Connect with us

California

Brother of California man killed by fleeing driver in Fayetteville seeks change in high-speed pursuit policies | Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Published

on

Brother of California man killed by fleeing driver in Fayetteville seeks change in high-speed pursuit policies | Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette


FAYETTEVILLE — The brother of a man killed when his car was hit by a fleeing driver in January wants to spare other families from a tragic, preventable loss. So, he’s started a petition drive to bring awareness to the issue.

David Michael Pemberton, 56, who had recently moved to Northwest Arkansas from California, was killed Jan. 13 when Noah Cargill, 20, of Fayetteville fled from an Arkansas State Police trooper who was attempting to stop him in connection with driving recklessly on Wedington Drive in Fayetteville, according to police.

Pemberton had moved for a fresh start and was helping his mother, who has had recent health issues, according to Jim Pemberton, his brother.

“He was simply going about his business when he lost his life due to this unsafe traffic pursuit,” Pemberton said. “No family should lose a loved one over a traffic violation, or as a result of any over-aggressive, unsafe traffic pursuits of any kind.”

Advertisement

Cargill fled, running a red light and traveling through a neighborhood at a high speed, according to police.

During the pursuit, Cargill swerved around cars on Rupple Road, nearly wrecking multiple times before losing control of his 2018 Dodge Charger and crashing into an oncoming 2010 Toyota Prius, killing Pemberton, according to police.

Cargill was arrested by Arkansas State Police in connection with first-degree murder, being a felon in possession of a firearm, fleeing, reckless driving, driving on a suspended or revoked driver’s license, speeding, operating a vehicle without insurance, careless driving, failure to stop or yield and running a red light.

The murder charge stems from Cargill actively committing two felonies — fleeing from a state trooper and being a felon in possession of a firearm — and acting in furtherance of those felonies when he caused a person’s death under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, according to a preliminary police report filed with prosecutors.

Pemberton said his brother would still be alive if the police had stopped their pursuit.

Advertisement

“I went and visited the scene, and I was just shocked that a high-speed pursuit happened in a neighborhood where there are apartment complexes, a school, roundabouts,” Pemberton said Friday. “It’s evident and clear that that was not a safe area for a high-speed pursuit, and from the initial reports the speeds were up to 100 mph, maybe even more, in a residential area.”

Col. Mike Hagar, who heads up the Arkansas State Police, said Pemberton’s death is a worst-case scenario.

“Troopers are trained to put the safety of the general public first. Troopers are instructed to do one of two things if they have someone fleeing from them,” Hagar said in an email Friday. “They are to either engage that suspect and stop him as fast as they possibly can, or, if they cannot successfully do that, they are to disengage.”

Jim Pemberton said other, less dangerous options should be available. He said there should be speed limits for a pursuit in a residential area. There should be limits on the length of a pursuit, such as how many blocks before it is called off, he added. But there’s nothing like that, leaving it basically at the discretion of the officers.

The public’s safety should be of the utmost importance, not catching the perpetrator or traffic violator, Pemberton said.

Advertisement

“In this case, this is a traffic violation, so you’re going to pursue someone at 100 mph for a traffic violation in a residential area when you could call in an intercept, you can run plates. There are so many things they could do to not put all the public at risk and still catch the suspect,” he said. “Well, they caught him, but he killed my brother, so clearly there was an imminent danger, and clearly that was not a good pursuit.”

Pemberton and his family have started a petition aimed at bringing about change in law enforcement policy and improved training in regard to police pursuits and the safety of civilians.

The petition is in no way an attack on law enforcement, just a call for change to better protect others during traffic pursuits. It’s a national issue that is worsening, he said.

His research shows between 2014 and 2018, there were over 2,000 deaths related to pursuits and 2020 saw 455 deaths — an average of well over one death per day.

Judgment calls

Advertisement

Hagar said that from 2016 to the first of this year, troopers engaged in 3,725 pursuits and tactical vehicle interventions were used just short of 1,000 times.

“In all of those pursuits, we did not have an innocent civilian fatality. Not one in all those pursuits,” Hagar said. “But, one is too many, so we have been proactive in trying to get the message out to stop engaging in this type of behavior. We’ve done PSA’s, we’ve done news releases, we’ve done social media posts. Because our primary concern is the general public. Our primary concern is that this is going to happen. This is the worst-case scenario. An innocent civilian lost their life.”

In Arkansas, four drivers fleeing from state police died in 2023 as a result of a crash, making it the deadliest year for state police pursuits since at least 2016. Three of those deaths came after a trooper used a tactical vehicle intervention to end the chase.

In 2022, three people were killed in pursuits by troopers, state police data show, up from none in 2021. The state reported two fatalities from pursuits in 2020, one in 2019, none in 2018 and two in 2017.

By the end of October 2023, state police had recorded 513 pursuits, about 33% of which occurred in the Troop A patrol area that includes Pulaski, Saline, Lonoke and Faulkner counties.

Advertisement

That was higher than the 464 pursuits reported by the end of October 2022, the 493 reported by that date in 2021, and the 480 reported by the end of October 2020, data shows.

Fayetteville police say their pursuit policy is much more restrictive than that of the State Police and that officers are seldom involved in high-speed pursuits largely because they operate in a different, more urban environment. Fayetteville officers were not involved in the pursuit of Cargill that led to Pemberton’s death, according to Sgt. Stephen Mauk.

“We’re policing a densely populated area, whereas they’re for the most part doing policing activities on open highways,” Mauk said. “We do not pursue unless we are chasing a violent felon.”

Even then, officers weigh whether the greater threat to the public is coming from the individual remaining at large or from their pursuit of that person, Mauk said.

“So the person pursuing, even if it’s a violent felony, if the circumstances become dangerous considering the pursuit itself like crashes and densely populated areas, the vehicle conditions, road conditions, all these other factors, it can be terminated,” Mauk said. “It can also be terminated by a supervisor at any point.”

Advertisement

Mauk said officers are not authorized to pursue unless they know on the front end that the person is being sought for a violent felony. Fayetteville officers have pursued bank robbers, shooting suspects and homicide suspects in the past, he said.

“If it becomes too perilous, then you shut it down,” Mauk said. “Your mission is to protect the citizens, protect the officer and protect the person fleeing as well.”

Mauk said another caveat is that if police know who the person is, they can get them later under safer, more controlled conditions rather than risking a pursuit.

“You set the conditions up to a more favorable outcome for everybody involved,” Mauk said. “We’ll just go get them later.”

More News

[https://www.change.…” target=”_blank”>https://shorturl.at…]

Advertisement

 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California residents flee massive wildfire sparked by burning car

Published

on

California residents flee massive wildfire sparked by burning car


Thousands of Northern California residents were forced to evacuate their homes as a massive wildfire scorched more than 250 square miles. The Park Fire, California’s largest this year, was started by a man who pushed a burning car into a gully.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California's billionaire utopia faces a major setback

Published

on

California's billionaire utopia faces a major setback


Silicon Valley’s billionaire-backed plan to turn 60,000 acres into a utopian “city of yesterday” is officially delayed by at least two years. California Forever confirmed on July 22 that its “East Solano Plan” rezoning proposal will not appear on the region’s November election ballot. Instead, the $900 million project will first receive a full, independent environmental impact review while preparing a development agreement with local county supervisors.

Speaking with The New York Times this week, California Democratic state senator John Garamendi said, “The California Forever pipe dream is in a permanent deep freeze.”

First unveiled in August 2023 after years of stealth land purchases just outside San Francisco, organizers bill the 60,000 acre East Solano Plan as a multistep campaign to build “one of the most walkable and sustainable [towns] in the United States.” Concept art on California Forever’s website depicts idyllic pedestrian squares and solar farms, with lofty promises to bring hundreds of thousands of jobs to the area along with “novel methods of design, construction, and governance,” according to a previous profile. Overseen by former Goldman Sachs trader Jan Sramek, California Forever received financial backing from wealthy venture capitalists including LinkedIn’s co-founder Reid Hoffman and Lauren Powell Jobs, billionaire philanthropist and widow of Steve Jobs.

[ California’s billionaire utopia may not be as eco-friendly as advertised.]

Advertisement

But from the start, locals, environmental advocates, and politicians pushed back against the East Solano Plan. By November 2023, news broke that California Forever’s parent company previously sued a group of locals for $510 billion, citing antitrust violations after the defendants refused to sell their land (the locals later agreed to sell for $18,000 per acre). Meanwhile, state representatives voiced security concerns about the proposed city’s proximity to the nearby Travis Air Force Base.

Last month, the accredited Solano Land Trust announced its opposition to the plan, citing what it believed would be a “detrimental impact” to the region’s “water resources, air quality, traffic, farmland, and natural environment.” The land trust also alleged California Forever backers misled the public by describing much of the area as “non-prime farmland” with “low quality soils.” In reality, the Solano Land Trust explained that the “sensitive habitat… home to rare and endangered plants and animals” includes some of the state’s most water-efficient farmland.

In this week’s announcement, Sramek claims a recent poll conducted by California Forever indicated 65 percent of East Solano residents “support development of good paying jobs, more affordable homes, and clean energy,” while noting that “most voters are also asking for a full environmental impact report to be completed first.”

“The idea of building a new community and economic opportunity in eastern Solano seemed impossible on the surface,” Sramek wrote to Popular Science last year. “But after spending a lot of time learning about the community, which I now call home, I became convinced that with thoughtful design, the right long-term patient investors, and strong partnerships… we can create a new community.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Tech Jobs Keep Moving Out of California. Don’t Panic Yet.

Published

on

Tech Jobs Keep Moving Out of California. Don’t Panic Yet.


It has been a weird four years for California’s technology sector. It boomed early in the Covid-19 pandemic as people in the US and around the world geared up for remote work and directed their spending to online services (games, streaming, spin classes, etc.) they could consume without leaving home. But that rise in remote work, combined with highest-in-the-nation real estate costs, strict pandemic rules and other factors, also led to something of an exodus from the state’s coastal cities, with high-profile departures of tech leaders in 2020 and 2021 and even occasional claims that the San Francisco Bay Area’s reign as global tech capital was ending.

A few high-profile departures are still taking place, with Elon Musk announcing this month that he will be moving the headquarters of two more of his companies — X, the former Twitter, and SpaceX — from California to Texas, where he moved Tesla Inc.’s headquarters in 2021. But there have also been stories of tech leaders returning and San Francisco beginning a resurgence, with the boom in generative artificial intelligence — the biggest story in tech now — very much concentrated around the San Francisco Bay. My fellow Bloomberg Opinion columnist Conor Sen thinks it might even be a good time to buy some slightly marked-down San Francisco real estate.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending