according to a February arbitration ruling related to the real estate dispute. That ruling found Cantor “consists solely” of Continuum’s legal owner, Deba Shyam, and shares the Continuum offices. Shyam did not respond to calls and emails seeking comment.

Advertisement

Cantor upheld its contractual obligations and was transparent with its lenders, while the loans were audited and independently reviewed multiple times over the years, said the Cantor attorney Brandon Tran, who also represents Stupin and Marcil.

The pair are passive investors in Cantor and held no operational roles, he added. Cantor in legal filings has disputed that the Western Alliance loan is in default.

In a statement, Marcil said he had invested in several of Continuum’s properties. He denied wrongdoing and said that he was a victim.

Spokespeople for Zions and Western Alliance did not respond to requests for comment.

Reporting by Douglas Gillison and Chris Prentice; Editing by Michelle Price

Advertisement

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California sues truck-makers for breaching zero-emission sales agreement

Published

on

California sues truck-makers for breaching zero-emission sales agreement


California air quality officials have sued four truck manufacturers for breaching a voluntary agreement to follow the state’s nation-leading emissions rules, the state announced Tuesday.

What happened: Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office filed a complaint Monday in Alameda County Superior Court, arguing that the country’s four largest truck-makers — Daimler Truck North America, International Motors, Paccar and Volvo North America — violated an enforceable contract that they signed with the California Air Resources Board in 2023.

The lawsuit comes two months after the manufacturers filed their own complaint in federal court, arguing the agreement — known as the Clean Truck Partnership — is no longer valid after Republicans overturned California’s Advanced Clean Truck rule in June through the Congressional Review Act.

Advertisement

Why it matters: The move sets up a fight to determine whether the federal system or state courts — where CARB would have a higher likelihood of prevailing — will review the case.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending