Connect with us

West

California Dem compares 'Save Girls Sports' law to Nazi Germany, as two trans athlete ban bills fail to pass

Published

on

California Dem compares 'Save Girls Sports' law to Nazi Germany, as two trans athlete ban bills fail to pass

The California state legislature failed to pass two separate bills aimed at protecting girls sports from trans inclusion on Tuesday. During debate for one of the bills, a Democratic state lawmaker compared the proposals to practices employed by Nazi Germany in the holocaust.

California assembly member Rick Chavez Zbur made the comparison while arguing against the first bill, AB 89. 

“This is really reminiscent to me of what happened in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. We are moving towards autocracy in this country. In Nazi Germany, transgender people were persecuted, barred from public life,” Zbur said.

Zbur was then interrupted by mediators who protested his comparison and argued it was out of order. But Zbur continued his analogy. 

“This is about this, this is about this bill,” Zbur argued. “They were barred from public life. They were detransitioned. They were imprisoned and killed in concentration camps. And the way it started was the same kind of things that are happening in this country by the Trump administration.”

Advertisement

California assembly member Rick Chavez Zbur made the comparison while arguing against the first bill, AB 89. (Getty Images)

California Republican assembly member Kate Sanchez, who proposed AB 89, said she heard audible gasps in the assembly chamber during Zbur’s argument, and that one attendee had to excuse herself from the room.

“There was a lot of gasps and shock,” Sanchez told Fox News Digital. 

“It was very tone-deaf. We had a mother who had been in the holocaust itself, so she had to leave the committee hearing because it was so offensive to hear… she stood up and left because she was just so uncomfortable with the situation.” 

Advertisement

Multiple Democrat residents, including a member of the LGBTQ community, appeared on the assembly floor Tuesday to advocate in support of the bill. 

But AB 89 was ultimately struck down by the Democratic majority. However, it will be allowed for reconsideration at a later date. 

“I am just so disgusted that my Democrat colleagues were unable to stand for the protection of women and girls,” Sanchez said. “Not only are they ignoring the will of the people… they’re ignoring the everyday mom, dad, girl in sports. They are ignoring their wants.

Democrat assembly member Avalino Valencia was absent from Tuesday’s vote. Speaker of the Assembly Robert Rivas inserted himself in the committee to vote in Valencia’s absence. Valencia’s office has not responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

Just moments after Democrats struck down Sanchez’s bill, the committee voted on AB 844, which would also ban trans athletes from girls sports and was proposed by California Republican assembly member Bill Essayli. Debate for Essayli’s bill featured testimony from conservative activist and filmmaker Matt Walsh.

Advertisement

NEWSOM’S ‘UNFAIR’ REMARK ON GIRLS’ SPORTS BELIES RECORD AS GOVERNOR: ‘ABSOLUTE BULLS—‘

And like Sanchez’s bill, Essayli’s was also struck down by the Democrat majority. Essayli told Fox News Digital that he believes the Democrat’s resistance to the two bills was intended to send a message to Gov. Gavin Newsom. 

Newsom prompted backlash from those in his own party with comments on his podcast last month, expressing his belief that trans athletes in girls sports was “deeply unfair,” but defended allowing it anyway.

“I think there really is a civil war here brewing within the Democrat Party on how to address these issues. You have the governor going in one direction, and I think what you saw today with the leadership in the legislature, which tends to be even more radical and progressive than the governor, taking a completely different approach. And I think they wanted to send a message to the governor that they’re not budging on this issue,” Essayli said.

“Today they wanted to send a message to their progressive, extremist base that they’re not abandoning them.”

Advertisement

The Democratic majority prevented both bills from passing just days after President Donald Trump’s Education Secretary Linda McMahon sent a formal warning to Newsom and the rest of the state, suggesting federal funding may be cut to the state if it continues to enable trans inclusion in girls sports. 

MAINE UNIVERSITIES AGREE TO KEEP TRANSGENDER ATHLETES OUT OF WOMEN’S SPORTS AFTER TRUMP ADMIN PAUSES FUNDING

“Allowing participation in sex-separated activities based on ‘gender identity’ places schools at risk of Title IX violations and loss of federal funding. As Governor, you have a duty to inform California school districts of this risk,” McMahon wrote in the letter.

“As Secretary of Education, I am officially asking you to inform this Department whether you will remind schools in California to comply with federal law by protecting sex-separated spaces and activities. I am also officially asking you to publicly assure parents that California teachers will not facilitate the fantasy of ‘gender transitions’ for their children.”

The Democratic majority prevented both bills from passing just days after President Donald Trump’s Education Secretary Linda McMahon sent a formal warning to Newsom and the rest of the state, suggesting federal funding may be cut to the state if it continues to enable trans inclusion in girls sports. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Advertisement

The state’s high school sports association, the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF), is currently under federal investigation for potential Title IX violations after several controversial incidents involving trans athletes occurred over the last year.

The CIF was one of the first state athletic associations to announce it would continue allowing trans athletes to compete with girls after Trump signed the “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” executive order on Feb. 5. The CIF stated an 11-year-old state law, AB 1266, which has been in effect since 2014 and gives trans athletes the right to participate in the gender category based on gender identity and not birth sex, for its non-compliance.

Both Sanchez and Essayli told Fox News Digital they expect the Trump administration to amplify its pressure on the state and potentially cut funding in order to enforce the executive order after their bills failed to pass Tuesday. 

“I think a lot will come down the pipe over the next week or so,” Sanchez said. “There will be a lot of development from what I’ve been told.”

Advertisement

Essayli envisions a situation playing out in California similar to the one that has been playing out in Maine over the last month, as a public feud between Trump and Gov. Janet Mills has resulted in a hostile back-and-forth between the state and federal agencies over the issue of trans inclusion. 

“None of us really went in thinking the Democrats in the legislature were going to change their position on this today, but what we wanted to do is make a clear record, make our arguments and show the world where they stand, where the Democrats stand on this, expose their position on this,” Essayli said. “And I think we accomplished that.”

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Nevada ends regular season at home vs Air Force

Published

on

Nevada ends regular season at home vs Air Force


RENO, Nev. (KOLO) – The Nevada men’s basketball team will end the 2025-2026 regular season at home this weekend against Air Force.

The game against the Falcons will be played on March 7 at 7:00 p.m. in Reno. The game will be broadcast on the Mountain West Network.

The 3-27 Falcons are coming off an 86-60 loss to Grand Canyon on Tuesday.

Meanwhile, the 19-11 Nevada Wolf Pack are coming off an 83-73 loss on the road against Wyoming.

Advertisement

The game will be the final regular season matchup prior to the start of the 2026 Mountain West Tournament, which will begin on March 11 in Las Vegas. The seeding and matchups for the tournament have not been announced as of March 6.



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico (NMAA) High School Boys Basketball State Championship Brackets, Schedules – March 7, 2026

Published

on

New Mexico (NMAA) High School Boys Basketball State Championship Brackets, Schedules – March 7, 2026


The 2026 New Mexico high school boys basketball state championships begin on Saturday, March 7, with 40 games in the first round of action.

High School on SI has brackets for every classification in the New Mexico high school basketball state brackets. The championship games begin on March 14 at the University of New Mexico – The Pit.

New Mexico (NMAA) High School Basketball State Championship Brackets, Schedule – March 7

Advertisement

No. 1 Volcano Vista vs. No. 16 Santa Fe – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 8 Las Cruces vs. No. 9 Albuquerque – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 5 Hobbs vs. No. 12 Organ Mountain – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 4 La Cueva vs. No. 13 Atrisco Heritage Academy – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Rio Rancho vs. No. 14 Mayfield – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Sandia vs. No. 11 Farmington – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 7 Centennial vs. No. 10 Carlsbad – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 2 Cleveland vs. No. 15 Alamogordo – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 Highland vs. No. 16 Grants – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 8 Belen vs. No. 9 Portales – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 5 Taos vs. No. 12 St. Pius X – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 4 Del Norte vs. No. 13 Valencia – 03/07, 7:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Hope Christian vs. No. 14 Pojoaque Valley – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Albuquerque Academy vs. No. 11 Goddard – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 7 Gallup vs. No. 10 Silver – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 2 Artesia vs. No. 15 Bloomfield – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 St. Michael’s vs. No. 16 Wingate – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 8 Tohatchi vs. No. 9 New Mexico Military Institute – 03/07, 3:00 PM MT

No. 5 Santa Fe Indian vs. No. 12 Sandia Prep – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 4 Navajo Prep vs. No. 13 Hot Springs – 03/07, 3:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Cobre vs. No. 14 Ruidoso – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Bosque vs. No. 11 Cottonwood Classical Prep – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 7 East Mountain vs. No. 10 Robertson – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 2 Tularosa vs. No. 15 West Las Vegas – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 Texico vs. No. 16 Clayton – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 8 Tucumcari vs. No. 9 Mora – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 5 Mesilla Valley Christian School vs. No. 12 Dulce – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 4 Santa Rosa vs. No. 13 Eunice – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Mesa Vista vs. No. 14 Hozho Charter Academy – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Rehoboth Christian vs. No. 11 Oak Grove Classical – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 7 Escalante vs. No. 10 Menaul – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 2 Pecos vs. No. 15 Mescalero Apache – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT


Advertisement

No. 1 Logan vs. No. 16 Quemado – 03/07, 4:00 PM MT

No. 8 Cliff vs. No. 9 To’hajiilee – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 5 Alamo Navajo vs. No. 12 Grady – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

No. 4 Melrose vs. No. 13 Elida – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 3 Cimarron vs. No. 14 Pine Hill – 03/07, 5:00 PM MT

Advertisement

No. 6 Roy/Mosquero vs. No. 11 Mountainair – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT

No. 7 Magdalena vs. No. 10 Springer – 03/07, 3:00 PM MT

No. 2 Fort Sumner/House vs. No. 15 Gateway Christian – 03/07, 6:00 PM MT




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Keizer city councilor fined $500 by Oregon ethics commission

Published

on

Keizer city councilor fined 0 by Oregon ethics commission


play

The Oregon Government Ethics Commission voted March 6 to fine Keizer City Councilor Soraida Cross $500 after an investigator found she tried to use her position to avoid a criminal citation.

In a stipulated final order signed by Cross, an OGEC investigator detailed a May 14, 2025, incident in which Cross attempted to call Marion County Sheriff Nick Hunter on his personal cellphone when police responded to a domestic dispute at the home Cross shared with her ex-husband.

Advertisement

During the incident, first reported by Keizertimes, a woman accused Cross of pushing her off a barstool.

Salem Police responded to the 911 call in Keizer to avoid a possible conflict of interest. Video footage obtained by Keizertimes shows Cross telling the officer she is a city councilor, played golf with Keizer Police Chief Andrew Copeland and is friends with Hunter.

The body camera footage was later shared on social media by Marion County Democrats.

Paige Barton, chair for Marion County Democrats, filed a complaint against Cross with the ethics commission.

Advertisement

When Cross told the officer she was a councilor, she attempted to “use her official position to avoid the financial detriment associated with a criminal citation,” according to the order.

The order said Cross “used confidential information in an attempt to obtain a personal gain” when she called Hunter on his personal cellphone to involve him in the Salem Police investigation.

“The personal phone number of Mr. Hunter is not publicly available information, such that any member of the public may contact him when dealing with law enforcement matters,” the order said.

The criminal citation for harassment was forwarded to the Polk County District Attorney’s Office due to a possible conflict of interest. The office declined to prosecute.

Advertisement

Cross told OGEC that she did not willingly or intentionally violate Oregon ethics law.

“She further asserts that she is a victim of domestic violence and that the police were called to her home on May 14, 2025, by her ex-husband as a form of retaliation and that was not the only time,” officials said in the order. “Ms. Cross further contends that on the evening of May 14th, she needed to call her friends, which is why she contacted Marion County Sheriff Nick Hunter whom she called for advice out of fear and there was no malicious intent.”

Commission investigator Daniel Pacheco said in a preliminary investigation that Cross appeared to try to use her position to avoid financial detriment, such as legal fees associated with a criminal charge.

The commission voted 5-0 in October to find a substantial objective basis for believing Cross violated Oregon law. A more in-depth investigation ensued.

In the order, OGEC officials said the results of the investigation pointed to a preponderance of evidence that Cross violated Oregon ethics law.

Advertisement

Cross signed the stipulated final order on Feb. 17, waiving her right to a contested hearing and judicial review. She will pay a $500 civil penalty to settle the matter.

The commission approved accepting the final order in a 6-0 vote with one abstention.

For questions, comments and news tips, email reporter Whitney Woodworth at wmwoodworth@statesmanjournal.com, call 503-910-6616 or follow on X at @wmwoodworth





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending