Connect with us

California

Burned and uninsured: Wildfires are leaving California’s housing market in trouble | CNN Business

Published

on

Burned and uninsured: Wildfires are leaving California’s housing market in trouble | CNN Business



Los Angeles
CNN
 — 

After the 2018 Camp Fire – the deadliest wildfire in California’s history – engulfed Michael and Kristy Daneau’s Paradise home, the couple and their four daughters were forced to move 30 miles away to find a home they could afford.

They moved to Cohasset to buy a home with money they received through their insurance claim and their portion of an $11 billion Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) settlement with insurance companies for the blazes linked to its equipment failure.

Six years later, the family’s experiencing déjà vu: Their new home in the rocky region of northern California recently burned down to the studs in the 2024 Park Fire, the fourth largest fire in the state’s history.

Advertisement

But this time the Daneaus don’t have the safety net of insurance to help them rebuild their lives.

When they moved to Cohasset, they were denied homeowners insurance from every company they contacted, citing wildfire concerns, and when they finally found an insurer that would offer them a plan, they couldn’t afford it.  They were priced out – uninsured in a state prone to natural disasters. And now they are left with, essentially, nothing.

The climate crisis, acutely felt in California, is driving a rapid increase in the intensity and frequency of wildfires and the number of homes lost in them. That’s made home insurance increasingly unaffordable or even inaccessible – and that’s leaving more people in the same position as the Daneaus.

“We’re literally back to square one, as if we’re starting over in life again. It’s numbing, to be honest,” Michael said. He and his family are relying on what little they have saved and are hoping to secure $30,000 through donations on their GoFundMe page to “find a place, even if it’s to rent,” he said.

 Last year alone, the Insurance Information Institute tracked $80 billion in insured losses caused by natural catastrophes across the US. The Daneaus’ home was one of approximately 19,000 structures that were destroyed in the 2018 Camp Fire. Consequently, insurers are rushing to leave states like California to stop incurring such costs.

Advertisement

Since 2015, the California Department of Insurance has kept a record of the number of renewed and canceled policies in the state’s high fire-risk areas, which make up more than a quarter of the state. They recorded an increase in canceled policies until the most recent report published in 2022, with the sharpest increase being 10% in 2019.

When policies aren’t being canceled altogether, insurance rates sometimes rise by exorbitant amounts. California’s largest insurer, State Farm, requested a 30% rate increase for its homeowner’s line last month. This came a year after State Farm completely stopped selling insurance for new homes, citing wildfire risks. State Farm did not respond to a request for comment from CNN.

With the combination of rate increases, non-renewals and plan cancellations, many California homeowners have been pushed to the state’s temporary solution: the California FAIR Plan, a private association created by the state as a last-resort insurer for those being denied plans.

The California FAIR Plan was established in 1968 to provide an insurance option for those who are unable to procure insurance through the traditional market. However, what was established as a temporary solution has now become the only solution for many.

After every insurance company denied the Daneaus coverage for the home they moved to in Cohasset, the couple explored their insurance options through the California FAIR Plan. What was first an affordable solution became far too expensive by 2022, when they told CNN the plan would have cost them $12,000 with a $7,000 down payment and a $4,000 payment in the next month.

Advertisement

“The first year, it seemed okay … the second year it went up to where it stung a bit. The last few years, it’s been so unattainable, we would practically have to have a mortgage payment to be able to afford the California FAIR Plan, plus the secondary insurance that you would need to go along with it,” Michael Daneau said.

Since 2019, the California FAIR Plan has seen a 164% increase in policies, with a 27% jump just this past year, an indication of how many residents across the state are unable to access private insurance.

Last year, California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara reached an agreement with insurers with an aim to cover approximately 85% of properties in high-risk areas. However, the commissioner does not have the authority to force insurance companies to increase coverage.

As homeowners continue grappling for insurance options, the question of what’s next has become important for homeowners and insurers alike. Across the Golden State, both groups are exploring ways for California to become wildfire resilient.

The Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), a non-profit research organization backed by insurers, has spearheaded both an advocacy and research effort in making infrastructure more resilient.

Advertisement

One result has been the Wildfire Prepared program, which designates homes as wildfire resilient after an evaluation of both retrofitted and newly built homes.

The IBHS evaluation standards include components such as wildfire-resistant decks, upgraded windows and doors, and removal of back-to-back fencing, according to Steve Hawks, senior director for wildfire at IBHS.

After the 2018 Woolsey fire, which destroyed 1,643 structures in the Santa Monica mountains, the Los Angeles Emergency Preparedness Foundation (LAEPF), a local non-profit, was mobilized to educate homeowners about the need to harden their homes.

In a door-to-door effort, they reached Angela Wilson, a Malibu homeowner of 37 years, who has taken various steps in the past year while collaborating with LAEPF to make her home wildfire resilient.

Beyond structural changes such as shuttering her doors and adding metal mesh to vents, the avid gardener has made the tough decision to part with her flower beds and lush gardens.

Advertisement

“[My insurance plan] wasn’t canceled but my insurance company increased the rates quite a bit,” she said. Wilson has not yet completed the program, but hopes it will help bring her insurance costs down eventually.

“Some insurers have started giving a list of changes homeowners need to make to keep their insurance or maybe even get a discount of rates,” said Brent Woodworth, chairman & CEO of LAEPF. But he cautioned there’s no guarantee of that, leaving homeowners like the Daneaus grappling with uncertainty.

“I’m personally so numb that I just can’t wrap my head around where we’re going to go, what we’re going to do. How do we go from here knowing that we’ve built a beautiful life for us and our kids, and now we have literally nothing,” Michael Daneau said.

CNN’s Camila Bernal and Sarah Moon contributed reporting.

Advertisement



Source link

California

California regulators kill charity fireworks for America’s 250th, sparking outrage

Published

on

California regulators kill charity fireworks for America’s 250th, sparking outrage


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As the nation prepares for its 250th Independence Day celebration, a decades-long California Fourth of July fireworks tradition that has raised millions for local children’s programs is going dark this year after the California Coastal Commission rejected a final effort to keep it alive, citing environmental concerns to protect the bay.

“We’ve raised over the past 14 years $2 million for kids programs here in Long Beach,” event organizer John Morris told Fox News Digital, adding the July 3 event is fully funded by the local community.

“This community pays for everything — everything. City fees, and the city doesn’t give us a break. We pay $20,000 to the city for police and fire, which I’m fine with, because there’s 100,000 people enjoying the fireworks,” said Morris, a Long Beach resident and business owner.

Advertisement

Morris, who owns the Boathouse on the Bay restaurant, had planned a scaled-up fireworks display this year to mark America’s 250th Independence Day.

CALIFORNIA BEACH TOWN BANS THE USE OF BALLOONS

Long Beach residents have enjoyed the fireworks organized by John Morris for over a decade. (Scott Varley/MediaNews Group/Torrance Daily Breeze via Getty Images)

In January, Coastal Commission staff rejected the proposal, and last week commissioners unanimously upheld that decision despite an appeal backed by local, state and federal officials.

Regulators warned Morris last year that 2025 would likely be the final year for fireworks at the event, as they continue pushing organizers to switch to drone shows they say are more environmentally friendly.

Advertisement

The decision stands in contrast to other approvals by the commission, including a permit granted to SeaWorld allowing up to 40 nights of fireworks.

“They get 40 nights in Mission Bay. All I’m asking for is 20 minutes — it doesn’t make any sense,” Morris said.

Morris, 78, also pushed back on the environmental concerns cited by the commission, pointing to years of testing around the event.

CLIMATE EXECUTIVE WARNS CALIFORNIA ‘FUNCTIONALLY BANKRUPT,’ $1T SHORTFALL COULD SHAKE NATION

Due to the lack of fireworks, Morris has decided to cancel the July 3rd celebration.

Advertisement

“We’ve had 10 years of environmental studies,” Morris said. “We test the water before and after the fireworks and send a robotic camera into the bay to check for debris — there’s never been any. It’s been spotless.

“We’ve also had eight years of bird reports to make sure we’re not harming wildlife. We’ve never had an issue. We’ve never been written up one time. So what is it really about?”

Joshua Smith, a spokesman for the California Coastal Commission, told Fox News Digital that permits are determined on a case-by-case basis, citing environmental concerns to “protect the bay.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Organizer John Morris said environmental studies are regularly conducted to measure the impact of the fireworks show on the bay. (Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Smith said Morris was approved for a permit to hold a drone show in lieu of fireworks. Morris told Fox News Digital such a show would cost about $200,000 — roughly four times more than traditional fireworks.

Smith confirmed that SeaWorld received a permit allowing 40 nights of fireworks. When pressed on the discrepancy, he reiterated that decisions are made individually and declined to provide further details.

Morris said the loss of the fireworks show will be felt across the community, from local businesses to families who have made the event an annual tradition.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Billionaire Steyer’s spending binge dwarfs rival campaigns in California governor’s race

Published

on

Billionaire Steyer’s spending binge dwarfs rival campaigns in California governor’s race


LOS ANGELES (AP) — In the wide-open race for California governor, billionaire Tom Steyer is on a spending binge.

The hedge fund manager-turned-liberal activist is using his personal fortune to saturate TV screens and mobile phones with advertising, while his competitors accuse him of trying to use his vast wealth to buy the state’s most powerful job.

Steyer’s ads — in which he promises to bring down household costs or rails against federal immigration raids — appear inescapable at times in heavily Democratic Los Angeles, the state’s largest media market. Data compiled by advertising tracker AdImpact show Steyer has spent or booked over $115 million in ads for broadcast TV, cable and radio — nearly 30 times the amount of his nearest Democratic rival.

If he makes it through the June 2 primary election, Steyer could easily eclipse the 2010 record set by Republican Meg Whitman, who spent $178.5 million in a losing bid for governor, much of it her own money. At the time, it was the costliest campaign for statewide office in the nation’s history.

Advertisement

Even when ad buys from all his major competitors are combined, along with ad purchases by independent committees supporting candidates, Steyer is outspending the field by tens of millions of dollars.

“Billionaire money is flooding our state in an attempt to buy this election,” former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, one of Steyer’s chief rivals, warned her supporters this month.

Mail-in ballots are set to go out to voters next month. Steyer is among a crowd of candidates hoping to seize a spotlight after former Democratic U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell’s dramatic departure from the race following sexual assault allegations that he denies.

But while Steyer has ticked up in polling amid his spending splurge, he has not broken away from the field, leaving some wondering if he’s getting value for his dollars.

“If your first round of ads doesn’t move you dramatically (in the polls), the third, fourth, fifth, six, seventh and eighth rounds won’t either,” said veteran Democratic strategist Bill Carrick, who for years advised the late Democratic U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein. “There is something inherently holding Steyer back.”

Advertisement

In recent prior campaigns for governor, at this stage a leading candidate was taking control of the race. This year, voters appear to be shrugging at a contest that lacks a star candidate among seven leading Democrats and two Republicans.

“Somehow the campaign is frozen,” Carrick added.

History shows that money doesn’t always translate into votes.

Billionaire developer Rick Caruso spent over $100 million in 2022 in his bid to become Los Angeles mayor, much of it his own money, but he was handily defeated by Mayor Karen Bass, who spent a fraction of Caruso’s total. Billionaire former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg spent more than $1 billion of his own money on his 2020 presidential bid before dropping out. And Steyer’s money was unable to lift him into contention in the 2020 presidential contest, when he dropped out early in the year after a poor finish in the South Carolina primary.

Steyer has never held elected office.

Advertisement

In a 2019 interview with The Associated Press, Steyer was asked what he would say to people who think he’s trying to buy the presidency.

“I don’t think that’s possible,” Steyer said at the time, before adding, “I’m never going to apologize for succeeding in business. That’s America, right?”

His campaign did not respond directly when asked about similar criticism facing his run for governor.

“Tom now stands as the only Democrat with the grassroots energy, institutional backing and resources to advance to the general election,” spokesperson Kevin Liao said in a statement.

The governor’s race was recently reordered by two developments: Swalwell, a leading Democrat, abruptly withdrew from the race then resigned from Congress, following sexual assault allegations. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump endorsed conservative commentator Steve Hilton.

Advertisement

Still, there is no clear leader.

Polling in late March and early April by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California found a cluster of candidates in close competition: Democrats Steyer and Porter, Republicans Hilton and Chad Bianco, and Swalwell. Other candidates were trailing. The polling was conducted before Swalwell withdrew.

Democrats have feared the party’s large number of candidates could lead to them getting shut out of the general election in November. That’s because California has a primary system in which only the top two vote-getters advance to the general election, regardless of party.

Leading Democrats are all claiming to have picked up support since Swalwell’s exit. Steyer nabbed one plum endorsement, when the influential California Teachers Association, which previously backed Swalwell, recommended him.

In his ads, Steyer promises to “abolish” U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which has been staging raids across California. In another, he laments the state’s punishing cost of housing, “Everybody needs an affordable place to live,” he says.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

California

Tory Lanez Sues California Prison System for $100 Million Over Stabbing

Published

on

Tory Lanez Sues California Prison System for 0 Million Over Stabbing


Rapper was stabbed 16 times by fellow inmate in May 2025 while 10-year sentence in Megan Thee Stallion shooting case

Tory Lanez has filed a $100 million lawsuit against the California Department of Corrections stemming from a May 2025 incident where the rapper was stabbed in prison.

Advertisement

Lanez — born Daystar Peterson and currently serving a 10-year sentence after being found guilty in the Megan Thee Stallion shooting case — also sued the warden and guards at the California Correctional Institute in Tehachapi, where the rapper was stabbed 16 times in an “unprovoked life-threatening attack” by another inmate, the lawsuit states. 

Peterson was hospitalized following the May 2025 incident, suffering a collapsed lung among stab wounds to his back, torso, and head.

According to the Associated Press, the lawsuit criticized the Department of Corrections for housing Peterson with fellow inmate and alleged attacker Santino Casio, who was serving a life sentence for second-degree murder. “The choice to house Casio with Peterson was known or should have been a known danger,” the lawsuit said, adding that Tory Lanez’ “high-profile celebrity status” made him a target.

The lawsuit also said that prison guards were slow to respond to the shanking, and didn’t employ flash grenades or other measures to halt Casio’s attack.; Casio was not charged for stabbing Peterson, the Associated Press notes.

Trending Stories

Advertisement

Lanez, who following his hospitalization was transferred to San Luis Obispo County’s California Men’s Colony, also alleges in the lawsuit that he never received his possessions from the California Correctional Institute in Tehachapi, including songbooks filled with lyrics to his unreleased music.

Lanez is serving a 10-year prison sentence for shooting Megan Thee Stallion in the foot during a confrontation in the summer of 2020. He was eventually convicted on several firearms charges, including assault with a firearm, in December 2022. In November 2025, his appeal was denied by a three-judge panel, and the 10-year sentence was upheld.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending